logo
NU's academic audit for UDRF completed

NU's academic audit for UDRF completed

Time of India3 days ago

1
2
Nagpur: The Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University (RTMNU) completed the University Department Ranking Framework (UDRF) academic audit, as per the directives of the govt of Maharashtra.
The audit focused on assessing performance of all postgraduate teaching departments across faculties under a structured, evidence-based evaluation system aligned with national standards.
The audit was conducted by a panel of external experts, comprising eminent academicians, senior scientists, and industry professionals.
Namdeo Kalyankar, former vice-chancellor of Gondwana University (chairman), Prof Alok Shrotriya, senior professor at Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, Amarkantak (MP), AK Raina, senior scientist at CSIR-CIMFR, Nagpur, Prof D Nagarjun from the department of earth sciences, University of Mysore, Karnataka, Arvind Kumar, centre head at TCS Mihan, Anita Rao, industrial consultant at Vidarbha Industries Association, Nagpur, and Avneesh Anshul, principal scientist at CSIR-Neeri, were part of the expert group.
Over several days of rigorous scrutiny, the committee evaluated departmental submissions, including reports, academic audit documents, publications, and supporting evidence. The review was conducted on the basis of five broad thematic areas: Faculty output, research, and professional activities; NEP initiatives, teaching, learning, and assessment process; departmental governance and best practices; student support, achievements, and progression; conferences, workshops, and collaborations.
Each department's performance was meticulously analysed in light of the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF), National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC), and NEP 2020 frameworks, with focus on both quantitative metrics and qualitative impact.
During the closing session, several committee members offered valuable insights and actionable recommendations. Arvind Kumar emphasised the importance of developing a strong alumni network to support mentorship, funding, and industry networking.
He encouraged departments to proactively identify industrial partners for collaborative projects, internships, and on-the-job training (OJT), and to commercialise faculty-generated patents and IP for societal impact and institutional growth.
Prof D Nagarjun advocated for a minimum benchmark of three quality research publications per faculty per year, especially through collaborative and team-based research that fosters a culture of academic inquiry.
He encouraged departments in the humanities and social sciences to also contribute to Scopus/Web of Science-indexed journals and to utilise copyrights and patents as tools for scholarly recognition.
He noted that translation of books and study material can serve as meaningful academic contributions, enhancing access and outreach.
AK Raina emphasised the need to integrate curiosity-driven learning and questioning into pedagogy.
He underlined that critical thinking and inquiry-based learning should be central to classroom practice in the contemporary educational landscape.
Kalyankar lauded NU for its meticulous planning, robust documentation, and systematic execution of the UDRF audit process. He commended the heads of departments for their dedicated efforts and highlighted the departments of pharmaceutical sciences, physics, and chemistry as exemplars of research innovation, academic productivity, and best practices.
Acting VC Madhavi Khode Chavare expressed deep appreciation to the expert committee for their time, insights, and encouragement. She reiterated that the UDRF is not merely a ranking system, but a strategic initiative to foster transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement. She urged all departments to internalise the recommendations and continue striving toward academic and research excellence.
This audit aligns with Maharashtra's vision for higher education reforms. The outcomes of the UDRF will not only strengthen internal quality assurance but also contribute to improving the university's standing in national and global rankings. The entire UDRF initiative at NU was coordinated under the leadership of Smita Acharya, director of IQAC, with the support of deans of various faculties, departmental coordinators, and university administrative staff.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why academicians need to take intellectual property (IP) issues seriously
Why academicians need to take intellectual property (IP) issues seriously

The Hindu

time4 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Why academicians need to take intellectual property (IP) issues seriously

In today's knowledge-driven academic ecosystem, intellectual property (IP) cannot be neglected. As universities and research institutions compete for global recognition, metrics such as research publications, patents, and innovation outputs have become central to institutional rankings, funding opportunities, and overall prestige. Frameworks like the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) in India explicitly assign considerable weight to research and IP-related outputs, pushing academicians to increase their scholarly contributions. While this emphasis has propelled research activities across disciplines, it has also inadvertently fostered a culture of pressure that sometimes encourages shortcuts, compromises, and unethical practices. It is in this context that academicians must urgently recognise the importance of taking IP issues seriously. IP laws exist to protect the original creations of individuals and institutions, ensuring that authors, artists, inventors, and researchers receive due credit and control over their work. For academicians, IP is closely tied to their professional identity. A research paper, a patented invention, or even an unique dataset or teaching method constitutes a form of intellectual property that carries both academic and economic value. When managed ethically, IP contributes to a scholar's reputation, opens avenues for collaboration, and even attracts funding or commercial interest. However, the race to publish and gain recognition has led to increased instances of IP-related violations. These range from blatant plagiarism to more nuanced forms of misconduct such as improper attribution, unauthorised use of images or data, and inclusion of undeserving authors. Such violations not only inflict legal scourge but also damage the integrity of academicians and their institutions. Misuse of IP — be it written work, images, music, or data — can invite lawsuits, damage reputation, and lead to professional setbacks. Growing concern The most common IP-related problem in academia is plagiarism. With the maturation of multiple online content resources, it has become simpler than ever to copy content — knowingly or unknowingly — without attribution. Even the content from generative software are not immune to plagiarism. Detecting plagiarism is only on part of the problem. Institutions must focus on cultivating a culture where originality is valued and ethical writing is taught from the undergraduate level. Authorship disputes are another form of academic misconduct that undermines intellectual integrity. In many cases, faculty members insist on including their names on the work of students or junior researcher without making substantial contributions. Conversely, students or research assistants are sometimes left out of publications to which they have made significant inputs. This not only distorts the academic record but also breeds mistrust and resentment within research teams. Role of institutions Institutions play a pivotal role in promoting IP awareness and ethical research practices. Universities must integrate IP education into the curriculum, particularly for postgraduate and doctoral students. Workshops, seminars, and orientation sessions should be held regularly to familiarise scholars with copyright laws, patent procedures, plagiarism detection tools, and the ethical implications of authorship. Faculty members must lead by example and ensure that their own work adheres to IP laws and mentor students on responsible conduct. Encouraging original thinking, teaching proper citation techniques, and actively discouraging shortcuts can go a long way in fostering a culture of respect for intellectual property. Taking IP issues earnestly is not merely a legal necessity; it is a positive ethical character to be inculcated in the academic community. By upholding IP rights, academicians protect their own reputation and career, enhance their institutions' credibility, and contribute to a culture of integrity and long lasting excellence in education. In a world overflowing with information but lacking in originality, academicians must uphold the highest standards of intellectual honesty. They must remind themselves and their students that the true reward of research lies not in the number of publications or patents, but in the integrity and impact of their contributions. The future of academia depends on it. The writer is Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, CMR University, Bengaluru.

NU's academic audit for UDRF completed
NU's academic audit for UDRF completed

Time of India

time3 days ago

  • Time of India

NU's academic audit for UDRF completed

1 2 Nagpur: The Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University (RTMNU) completed the University Department Ranking Framework (UDRF) academic audit, as per the directives of the govt of Maharashtra. The audit focused on assessing performance of all postgraduate teaching departments across faculties under a structured, evidence-based evaluation system aligned with national standards. The audit was conducted by a panel of external experts, comprising eminent academicians, senior scientists, and industry professionals. Namdeo Kalyankar, former vice-chancellor of Gondwana University (chairman), Prof Alok Shrotriya, senior professor at Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, Amarkantak (MP), AK Raina, senior scientist at CSIR-CIMFR, Nagpur, Prof D Nagarjun from the department of earth sciences, University of Mysore, Karnataka, Arvind Kumar, centre head at TCS Mihan, Anita Rao, industrial consultant at Vidarbha Industries Association, Nagpur, and Avneesh Anshul, principal scientist at CSIR-Neeri, were part of the expert group. Over several days of rigorous scrutiny, the committee evaluated departmental submissions, including reports, academic audit documents, publications, and supporting evidence. The review was conducted on the basis of five broad thematic areas: Faculty output, research, and professional activities; NEP initiatives, teaching, learning, and assessment process; departmental governance and best practices; student support, achievements, and progression; conferences, workshops, and collaborations. Each department's performance was meticulously analysed in light of the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF), National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC), and NEP 2020 frameworks, with focus on both quantitative metrics and qualitative impact. During the closing session, several committee members offered valuable insights and actionable recommendations. Arvind Kumar emphasised the importance of developing a strong alumni network to support mentorship, funding, and industry networking. He encouraged departments to proactively identify industrial partners for collaborative projects, internships, and on-the-job training (OJT), and to commercialise faculty-generated patents and IP for societal impact and institutional growth. Prof D Nagarjun advocated for a minimum benchmark of three quality research publications per faculty per year, especially through collaborative and team-based research that fosters a culture of academic inquiry. He encouraged departments in the humanities and social sciences to also contribute to Scopus/Web of Science-indexed journals and to utilise copyrights and patents as tools for scholarly recognition. He noted that translation of books and study material can serve as meaningful academic contributions, enhancing access and outreach. AK Raina emphasised the need to integrate curiosity-driven learning and questioning into pedagogy. He underlined that critical thinking and inquiry-based learning should be central to classroom practice in the contemporary educational landscape. Kalyankar lauded NU for its meticulous planning, robust documentation, and systematic execution of the UDRF audit process. He commended the heads of departments for their dedicated efforts and highlighted the departments of pharmaceutical sciences, physics, and chemistry as exemplars of research innovation, academic productivity, and best practices. Acting VC Madhavi Khode Chavare expressed deep appreciation to the expert committee for their time, insights, and encouragement. She reiterated that the UDRF is not merely a ranking system, but a strategic initiative to foster transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement. She urged all departments to internalise the recommendations and continue striving toward academic and research excellence. This audit aligns with Maharashtra's vision for higher education reforms. The outcomes of the UDRF will not only strengthen internal quality assurance but also contribute to improving the university's standing in national and global rankings. The entire UDRF initiative at NU was coordinated under the leadership of Smita Acharya, director of IQAC, with the support of deans of various faculties, departmental coordinators, and university administrative staff.

BSc students at PRSU can now study Sanskrit
BSc students at PRSU can now study Sanskrit

Hindustan Times

time5 days ago

  • Hindustan Times

BSc students at PRSU can now study Sanskrit

Students enrolled in Bachelor of Science (BSc) programme at colleges affiliated with Prof Rajendra Singh (Rajju Bhaiya) State University, Prayagraj will now have the option to study traditional subjects like Sanskrit alongside their core science subjects. PRSU campus in Prayagraj (HT File photo) According to university officials, this initiative is part of the recently implemented National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, which seeks to offer students multidisciplinary learning opportunities and improve their employability. Previously, undergraduate students in these affiliated colleges were required to study three subjects within a single faculty or stream. Under the new system, students must now study two major subjects along with one minor subject from a different faculty, shared officials. For example, science students can opt for humanities subjects such as Sanskrit, Political Science, or Economics as their minor—provided that the chosen minor is offered by their college, explained the officials. Confirming the move, PRSU vice-chancellor Prof Akhilesh Kumar Singh said that the minor subject will be studied during the first two years of the undergraduate programme. In the third year, students will focus solely on their two major subjects, he added. A bachelor's degree will be awarded after three years of study. In the fourth year, students will specialise in one of their major subjects and will earn a bachelor's (Honours) degree. Those who score over 75% in all three years will be eligible for an 'Honours with Research' track, and upon completing the fifth year, they will also receive a postgraduate degree, he explained. Formerly known as Allahabad State University, PRSU was established in 2016. It has around 717 affiliated colleges, including Prayagraj (383), Kaushambi (78), Fatehpur (82) and Pratapgarh (174). These include government-run, government-aided and self-financed colleges.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store