logo
One year of Labour: City's patience fades as bond market signals damning verdict

One year of Labour: City's patience fades as bond market signals damning verdict

Daily Mail​2 days ago
Labour swept to power exactly a year ago armed with a sizeable majority and pledge to revive an increasingly frail British economy.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Chancellor Rachel Reeves and cabinet colleagues immediately launched a City charm offensive in the wake of their July 2024 victory, hoping to persuade businesses and investors to back Labour's economic strategy.
But while many appeared cautiously optimistic after several years of uncertainty under multiple Tory leaders, patience is rapidly wearing thin.
Economic growth remains tepid, business and consumer confidence are increasingly weak, and UK inflation expectations continue to surpass those of global peers.
The watering down of welfare reform and the winter fuel allowance U-turn, while welcomed by activists, has eroded the policy certainty associated with a large parliamentary majority and damaged hopes Labour can get a grip of an increasingly fragile fiscal position.
And while Reeves appears to have the Prime Minister's confidence for now, the market response to this week's dramatic PMQs demonstrates market anxiety over Britain's ability to get its house in order.
Higher employer national insurance contributions and a living wage hike since April have only exacerbated the dilemma, with higher labour costs simultaneously weighing on economic output while ramping-up broader inflation.
The result has been to see double-digit increases in longer-term gilt yields – the interest on government debt – with 10- and 30-year yields up 36 and 67 basis points, respectively, over the last year.
There is also now a huge gap between the yield on UK government bonds compared to global peers.
Market veteran Michael Browne, currently an investment strategist at Franklin Templeton, told This is Money: 'The markets are telling you that there is a persistent inflation concern in the UK, which is approximately two-to-three times that of Germany.
'It's telling you there is a lack of confidence in the bond market at the moment about our inflationary position.'
Playing a tough hand
While Labour's complaints of a 'fiscal blackhole' left by the Tories appear to have been met with limited sympathy among media and voters, market participants are aware the UK's economic woes are not a new phenomenon.
'[Labour inherited] a debt-to-GDP ratio of 95 per cent, rising interest rate costs occurring in a period where growth rates were extremely poor and were likely to remain pretty poor,' said Browne.
'Inflation was also running at 3.5 to 4 per cent, so the Bank of England were never going to cut rates very much to help you out.'
He notes Labour have yet to 'disrupt markets' since coming to power, 'especially relative to some of their recent predecessors'.
Browne also praised 'really sensible' efforts to separate day-to-day spending from capital expenditure, and adjustments to the Government's fiscal rules to allow for headroom earmarked for capital projects spending.
Similarly, chief economist at Panmure Liberum Simon French said governing an advanced economy 'with an ageing population, underinvested infrastructure, fiscal liabilities designed under more favourable cost of capital conditions… and almost 20 years of sluggish productivity growth is not an easy task'.
'Overlay this with a generational shift in defence spending and threats of unprecedented international trade disruption and that task begins to look insurmountable,' he added.
French also noted UK GDP is still 'closely tracking' the G7 median since the election, up 0.8 per cent on a compound basis over the three quarters of available data, despite an economic slowdown being a common symptom of a 'change election'.
He said: 'A slowdown in activity as the private sector responds to a new regulatory and taxation counterparty, and as the public sector reprofile their activity to new ministerial priorities, is the experience of previous UK change elections in 1979, 1997 and 2010.'
The deterioration of the geopolitical environment, as well as the imposition of damaging trade tariffs, have not helped.
However, French scores Labour's economic track record as 'a modest six-out-of-10 – clear room for improvement'.
'That score acknowledges the context of a challenging domestic and international backdrop, soft economic trends that were entrenched pre-election, but also some own goals,' he said.
Labour's job tax hikes weigh
The Consumer Price Index was at 3.4 per cent for the 12 months to May, according to the most recent Office for National Statistics data.
Though this was down from 3.5 per cent the previous month, CPI is not expected to fall back to the BoE's 2 per cent target for some time.
Economists point to above inflation increases to public sector pay, as well as the living wage and NI hikes, as driving a decoupling of UK CPI from peers in the G7 and ending a trend of parity that had persisted in the run-up to last year's election.
At the same time, higher labour costs have already started to hit the jobs market with unemployment inching higher from historic lows and the vacancy rate shrinking.
Chief economist at the Institute of Directors Anna Leach said Labour's tax increases on business 'have already undermined' its industrial strategy's ambition 'to make the UK the best country to invest anywhere in the world'.
She added: 'The reality is that the government has been much more radical in taxing business than it has been in removing blockers to growth.
'We need to see faster progress and greater ambition on de-regulation – particularly planning reform – and a reconsideration of the tax landscape for business if we're to change the UK's economic fortunes.'
Economic momentum also faces battered consumer confidence, which has seen Britons prefer to crowd cash into savings rather than spend.
The Office for Budget Responsibility slashed its full-year forecasts for GDP growth from 2 to 1 per cent for 2025 in March, with the economy expected to expand by around 1.5 per cent over the next five years.
But the BoE is reticent to come to the Government's rescue to avert further economic deterioration with bumper interest rate cuts. The central bank has consistently signalled a slow-and-steady approach to keep inflation under control.
The BoE is still expected to cut rates twice more this year, taking base rate from 4.25 to 3.75 per cent. While the US Federal Reserve is also cutting slowly, the European Central Bank has already reduced its key policy rate to 2 per cent.
Franklin Templeton's Browne said: 'If you have an imbalance - if monetary policy and fiscal policy are out of sync - then that's going to remain the case for a long time.'
Bond market demands: Cuts or tax hikes?
A slow-and-steady approach to interest rate cuts amid higher inflation is likely to keep long-term government borrowing rates at already painful levels, even as the UK issues even more gilts.
'Gilt market spreads signal concern over a deterioration in both the current budget balance and total government borrowing aggregates,' said Panmure Liberum's French.
The passage of the Government's welfare reforms was intended to save as much as £5billion, but their dilution still leaves the Chancellor facing a multi-billion pound hole to fill if she is to maintain her fiscal rules.
Reeves had hoped that improved economic growth would free her of the need for further painful spending cuts, or for her to break the Government's pledge not to hike taxes on individuals.
In absence of any material growth, however, tough choices loom this autumn.
Browne said: 'Her options are now [are]; one, tax more, no doubt focused on companies and wealth. Two, not care by pretending it's not a problem and lose all credibility, [or] three, find cuts elsewhere.
'Option one pushes the economy towards the doom loop of tax and spend. Option two scares the bond market as did Truss during her 44 day Premiership, [and] option three we know won't happen.
Darius McDermott, managing director at Chelsea Financial Services, added: 'While Reeves' policies may be flawed, the real concern for investors is that a potential replacement could push the party further to the left at a time when markets are desperate for signs of credible fiscal leadership.
'Without a clear pivot towards tough decisions, the risk is this discomfort could spiral into a broader crisis of confidence in UK debt.'
The large gap between yields on longer-term UK government debt compared to G7 peers demonstrates bond investors' inflation concerns
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

German minister wants more firms eligible for electricity relief, FT says
German minister wants more firms eligible for electricity relief, FT says

Reuters

time34 minutes ago

  • Reuters

German minister wants more firms eligible for electricity relief, FT says

BERLIN, July 6 (Reuters) - German Economy Minister Katherina Reiche wants to make planned measures aimed at lowering companies' electricity costs more widely available than previously suggested, the Financial Times reported on Sunday, citing people with knowledge of the plan. Earlier this year, Germany's ruling coalition of conservatives and Social Democrats agreed to cut electricity tax to the European minimum for all consumers. But the Finance Ministry's framework budget for 2026 introduced last month limited the planned relief to industry, agriculture and forestry, excluding many companies and consumers, citing financial difficulties. Reiche said last month Germany would present a concrete concept for an industrial electricity price before the summer break and aimed to implement it by the end of the year. The FT said Reiche wants to expand the number of companies eligible for what it called electricity price subsidies to 2,200 from 350. The paper added that the people it cited estimated the cost at 4 billion euros ($4.7 billion) and the measure would fund up to half of firms' electricity costs over three years. Asked for comment by Reuters, the Economy Ministry said in a statement that under newly announced European Union rules up to around 2,200 "energy- and trade-intensive" companies could receive aid to cover up to half their power costs. "The (German) concept is currently being worked on," it added, declining to elaborate. The FT quoted the ministry as saying its scheme would aim to deliver "swift and reliable" aid to the chemical, glass and plastics industries, which have "a far-reaching impact on other sectors through the value chains". ($1 = 0.8490 euros)

Police chiefs call for cuts to number of forces in England and Wales
Police chiefs call for cuts to number of forces in England and Wales

The Guardian

time37 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Police chiefs call for cuts to number of forces in England and Wales

Police chiefs in England and Wales have told ministers that the number of forces should be cut to end 'the postcode lottery for victims of crime', the Guardian has learned. They believe a reduction from the current 43 forces would save money, cut overheads and boost crime-fighting efforts. Law enforcement leaders told the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, last month at a roundtable on police reform that they were in agreement about the need for the change. Cooper has already backed other police reforms, such as setting up a national centre for policing, and believes the way policing across England and Wales is organised is out of date. But a lack of money threatens to delay changes and some smaller forces may oppose the changes. One source said any changes could start with smaller forces merging or being abolished. In the west, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire could merge. In the Midlands, Warwickshire could join with the West Mercia force or be absorbed by the much bigger West Midlands force. In the east, the Norfolk and Suffolk forces could merge. The West Yorkshire, North Yorkshire and the South Yorkshire forces could also merge. Gavin Stephens, the chair of the National Police Chiefs' Council, told the Guardian: 'Police reform is about restructuring policing so that it can keep up with modern criminality, retaining the bedrock of community policing whilst modernising our workforce to deal with national threats such as organised crime and violence against women and girls. 'Our current model of 43 different police forces in England and Wales has a wide range of geographical size, workforce size and operational capabilities. There is also real variation in financial resilience and the ability to invest, which means policing operates in subtly different ways with often incompatible technology, which leads to inefficiencies and inconsistency. 'A smaller number of police forces, supported by a national policing organisation, would enable us to make decisions far quicker and maximise funding to invest in technology and our workforce. Making improvements to our service once and for all, instead of in 43 different ways, would help to end the postcode lottery victims face when reporting crime.' One senior source said: 'Everyone is in agreement we need fewer forces. It would create efficiencies and greater effectiveness.' Another source with knowledge of discussions said: 'Chiefs of smaller forces are nervous but accept this is where the tide is going. We hope for a phased reduction over the next decade.' No changes are expected to happen in this parliament, and any change of government after the next election could lead to the agreement to abolish police forces being scuppered. Politically, it was believed a reduction in the number of forces would have to happen under Labour. MPs representing Conservative areas, which tend to be less urban, feared police would move from more rural areas to areas where crime tended to be higher. One chief constable said that if their force absorbed a smaller force, people in more rural areas could be offered a guarantee about how many officers would be ringfenced to protect them. As yet, no detailed plans have been drawn up or presented to the government, but Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan police commissioner, said he favoured a reduction to as few as 12 forces. It is understood that this is the number of forces senior police chiefs think should ultimately cover England and Wales. In a piece for the Sunday Times, Rowley said: 'The 43-force model was designed in the 1960s and hasn't been fit for purpose for at least two decades. It hinders the effective confrontation of today's threats and stops us fully reaping the benefits of technology. 'We need to reduce the number of forces by two-thirds, with the new, bigger and fully capable regional forces supported by the best of modern technology and making better use of the limited funding available.' In Scotland, forces have already merged into one organisation covering the entire country, which is the second largest in the UK behind the Met. Northern Ireland is also covered by a single force.

Justice has no age limit warns Met commissioner after Palestine Action protester, 83, is arrested
Justice has no age limit warns Met commissioner after Palestine Action protester, 83, is arrested

Daily Mail​

time38 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Justice has no age limit warns Met commissioner after Palestine Action protester, 83, is arrested

The head of the Metropolitan Police has said the law 'does not have an age limit' after an 83-year-old reverend was arrested for supporting Palestine Action, which has been banned as a terror group. The Met Police said officers were responding to the demonstration in Parliament Square, London, and later added that 29 people were arrested. The protest started at about 1.10pm and officers were seen taking people away shortly after 1.30pm. Reverend Sue Parfitt, 83, who was sat in a camp chair with placards at her feet, appeared to have been taken away by officers. A woman seen lying on the ground in handcuffs was lifted by officers and put in a police van. Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley was asked on the BBC 's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg whether it was a good use of police time after the priest was pictured being taken away from the demonstration. He said: 'The law doesn't have an age limit, whether you're 18 or 80. 'If you're supporting proscribed organisations, then the law is going to be enforced. 'Officers, you could see, did it with great care and tried to preserve that person's dignity, but they're breaking a serious law. 'Palestine Action have over the last 18 months, I have to be careful what I say, because there's cases coming to trial, but some really serious criminal offences that they're accused of. There are millions of pounds worth of damage on multiple occasions. There are assaults, there are weapons used. 'It is not about protest. This is about an organisation committing serious criminality and obviously the Home Secretary was persuaded by the papers on her desk to proscribe them, that law has come into force, and if people want to defy that law, then we have to enforce it.' Palestine Action lost a late-night Court of Appeal challenge on Friday which sought to stop the protest group being banned, less than two hours before the new legislation came into force at midnight. Around two dozen people, including a professor and an emergency care worker who recently returned from Gaza, sat in front of the Gandhi statue in Parliament Square on Saturday expressing support for the group, which is now a proscribed terrorist organisation. They held signs saying: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' Shortly after their arrival, police officers could be seen engaging with the protesters and the Met said it had began making arrests. Several people were seen being carried away by officers. A spokesperson for the force said: 'The group is now proscribed and expressing support for them is a criminal offence. Arrests are being made.' Campaign group Defend Our Juries said today's protest will be the first in a series of actions which will see activists take to Parliament Square every week. Around 20 people, including a priest, professor and an emergency care worker who is just back from Gaza, sat in front of the Gandhi statue in Parliament Square on Saturday expressing support for the group It comes after the Home Office today welcomed the ban on Palestine Action, with the group failing to block its proscription as a terrorist organisation in a late-night legal bid. Lawyers representing co-founder Huda Ammori, whose father is Palestinian, asked for the decision to be delayed at least until July 21. The designation as a terror group means that membership of or support for Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Palestine Action argues it is a protest group that has never incited or encouraged violence, but does support civil disobedience. Activists protest against the continuing war in Gaza, which has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians since October 7 - when 1,200 Israelis were killed by a Hamas incursion into the country. One of those protesting today is former government lawyer Tim Crosland. He said: 'There are already 18 Palestine Actionists held in UK prisons without a trial, following lobbying by the Israeli government and Elbit Systems, the leading supplier of the machinery of genocide. 'If we cannot speak freely about the genocide of Palestinians, if we cannot condemn those who enable it and praise those who resist it, then the right to freedom of expression has no meaning, and democracy in this country is dead.' The Met Police issued a warning ahead of the protest, stating there are a number of events taking place in London this weekend and 'anyone attending should be aware that officers policing these will act where criminal offences, including those related to support of proscribed groups or organisations, are committed'. Proscription makes it a criminal offence under the Terrorism Act 2000 (TACT) to invite or express support for an organisation through chanting, wearing clothing or displaying articles such as flags, signs or logos, the Met said. It is also illegal to belong to the organisation or publish similar signs of support online. Police arresting protesters in Parliament Square were met with cries of 'Met Police you are puppets of the Zionist state' and 'leave them alone'. Another supporter, not directly involved in the Palestine Action protest, shouted: 'Who do you protect? Who do you serve?' There were also chants of 'From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free'. A woman seen lying on the floor in handcuffs was carried away in the air by officers and put in a police van. While suspended and flanked by a large group of police, she said calmly: 'Free Palestine, stop the genocide, I oppose genocide, I support the rights of the Palestinian people, I support freedom of speech, I support freedom of assembly'. A mass of people crowded around to film the scene. Officers placed her in the vehicle parked on the road behind the square before returning to the Mahatma Ghandi statue, where almost no protesters remained. Chants of 'shame' broke out, directed at the police, and officers moved behind the Ghandi statue. Most of the police dispersed at around 2.10pm. One of those seen at today's protest is 83-year-old Reverend Sue Parfitt, who has previously been arrested for action she took to call for urgent change to tackle the climate crisis. The group's social media pages were removed overnight on Friday, with leaders stating this was due to the risk of people being prosecuted for liking or sharing posts online She was previously arrested for allegedly attempting to damage the Magna Carta with Just Stop Oil, and for protest action with Insulate Britain. Leslie Tate, 76, a Green councillor from Hertfordshire at the protest, said: 'Palestine Action are not a violent organisation, and the proscription is wrong. 'You do know, of course, that they were proscribed by Parliament with two other groups involved - all three at once - so that was a trick to make sure the Bill went through. 'The evidence from their actions that they've taken from the start of Palestine Action is that they all have been non-violent. 'This protest is necessary to defend our democracy, and this is the creeping edge of totalitarianism, frankly. 'We thought they (the police) would probably take pictures of people. It's the obvious thing to do, to photograph them, then they have their identity, rather than make arrests.' Paddy Friend, a 25-year-old law student from London who was watching the protest said: 'In 2025, we no longer have freedom of speech. We can no longer go down to Parliament Square and hold a sign. 'I'm here because I'm terrified. I'm absolutely terrified about this country and I hope to be as brave as these people (protesting), I really do because we cannot let this happen. 'If now isn't the time for hundreds and thousands of us to come together and stand against this, then when's it going to be? 'All arms exports (to Israel) need to stop. We need to stop providing military assistance, we need to cut off all diplomatic ties with Israel.' It came after Palestine Action lost a late-night Court of Appeal challenge on Friday evening, which sought to stop it being banned, less than two hours before the move came into force at midnight. Large crowds gathered outside the Court of Appeal yesterday in support of Palestinians. The group's social media pages were removed overnight on Friday, with leaders stating this was due to the risk of people being prosecuted for liking or sharing posts online. A Home Office spokesperson said on Saturday: 'We welcome the Court's decision and Palestine Action are now a proscribed group. 'The Government will always take the strongest possible action to protect our national security and our priority remains maintaining the safety and security of our citizens.' The move to ban the organisation was announced after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident claimed by Palestine Action, which police said caused around £7 million of damage. In a letter to the Home Secretary, protesters said: 'We do not wish to go to prison or to be branded with a terrorism conviction. But we refuse to be cowed into silence by your order.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes was 'disgraceful' and that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'. MPs in the Commons voted 385 to 26, majority 359, in favour of proscribing the group on Wednesday, before the House of Lords backed the move without a vote on Thursday. Four people - Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 - have all been charged in connection with the incident at Brize Norton. They appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Thursday after being charged with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage, under the Criminal Law Act 1977.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store