logo
Scientists Gene Hack Mice So Their Livers Produce Their Own Ozempic-Like Drug

Scientists Gene Hack Mice So Their Livers Produce Their Own Ozempic-Like Drug

Yahoo3 hours ago
Scientists have gene-hacked mice to produce their own Ozempic-like drugs — possibly, and provocatively, perhaps paving a path for humans to do so themselves one day.
In a new study published in the journal Communications Medicine, researchers from Japan's University of Osaka successfully gene-edited mice livers to produce exenatide, a first-generation diabetes drug and predecessor to now-trendy jabs like Ozempic and Mounjaro.
Using lab mice that were obese and pre-diabetic — which sounds, we have to note, both sad and adorable — the researchers used a CRISPR-based genetic editing method to add a gene to the rodents' liver cells instructing them how make exenatide. Soon after, the Osaka researchers detected the drug in the rodents' blood, and kept finding it for up to 28 weeks as the gene-edited mice "ate less food and gained less weight" than their unedited counterparts, as a press release about the study explains.
It's not the first time researchers have gene-hacked living things into creating glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor/agonists, the class of drugs to which Ozempic belongs, and which are believed to mimic the stomach's feeling of fullness. Back in 2017, researchers from the University of Chicago gene-edited human and mice skin cells to produce GLP-1, then grafted them onto host animals that subsequently showed increased insulin secretion and reversed weight gain. And more recently, student scientists at Canada's University of Ottawa genetically tricked a tobacco cousin into producing a similar compound.
Taken all together, and it's an intriguing proof of concept for bespoke genetic treatments that could help the body produce its own medication — a radical departure from the current model of the pharmaceutical and medical industries.
"We hope that our design of a one-time genetic treatment can be applied to many conditions that do not have exact genetic causes," explained Keiichiro Suzuki, the study's senior author, in the press release.
Still, as Gizmodo notes, not all GLP-1s are created equal. Taken twice a day orally, the original formula of exenatide made it far less long-lasting than semaglutide, and although an extended-release version was eventually manufactured and sold, both have since been discontinued over long-known risks of pancreatitis — though to be fair, Ozempic has been linked to the same condition, even if the research remains inconclusive.
While it remains unclear whether the Osaka researchers plan to experiment with a compound closer to semaglutide, the biopharmaceutical company Fractyl Health has also been working on a gene therapy that trains the body to create its own GLP-1s. Earlier this year, the company began the approval process for human trials in Europe, which will begin next year if accepted by health regulators.
Notably, neither of these mice studies addressed the GLP-1 elephant in the room: that these drugs, regardless of exact formulation, carry an increased risk of pancreatitis and other gastrointestinal problems. Could producing them in-vivo result in fewer side effects? It seems too early to tell — but we'll be watching.
More on GLP-1 research: Human Experiments on GLP-1 Pill Looking Extremely Promising
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Which Diet Strategy Best Suits T2D Care in Obesity?
Which Diet Strategy Best Suits T2D Care in Obesity?

Medscape

time41 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Which Diet Strategy Best Suits T2D Care in Obesity?

TOPLINE: Patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) achieved similar improvements in A1c levels and weight loss with intermittent energy restriction, time-restricted eating, and continuous energy restriction; however, intermittent fasting provided additional benefits in lowering fasting blood glucose and triglyceride levels, improving insulin sensitivity, and increasing patient adherence. METHODOLOGY: The 5:2 intermittent fasting method, which involves eating normally for 5 days and restricting calories for 2 days each week, has shown effectiveness in weight management and blood glucose control; however, its direct comparison with 10-hour time-restricted eating in patients with obesity and T2D remains unclear. Researchers in China conducted a single-center, randomized trial between November 2021 and November 2024 to compare the effects of three different dietary interventions in patients with obesity and T2D. They randomly assigned 90 patients in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three groups — intermittent energy restriction, time-restricted eating, or continuous energy restriction — with a similar weekly intake of calories across all groups. A nutritionist provided supervision and guidance for the interventions over 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was a change in A1c levels, and secondary endpoints included various laboratory parameters, adverse events, and patient adherence. TAKEAWAY: The 16-week intervention was completed by 63 patients including 18 women (average age, 36.8 years; baseline BMI, 31.7; A1c level, 7.42%). Adherence was highest with intermittent energy restriction (85%), followed by continuous energy restriction (84%) and time-restricted eating (78%). After 16 weeks, A1c levels were reduced by 1.03%-1.56% and weight reduced by 5.7-8.6 kg across all three groups; although no significant differences were found between the groups, the intermittent energy restriction group showed the greatest absolute changes. Compared with the other two interventions, intermittent energy restriction resulted in significantly lower fasting glucose and triglyceride levels (by an average of 2.3 mmol/L and 1.139 mmol/L, respectively) and improved insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index, 80.23; P < .05 for all). Hypoglycemia occurred in two patients each in the intermittent energy restriction and time-restricted-eating groups and three patients in the continuous energy restriction group. IN PRACTICE: 'The research fills a gap in directly comparing 5:2 intermittent energy restriction with a 10-hour time-restricted eating in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes. The findings provide scientific evidence for clinicians to choose appropriate dietary strategies when treating such patients,' said the lead author in a news release. SOURCE: This study was led by Haohao Zhang, PhD, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University in Zhengzhou, China. It was presented on July 13, 2025, at the ENDO 2025: The Endocrine Society Annual Meeting, in San Francisco. LIMITATIONS: This study did not report any specific limitations. DISCLOSURES: This study did not report any specific funding or conflicts of interest. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

Clinical Trials: The Future Hinges On Orchestration, Not More Tools
Clinical Trials: The Future Hinges On Orchestration, Not More Tools

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Clinical Trials: The Future Hinges On Orchestration, Not More Tools

Rahul Saluja, Managing Partner & Board Advisor at Cognizant, driving growth in Life Sciences, Digital Transformation & Smart Manufacturing. Over the past few years, we've seen a wave of digital innovation in clinical trials: decentralized models, eConsent, real-time monitoring and direct-to-patient logistics. We've digitized nearly every touchpoint. But here's the problem: Digitization doesn't equal transformation. In many cases, we've simply layered new tools onto an outdated operating model. The structure beneath—the way clinical trials are orchestrated across functions—has barely evolved. We're running modern trials with legacy assumptions, and it's showing. Sponsors are still dealing with mid-trial surprises, delayed shipments, inconsistent patient engagement and misaligned teams. And patients, who now live in a world of real-time apps and same-day delivery, are losing patience with trial timelines and broken communication loops. We don't have a technology gap; we have a coordination gap. The Illusion Of Progress There's a difference between having digital capabilities and knowing how to use them to drive outcomes. Today, different teams manage different parts of the trial: • Clinical ops oversee protocol execution. • Supply manages depots and packaging. • Commercial stays focused on engagement and growth. • Digital leads the platform strategy. Each function is doing its job, but in isolation. The challenge is no longer about building new platforms. It's about aligning those platforms around a common operational framework. That's where most organizations are falling short—and where real transformation needs to happen. Borrowing From Industries That Got It Right In complex industries like aviation and logistics, orchestration isn't optional. It's built in. These industries rely on control towers—centralized command centers that bring data, systems and decision making together in real time. Life sciences needs something similar—a clinical control tower. Think of it as a strategic layer that connects your decentralized trial ecosystem, where supply chain, protocol changes, site performance and patient data all speak to each other. This isn't a dashboard. It's an orchestration engine—one that allows your teams to anticipate disruptions, coordinate faster and act with clarity. What It Looks Like In Practice A clinical control tower connects: • Randomization and trial supply management (RTSM) and supply planning tools. • Real-time site feedback and patient insights. • Protocol changes with operational impact modeling. • AI and analytics to identify risk signals before they escalate. The impact? • Fewer surprises • Smoother amendments • Faster delivery • Better sponsor experience • Higher patient retention And perhaps most importantly, it builds trust—with internal teams, external partners and the patients we're ultimately serving. The Leadership Shift That's Needed Transformation at this level doesn't happen from the bottom up. It requires leadership that understands how strategy, operations and execution intersect. Life sciences leaders—especially across clinical, digital and commercial domains—need to ask tougher questions: • Are our systems integrated, or are they simply adjacent? • Do our teams operate from the same data and timelines? • Can we course-correct mid-trial in real time? • Are we building toward speed and scale or stuck in reaction mode? The organizations that can confidently answer these questions will be the ones that define the next era of clinical development. What's At Stake It's not just about efficiency. It's about resilience and the ability to adapt quickly, maintain compliance, protect timelines and ensure quality—all while keeping the patient at the center. In the next five years, life sciences companies will be judged not just by innovation, but by execution. Those most successful won't necessarily have the most tools, but those that know how to connect them. Final Thought The future of clinical trials won't be defined by technology alone. It will be defined by how well we orchestrate that technology across teams, systems and time zones. Patients are living in 2025. They expect seamless, smart and responsive experiences. It's time our trial infrastructure caught up. To get there, we don't need more dashboards. We need alignment. We need orchestration. And most of all, we need leadership bold enough to rethink how trials are truly run. Forbes Business Development Council is an invitation-only community for sales and biz dev executives. Do I qualify?

Japan's former Emperor Akihito hospitalized to get new treatment for heart condition
Japan's former Emperor Akihito hospitalized to get new treatment for heart condition

Washington Post

timean hour ago

  • Washington Post

Japan's former Emperor Akihito hospitalized to get new treatment for heart condition

TOKYO — Japan's 91-year-old former Emperor Akihito was hospitalized Monday to adjust his heart medication, palace officials said. Akihito was diagnosed in May with myocardial ischemia, an asymptomatic heart condition of reduced blood flow from the coronary arteries to the heart muscle. He has since been on medication to improve blood flow to his heart while avoiding excessive exercise and reducing liquid intake. Akihito abdicated in 2019, handing over the Chrysanthemum Throne to his son, current Emperor Naruhito and now holds the title of Emperor Emeritus. After two months on the medication, doctors found little improvement in Akinito's condition and decided to give him an additional treatment to alleviate the burden on his heart, the Imperial Household Agency said. Monday's hospitalization was to carefully determine the right dose of the new medication to avoid side effects, while monitoring his heart by electrocardiogram and other examination, the IHA said. In 2012, Akihito underwent a coronary artery bypass surgery. Three years ago, he was diagnosed with right heart failure caused by tricuspid valve insufficiency. Akihito was seen in the back seat of a palace car, wearing a white surgical mask and accompanied by his wife, Empress Emerita Michiko, as he was taken to the hospital. Palace officials said they couldn't say how long Akihito would have to be hospitalized.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store