Handful of MPs condemn Palestine Action ban as vast majority back proscription
MPs voted 385 to 26 in favour of the ban, which will make it a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison to be a member of or show support for Palestine Action.
The House of Lords is set to vote on the motion on Thursday. If passed, it will come into force at midnight on 9 July, pending a legal challenge by the group requesting 'interim relief' to stay the order.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's order proposed two other organisations for proscription along with Palestine Action, neo-Nazi groups the Maniacs Murder Cult (MMC) and the Russian Imperial Movement (RIM).
MPs had to vote to proscribe all three, or none at all, a move which several MPs suggested was intended to pressure parliamentarians to back the measure and that Palestine Action dubbed a 'Trumpian tactic'.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
'We don't know - and we will never know - if MPs approve the Home Secretary's authoritarian ban on Palestine Action because she refused MPs' request to allow them to vote specifically on this,' the group said in a statement.
During the debate, independent MP Zarah Sultana said the move 'lumps a non-violent network of students, nurses, teachers, firefighters and peace campaigners - ordinary people, my constituents and yours - with neo-Nazi militias and mass-casualty cults'.
'To equate a spray can of paint with a suicide bomb isn't just absurd, it is grotesque,' she added.
'This will go down as a dark day in our country's history. People will ask which side were you on and I stand with the millions of people who oppose genocide… I say this loudly and proudly… we are all Palestine Action'.
'To equate a spray can of paint with a suicide bomb isn't just absurd, it is grotesque'
- MP Zarah Sultana
Green Party leader Carla Denyer said she was 'absolutely furious' about 'the cynical lumping together of these three organisations into a single vote'.
'Us MPs who wanted to proscribe the MMC and RIM were prevented from doing so because we could not vote to erode democracy and the freedom of speech,' Denyer said in a video shared on X.
Labour MP Nadia Whittome highlighted the irony of the fact that the vote coincided with the 97th anniversary of women gaining the right to vote - which was won due to direct action tactics deployed by the suffragette movement.
'The suffragettes carried out direct action far more extreme than anything those in Palestine Action have done. Yet today, their role in changing history for the better is commemorated'.
'The last opportunity'
The ban flies in the face of mounting concerns raised by NGOs, lawyers and UN experts.
Despite Home Office minister Dan Jarvis arguing that Palestine Action's proscription 'will not impinge on people's right to protest', several UN special rapporteurs warned the decision could have a 'chilling effect' on protest and advocacy in relation to Palestine.
Simon Pook, a lawyer representing several Palestine Action activists, described the ban as 'a serious and significant erosion of our civil rights to undertake peaceful direct action'.
'It appears that lowering the bar of terrorism to direct action protest groups may have the effect of bringing Britain ever closer to an authoritarian police state,' Pook told Middle East Eye.
Laura O'Brien, head of the protest team at Hodge Jones & Allen Solicitors, told MEE that the proscription 'marks a dark chapter for fundamental rights in the UK'.
'Where damage or violence is used, the existing criminal law provides all the powers the Government needs to investigate, prosecute and punish. Proscription is political overreach designed to intimidate those who support direct action,' she said.
Hundreds gathered outside Westminster to protest the ban on Wednesday evening, with four people arrested, including 'a man who blocked the gates of Downing Street with his mobility scooter', according to the Metropolitan Police.
'Like a kidnapping': How UK police are hunting pro-Palestine activists Read More »
Palestine Action said that protesters were instructed to assemble further away from Whitehall due to Public Order Act restrictions imposed by the police.
In a post on X, Palestine Action called for a protest outside the Royal Courts of Justice on Friday, where an urgent hearing is set to be held to decide whether the order can be suspended, pending further proceedings to decide whether a legal challenge can be brought.
The group described this as 'the last opportunity to stop the proscription'.
Meanwhile, four Palestine Action activists have been charged after breaking into an RAF base and spray painting two planes last month.
In a statement, the police said the activists had been charged with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place for a purpose 'prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom', and conspiracy to commit criminal damage.
According to the statement, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) will argue in court that the offences have a 'terrorist connection'.
The CPS stated they would do the same for the Filton 18, activists who were arrested on terrorism charges following an action in August 2024.
A direct action group with the name 'Yvette Cooper,' which has the same branding as Palestine Action, emerged amid the impending ban.
The newly formed group posted footage purportedly of activists spray painting trucks belonging to Time Logistics, a company which it said transports weapons for 'Israel's biggest weapons firm'.
'If you want to ban Palestine Action, you'll have to proscribe Yvette Cooper too,' the post read.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
The rise of paramilitary settler groups in Israel's West Bank strategy
Last week, just days after Israeli forces killed three men while intervening to protect settlers violently storming the Palestinian village of Kafr Malik in the occupied West Bank, an unusual wave of condemnation swept through Israeli politics and media. But the outrage was not directed at the killing of Palestinians. It came only after settlers turned on Israeli soldiers. On Friday night, settlers, commonly referred to in Israel as the 'Hilltop Youth', attacked soldiers stationed at an outpost near Kafr Malik, northeast of Ramallah. The following day, the same group stormed a nearby military base. For a military long accustomed to escorting settlers during raids on Palestinian communities, the aggression from their usual allies was both unexpected and unsettling. The term 'Hilltop Youth' may no longer accurately describe this group. Their structure, tactics, and growing confidence suggest they now function more as a paramilitary organisation than as an informal collection of radicalised young settlers. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defence Minister Israel Katz, and politicians from across Israel's political spectrum, including members of both the coalition and the opposition, swiftly condemned the attacks on soldiers. Yet the violent activities of these settler groups against Palestinians have continued for years with little political or legal consequence. State-sanctioned violence The rise of settler militias is not a new phenomenon. During the May 2021 clashes between Jews and Palestinians, coordinated settler militias carried out simultaneous assaults on Palestinian villages across the West Bank. These militias do not operate spontaneously but rather operate within the framework of an organization that includes several hundred-armed men. Israeli army detains Palestinian family members after settlers attack village Read More » What has changed is the apparent formalisation of their operations under the current Israeli government. Since Bezalel Smotrich, who also serves as Israel's finance minister, assumed control of the Civil Administration in the West Bank, these militias appear to be operating in closer alignment with a broader strategic objective: expanding Israeli control over Area C, which makes up about 60 per cent of the West Bank, effectively obstructing the possibility of establishing a future Palestinian state. A central feature of this strategy is the proliferation of so-called 'shepherds' farms', a settlement model that allows settlers to seize large tracts of land without formal government approval and with little, if any, military resistance. These farms typically begin with just a few settlers, sometimes as few as two or three, but they quickly spread across wide areas. Through these outposts, small groups of settlers, often linked to the Hilltop Youth, manage to assert control over vast stretches of land. The settlers who run these farms routinely intimidate and forcibly expel Palestinian herders and residents, creating de facto zones of exclusion without official annexation. For Palestinians living in the West Bank, the violence and dispossession inflicted by these militias are neither new nor isolated. But the recent attacks on Israeli soldiers have briefly drawn attention to these groups, exposing a reality Palestinians have long endured: that parts of the settler movement are evolving into organised, militarised forces pursuing a territorial agenda with increasing impunity. Post-Smotrich strategy Under Smotrich's leadership, many of these farms are now being legalised. At the same time, attacks (seemingly deliberate and coordinated) are increasing against Palestinian shepherds and Bedouin communities east of the Alon Road, particularly in the Jordan Valley. The purpose of these attacks appears to be clear: to drive Palestinians from the area. Recently, the settler militias have begun pushing westward from the Alon Road, moving closer to the Nablus and Ramallah regions. It remains uncertain whether the militias are receiving direct orders from Smotrich himself, but their objectives are evidently aligned. Both are working towards a shared goal: to consolidate Israeli control over Area C and to clear it of its Palestinian inhabitants. Smotrich's apparent aim is to ensure that these annexed areas are as devoid of Palestinians as possible, reducing the number who would have any claim to citizenship An example of this tacit cooperation emerged in the aftermath of last Friday's events. Smotrich declared that shooting at Jews constituted 'a red line' that must not be crossed, stating unequivocally that it was forbidden to shoot at Jews. Settlers had initially claimed that a 14-year-old boy had been shot by Israeli soldiers, though it later emerged that the boy had been injured while throwing stones at soldiers in an entirely different location. Nevertheless, Smotrich chose to side with the Hilltop Youth's version of events. The attack on the military base the following day forced the finance minister to publicly condemn the settlers' actions, but the shared strategic interests between the two sides remain intact. The increased pace of attacks against Palestinians in recent times may stem from the Israeli finance minister's concern that the government will collapse or that he will not be a member of the next government. In most polls, Smotrich's Religious Zionist Party does not pass the electoral threshold. UK and allies sanction Israeli ministers Ben Gvir and Smotrich over Gaza comments Read More » Smotrich is one of the most sophisticated and sharp politicians in Israel and has a developed historical consciousness. The aggressive expansion by armed settler militias across the West Bank is not simply a series of isolated attacks; it is part of Smotrich's broader effort to establish irreversible 'facts on the ground' in the event of a change in government. He may well be correct in his calculation. It is highly unlikely that any future Israeli government will move to dismantle shepherds' farms or outposts in the West Bank, and even less likely that it would act to restore displaced Palestinians to the lands from which they were expelled. Smotrich may also have in mind the contours of the Trump administration's Middle East plan, which he has publicly criticised. According to that plan, much of Area C would be annexed to Israel, while a fragmented Palestinian state would exist as disconnected enclaves throughout the West Bank. Smotrich's apparent aim is to ensure that these annexed areas are as devoid of Palestinians as possible, reducing the number of Palestinians who would have any claim to citizenship or full rights within the Israeli state. The ongoing war in Gaza is also shaping the thinking of settler militias, as well as bolstering Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. The war has created a permissive environment that seems to embolden these actors to accelerate their agenda in the West Bank. Settler fantasy Settlers have long harboured the ambition of emptying the West Bank of its Palestinian population. For years, this aspiration was broadly understood, even among settlers themselves, as an unattainable fantasy. However, the near-total destruction of Gaza and the growing perception that the ethnic cleansing of the Gaza Strip has, at least semi-explicitly, become one of the war aims of Prime Minister Netanyahu, have emboldened settler groups to believe that such a scenario might also be possible in the West Bank. Israeli forces kill three Palestinians in violent West Bank settler assault Read More » Ethnic cleansing in the West Bank would, however, present far greater logistical and political challenges than in Gaza. Unlike Gaza, the West Bank features a more intertwined population of Palestinians and settlers. Additionally, Jordan (positioned just across the border) would almost certainly respond with far less tolerance than Egypt in the event of any Israeli attempt to forcibly expel hundreds of thousands of Palestinians into its territory. Nevertheless, some of the methods currently employed by the Israeli military in Gaza appear to be gradually making their way to the West Bank, albeit on a smaller scale. In recent months, large sections of the Tulkarm and Jenin refugee camps, along with other areas, have been bulldozed, and hundreds of homes have been demolished by Israeli forces. The images emerging from these sites increasingly resemble those coming out of Gaza. Even if the West Bank is not yet experiencing a full replication of the Gaza campaign, what is unfolding may well be seen as preparation for a more extensive effort by Smotrich and the settler militias to 'clear' key areas of Palestinians. A race between thugs Last Friday's attack on the Israeli army by settler militias marked a rare deviation from the unwritten rules that have long governed the relationship between settlers and the military in the West Bank. This breach prompted some criticism within Israel. However, such criticism is unlikely to have any meaningful impact on the militias' operations or on the broader trajectory of settlement expansion and Palestinian displacement. Defence Minister Israel Katz, who recently revoked the use of administrative detention orders against Jewish settlers (thereby weakening the enforcement powers of the Shin Bet's Jewish Division) has now announced the formation of a new police unit tasked with addressing settler violence. Israel's Ben Gvir calls for aid to be bombed amid siege on Gaza Read More » According to Katz, the Israeli army and the Shin Bet will be involved in some capacity, but the unit will be led primarily by police officers. In practice, however, there is little doubt that the appointment of the unit's commander will require the approval of Ben Gvir, who oversees the police and is widely seen as an ally of the settler movement. As such, the creation of this unit appears less a genuine effort to curb settler violence and more a political manoeuvre to manage public perception. It is likely aimed at deflecting criticism rather than seriously addressing the ongoing attacks. Public assaults on Israeli soldiers are broadly unpopular within Israel, and even Israelis from the centre and centre right oppose settler violence against Palestinians. These factors pose a potential threat to the political project advanced by Smotrich and the settler militias. Yet despite these internal tensions, the project is unlikely to be fundamentally derailed. Smotrich and Ben Gvir, who serve as the settler movement's most prominent representatives within the Knesset, are now deeply embedded within the core of the Israeli government, making it difficult to envisage any scenario in which this agenda is meaningfully challenged from within. Still, as is often the case within violent movements of this nature, there may be more extreme elements who perceive Smotrich and Ben Gvir as too moderate or insufficiently committed to the cause. But this is ultimately a competition among factions driven by escalating radicalism. It is a race between thugs.
Khaleej Times
an hour ago
- Khaleej Times
Gaza ceasefire: Trump expects Hamas decision in 24 hours on 'final' peace proposal
US President Donald Trump said on Friday it would probably be known in 24 hours whether the Palestinian group Hamas has agreed to accept what he has called a " final proposal" for an Israel-Hamas ceasefire in Gaza. The president also said he had spoken to Saudi Arabia about expanding the Abraham Accords, the deal on normalisation of ties that his administration negotiated between Israel and some Gulf countries during his first term. Trump said on Tuesday Israel had accepted the conditions needed to finalise a 60-day ceasefire with Hamas, during which the parties will work to end the war. He was asked on Friday if Hamas had agreed to the latest ceasefire deal framework, and said: "We'll see what happens, we are going to know over the next 24 hours." A source close to Hamas said on Thursday the Islamist group sought guarantees that the new US-backed ceasefire proposal would lead to the end of Israel's war in Gaza. Two Israeli officials said those details were still being worked out. Dozens of Palestinians were killed on Thursday in Israeli strikes, according to Gaza authorities. The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered in October 2023 when Hamas attacked Israel, killing 1,200 and taking about 250 hostages, Israeli tallies show. Gaza's health ministry says Israel's subsequent military assault has killed over 56,000 Palestinians. It has also caused a hunger crisis, internally displaced Gaza's entire population and prompted accusations of genocide at the International Court of Justice and of war crimes at the International Criminal Court. Israel denies the accusations. A previous two month ceasefire ended when Israeli strikes killed more than 400 Palestinians on March 18. Trump earlier this year proposed a U.S. takeover of Gaza, which was condemned globally by rights experts, the U.N. and Palestinians as a proposal of "ethnic cleansing." Trump made the comments on the Abraham Accords when asked about U.S. media reporting late on Thursday that he had met Saudi Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman at the White House. "It's one of the things we talked about," Trump said. "I think a lot of people are going to be joining the Abraham accords," he added, citing the predicted expansion to the damage faced by Iran from recent U.S. and Israeli strikes. Axios reported that after the meeting with Trump, the Saudi official spoke on the phone with Abdolrahim Mousavi, chief of Iran's General Staff of the Armed Forces. Trump's meeting with the Saudi official came ahead of a visit to Washington next week by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Hamas response on ceasefire proposal expected within 24 hours, Donald Trump says
US President Donald Trump said on Friday that it would probably be known within 24 hours whether Hamas is to agree on a "final proposal" for a ceasefire in Gaza. His comments came after Hamas leaders held talks on the final details of the proposal on Thursday, sources told The National. Hamas is expected to agree on a truce and the release of some hostages, but the group is seeking clarification about some issues, the sources said as discussions took place in Cairo. Mr Trump said on Tuesday that Israel had accepted the conditions needed to finalise a 60-day ceasefire agreement, during which the parties would work to end the conflict. When asked on Friday whether Hamas had agreed to the latest terms, he said: "We'll see what happens, we are going to know over the next 24 hours." The main provisions in the proposed deal are a 60-day truce, during which Hamas will release 10 living hostages, as well as the remains of half of those who died in captivity. In return, about 1,200 Palestinians detained in Israel would be released, sources told The National. The proposal also envisions negotiations between Israel and Hamas on ending the war and an Israeli withdrawal from the enclave. The two sides are also reviewing the mechanics of the resumption and distribution of aid in Gaza, where hundreds of thousands are facing hunger and an acute shortage of essential items. Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who has bitterly opposed any deal throughout the war, on Thursday called on far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich to 'join forces' to block a 'reckless deal'. Mr Smotrich this week promised to oppose any deal that ended the fighting. 'We must not stop the war without victory,' Mr Ben-Gvir told Israel's public broadcaster. 'What do you think will happen if we stop the war now? That Hamas will hand out flowers?' His comments came as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prepares to visit Washington next week. The Gaza war broke out in October 2023, when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking about 240 hostage. The group is believed to still have about 50 hostages, with fewer than half of them thought to be alive. The Hamas attack prompted a devastating assault by Israel that has so far killed more than 57,000 Palestinians, health authorities in Gaza have said. The war has displaced the majority of the enclave's estimated two million population, with many having been forced to flee more than once, and destroyed swathes of built-up areas. Mediators from Egypt, Qatar and the US have been trying in vain since March to broker a deal for a ceasefire and the release of hostages.
