logo
Family uses AI to present message in court from loved one no longer alive

Family uses AI to present message in court from loved one no longer alive

Phone Arena12-05-2025
Artificial intelligence (AI) is all around us and while some use it to create funny animated pictures of themselves, others use it to "bring back" their loved ones that have departed.
Maybe we've hit a new frontier in courtroom proceedings – recently, a simulated version of a deceased man created with AI spoke directly to his assailant during a sentencing hearing in Arizona. The AI-generated avatar of Christopher Pelkey, developed by his family, was presented in Maricopa County Superior Court, just before Gabriel Paul Horcasitas was sentenced for fatally shooting Pelkey during a 2021 road-rage incident. The digital recreation of Pelkey appeared on video wearing a green sweatshirt and a full beard, standing against a plain white background. Early in the video, the avatar clarified that it was an AI representation, a point made clear by minor audio irregularities and imperfect synchronization of speech and facial movements. In the message, the avatar expressed a sense of tragic irony about the encounter, suggesting that under different circumstances, they might have become friends. Pelkey, a 37-year-old US Army veteran, lost his life in the incident. His family chose to create the AI message to honor his memory and articulate their pain. Since the video was not used as evidence, the court allowed greater flexibility in presenting it during the sentencing phase. Horcasitas, who had already been found guilty of manslaughter and endangerment, received a sentence of ten and a half years in state prison.Stacey Wales, Pelkey's sister, wrote the script for the avatar after finding it difficult to fully express her grief in her own words. Although she admitted she could not forgive Horcasitas, she believed her brother would have taken a more empathetic approach. The video, she explained, was meant to remind the court of her brother's humanity and the lasting impact of the tragedy. She worked with her husband and a friend, both of whom are in the tech industry, to produce the simulation.The use of generative AI in this case introduces a new and emotionally charged way of applying technology in the legal system. While courts have been cautious about AI, especially after incidents where lawyers used fake cases created by AI, this new use without evidence adds another level of complexity.Harry Surden, a law professor at the University of Colorado, pointed out that using generative AI in court raises ethical concerns. He explained that simulated content can skip over careful thinking and appeal directly to emotions, making it more powerful – and possibly more problematic – than regular evidence. He stressed that while these tools may seem real, they are still made up and should be treated as such.
Image credit – OpenAI Let's hope nobody is in the aforementioned situation, but if you want to give AI videos a try, you could do so by using ChatGPT, for example – it's a straightforward process that combines AI-generated content with video creation tools.What to do: Generate a script: Use ChatGPT to create a script for your video.
Choose a text-to-video tool: Pick a text-to-videoplatform.
Customize and edit: Adjust voiceovers, visuals, and background music.
Export and share: Export the video and upload it to platforms like YouTube.
First, you'll use ChatGPT to generate a script for your video. Then, you can choose a text-to-video platform (you can find those online) to convert the script into a video, adjusting settings such as voiceovers and visuals. Finally, after previewing and editing the video, you can export it and share it across platforms like YouTube or social media.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Remember the Cambridge Analytica scandal? Zuckerberg and Meta settle $8 billion lawsuit
Remember the Cambridge Analytica scandal? Zuckerberg and Meta settle $8 billion lawsuit

Phone Arena

time3 days ago

  • Phone Arena

Remember the Cambridge Analytica scandal? Zuckerberg and Meta settle $8 billion lawsuit

Do you recall the Cambridge Analytica scandal? Yes, I remember it clearly to this day. Now that you mention it, it all comes back. Never heard of it. Yes, I remember it clearly to this day. 0% Now that you mention it, it all comes back. 0% Never heard of it. 0% Receive the latest Apps news By subscribing you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy The settlement was announced Thursday during a hearing in Delaware, just as the trial was about to begin its second day. Details of the settlement remain confidential for the moment, and attorneys for the defense offered no comment, while the judge congratulated both sides on resolving the lawsuit, brought by Meta shareholders, accused Zuckerberg, venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, Sandberg, and other former executives of failing to prevent privacy breaches that cost the company billions in regulatory dispute centered on Facebook's failure to follow a 2012 FTC agreement to protect user data, which led to a $5 billion fine in 2019. Shareholders wanted executives to repay the company from their own wealth, but the defendants called the claims "extreme" and denied any trial was expected to feature testimony from prominent figures, including Zuckerberg, Sandberg, Netflix co-founder Reed Hastings, and Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel. Zuckerberg was slated to testify Monday, and Sandberg later in the week. Sandberg was criticized for deleting important emails, which hurt her defense in court. By settling, she and the others avoid having to testify under oath or reveal information that could harm the core of the lawsuit were so-called Caremark claims – lawsuits that say company leaders didn't do their job to keep the company out of legal trouble. Basically, shareholders argue the board ignored big warning signs or didn't set up any system to make sure the company followed the law. These cases are very hard to win because you have to prove the leaders acted in bad faith, not just made allegations stemmed from the Cambridge Analytica scandal, which involved the political consulting firm improperly collecting data from millions of Facebook users without their consent. This data was used to target voters during the 2016 US presidential election and other campaigns. The breach exposed major flaws in Facebook's data privacy practices and sparked global outrage. It led to investigations, significant fines – including a $5 billion penalty from the Federal Trade Commission – and raised awareness about how personal information is handled by social media platforms.I think it's safe to say that it's all forgotten by now – forgotten by regular Facebook users, I mean. Zuck and co. will remember this little stunt for life.

AT&T, Verizon breach mastermind "kiberphant0m" pleads guilty to cybercrime charges
AT&T, Verizon breach mastermind "kiberphant0m" pleads guilty to cybercrime charges

Phone Arena

time4 days ago

  • Phone Arena

AT&T, Verizon breach mastermind "kiberphant0m" pleads guilty to cybercrime charges

A former Army soldier admitted guilt on Tuesday in connection with a string of cyberattacks and extortion attempts targeting telecommunications companies, including AT&T and Justice Department revealed that 21-year-old Cameron John Wagenius, who used the aliases "kiberphant0m" and "cyb3rph4nt0m" on various forums, had been involved in years of malicious activity, some of which occurred while he was still serving in the probably recall the story – Wagenius was arrested in December 2024. He went from Army communications specialist to cybercriminal mastermind, leaking AT&T and Verizon call logs, selling SIM-swapping services, and even running a botnet for DDoS attacks. He was caught near a Texas base after boasting about posting Trump's call records and threatening to dump NSA data online. Wagenius pleaded guilty to charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, extortion related to computer fraud, and aggravated identity theft. He now faces a possible sentence of up to 27 years in federal prison, with sentencing scheduled for October 6. He had previously admitted to two counts involving the unlawful transfer of confidential phone record information connected to the same scheme. – Allison Nixon, chief research officer at Unit 221B for CyberScoop, July 2025 According to investigators, Wagenius and his accomplices sought to defraud at least 10 organizations by stealing login credentials and exploiting network access. Court documents show that in November, he attempted to extort $500,000 from a major telecommunications company by threatening to release sensitive call data belonging to high-ranking officials. Authorities said that the stolen information included phone and text records obtained through breaches of cloud environments such as Snowflake. AT&T confirmed in July that its Snowflake environment was compromised in April, leading to the theft of six months' worth of call and text data affecting nearly all of its customers. Two alleged co-conspirators, Connor Moucka and John Binns, were indicted in November for similar crimes involving breaches of multiple organizations' cloud systems. Moucka, a Canadian national, agreed to extradition to the United States earlier this year to face 20 federal charges tied to attacks that impacted as many as 165 Snowflake customers. Investigators who examined Wagenius' devices discovered thousands of stolen identification documents and substantial cryptocurrency holdings, suggesting the proceeds of multiple fraud schemes. Officials believe the group attempted to extort at least $1 million and sold portions of the stolen data to fund additional criminal activity, including SIM-swapping operations. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer

Judge orders Huawei to face U.S. criminal charges
Judge orders Huawei to face U.S. criminal charges

Phone Arena

time02-07-2025

  • Phone Arena

Judge orders Huawei to face U.S. criminal charges

China's Huawei Technologies, one of the top networking companies globally, must face criminal charges in the U.S., according to U.S. District Judge Ann Donnelly. On Tuesday, Judge Donnelly rejected Huawei's request to dismiss the 16-count federal indictment against the company. In her 52-page decision, the judge said that Huawei's arguments in its filing asking her to dismiss the case were premature. Huawei is accused of stealing technology, engaging in racketeering, wire and bank fraud, and committing other illegal acts. For example, the U.S. says that Huawei and some of its subsidiaries planned to illegally obtain U.S. trade secrets. It is also accused of installing surveillance equipment that allowed Iran to spy on anti-government protesters in 2009. Huawei also violated U.S. sanctions by doing business with North Korea. The U.S. has long considered Huawei to be a national security threat and in 2019 it was placed on the Entity List by the Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS). As a result, Huawei cannot obtain U.S.-origin parts and components without the supplier obtaining a special license from the U.S. Commerce Department. Exactly one year later, the Commerce Department tightened the noose around Huawei by using the Foreign-Produced Direct Product Rule (FPDPR). As a result, any foundry using American technology to build chips is blocked from shipping said chips to Huawei without a license. Huawei has managed to get around these sanctions by developing its own HarmonyOS operating system. Replacing the chips it could no longer receive was a harder problem to solve. After using all of its remaining Kirin 9000 inventory (this was the Huawei-designed 5nm chip that was the first to support 5G with an integrated 5G modem), Huawei was able to obtain Snapdragon application processors for its flagship phones. However, the U.S. issued the necessary licenses to Qualcomm because it tweaked the chips so they couldn't work with 5G networks. While the inability of Huawei and China's SMIC foundry to obtain the necessary lithography machines prevent it from closing the gap with chips designed by Apple, Qualcomm, MediaTek and others, Huawei stunned the wireless world in 2023 by using a 7nm chip built by SMIC with 5G support to power the Mate 60 series. This allowed the manufacturer to sell 5G phones once again. China has accused the U.S. of "economic bullying" and using national security to oppress Chinese companies. In its filing requesting a dismissal, Huawei says that the U.S. allegations are too vague. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store