logo
Why academicians need to take intellectual property (IP) issues seriously

Why academicians need to take intellectual property (IP) issues seriously

The Hindua day ago

In today's knowledge-driven academic ecosystem, intellectual property (IP) cannot be neglected. As universities and research institutions compete for global recognition, metrics such as research publications, patents, and innovation outputs have become central to institutional rankings, funding opportunities, and overall prestige. Frameworks like the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) in India explicitly assign considerable weight to research and IP-related outputs, pushing academicians to increase their scholarly contributions. While this emphasis has propelled research activities across disciplines, it has also inadvertently fostered a culture of pressure that sometimes encourages shortcuts, compromises, and unethical practices. It is in this context that academicians must urgently recognise the importance of taking IP issues seriously.
IP laws exist to protect the original creations of individuals and institutions, ensuring that authors, artists, inventors, and researchers receive due credit and control over their work. For academicians, IP is closely tied to their professional identity. A research paper, a patented invention, or even an unique dataset or teaching method constitutes a form of intellectual property that carries both academic and economic value. When managed ethically, IP contributes to a scholar's reputation, opens avenues for collaboration, and even attracts funding or commercial interest.
However, the race to publish and gain recognition has led to increased instances of IP-related violations. These range from blatant plagiarism to more nuanced forms of misconduct such as improper attribution, unauthorised use of images or data, and inclusion of undeserving authors. Such violations not only inflict legal scourge but also damage the integrity of academicians and their institutions. Misuse of IP — be it written work, images, music, or data — can invite lawsuits, damage reputation, and lead to professional setbacks.
Growing concern
The most common IP-related problem in academia is plagiarism. With the maturation of multiple online content resources, it has become simpler than ever to copy content — knowingly or unknowingly — without attribution. Even the content from generative software are not immune to plagiarism. Detecting plagiarism is only on part of the problem. Institutions must focus on cultivating a culture where originality is valued and ethical writing is taught from the undergraduate level.
Authorship disputes are another form of academic misconduct that undermines intellectual integrity. In many cases, faculty members insist on including their names on the work of students or junior researcher without making substantial contributions. Conversely, students or research assistants are sometimes left out of publications to which they have made significant inputs. This not only distorts the academic record but also breeds mistrust and resentment within research teams.
Role of institutions
Institutions play a pivotal role in promoting IP awareness and ethical research practices. Universities must integrate IP education into the curriculum, particularly for postgraduate and doctoral students. Workshops, seminars, and orientation sessions should be held regularly to familiarise scholars with copyright laws, patent procedures, plagiarism detection tools, and the ethical implications of authorship.
Faculty members must lead by example and ensure that their own work adheres to IP laws and mentor students on responsible conduct. Encouraging original thinking, teaching proper citation techniques, and actively discouraging shortcuts can go a long way in fostering a culture of respect for intellectual property.
Taking IP issues earnestly is not merely a legal necessity; it is a positive ethical character to be inculcated in the academic community. By upholding IP rights, academicians protect their own reputation and career, enhance their institutions' credibility, and contribute to a culture of integrity and long lasting excellence in education.
In a world overflowing with information but lacking in originality, academicians must uphold the highest standards of intellectual honesty. They must remind themselves and their students that the true reward of research lies not in the number of publications or patents, but in the integrity and impact of their contributions. The future of academia depends on it.
The writer is Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, CMR University, Bengaluru.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why academicians need to take intellectual property (IP) issues seriously
Why academicians need to take intellectual property (IP) issues seriously

The Hindu

timea day ago

  • The Hindu

Why academicians need to take intellectual property (IP) issues seriously

In today's knowledge-driven academic ecosystem, intellectual property (IP) cannot be neglected. As universities and research institutions compete for global recognition, metrics such as research publications, patents, and innovation outputs have become central to institutional rankings, funding opportunities, and overall prestige. Frameworks like the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) in India explicitly assign considerable weight to research and IP-related outputs, pushing academicians to increase their scholarly contributions. While this emphasis has propelled research activities across disciplines, it has also inadvertently fostered a culture of pressure that sometimes encourages shortcuts, compromises, and unethical practices. It is in this context that academicians must urgently recognise the importance of taking IP issues seriously. IP laws exist to protect the original creations of individuals and institutions, ensuring that authors, artists, inventors, and researchers receive due credit and control over their work. For academicians, IP is closely tied to their professional identity. A research paper, a patented invention, or even an unique dataset or teaching method constitutes a form of intellectual property that carries both academic and economic value. When managed ethically, IP contributes to a scholar's reputation, opens avenues for collaboration, and even attracts funding or commercial interest. However, the race to publish and gain recognition has led to increased instances of IP-related violations. These range from blatant plagiarism to more nuanced forms of misconduct such as improper attribution, unauthorised use of images or data, and inclusion of undeserving authors. Such violations not only inflict legal scourge but also damage the integrity of academicians and their institutions. Misuse of IP — be it written work, images, music, or data — can invite lawsuits, damage reputation, and lead to professional setbacks. Growing concern The most common IP-related problem in academia is plagiarism. With the maturation of multiple online content resources, it has become simpler than ever to copy content — knowingly or unknowingly — without attribution. Even the content from generative software are not immune to plagiarism. Detecting plagiarism is only on part of the problem. Institutions must focus on cultivating a culture where originality is valued and ethical writing is taught from the undergraduate level. Authorship disputes are another form of academic misconduct that undermines intellectual integrity. In many cases, faculty members insist on including their names on the work of students or junior researcher without making substantial contributions. Conversely, students or research assistants are sometimes left out of publications to which they have made significant inputs. This not only distorts the academic record but also breeds mistrust and resentment within research teams. Role of institutions Institutions play a pivotal role in promoting IP awareness and ethical research practices. Universities must integrate IP education into the curriculum, particularly for postgraduate and doctoral students. Workshops, seminars, and orientation sessions should be held regularly to familiarise scholars with copyright laws, patent procedures, plagiarism detection tools, and the ethical implications of authorship. Faculty members must lead by example and ensure that their own work adheres to IP laws and mentor students on responsible conduct. Encouraging original thinking, teaching proper citation techniques, and actively discouraging shortcuts can go a long way in fostering a culture of respect for intellectual property. Taking IP issues earnestly is not merely a legal necessity; it is a positive ethical character to be inculcated in the academic community. By upholding IP rights, academicians protect their own reputation and career, enhance their institutions' credibility, and contribute to a culture of integrity and long lasting excellence in education. In a world overflowing with information but lacking in originality, academicians must uphold the highest standards of intellectual honesty. They must remind themselves and their students that the true reward of research lies not in the number of publications or patents, but in the integrity and impact of their contributions. The future of academia depends on it. The writer is Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, CMR University, Bengaluru.

NU's academic audit for UDRF completed
NU's academic audit for UDRF completed

Time of India

time4 days ago

  • Time of India

NU's academic audit for UDRF completed

1 2 Nagpur: The Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University (RTMNU) completed the University Department Ranking Framework (UDRF) academic audit, as per the directives of the govt of Maharashtra. The audit focused on assessing performance of all postgraduate teaching departments across faculties under a structured, evidence-based evaluation system aligned with national standards. The audit was conducted by a panel of external experts, comprising eminent academicians, senior scientists, and industry professionals. Namdeo Kalyankar, former vice-chancellor of Gondwana University (chairman), Prof Alok Shrotriya, senior professor at Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, Amarkantak (MP), AK Raina, senior scientist at CSIR-CIMFR, Nagpur, Prof D Nagarjun from the department of earth sciences, University of Mysore, Karnataka, Arvind Kumar, centre head at TCS Mihan, Anita Rao, industrial consultant at Vidarbha Industries Association, Nagpur, and Avneesh Anshul, principal scientist at CSIR-Neeri, were part of the expert group. Over several days of rigorous scrutiny, the committee evaluated departmental submissions, including reports, academic audit documents, publications, and supporting evidence. The review was conducted on the basis of five broad thematic areas: Faculty output, research, and professional activities; NEP initiatives, teaching, learning, and assessment process; departmental governance and best practices; student support, achievements, and progression; conferences, workshops, and collaborations. Each department's performance was meticulously analysed in light of the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF), National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC), and NEP 2020 frameworks, with focus on both quantitative metrics and qualitative impact. During the closing session, several committee members offered valuable insights and actionable recommendations. Arvind Kumar emphasised the importance of developing a strong alumni network to support mentorship, funding, and industry networking. He encouraged departments to proactively identify industrial partners for collaborative projects, internships, and on-the-job training (OJT), and to commercialise faculty-generated patents and IP for societal impact and institutional growth. Prof D Nagarjun advocated for a minimum benchmark of three quality research publications per faculty per year, especially through collaborative and team-based research that fosters a culture of academic inquiry. He encouraged departments in the humanities and social sciences to also contribute to Scopus/Web of Science-indexed journals and to utilise copyrights and patents as tools for scholarly recognition. He noted that translation of books and study material can serve as meaningful academic contributions, enhancing access and outreach. AK Raina emphasised the need to integrate curiosity-driven learning and questioning into pedagogy. He underlined that critical thinking and inquiry-based learning should be central to classroom practice in the contemporary educational landscape. Kalyankar lauded NU for its meticulous planning, robust documentation, and systematic execution of the UDRF audit process. He commended the heads of departments for their dedicated efforts and highlighted the departments of pharmaceutical sciences, physics, and chemistry as exemplars of research innovation, academic productivity, and best practices. Acting VC Madhavi Khode Chavare expressed deep appreciation to the expert committee for their time, insights, and encouragement. She reiterated that the UDRF is not merely a ranking system, but a strategic initiative to foster transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement. She urged all departments to internalise the recommendations and continue striving toward academic and research excellence. This audit aligns with Maharashtra's vision for higher education reforms. The outcomes of the UDRF will not only strengthen internal quality assurance but also contribute to improving the university's standing in national and global rankings. The entire UDRF initiative at NU was coordinated under the leadership of Smita Acharya, director of IQAC, with the support of deans of various faculties, departmental coordinators, and university administrative staff.

A quiet revolution  Atma Ram Sanatan Dharma College, New Delhi
A quiet revolution  Atma Ram Sanatan Dharma College, New Delhi

India Today

time21-06-2025

  • India Today

A quiet revolution Atma Ram Sanatan Dharma College, New Delhi

Investing in infrastructure, overhauling the curriculum, cultivating a research culture and leveraging its existing strengths—this DU college set out on a deliberate and determined journey towards change ATMA RAM SANATAN DHARMA COLLEGE , New Delhi No. 8 (2025) up from No. 14 (2020) Despite its prime location in Dhaula Kuan, rich legacy and a large student body, Atma Ram Sanatan Dharma (ARSD) College was rarely the first choice for top-scoring students coming to Delhi University (DU). That changed with National Institutional Ranking Framework or NIRF 2024 where ARSD emerged in 5th place. 'This isn't just imp­rovement, it's a leap,' says ARSD principal Prof. Gyantosh Kumar Jha, sitting in his office surrounded by student souvenirs. 'Overtaking SRCC, Lady Shri Ram, even St Ste­phen's—DU's hallmark colleges—is a reversal no one saw coming, though the pieces had been carefully laid out for years. Not just academics, focus on all-round development of stude­nts, that's the soul of what we tried to do here.' It shows. It has been a quiet journey of evolution, pouring crores into infrastructure, overhauling the curriculum, cultivating a dynamic research culture and placing faith in its students to deliver the results. Today, ARSD proudly boasts the highest NAAC (National Assessment and Accreditation Council) score among DU colleges: an A++ with a CGPA of 3.77. In 2023, it was declared the best DU college under the NIRF's special category, 'Research and Professional Practice', awarded an outstanding 94.84 out of 100. The college has published more than 1,000 research papers, secured many patents and numerous government research projects. What distinguishes ARSD, though, is its pioneering move to get undergraduates, and not just postgraduates, to collaborate with the faculty on year-round research. 'Our students' research papers are regularly published in international journals,' says Prof. Jha. 'We encourage students to question, explore, build ideas, be it in the arts, sciences, or social sciences.' Fortunately, ARSD's quest for aca­demic excellence has not come at the cost of its culturally vibrant atmosphere. Its 40-day theatre workshop every year has become a signature initiative, attended every year by alumni as well as theatre enthusiasts at home and abroad. 'It's a big deal here,' the principal says. 'Our students got selected for the National School of Drama. This workshop is a way for them to gear up for it.' A MODERN CAMPUS Walking around the campus today, you encounter a space redesigned for contemporary times. Classrooms are now digitally equipped, labs have been spruced up and sustainability is a visible commitment, reflected in the bamboo structures, the manicured lawns, rainwater harvesting systems and vermicomposting units. Admini­strative processes are digitised, CCTV cameras ensure safety and the newly renovated canteen serves delicious meals with a side dish of nostalgia. Most crucially, a new kind of student is now filing past ARSD's gates—those with marks in the 90s and seeking a mix of a rigorous academic environment and creative freedom. Placement offers have surged, tie-ups with prestigious institutions like the National Productivity Council and the Netaji Subhas University of Technology have deepened and the faculty is encouraged to invest in personal growth—collectively logging in 1,100 hours of professional development in the past five years. This transformation hasn't happ­ened overnight, nor is it a result of any single sweeping reform. It's the product of a steady, determined pursuit of excellence. 'We were never tied to rankings,' says Jha. 'We were chasing quality. The rankings followed.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store