Maxton Hall Reveals Season 2 Premiere Plan on Amazon — Get Ready for a Long Wait
The popular teen drama — which was one of TVLine's Hidden Gems You May Have Missed from last year's TV — premiered in May 2024, meaning it will be well over a year between seasons by the time the show comes back.
More from TVLine
13 Hidden Gems You May Have Missed From This Year's TV
TVLine Items: Maxton Hall Renewed, NBC News Vet Leaving and More
TVLine Items: Jimmy Johnson Retires From Fox Sports, PAW Patrol Double Renewal and More
The German-language series follows Ruby Bell (played by Harriet Herbig-Matten), a scholarship student at a prestigious UK private school who learns of a rich classmate's scandalous secret and then falls into a love-hate relationship with said classmate's twin brother, James Beaufort (Damian Hardung).
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Prime Video DE (@primevideode)
In Season 2, 'those who fly high can also fall low,' reads the official synopsis. 'After their passionate night together in Oxford and her greatest life goal within reach, everything seems to be going perfectly for Ruby. But a stroke of fate in James' family changes everything and James himself, of all people, brings her back from cloud nine to a harsh reality.'
'Ruby is devastated. She has never had such strong feelings for anyone as she does for James — and she has never been so hurt by anyone either,' the description continues. 'She wants her old life back, where no one at Maxton Hall knew her and she wasn't part of the elitist world of her classmates. But she can't forget James — especially since he's doing everything he can to win her back.'
Scroll down for some Season 2 photos, then hit the comments with your thoughts!
Best of TVLine
Yellowjackets Mysteries: An Up-to-Date List of the Series' Biggest Questions (and Answers?)
The Emmys' Most Memorable Moments: Laughter, Tears, Historical Wins, 'The Big One' and More
'Missing' Shows, Found! The Latest on Severance, Holey Moley, Poker Face, YOU, Primo, Transplant and 25+ Others
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
4 minutes ago
- New York Post
How Meghan Markle celebrated her ‘beautiful' 44th birthday
Meghan Markle is 44! The Duchess of Sussex celebrated her special day on Monday with husband Prince Harry, their two children Archie, 6, and Lilibet, 4, and her mom Doria Ragland. 'Blowing out the candles on a beautiful 24 hours, and thanking my husband, friends and family for making it so special,' she wrote on Instagram Tuesday alongside a sweet birthday snap. Advertisement 6 Meghan Markle shared this sweet snap to Instagram to celebrate her 44th birthday. Instagram/@meghan 6 The Duchess of Sussex celebrated her special day on Monday with husband Prince Harry, their two children Archie, 6, and Lilibet, 4, and her mom Doria Ragland. Meghan Markle/Instagram 'To those of you I don't know, but who send love every day – thank you so much,' Markle added. 'Please know I feel it and appreciate it ❤️' Advertisement The duchess also gushed about the birthday dinner she enjoyed in Los Angeles with her closest loved ones. 'And just to get a little foodie on you….this dinner last night at @funke_la with the culinary mastery of @evanfunke and his team is in the top five meals of my life,' she said. 'Extraordinary 🍝 Thank you for a standout dining experience.' 6 Meghan Markle is celebrating her 44th birthday with her family. AP While the 'Suits' alum's birthday plans were initially under wraps, she ended up marking the occasion with a low-key soirée surrounded by her nearest and dearest — which no longer includes the Windsor clan. Advertisement Like in recent years, the royals – who have had virtually no communication with Markle since her and Harry's swift departure from royal life in 2020 – will not be sending a public birthday message. Indeed, the Firm was silent on the 'Suits' alum's 42nd and 43rd birthdays. 6 While the 'Suits' album's birthday plans remain under wraps, she will mark no doubt the occasion with a low-key soiree surrounded by her nearest and dearest. Getty Images for TIME 6 The Duchess of Sussex shares son Archie and daughter Lilibet with husband Prince Harry. meghan/Instagram Advertisement It was a stark contrast to the previous year, when the royals, including the Prince and Princess of Wales, as well as King Charles and Queen Camilla, all publicly shared birthday messages for Markle's 41st birthday on social media. 'Wishing The Duchess of Sussex a very Happy Birthday today,' the royals wrote at the time. The Firm only issues birthday messages to senior working members of the monarchy, while non-working members only receive public messages on milestone birthdays. 6 The former actress resides in Montecito, Calif., with Harry and their two children. Meghan Markle/Instagram In the early hours of her 44th birthday on Monday, Markle shared a video of herself carrying a wicker basket filled with a floral arrangement and bottles of her newly released As Ever rosé line. 'Coming soon…' she teased on As Ever's Instagram page, alongside a video of her frolicking in the grass at her sprawling Montecito, Calif., estate. 'Goodness in a glass. Right around the corner…' she added, referring to her new 2024 Napa Valley Rosé. 'Cheers to August!'


NBC News
35 minutes ago
- NBC News
New AI site lets users create entire animated shows
A new online AI tool called Showrunner lets users create animated series in minutes, allowing for parodies of political figures or cartoon versions of themselves. NBC News' Steven Romo speaks to one of the co-creators and puts the tech to the test.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I watched Prime Video's new movie with 0% on Rotten Tomatoes and it's the most fun I've had with a film this year
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. I've long been a fan of H.G. Wells' classic sci-fi novel "The War of the Worlds", having gone so far as to visit Horsell Common where it begins, but it's fair to say that its adaptations almost all fall far short (excluding Jeff Wayne's fantastic musical). But still, as a fan, I felt compelled to watch the new version, which was secretly dropped on Prime Video on Wednesday, July 30 (though it wasn't made by them, as Universal was behind it). This movie, called just War of the Worlds, stars Ice Cube as a guy sitting in front of his computer; the movie was produced by the same person who made Searching and like that movie, almost all the story is told through a guy's computer screen as he goes on video calls, watches social media footage and does his job. The movie's 0% score on Rotten Tomatoes tells you just how well that works. Ice Cube plays a Department of Homeland Security officer who's hunting for a mysterious hacker and watches as aliens begin to land across the globe and murder everyone while humanity responds. Near the end of the film he suddenly has to do something beyond using his powers to stalk his children. So it's an alien invasion movie in which we only see the aliens through blurry vertical phone clips (which is for the best, given the poor CGI when we do see them) and spend most of the time watching Ice Cube mope on his PC. Not exactly what H.G. Wells was expecting, but he was probably expecting it to be a 90-minute commercial even less. I've never seen a movie with more product placement, or with more egregious product placement. The movie has copious and heinous products shoved down your throat incessantly: at once point Ice Cube commands his daughter to get into a Tesla which he's hacked, and remotely pilots, constantly we're seeing various Microsoft, Google or Apple apps, and a particularly galling example (that's been torn apart on social media) sees the character's Amazon delivery driver son-in-law uses a drone to fly a USB drive past loads of aliens and into a secret base to deliver Cube some information. It feels like a 90-minute advert (except longer than that, because by default Prime Video viewers have to watch extra commercials for several minutes before the movie even begins). At some points, War of the Worlds tries to make a point; something about how mass surveillance is bad. But Ice Cube eventually uses the mass surveillance to save the day, and at the end the government decides to make a different mass surveillance system that they pledge won't be used for evil. So... mass surveillance is good!? Having fun I don't think Rotten Tomatoes is a good way to quantify the quality of a movie but in this case it's totally right; War of the Worlds is an absolute mess. Yet I still had a great time watching it. That's because I didn't go into the movie alone, but with some friends, some wine and party later on that I needed to pre-game for. And that helped me see it for what it truly is: a new "so bad it's good" classic. Drinking games are easy to make up for a movie like this, and that's how we got through it (not that we're recommending drinking games, but a glass of wine might help on this movie!). One I quickly regretted suggesting is: "drink every time there's a product placement". I said this early in the movie before it became clear how many there would be, and when you start looking out for them, there are countless. I've mentioned Amazon and Tesla but there are also mentions of so many other brands, and basically every computer app under the sun. Double drink if the reference is so egregious and unexpected that it gives you whiplash, like the aforementioned Prime Air one. Another rule: "drink every time it's clear Ice Cube didn't have a script". This isn't an insult to the musician and actor, and he's been great in quite a few things he's been in. But lots of the time we see him in the movie, it's just brief cuts when we see his reactions to various events, and there are plenty of examples where his expressions don't match up to the events. Instead, it feels like the filmmakers shot a load of random reactions and then plastered them into the film; most of the time when we see him observing some mass act of destruction, he just looks confused about whether the camera is rolling or not. Some of the most embarrassing moments are when he does react: "take your intergalactic asses back home", he muses like he's half-watching a sports game played on a TV on the other side of a bar. Many of his expositional lines sound pretty dispassionate too. Here's a third: "drink every time a known actor randomly turns up". Though Ice Cube is our main protagonist and we see quite a bit of his children too, there are brief segments with Eva Longoria, Clark Gregg, Andrea Savage, and a few other "hey, is that X from Y?" faces. It looks like these were all filmed in the actors' homes (or on a golf course, in one example, presumably shot while he was waiting for someone else to tee up) and lots of the time it sounds like they're reading the script as they deliver their lines. There's a lot more about the movie that is pretty hilarious, from the baffling timeline of it (somehow, Earth assembles all its military forces, fights the aliens and wins lots of battles in the time it takes Ice Cube's daughter to drive to a nearby medical facility), the mind-boggling reliance on stock footage, the fact that there are about eight title-drops in five minutes, the total lack of commitment to the 'screenlife' format through vast swathes of the movie, or the headache-inducing editing style that forced even my non-drinking friend to reflect that they felt nauseous. There are plenty of other drinking rules if you've got the tolerance, though for your liver I'd recommend sticking to just three. And I'm not saying you have to drink to watch War of the Worlds — people always say that you don't need to drink to have fun — but I've no idea if I would've enjoyed the movie at all if I wasn't drinking. My teetotal mate liked it least of all of us. But I was enjoying a bottle of wine and I had great fun laughing at the movie. Missing the point As a fan of the original book, War of the Worlds makes me sad at just how far we've come from the core text. The original novel The War of the Worlds, published in 1898, was thematically of its time: you can easily read into it themes of pre-war tension (the Great War was brewing at the time), of colonization and imperialism during the tumultuous end to the British Empire, and a conflict between rural and urban Britain. That first theme in particular would be particularly prescient today, when social media is convinced that the world is about to erupt into a new war. So the theme of mass surveillance is bonkers as a choice. That's not all that's bizarre; a core part of many adaptations of The War of the Worlds is the idea of a journey; in the book the narrator travels from the town of Woking to Primrose Hill in North London; a journey you can drive in an hour or make via rail in 75 minutes nowadays but wouldn't have been so easy in the Victorian times. Through this journey the narrator meets various people and witnesses events in the Martians' war on Earth, the voyage reflecting changes in the world around him (that's those themes again!). And that's an idea that some of the better adaptations have, even Spielberg's War of the Worlds with Tom Cruise. There's not so much of a journey you can do when your main character is getting back problems behind a desk. Even the scampering about of Cube's children can barely count when the geography to it is impossible to follow. Let's not even mention the famous ending of the novel, when the aliens succumb to Earth diseases and die without our intervention. That is a fascinating reflection of our powerlessness in the face of war and destruction when only random chance and luck can save us, but not here. Instead, Ice Cube needs to upload a virus into a specific USB port to save the day and kill the aliens. Boring. Wells' book, like many classics from the country, has something ineffably British about it; from the place names and themes to the narrators' being an observer instead of an active participant (we don't need to be heroes). Like many other American adaptations of classic British works, War of the Worlds strips out all the charm and cultural identity. This isn't anything new; Amazon's own The Rings of Power did what Peter Jackson avoided in botching The Lord of the Rings while Hollywood-made classic period dramas are filled with bonkers fantasies about pre-Industrial Britain and it seems that every new week there's another US cable version of Sherlock which gets two steps further from the original. Don't get me started on upcoming versions of Frankenstein, The Chronicles of Narnia or Amazon's upcoming Bond plans. I'm not saying that Americans can't adapt British source materials, and there are probably good examples (I have to say this even though I can't think of one off the top of my head; maybe the undetectability of good examples is a great compliment). But War of the Worlds is proof that the track record is poor, and the butchering of the book is an indication that the movie is fair game to criticize (if the fact it was made by a huge studio instead of a bunch of determined indie filmmakers wasn't enough). Solve the daily Crossword