logo
Hailey Bieber's ‘glazed donut' is a $1.5 billion gamble

Hailey Bieber's ‘glazed donut' is a $1.5 billion gamble

The Age03-06-2025
But Elf is paying a pretty polished price for Rhode, also known for its sleek, minimal packaging. The $US800 million in cash and stock payable at the close of the deal, expected before September, equates to 3.8 times Rhode's sales of $US212 million in the year to March 31, 2025. Including the additional $US200 million payable based on Rhode's performance over the next three years, the multiple is 4.7 times. The latter is in line with the lush deal multiple on L'Oreal SA's purchase of natural beauty label Aesop two years ago.
To justify the price tag, Elf must ensure that its new addition doesn't run out of, well, Rhode.
The narrow product range is the obvious starting point for expansion. Elf has rolled out a raft of innovations, appealing to its Gen Z buyers and turbocharging sales, so this avenue looks promising.
There is also scope for Rhode to reach a wider range of customers. The brand is already due to launch in Sephora in the US, Canada and the UK this fall, a major milestone. Longer term, Elf could leverage its partnerships with other retailers — it is available in Ulta Beauty in the US for example, in Douglas in Italy and Boots in the UK — to maintain the momentum.
Assuming Elf doubles sales over the next three to five years — which looks feasible — then the acquisition multiple would fall to a more reasonable level of about two times.
Loading
But there are risks to this trajectory, the most significant of which is Bieber herself.
So far, she has bucked the broader boredom with celebrity-led brands. But her relevance must be sustained. Six years ago, Coty made a big bet on the Kardashians, paying $US600 million for a majority stake in Kylie Cosmetics, founded by Kylie Jenner. A year later, it spent $US200 million on a 20 per cent stake in Kim Kardashian's beauty business. The results have been mixed. While Kylie Cosmetics has increased sales by 1.5 times over the past two years, helped by launches of skincare and fragrance, Kardashian's underwear label Skims recently acquired Coty's shareholding, resulting in a $US71 million loss for the US-listed company.
Bieber will join Elf as Rhode's chief creative officer and head of innovation. The new owner also has a strong track record of connecting with Gen Z via social media, through viral moments such as its tie-up with Chipotle Mexican Grill. And it has some experience managing celebrity and influencer involvement. It acquired Naturium, the skincare line created by influencer Susan Yara and beauty-brand accelerator The Center for $US355 million two years ago. It also developed Alicia Keys' brand. Even so, Rhode being so closely associated with its founder is a risk that must be managed.
This isn't the only challenge. Lindsay Dutch, analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, expects Elf's sales growth to slow this financial year following a frenetic pace of revenue expansion. The beauty boom is also fading, although Ulta said after the deal was announced that many consumers were turning to fragrance and body lotion as a comfort and escape from economic uncertainty. There's also the pressure from US President Donald's Trump's tariffs. Elf makes about 75 per cent of its products in China and will add $US1 to all its products globally on August 1 to reflect the levies.
With so much to grapple with already, taking a big bet on a celebrity-backed brand looks a surprising diversion. But as any beauty enthusiast knows, there is always room for one more lipstick, particularly if it's a peptide-infused pout enhancer.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla loses billion-dollar revenue source as US ditches fuel economy fines
Tesla loses billion-dollar revenue source as US ditches fuel economy fines

The Advertiser

time5 hours ago

  • The Advertiser

Tesla loses billion-dollar revenue source as US ditches fuel economy fines

For the first time in 50 years, automakers in the US will no longer be fined for failing to meet fuel consumption standards, significantly impacting a major revenue stream for electric vehicle (EV) maker Tesla. US President Donald Trump's July 4 (2025) bill ended penalties for automakers that do not meet North America's world-leading CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) standards, first introduced in 1975. It acts retrospectively, with automakers not liable for any penalties incurred from and including 2022. According to Reuters, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is "working on its reconsideration of fuel economy rules". CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. The same bill also terminated US federal tax credits for new and used EVs of between $US4000-$7500 (A$6137-$11,507), which will end on September 30, 2025. The US Department of Transportation (DOT) describes CAFE's purpose as "to reduce energy consumption by increasing the fuel economy of cars and light trucks". It adds: "When these standards are raised, automakers respond by creating a more fuel-efficient fleet, which improves our nation's energy security and saves consumers money at the pump, while also reducing greenhouse emissions". The removal of fines is a boost for the bottom line of some of the world's largest car manufacturers, including Ford, General Motors (GM) and Stellantis – the latter of which has US brands including Jeep, Chrysler, Dodge and Ram under its umbrella. According to Reuters, Stellantis paid almost $US600 million (A$921m) in CAFE fines between 2016 and 2020, while GM paid $US128.2 million (A$196.7m) in penalties between 2016-2017. Tesla, on the other hand, has now suffered a major blow to one of its most important revenue streams. The EV company raked in $US2.76 billion (A$4.23bn) in 2024 alone from selling 'carbon credits' to other automakers, including credit revenue collected in other markets such as Europe. The company's 2024 credit revenue represented a 54 per cent year-on-year increase, yet it wasn't enough to prevent a fall in profit from $US15 billion (A$23bn) in 2023, to $US7.1 billion (A$10.89bn) for the 2024 calendar year, when the Toyota RAV4 also poached the title of world's best-selling car from the Model Y by fewer than 3000 sales. The EV brand was already under stress from the first recorded annual sales decline in its history – with deliveries sliding by 1 per cent in 2024 – even before the elimination of revenue from carbon credits. "If things go bad for Tesla and they don't sell enough cars this year, they might not have enough credits for what they promised Stellantis and the others," Peter Mock, managing director of the International Council on Clean Transportations (ITCC) told Politico in March. "Tesla is under pressure." With these credits disappearing in the US, the pressure on Tesla has now increased. Under CAFE, fuel economy (and therefore emissions) was averaged across all models sold by a manufacturer, with those exceeding the limits able to buy 'credits' from those that haven't. Doing so allows automakers in breach to lower their average fuel consumption figure to reduce or avoid fines. EV-only brands such as Tesla and Polestar were able to make considerable profit from US credits, while also 'pooling' credits with automakers struggling to meet ever-tightening emissions laws in Europe. It's a similar arrangement to Australia's New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES), which was introduced this year with fines for automakers that exceed average CO2 emissions targets across their model ranges, in the form of penalties or credits for each sold vehicle under those limits respectively. NVES and the CAFE regulations have nearly identical goals, and have attracted the same arguments for and against on both sides. Likewise, NVES allows carbon credits to be traded between brands to reduce fines – although Polestar Australia boss Scott Maynard recently said their monetary value is debatable after Polestar announced its best start to a year with a 51 per cent global sales increase in the first half of 2025. In the first half of 2025, Tesla remained Australia's most popular EV brand, with the Model Y mid-size SUV being the best-selling EV followed by the BYD Sealion 7 medium SUV and Model 3 sedan in third. Tesla is due to announce its global sales figures for the second quarter of 2025 tomorrow (July 23). More: Everything Tesla More: What the first federal emission standard means for Aussie car buyers More: Polestar boss says new Australian emissions regulations 'didn't kill the weekend' Content originally sourced from: For the first time in 50 years, automakers in the US will no longer be fined for failing to meet fuel consumption standards, significantly impacting a major revenue stream for electric vehicle (EV) maker Tesla. US President Donald Trump's July 4 (2025) bill ended penalties for automakers that do not meet North America's world-leading CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) standards, first introduced in 1975. It acts retrospectively, with automakers not liable for any penalties incurred from and including 2022. According to Reuters, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is "working on its reconsideration of fuel economy rules". CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. The same bill also terminated US federal tax credits for new and used EVs of between $US4000-$7500 (A$6137-$11,507), which will end on September 30, 2025. The US Department of Transportation (DOT) describes CAFE's purpose as "to reduce energy consumption by increasing the fuel economy of cars and light trucks". It adds: "When these standards are raised, automakers respond by creating a more fuel-efficient fleet, which improves our nation's energy security and saves consumers money at the pump, while also reducing greenhouse emissions". The removal of fines is a boost for the bottom line of some of the world's largest car manufacturers, including Ford, General Motors (GM) and Stellantis – the latter of which has US brands including Jeep, Chrysler, Dodge and Ram under its umbrella. According to Reuters, Stellantis paid almost $US600 million (A$921m) in CAFE fines between 2016 and 2020, while GM paid $US128.2 million (A$196.7m) in penalties between 2016-2017. Tesla, on the other hand, has now suffered a major blow to one of its most important revenue streams. The EV company raked in $US2.76 billion (A$4.23bn) in 2024 alone from selling 'carbon credits' to other automakers, including credit revenue collected in other markets such as Europe. The company's 2024 credit revenue represented a 54 per cent year-on-year increase, yet it wasn't enough to prevent a fall in profit from $US15 billion (A$23bn) in 2023, to $US7.1 billion (A$10.89bn) for the 2024 calendar year, when the Toyota RAV4 also poached the title of world's best-selling car from the Model Y by fewer than 3000 sales. The EV brand was already under stress from the first recorded annual sales decline in its history – with deliveries sliding by 1 per cent in 2024 – even before the elimination of revenue from carbon credits. "If things go bad for Tesla and they don't sell enough cars this year, they might not have enough credits for what they promised Stellantis and the others," Peter Mock, managing director of the International Council on Clean Transportations (ITCC) told Politico in March. "Tesla is under pressure." With these credits disappearing in the US, the pressure on Tesla has now increased. Under CAFE, fuel economy (and therefore emissions) was averaged across all models sold by a manufacturer, with those exceeding the limits able to buy 'credits' from those that haven't. Doing so allows automakers in breach to lower their average fuel consumption figure to reduce or avoid fines. EV-only brands such as Tesla and Polestar were able to make considerable profit from US credits, while also 'pooling' credits with automakers struggling to meet ever-tightening emissions laws in Europe. It's a similar arrangement to Australia's New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES), which was introduced this year with fines for automakers that exceed average CO2 emissions targets across their model ranges, in the form of penalties or credits for each sold vehicle under those limits respectively. NVES and the CAFE regulations have nearly identical goals, and have attracted the same arguments for and against on both sides. Likewise, NVES allows carbon credits to be traded between brands to reduce fines – although Polestar Australia boss Scott Maynard recently said their monetary value is debatable after Polestar announced its best start to a year with a 51 per cent global sales increase in the first half of 2025. In the first half of 2025, Tesla remained Australia's most popular EV brand, with the Model Y mid-size SUV being the best-selling EV followed by the BYD Sealion 7 medium SUV and Model 3 sedan in third. Tesla is due to announce its global sales figures for the second quarter of 2025 tomorrow (July 23). More: Everything Tesla More: What the first federal emission standard means for Aussie car buyers More: Polestar boss says new Australian emissions regulations 'didn't kill the weekend' Content originally sourced from: For the first time in 50 years, automakers in the US will no longer be fined for failing to meet fuel consumption standards, significantly impacting a major revenue stream for electric vehicle (EV) maker Tesla. US President Donald Trump's July 4 (2025) bill ended penalties for automakers that do not meet North America's world-leading CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) standards, first introduced in 1975. It acts retrospectively, with automakers not liable for any penalties incurred from and including 2022. According to Reuters, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is "working on its reconsideration of fuel economy rules". CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. The same bill also terminated US federal tax credits for new and used EVs of between $US4000-$7500 (A$6137-$11,507), which will end on September 30, 2025. The US Department of Transportation (DOT) describes CAFE's purpose as "to reduce energy consumption by increasing the fuel economy of cars and light trucks". It adds: "When these standards are raised, automakers respond by creating a more fuel-efficient fleet, which improves our nation's energy security and saves consumers money at the pump, while also reducing greenhouse emissions". The removal of fines is a boost for the bottom line of some of the world's largest car manufacturers, including Ford, General Motors (GM) and Stellantis – the latter of which has US brands including Jeep, Chrysler, Dodge and Ram under its umbrella. According to Reuters, Stellantis paid almost $US600 million (A$921m) in CAFE fines between 2016 and 2020, while GM paid $US128.2 million (A$196.7m) in penalties between 2016-2017. Tesla, on the other hand, has now suffered a major blow to one of its most important revenue streams. The EV company raked in $US2.76 billion (A$4.23bn) in 2024 alone from selling 'carbon credits' to other automakers, including credit revenue collected in other markets such as Europe. The company's 2024 credit revenue represented a 54 per cent year-on-year increase, yet it wasn't enough to prevent a fall in profit from $US15 billion (A$23bn) in 2023, to $US7.1 billion (A$10.89bn) for the 2024 calendar year, when the Toyota RAV4 also poached the title of world's best-selling car from the Model Y by fewer than 3000 sales. The EV brand was already under stress from the first recorded annual sales decline in its history – with deliveries sliding by 1 per cent in 2024 – even before the elimination of revenue from carbon credits. "If things go bad for Tesla and they don't sell enough cars this year, they might not have enough credits for what they promised Stellantis and the others," Peter Mock, managing director of the International Council on Clean Transportations (ITCC) told Politico in March. "Tesla is under pressure." With these credits disappearing in the US, the pressure on Tesla has now increased. Under CAFE, fuel economy (and therefore emissions) was averaged across all models sold by a manufacturer, with those exceeding the limits able to buy 'credits' from those that haven't. Doing so allows automakers in breach to lower their average fuel consumption figure to reduce or avoid fines. EV-only brands such as Tesla and Polestar were able to make considerable profit from US credits, while also 'pooling' credits with automakers struggling to meet ever-tightening emissions laws in Europe. It's a similar arrangement to Australia's New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES), which was introduced this year with fines for automakers that exceed average CO2 emissions targets across their model ranges, in the form of penalties or credits for each sold vehicle under those limits respectively. NVES and the CAFE regulations have nearly identical goals, and have attracted the same arguments for and against on both sides. Likewise, NVES allows carbon credits to be traded between brands to reduce fines – although Polestar Australia boss Scott Maynard recently said their monetary value is debatable after Polestar announced its best start to a year with a 51 per cent global sales increase in the first half of 2025. In the first half of 2025, Tesla remained Australia's most popular EV brand, with the Model Y mid-size SUV being the best-selling EV followed by the BYD Sealion 7 medium SUV and Model 3 sedan in third. Tesla is due to announce its global sales figures for the second quarter of 2025 tomorrow (July 23). More: Everything Tesla More: What the first federal emission standard means for Aussie car buyers More: Polestar boss says new Australian emissions regulations 'didn't kill the weekend' Content originally sourced from: For the first time in 50 years, automakers in the US will no longer be fined for failing to meet fuel consumption standards, significantly impacting a major revenue stream for electric vehicle (EV) maker Tesla. US President Donald Trump's July 4 (2025) bill ended penalties for automakers that do not meet North America's world-leading CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) standards, first introduced in 1975. It acts retrospectively, with automakers not liable for any penalties incurred from and including 2022. According to Reuters, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is "working on its reconsideration of fuel economy rules". CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. The same bill also terminated US federal tax credits for new and used EVs of between $US4000-$7500 (A$6137-$11,507), which will end on September 30, 2025. The US Department of Transportation (DOT) describes CAFE's purpose as "to reduce energy consumption by increasing the fuel economy of cars and light trucks". It adds: "When these standards are raised, automakers respond by creating a more fuel-efficient fleet, which improves our nation's energy security and saves consumers money at the pump, while also reducing greenhouse emissions". The removal of fines is a boost for the bottom line of some of the world's largest car manufacturers, including Ford, General Motors (GM) and Stellantis – the latter of which has US brands including Jeep, Chrysler, Dodge and Ram under its umbrella. According to Reuters, Stellantis paid almost $US600 million (A$921m) in CAFE fines between 2016 and 2020, while GM paid $US128.2 million (A$196.7m) in penalties between 2016-2017. Tesla, on the other hand, has now suffered a major blow to one of its most important revenue streams. The EV company raked in $US2.76 billion (A$4.23bn) in 2024 alone from selling 'carbon credits' to other automakers, including credit revenue collected in other markets such as Europe. The company's 2024 credit revenue represented a 54 per cent year-on-year increase, yet it wasn't enough to prevent a fall in profit from $US15 billion (A$23bn) in 2023, to $US7.1 billion (A$10.89bn) for the 2024 calendar year, when the Toyota RAV4 also poached the title of world's best-selling car from the Model Y by fewer than 3000 sales. The EV brand was already under stress from the first recorded annual sales decline in its history – with deliveries sliding by 1 per cent in 2024 – even before the elimination of revenue from carbon credits. "If things go bad for Tesla and they don't sell enough cars this year, they might not have enough credits for what they promised Stellantis and the others," Peter Mock, managing director of the International Council on Clean Transportations (ITCC) told Politico in March. "Tesla is under pressure." With these credits disappearing in the US, the pressure on Tesla has now increased. Under CAFE, fuel economy (and therefore emissions) was averaged across all models sold by a manufacturer, with those exceeding the limits able to buy 'credits' from those that haven't. Doing so allows automakers in breach to lower their average fuel consumption figure to reduce or avoid fines. EV-only brands such as Tesla and Polestar were able to make considerable profit from US credits, while also 'pooling' credits with automakers struggling to meet ever-tightening emissions laws in Europe. It's a similar arrangement to Australia's New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES), which was introduced this year with fines for automakers that exceed average CO2 emissions targets across their model ranges, in the form of penalties or credits for each sold vehicle under those limits respectively. NVES and the CAFE regulations have nearly identical goals, and have attracted the same arguments for and against on both sides. Likewise, NVES allows carbon credits to be traded between brands to reduce fines – although Polestar Australia boss Scott Maynard recently said their monetary value is debatable after Polestar announced its best start to a year with a 51 per cent global sales increase in the first half of 2025. In the first half of 2025, Tesla remained Australia's most popular EV brand, with the Model Y mid-size SUV being the best-selling EV followed by the BYD Sealion 7 medium SUV and Model 3 sedan in third. Tesla is due to announce its global sales figures for the second quarter of 2025 tomorrow (July 23). More: Everything Tesla More: What the first federal emission standard means for Aussie car buyers More: Polestar boss says new Australian emissions regulations 'didn't kill the weekend' Content originally sourced from:

Tesla loses billion-dollar revenue source as US ditches fuel economy fines
Tesla loses billion-dollar revenue source as US ditches fuel economy fines

7NEWS

time5 hours ago

  • 7NEWS

Tesla loses billion-dollar revenue source as US ditches fuel economy fines

For the first time in 50 years, automakers in the US will no longer be fined for failing to meet fuel consumption standards, significantly impacting a major revenue stream for electric vehicle (EV) maker Tesla. US President Donald Trump's July 4 (2025) bill ended penalties for automakers that do not meet North America's world-leading CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) standards, first introduced in 1975. It acts retrospectively, with automakers not liable for any penalties incurred from and including 2022. According to Reuters, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is 'working on its reconsideration of fuel economy rules'. CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. The same bill also terminated US federal tax credits for new and used EVs of between $US4000-$7500 (A$6137-$11,507), which will end on September 30, 2025. The US Department of Transportation (DOT) describes CAFE's purpose as 'to reduce energy consumption by increasing the fuel economy of cars and light trucks'. It adds: 'When these standards are raised, automakers respond by creating a more fuel-efficient fleet, which improves our nation's energy security and saves consumers money at the pump, while also reducing greenhouse emissions'. The removal of fines is a boost for the bottom line of some of the world's largest car manufacturers, including Ford, General Motors (GM) and Stellantis – the latter of which has US brands including Jeep, Chrysler, Dodge and Ram under its umbrella. According to Reuters, Stellantis paid almost $US600 million (A$921m) in CAFE fines between 2016 and 2020, while GM paid $US128.2 million (A$196.7m) in penalties between 2016-2017. Tesla, on the other hand, has now suffered a major blow to one of its most important revenue streams. The EV company raked in $US2.76 billion (A$4.23bn) in 2024 alone from selling 'carbon credits' to other automakers, including credit revenue collected in other markets such as Europe. The company's 2024 credit revenue represented a 54 per cent year-on-year increase, yet it wasn't enough to prevent a fall in profit from $US15 billion (A$23bn) in 2023, to $US7.1 billion (A$10.89bn) for the 2024 calendar year, when the Toyota RAV4 also poached the title of world's best-selling car from the Model Y by fewer than 3000 sales. The EV brand was already under stress from the first recorded annual sales decline in its history – with deliveries sliding by 1 per cent in 2024 – even before the elimination of revenue from carbon credits. 'If things go bad for Tesla and they don't sell enough cars this year, they might not have enough credits for what they promised Stellantis and the others,' Peter Mock, managing director of the International Council on Clean Transportations (ITCC) told Politico in March. 'Tesla is under pressure.' With these credits disappearing in the US, the pressure on Tesla has now increased. Under CAFE, fuel economy (and therefore emissions) was averaged across all models sold by a manufacturer, with those exceeding the limits able to buy 'credits' from those that haven't. Doing so allows automakers in breach to lower their average fuel consumption figure to reduce or avoid fines. EV-only brands such as Tesla and Polestar were able to make considerable profit from US credits, while also 'pooling' credits with automakers struggling to meet ever-tightening emissions laws in Europe. It's a similar arrangement to Australia's New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES), which was introduced this year with fines for automakers that exceed average CO2 emissions targets across their model ranges, in the form of penalties or credits for each sold vehicle under those limits respectively. NVES and the CAFE regulations have nearly identical goals, and have attracted the same arguments for and against on both sides. Likewise, NVES allows carbon credits to be traded between brands to reduce fines – although Polestar Australia boss Scott Maynard recently said their monetary value is debatable after Polestar announced its best start to a year with a 51 per cent global sales increase in the first half of 2025. In the first half of 2025, Tesla remained Australia's most popular EV brand, with the Model Y mid-size SUV being the best-selling EV followed by the BYD Sealion 7 medium SUV and Model 3 sedan in third. Tesla is due to announce its global sales figures for the second quarter of 2025 tomorrow (July 23).

Tesla loses billion-dollar revenue source as US ditches fuel economy fines
Tesla loses billion-dollar revenue source as US ditches fuel economy fines

Perth Now

time5 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Tesla loses billion-dollar revenue source as US ditches fuel economy fines

For the first time in 50 years, automakers in the US will no longer be fined for failing to meet fuel consumption standards, significantly impacting a major revenue stream for electric vehicle (EV) maker Tesla. US President Donald Trump's July 4 (2025) bill ended penalties for automakers that do not meet North America's world-leading CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) standards, first introduced in 1975. It acts retrospectively, with automakers not liable for any penalties incurred from and including 2022. According to Reuters, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is 'working on its reconsideration of fuel economy rules'. CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. Supplied Credit: CarExpert The same bill also terminated US federal tax credits for new and used EVs of between $US4000-$7500 (A$6137-$11,507), which will end on September 30, 2025. The US Department of Transportation (DOT) describes CAFE's purpose as 'to reduce energy consumption by increasing the fuel economy of cars and light trucks'. It adds: 'When these standards are raised, automakers respond by creating a more fuel-efficient fleet, which improves our nation's energy security and saves consumers money at the pump, while also reducing greenhouse emissions'. The removal of fines is a boost for the bottom line of some of the world's largest car manufacturers, including Ford, General Motors (GM) and Stellantis – the latter of which has US brands including Jeep, Chrysler, Dodge and Ram under its umbrella. Supplied Credit: CarExpert According to Reuters, Stellantis paid almost $US600 million (A$921m) in CAFE fines between 2016 and 2020, while GM paid $US128.2 million (A$196.7m) in penalties between 2016-2017. Tesla, on the other hand, has now suffered a major blow to one of its most important revenue streams. The EV company raked in $US2.76 billion (A$4.23bn) in 2024 alone from selling 'carbon credits' to other automakers, including credit revenue collected in other markets such as Europe. The company's 2024 credit revenue represented a 54 per cent year-on-year increase, yet it wasn't enough to prevent a fall in profit from $US15 billion (A$23bn) in 2023, to $US7.1 billion (A$10.89bn) for the 2024 calendar year, when the Toyota RAV4 also poached the title of world's best-selling car from the Model Y by fewer than 3000 sales. The EV brand was already under stress from the first recorded annual sales decline in its history – with deliveries sliding by 1 per cent in 2024 – even before the elimination of revenue from carbon credits. Supplied Credit: CarExpert 'If things go bad for Tesla and they don't sell enough cars this year, they might not have enough credits for what they promised Stellantis and the others,' Peter Mock, managing director of the International Council on Clean Transportations (ITCC) told Politico in March. 'Tesla is under pressure.' With these credits disappearing in the US, the pressure on Tesla has now increased. Under CAFE, fuel economy (and therefore emissions) was averaged across all models sold by a manufacturer, with those exceeding the limits able to buy 'credits' from those that haven't. Doing so allows automakers in breach to lower their average fuel consumption figure to reduce or avoid fines. EV-only brands such as Tesla and Polestar were able to make considerable profit from US credits, while also 'pooling' credits with automakers struggling to meet ever-tightening emissions laws in Europe. Supplied Credit: CarExpert It's a similar arrangement to Australia's New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES), which was introduced this year with fines for automakers that exceed average CO2 emissions targets across their model ranges, in the form of penalties or credits for each sold vehicle under those limits respectively. NVES and the CAFE regulations have nearly identical goals, and have attracted the same arguments for and against on both sides. Likewise, NVES allows carbon credits to be traded between brands to reduce fines – although Polestar Australia boss Scott Maynard recently said their monetary value is debatable after Polestar announced its best start to a year with a 51 per cent global sales increase in the first half of 2025. In the first half of 2025, Tesla remained Australia's most popular EV brand, with the Model Y mid-size SUV being the best-selling EV followed by the BYD Sealion 7 medium SUV and Model 3 sedan in third. Tesla is due to announce its global sales figures for the second quarter of 2025 tomorrow (July 23). More: Everything Tesla More: What the first federal emission standard means for Aussie car buyers More: Polestar boss says new Australian emissions regulations 'didn't kill the weekend'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store