logo
If only we could expect surprises in Japan's Defense White Paper

If only we could expect surprises in Japan's Defense White Paper

AllAfrica3 days ago
Japan's 2025 Defense White Paper soon will be approved formally by the Cabinet.
It's not quite fair to say that if you've seen one White Paper you've seen them all, but one can pretty much anticipate what's coming – while hoping for something noteworthy.
The White Papers accurately describe the military/political threats to Japan – and for some years now the White Papers have explicitly declared the People's Republic of China as the main problem.
Also, in the last few years the White Papers have expressed concern over Chinese and Russian military cooperation and activities in the region and around Japan.
Taiwan will get a mention as a potential flash point threatening Japan's and regional security.
But there will be no specific mention of Japanese support to improve Taiwan's defenses.
That's left up to the United States – although Japan's aid to the Philippines (that will be mentioned in the White Paper) is intended to contribute to Taiwan's defense.
When it comes to Taiwan, Tokyo is leaving the hard work up to the Americans. It would be nice if the White Paper said otherwise.
Although the White Papers competently lay out the threats facing Japan, they come up short on the 'what to do about it' front.
It's not that they don't try.
But typically, White Papers call for buying some of this and some of that – as if buying more and specific hardware would solve Japan's defense problems and frighten off enemies.
There will be some more ships and more aircraft on order. And, in recent years, it's long-range missiles that are the big thing. This is the so-called 'counterstrike capability' that is the panacea for Japan's defense.
The White Paper needs to – but probably won't – describe a comprehensive, coherent plan for Japan's defense that includes: proper and adequate hardware;
more personnel;
better force organization, command and control, funding, war stocks, reserve force, logistics, casualty handling and ISR (intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance), etc. that makes the Japan Self Defense Force (JSDF) more, rather than less, of the sum of its parts.
And watch to see if the White Paper talks about how the Japan Self-Defense Forces and US forces will operate together more effectively – to include combat operations. It probably won't, other than offering platitudes about Japan's new Joint Operations Command representing a sea-change of some sort.
There will also be discussion of improving terms of service and living conditions of JSDF personnel. There always is. It's well-intentioned but won't be drastic enough to solve JSDF's severe manpower problems.
What would? A huge pay increase, much better housing, decent pensions and something akin to the United States' GI Bill that offers lifetime benefits for veterans. And a little respect for JSDF personnel from Japan's ruling class would be nice.
The White Paper will also describe Japan's efforts to strengthen relationships with other friendly nations through formal agreements, exercises, and exchanges. These are positive developments – especially given Japan's longtime refusal to do much on this score until recent years. But it's not enough to bolster Japan's defense in a major way. The US military tie-up is still indispensable.
Japan's missile defense and space operations will get a mention – and this is a true bright spot. Japan has, quietly, developed a real capability here.
All in all, the White Papers are clearly written, and they accurately describe threats facing Japan. But the prescriptions are, overall, piecemeal and don't usefully address Japan's fundamental defense shortcomings.
Do everything in the White Paper and Japan and the JSDF still wouldn't be able to fight a war – or at least not very well.
Since the Ministry of Defense has no real experience at this, it would do well do consult with people who do.
Asking USINDOPACOM to send over a few good war planners would be a start.
And then White Papers might be more interesting.
Grant Newsham is a retired US Marine officer and former US diplomat. He was the first Marine liaison officer to the Japan Self Defense Force, and is a fellow at the Center for Security Policy and the Yorktown Institute. He is the author of the book When China Attacks: A Warning to America.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

So soft resistance is not a legal concept? Why this is a worrying thought
So soft resistance is not a legal concept? Why this is a worrying thought

HKFP

time4 hours ago

  • HKFP

So soft resistance is not a legal concept? Why this is a worrying thought

One does not wish to seem ungrateful, but the enduring mystery of the hour – exactly what do officials mean by 'soft resistance' – has not been much clarified by the secretary for justice, who offered a definition last month. Soft resistance, said Paul Lam, has three main elements: making false or misleading statements, expressing them irrationally with emotional bias, and having the intention to create misunderstandings about the Chinese or Hong Kong governments and their policies. This looks like an extension of the law on subversion, already unmoored from its Common Law attachment to the provocation of violence. If this were the case, it would still leave a variety of tricky questions. For example, would sincere belief in the truth of the statement complained of be a defence? But Mr Lam scotched this notion by adding that 'methods of soft resistance may not always be illegal, but that did not mean they did not harm society.' He also said that although the term was hard to define the government would not use it arbitrarily. 'You can say it is a political term,' he mused. 'Not all issues in society should be addressed by legal means. [Legal means] are also not always the most effective way of handling [matters].' This brings us to a rather alarming question: What non-legal means is the government proposing to use? A few reminders: We have repeatedly been assured that freedom of expression continues to be protected in Hong Kong. Both the Basic Law and the National Security Law reiterate the point, which is often also made by officials. Anyone who complains about apparent infringements will be referred to the relevant part of the Bill of Rights Ordinance, which permits exceptions to protect – put briefly – reputations, public order (including national security) and public decency. But there is one condition attached to these exceptions: They must be 'provided by law.' That means that if a person engages in soft resistance, deplorable though that may be, using methods which are not illegal, then he or she is exercising the right to self-expression and is entitled to Mr Lam's protection while doing so. The answer to soft resistance that does not break the law is, of course, soft repression. This could take the form of counterarguments, pointing out untruths, denouncing irrational language and correcting misinterpretations of government policies. This should not be too difficult. The government has a whole department devoted to putting its version of events before the public. RTHK is at its service, and most of our surviving media take pride in doing more than justice to the government line. The answer to erroneous speech is, or should be, correct speech. Yet somehow, I do not think this was on the mind of the numerous senior officials who thought a 28th Handover anniversary speech was a good opportunity to denounce the evils of soft resistance and promise to extirpate it. Rosanna Law, the secretary for culture, art and tourism, for example, promised to step up scrutiny before allowing funding or the use of venues for shows. Other issuers of permits of various kinds are apparently putting their shoulders to the wheel. Of late, we learn that restaurants can lose their licences, social workers and teachers can be drummed out of their professions. Some people cannot run a bookshop without entertaining a stream of visitors from government departments, citing anonymous complaints about hygiene, fire safety, business regulations or whatever. We may have a government which, as Mr Lam said, welcomes criticism, but it is not very good at looking like that. The problem with this sort of thing is that after a while it makes people suspicious. Maybe the venue you wanted to hire really does have an air-conditioning problem. Who knows? The Lord moves in mysterious ways and routinely refuses to discuss individual cases. Recently the Inland Revenue Department resumed sending me annual tax returns. In normal times I would put this down to a lucrative one-off freelance gig in 2023 after which the employer very properly filed the usual form reporting how much it paid me. As it happened, though, this sudden renewal of interest in my finances coincided with several stories about news media and individual reporters being asked for large tax payments they did not owe. So an innocent bit of bureaucratic routine looks … fishy.

Russia's Lavrov visits North Korea
Russia's Lavrov visits North Korea

RTHK

time5 hours ago

  • RTHK

Russia's Lavrov visits North Korea

Russia's Lavrov visits North Korea Russian state media said Lavrov will discuss the Ukraine conflict and the situation in the Korean peninsula with his North Korean counterpart. Photo: Reuters Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov arrived in North Korea on Friday, North Korea's state media KCNA said on Saturday, the latest visit by a senior Russian official to the isolated state amid warming ties between the countries. Lavrov's visit, scheduled to Sunday, includes a meeting between the countries' foreign ministers, KCNA reported. Lavrov flew out of the Malaysian capital Kuala Lumpur following the Asean foreign ministers' meeting and arrived in Wonsan, North Korea's eastern coastal city, which is home to a recently opened resort and known for its missile and naval facilities. Lavrov's visit is the latest high-level meeting between the two countries amid a dramatic upgrading of their strategic cooperation that now includes a mutual defence pact. The South Korean intelligence service has said North Korea may be preparing to deploy additional troops in July or August, after sending more than 10,000 soldiers to fight with Russia in the war against Ukraine. North Korea has agreed to dispatch 6,000 military engineers and builders for reconstruction in Russia's Kursk region, where Ukrainian forces launched a mass cross-border incursion nearly a year ago. Russian news agencies also reported Lavrov's arrival and said after North Korea he is expected to travel to China to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation meeting, which is set to take place on Monday and Tuesday. Russia's state TASS news agency said Lavrov and his North Korean counterpart, Choi Son Hui, would discuss the 40-month-old Ukraine conflict and the situation on the Korean peninsula. TASS said the new coastal resort could boost Russian tourism to North Korea, citing the resumption of direct trains from Moscow to Pyongyang and a project to build a bridge across the Tumen River forming part of the boundary between North Korea, China and Russia. TASS quoted Deputy Russian Foreign Minister Andrei Rudenko as saying more high-level delegations would visit North Korea later this year. Rudenko said the accord on strategic partnership "clearly meets the changing needs over recent decades and strengthens traditionally friendly, good-neighbourly Russian-Korean relations to a qualitatively new level as allies." (Reuters)

China denies asking firms to collect data illegally after new EU probe on TikTok
China denies asking firms to collect data illegally after new EU probe on TikTok

HKFP

time13 hours ago

  • HKFP

China denies asking firms to collect data illegally after new EU probe on TikTok

Beijing denied on Friday asking firms to 'illegally' collect and store users' personal information, after an Irish regulator helping the European Union regulate data privacy began investigating Chinese social media giant TikTok. 'The Chinese government attaches great importance to and protects data privacy and security in accordance with the law,' foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said. Beijing 'has never and will never require companies or individuals to illegally collect or store data', Mao said. 'We hope that the European side will respect the market economy and fair competition, and provide a fair, just and non-discriminatory business environment for companies from all countries,' she told a regular news conference. The social media giant has been in the crosshairs of Western governments for years over fears that personal data could be used by China for espionage or propaganda purposes. However, TikTok has insisted that it has never received any requests from Chinese authorities for European users' data. TikTok was fined 530 million euros (US$620 million) in May by the Data Protection Commission over sending personal data to China, although the Chinese social media giant had insisted this data was only accessed remotely. TikTok, which has 1.5 billion users worldwide, is a division of Chinese tech giant ByteDance.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store