Brussels march urges EU to act over Budapest Pride ban threat
The march followed a law passed in Hungary in March that bans LGBT Pride events and allows facial recognition to identify organisers, a move widely condemned by rights groups and EU officials as an attack on civil liberties.
"We have come to sound the alarm," Viktoria Radvanyi, the chair of Budapest Pride, said while standing on a platform at the event.
"What is really alarming is that we have not seen the (European) Commission take any legal action in two months," said Radvanyi, who wore a rainbow-coloured necklace.
Although she met some Commission representatives on Friday, she accused the EU executive of being "complicit" with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban through its inaction
AFP | Nicolas TUCAT
"Do your job," she said, waving a Hungarian flag -- a slogan immediately taken up by the crowd, who held signs reading "Protect your children from Orban".
"I think it's really important that we keep turning out for every pride as long as there are people in the world facing discrimination," said Migiel Moens, 39, who was in the crowd with European flag sticking out of his pink shorts.
Roland Papp, a 35-year-old journalist who attended Budapest Pride for years, described a "horrible time".
"People tend to think that once you have your rights, they're not going to be taken away. That's not true," he said.
"Budapest pride had been going on for 30 years and now it's really going back to the horrible times," he said, vowing to be in the Hungarian capital on June 28 for the event.
AFP | Nicolas TUCAT
Budapest mayor Gergely Karacsony, welcomed on stage by two drag queens, vowed that the parade would go ahead.
"Budapest Pride cannot be banned, for the simple reason that love and freedom cannot be banned," said Karacsony, inviting supporters from across Europe to join what organisers hope will be the "biggest, most colourful and most international" pride event ever seen.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
44 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Ukraine is becoming the wedge driving US and Europe apart
Europe's sabotage of US peace efforts might force the White House to shift the entire burden of aid to Ukraine onto Europe alone. The irony of geopolitics is that friends can become overnight enemies and enemies can become friends – it's all about power dynamics. That's exactly what is emerging among Western allies, whose common enemy all along has been Russia, until Donald Trump came around and spoiled the party. It was bound to happen that Trump's determination to end the war between Ukraine and Russia would cause tension among the Western nations. War is used by unscrupulous politicians to stay in power, manipulating public perceptions to create an impression that a particular leader is a patriot who loves their country by standing up against the enemy, no matter the cost to human life, even genocide. Ukraine has increasingly emerged as a critical fault line in relations between the United States and European nations. Tension has been exacerbated by Kyiv, which, amid Trump's withdrawal of unconditional support, has been pressing the European Union for military and financial guarantees, which has become Volodymyr Zelensky's favourite topic when visiting Europe. With this pressure, Zelensky cast European leaders as adversaries to their American counterparts. ALSO READ: Zelensky signs decree for Ukraine's withdrawal from anti-landmine treaty Some observers have described Ukraine as the 'gravedigger' of transatlantic unity, pushing Nato to the brink of collapse. This idea was confirmed by Politico, which emphasised the possibility of Nato's eventual breakup. It pointed to a growing convergence between US and Russian positions on a range of global issues, despite persistent anti-Russian sentiment among European elites. Former EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell described the current trajectory as an 'uncoordinated divorce' between the US and Europe. Amid this tension, Ukraine has signed bilateral security and mutual defence agreements with 28 countries across the collective West over the past year. This is in addition to the $50 billion in financial support pledged by the G7 nations to Ukraine last December, drawn from the proceeds of frozen Russian assets. The proposal to deploy Western peacekeeping forces to Ukrainian territory remains little more than rhetorical flourish by European politicians seeking to bolster their domestic standing. ALSO READ: Trump reassures allies as NATO agrees 'historic' spending hike That's what one means by war and power – the innocent must die because politicians need to stay in power, be it in Europe or Israel. The West appears far from reaching consensus on direct involvement. Trump's firm stance against sending American troops, coupled with Europe's limited military capacity, have effectively ruled out the deployment of even a modest peacekeeping contingent. In a recent piece, UnHerd, a publication that claims to be neither going with the crowd nor pushing an agenda, echoed this scepticism. The publication argues that while Europe may technically have the capacity to support Ukraine for 'as long as it takes,' the political and strategic appetite to do so appears increasingly fragile. It has become clear that under Trump, the Western alliance will never be stable. Trump may prefer to abandon US sponsorship of Kyiv in exchange for providing Russia with guarantees of American noninterference in the Ukrainian conflict. In the end, Europe's sabotage of US peace efforts might force the White House to shift the entire burden of aid to Ukraine onto Europe alone – leaving them it to deal with this overwhelming problem without US involvement. NOW READ: Europe's appetite for war: Why peace in Ukraine remains elusive
eNCA
3 hours ago
- eNCA
Trump tax bill stalled by Republican rebellion in Congress
US - Republican leaders in the US Congress delayed a key vote for hours on Donald Trump's signature tax and spending bill Wednesday as they scrambled to win over a group of rebels threatening to torpedo the centerpiece of the president's domestic agenda. Trump is seeking final approval in the House of Representatives for his Senate-passed "One Big Beautiful Bill" - but faces opposition on all sides of his fractious party over provisions set to balloon the national debt while launching a historic assault on the social safety net. House Speaker Mike Johnson told lawmakers to return to their offices, holding open a series of afternoon procedural votes required before final approval for more than three hours after it was first called - with no sign of the stalemate breaking. Meanwhile his lieutenants huddled in tense meetings with holdouts behind the scenes. "We're going to get there tonight. We're working on it and very, very positive about our progress," Johnson told reporters at the Capitol, according to Politico. Originally approved by the House in May, the bill squeezed through the Senate on Tuesday by a solitary vote but had to return to the lower chamber Wednesday for a rubber stamp of the Senate's revisions. AFP | Drew ANGERER "This bill is President Trump's agenda, and we are making it law," Johnson said in a determined statement, projecting confidence that Republicans were "ready to finish the job." The package honors many of Trump's campaign promises, boosting military spending, funding a mass migrant deportation drive and committing $4.5 trillion to extend his first-term tax relief. But it is expected to pile an extra $3.4 trillion over a decade onto the country's fast-growing deficits, while forcing through the largest cuts to the Medicaid health insurance program since its 1960s launch. Fiscal hawks in the House, meanwhile, are chafing over spending cuts that they say fall short of what they were promised by hundreds of billions of dollars. Johnson has to negotiate incredibly tight margins, and can likely only lose three lawmakers among more than two dozen who have declared themselves open to rejecting the bill. - 'Abomination' - AFP | Jim WATSON Lawmakers were hoping to return from recess early Wednesday to begin voting straight away, although they have a cushion of two days before Trump's self-imposed July 4 deadline. The 887-page text only passed in the Senate after a flurry of tweaks that pulled the House-passed text further to the right. Republicans lost one conservative who was angry about adding to the country's $37 trillion debt burden and two moderates worried about almost $1 trillion in health care cuts. Some estimates put the total number of recipients set to lose their health insurance at 17 million, while scores of rural hospitals are expected to close. Meanwhile changes to federal nutrition assistance are set to strip millions of the poorest Americans of their access to the program. Johnson will be banking on Trump leaning on waverers, as he has in the past to turn around contentious House votes that were headed for failure. The president has spent weeks cajoling Republicans torn between angering welfare recipients at home and incurring his wrath. Trump pressured House Republicans to get the bill over the line in a private White House meeting with several holdouts on Wednesday. "Our Country will make a fortune this year, more than any of our competitors, but only if the Big, Beautiful Bill is PASSED!" he said in a Truth Social post. House Democrats have signaled that they plan to campaign on the bill to flip the chamber in the 2026 midterm elections, pointing to analyses showing that it represents a historic redistribution of wealth from the poorest Americans to the richest. "Shame on Senate Republicans for passing this disgusting abomination," House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters. By Frankie Taggart
The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
Politicians dangle immigration control as election bait
As elections near, political parties revive anti-illegal immigration rhetoric to lure frustrated voters while long-standing issues remain unresolved. A disgruntled South African job seeker belonging to Alexandra Dudula Movement holds a banner reading Foreigners Must Go Home during their operation to remove foreign street vendors on pavements and stalls in Alexandra township in Johannesburg on February 13, 2022. (Photo by Phill Magakoe / AFP) With the mushrooming of political parties ahead of next year's local government elections, it is becoming obvious that the campaign ticket is 'abahambe' – undocumented foreigners must go. Operation Dudula started its movement and gained popularity as a result of this. The Patriotic Alliance members at some point stood at a porous river blocking illegal crossing of foreigners, coining the abahambe slogan. Since then, we have seen a zoning in on the effects of the lack of immigration control that has plagued South Africa. Houses have been hijacked, services and utilities driven into hundreds of thousands in arrears. Spaza shops on every corner and run from RDP houses meant for the poor. Then, the expired food fiasco and food manufactured on site, the shops doubling up as living and sleep areas. ALSO READ: Gauteng Traffic Police and Home Affairs immigration officers arrested for kidnapping and theft All of a sudden, our political parties see it fit that it is time to regulate the industry. This is despite the fact that home affairs officials are arrested more frequently over corruption. Our cities are in disarray. South Africans who speak out on immigration control, or its lack thereof, are labelled as xenophobic. If the stories are true that government clinics are serving more foreigners than South Africans, then somewhere, something is fundamentally wrong. This is not a call to refuse medical assistance to those in need, but rather a question as to where are South Africans going for assistance because, as said by one woman on social media: 'We have been pushed out of hospitals and forced to go to private practitioners.' Who, then, are government clinics meant for? ALSO READ: Two immigration specialists arrested in Beitbridge corruption probe Let it be understood, compliance is regulation and not xenophobia. The government often talks of good neighbourly relations, a welcoming home for all Africans… but the same government now refuses to take any more strain from illegal immigrants. Even though the economy is in under strain, the timing of the government's admission is nothing short of dubious. It was first brought to our attention in 2008. The nerve for us to feign shock and horror when illegal foreigners took the government to court, forcing its hand to allow their stay and the enjoyment of civic provision. What the politicians use as an electioneering tool, which is close to the hearts of every citizen, becomes the carrot dangled for votes at election time.
