
Lincoln gentleman's club rules criticised as 'sexist'
A gentleman's club, which voted to continue to prohibit women from becoming members, has been called "sexist" by a feminist group.Women can only enter the Castle Hill Club in Lincoln as the guest of a man who is a member.Paul Watson, secretary at the club which opened in 1922, said the rule "had always been the same" and "for the rights or wrongs of it, they wanted to leave it that way."Ellie Henshaw, 19, from the University of Lincoln's Feminist Society, said the decision was "frustrating" and "its not the default anymore that women should be excluded".
All 560 members were asked to vote on whether women should be allowed to become members.The vote closed on 7 May.100 members voted to keep the rule the same. 78 voted for change.Mr Watson said the vote was "democratic" and "all members had different views on it".He said he believed women who visited the club as guests of male members were "happy"."They keep coming. They're obviously comfortable in how the club is set up."Mr Watson said the venue was historical."A lot of it has to do with the history of the club and about not wanting too much change to keep the club running as it has done since 1922."
Ms Henshaw said "times have changed" and women should be allowed to join."I'm a history student. I think denying progress in the name of history is a very flawed argument," she said.Bee Moore, 18, from the society, said she understood men's clubs were "historic"."But we live in an age where everyone is equal and excluding people is wrong", she said."I would call this sexist. I don't see a reason why women have been excluded."
According to Mr Watson, the Grade II listed building dates back to the middle ages and used to operate as a pub called the Black Boy.In 1922, as the pub was struggling to stay afloat, he said pub regulars took over the establishment and made it a gentleman's club. Eventually, the members bought the pub together and it became the free house run by volunteers which it remains."When I was first there, there were 80 members. There's 560 now," Mr Watson said.Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Starmer 'still facing 50-strong revolt' on welfare curbs despite humiliating climbdown amid frantic Labour haggling ahead of crunch vote tomorrow
Keir Starmer is still scrambling to defuse a disastrous Labour welfare revolt despite making an humiliating climbdown. Around 50 MPs look set to defy the PM in a crunch vote tomorrow in what could be a devastating blow to his authority. It might even still be enough to overturn Labour's huge majority. Ministers are due to lay out details of the concessions that were announced last week, including guarantees that no current health or disability benefit claimants will be worse off. That is expected to wipe out more than half the £5billion of savings Rachel Reeves was hoping for from the package, raising the threat of more tax rises in the Autumn. Sir Keir has blamed the G7 in Canada and Nato summit in The Hague last week for failing to address the Labour revolt earlier. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall is pledging that if MPs pass the Bill at second reading tomorrow it will be amended at committee stage. The original plans restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip) and cut the health-related element of universal credit. The changes to Pip will now only apply to new claims from November 2026. Plans to cut the health-related element of universal credit have also been blunted, with all existing recipients to have their incomes protected in real terms. Details of a review of the Pip assessment, to be led by disabilities minister Stephen Timms and 'co-produced' with disabled people, will also be published. Draft regulations for the 'right to try', to enshrine in law the right for people receiving health and disability benefits to try work without fear of reassessment, will also be laid in Parliament. The Work and Pensions Secretary said: 'We must build a welfare system that provides security for those who cannot work and the right support for those who can. Too often, disabled people feel trapped, worried that if they try to work, they could lose the support they depend on. 'That is why we are taking action to remove those barriers, support disabled people to live with dignity and independence, and open routes into employment for those who want to pursue it. 'This is about delivering a fairer, more compassionate system as part of our Plan for Change which supports people to thrive, whatever their circumstances.' Some £300million in employment support will also be brought forward over the next three years. Those with severe conditions who are unlikely to recover – about 200,000 people – will not be called for a reassessment of universal credit. From next year to 2030, all those who already receive the health element of universal credit and new claimants with severe conditions and 12 months or less to live will see an annual rise to their combined standard and limited capacity for work allowance at least in line with inflation. Ms Kendall had confirmed concessions to the plans after 126 Labour backbenchers signed an amendment that would have halted the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill at its first Commons hurdle. That is now expected to be withdrawn after the move appeased some rebellious MPs. But others are still committed to backing a similar amendment. Labour MP Rachael Maskell said she would sign the new amendment aiming to stop the Bill, saying it was not clear how the promised concessions would be brought in. 'There's no confidence… we're being asked to sign a blank check even with these changes,' she said. Vicky Foxcroft, who quit as a Labour whip over the reforms, told The Guardian there were 'areas where I still think there's need for movement' and that she had not decided how to vote. Olivia Blake, a Labour MP with a disability, told the paper the changes could create 'an unethical two-tier system that treats two people with the exact same injury or illness differently'. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has called the concessions 'the worst of all worlds'. The Liberal Democrats plan to vote against and have called for the Government to speed up access-to-work decisions to help people enter the workforce. Deputy leader Daisy Cooper said: 'Liberal Democrats simply cannot support any measures that make things harder for unpaid carers, disabled people who rely on support with daily tasks in order to stay employed, and those whose disabilities mean that they will never be able to work.

Western Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
GB News announces expansion into the US
The news channel, launched in 2021, will open a new bureau in Washington DC as it launches its services across the Atlantic. The two-hour programme will begin in September from a studio 'close to the White House' and will 'bring British audiences closer than ever to the political news which unfolds each day in America'. The programme will feature 'headline-making exclusives, thought-provoking interviews with major figures, and in-depth analysis of the Trump presidency as well as stories from across the US', according to GB News. The move includes an extension of GB News' distribution across the US, with content to be made available free to American audiences. Turner said: 'With the gutsiest guests and the most iconic backdrops, I intend to keep viewers up late. Fronting the next stage of GB News's evolution is both a huge honour and an immense responsibility, and I cannot wait to represent the people's channel on a global stage. 'We will be disrupting the late-night TV space as the next day's papers land in the UK and America's prime-time analysis gears up. This affords us the chance to deliver a unique UK-USA hybrid of political, cultural and social issues from the start-line of global politics. 'We will fulfil the need for a British voice with an international perspective to help our viewers get a sense of who's really on their side. 'Tapping into Washington's heartbeat and delivering real-time perspective with editorial edge, the show will be alive, and a conversation that's punchy, intelligent and unmissable. What happens in DC reverberates in GB and we will capture every moment. 'Our highly engaged British audience understands how events in the US are directly impacting government policy and living standards here. 'We have a job to do: bridging the gap between British and American politics in the fearless style that typifies GB News. 'We will include the very best guests that Washington has to offer, alongside quintessentially British voices in an unparalleled assessment of events on both sides of the Atlantic. 'This isn't just a media experiment, this is a market intervention. And I look forward to leading it from the front.' Bev Turner (GB News/PA) Turner, 51, who began presenting her own show on GB News in 2022, previously hosted a talk show on LBC and has appeared on ITV's This Morning and Good Morning Britain. Michael Booker, GB News editorial director, said: 'This is a huge moment for GB News as we grow our presence and deliver more of the fearless journalism that defines us. 'The world's biggest political story is playing out in Washington, and its impact is being felt daily in towns and cities across Britain. 'More than ever before, what happens in the USA is having huge consequences, both socially and economically, for the people of Britain. 'We've seen time and again this year that a decision made on one day in Washington DC is felt the next day in Washington, Tyne and Wear. 'It's essential the people's channel is right there, reporting live, asking the tough questions, and telling it like it is. 'While others scale back on live free coverage, GB News is investing in our content. 'Our new Washington investment, our expanded programming and our brilliant on-the-ground team will ensure we're not just reporting on the story but that we're right at the heart of it.'


The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer's disability benefit U-turn not enough, says rebel Labour whip
Sir Keir Starmer 's £3bn U-turn on his planned welfare cuts does not go far enough, a leading rebel who quit her frontbench job over the changes has warned. The prime minister is still facing the prospect of around 50 Labour MPs voting against his welfare reforms, with former government whip Vicky Foxcroft among those calling for fresh concessions. Ms Foxcroft dramatically quit this month in protest at the plans, saying she could not back cuts that will harm disabled people. And, in an interview with The Guardian after Sir Keir's U-turn, she said it was 'good to hear that people won't be losing their benefits who are currently on them' but said there were 'areas where I still think there's need for movement'. She has not decided whether to back the government's plans on Tuesday, and around 50 Labour MPs are still expected to vote against the welfare shakeup even after the U-turn. Labour whips have reportedly urged potential rebels to await the details of a review into personal independence payments (Pip), led by disability minister Sir Stephen Timms, before rebelling against the government. But one Labour MP said on Monday he will still oppose the measures even after Sir Keir's concessions. Eltham and Chislehurst MP Clive Efford told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'There are still £3.5 billion-worth of savings that are required in these measures and we don't yet know the poverty impact that they will have.' Mr Efford said the rebellion was initially calling for more time to understand the impact of the changes, and warned against 'taking what I think is a leap in the dark'. 'There are choices that the Government can make here; there are other places it can go to identify the resources,' he added. Meanwhile minister Jacqui Smith would not say what the consequences would be for those who do rebel on Tuesday. Baroness Smith said it is 'not constructive' to discuss potential punishments but that the government will 'keep talking, keep explaining the moves that the Government has already made to recognise some of the concerns'. She told Times Radio: 'The way in which legislation goes through Parliament is it's always the case that you discuss the principles at second reading and I hope that all MPs will recognise the need for reform, and that's what this Bill is about.' Rachael Maskell, one of the leading Labour rebels, told The Times: 'The whips have been effective at saying to colleagues they need to wait and see what the Timms review is going to achieve. 'I think personally it makes the bill even more difficult [to support], because it is a blank cheque now. I just think there are too many unanswered questions.' As work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall prepares to outline the government's concessions in parliament on Monday, Sir Keir was said to be preparing further last-minute concessions to rebels. Health secretary Wes Streeting on Sunday hinted further changes to the bill could be made. 'There is a review on Pip and we've got to listen,' he told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg. He said the government is in a better position than last week, where defeat over the welfare changes looked all but certain, but would not say he is confident the bill will pass. Ms Kendall on Sunday night said the government is reforming the welfare system so that it 'provides security for those who cannot work and the right support for those who can'. 'Too often, disabled people feel trapped—worried that if they try to work, they could lose the support they depend on,' she said. She added: 'That is why we are taking action to remove those barriers, support disabled people to live with dignity and independence, and open routes into employment for those who want to pursue it.' As well as publishing the terms of reference for the Timms review on Monday, the government will also publish legislation offering benefit claimants a 'right to try' work. In a bid to encourage claimants into work, it will allow them to try jobs without the fear of losing their payments if it does not work out. It comes after The Independent reported warnings that thousands of disabled women could find themselves trapped with abusers as a result of the government's upcoming welfare cuts. Domestic violence charity Refuge and the Women's Budget Group (WBG) have issued a stark warning over the reforms, saying that in the long term, the cuts to vital funding for daily living costs for disabled people – which will impact all new claimants – will make it difficult for those at risk to flee abusive relationships. Even with the concessions, the welfare cuts will be 'devastating for disabled women', WBG said, noting that disabled women are twice as likely to be victims of domestic abuse. For many, PIP is the only income they receive, WBG warned, so not having access to this source of individual support elevates the risk of coercive control and makes it harder to escape abusive situations.