
'Ache Din' not for Delhi citizens as fuel ban for old vehicles to kick in from November
Environment Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa stated that vehicles would not be impounded and emphasised a "new system" to balance environmental goals with public rights. "We will not let Delhi's environment be harmed, nor will we permit the confiscation of vehicles owned by its residents," he said on July 4.In response to Delhi's plea, CAQM convened a meeting and decided to enforce the fuel ban uniformly across all six NCR cities which includes Delhi, Gurugram, Faridabad, Noida, Ghaziabad, and Sonipat, from November 1, providing time for systemic improvements and public preparation.The authorities acknowledged operational challenges, including:Incomplete ANPR infrastructure in NCR citiesPoor integration with state vehicle databasesRisk of illegal fuel sourcing from neighbouring statesThese concerns were central to the Delhi government's request for a delay in implementation.The policy has sparked political uproar and legal action. Delhi Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena urged the state government to pause the move, calling the ban unfair to the middle class who "spend their life's earnings on a vehicle."Delhi High Court has also issued notices to the Delhi government and CAQM in response to a petition filed by the Delhi Petrol Dealers Association, which challenged the enforceability of the order.Meanwhile, Chief Minister Rekha Gupta admitted on social media that while the government is committed to fighting pollution, the transition must be sensitive to economic and social realities.When the ban was first announced at the start of the month, opposition leaders, including Saurabh Bharadwaj and Atishi, lashed out at the BJP-led Delhi government, accusing it of acting hastily, backpedaling under pressure, and lacking administrative foresight. Atishi went further, alleging "collusion" with car manufacturers and scrap dealers, calling the plan a "betrayal of public trust."If implemented as scheduled, from November 1, no fuel will be provided to vehicles that fall outside the age criteria in all six NCR districts. Authorities plan to rely on ANPR cameras to automatically detect the age of vehicles at fuel stations.advertisementHowever, unless a formal, transparent, and uniform system is introduced across NCR and unless public concerns are addressed, the policy may once again run into logistical roadblocks, public defiance, and more challenges.Subscribe to Auto Today Magazine- Ends
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
34 minutes ago
- India Today
Maharashtra language war: Is it with an eye on Mumbai municipal polls? Experts debate
The language controversy in Maharashtra has escalated, with Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) workers protesting and allegedly assaulting non-Marathi speakers in Mumbai suburbs. This comes ahead of crucial municipal elections, raising questions about whether this is a genuine fight for Marathi pride or a political strategy. The Thackeray cousins, Uddhav and Raj, have united on this issue, while the BJP denies accusations of imposing Hindi. The Congress and NCP have taken a cautious approach so far. Critics argue this may be more about control of the BMC's large budget than language issues. The controversy has sparked debates about cultural identity, language policy, and political opportunism in Maharashtra. The issue of Marathi language and identity has resurfaced in Maharashtra politics, with opposition parties uniting against a government order on Hindi language education. Shiv Sena UBT leader stated the party's commitment to promoting Marathi while respecting other languages. The NCP accused the government of failing to address public concerns and provide concrete solutions for Marathi language promotion. BJP faces criticism over comments by MP Nishikant Dubey. The debate has reignited discussions on Marathi pride ahead of BMC elections, with speculation about potential alliances between Uddhav and Raj Thackeray. The issue highlights ongoing tensions between regional identity and centralized education policies.


The Hindu
35 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Ban on fuel to ‘end of life' vehicles in Delhi put on hold till November 1
The Commission for Air Quality Management in NCR and Adjoining Areas (CAQM) on Tuesday deferred the ban on refuelling of overage or 'end of life' vehicles (ELVs) in Delhi to November 1. The prohibition will now come into effect in the national capital on the day it is scheduled to be enforced in the five adjoining 'high-vehicle-density' (HVD) districts of Gurugram, Faridabad, Ghaziabad, Gautam Buddha Nagar and Sonipat. The pollution control body had on April 23 announced a ban on the refuelling of overage vehicles — petrol vehicles older than 15 years and diesel vehicles older than 10 years — in Delhi from July 1. It had directed authorities to impound the ELVs. Environment Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa lauded the 'people-centric' decision. 'This is a big relief for thousands of citizens who were unfairly impacted. I thank the CAQM for acting swiftly on our concerns,' he said. The Minister added, 'Delhi will not tolerate selective and faulty enforcement. Unlike the previous governments that looted the city, our government is committed to protecting people's rights and dignity.' The development was also welcomed by fuel retailers and resident welfare associations (RWAs). Although the Delhi government had initially supported the directive, after facing public backlash, Mr. Sirsa had on July 3 written to the Centre's air quality monitoring panel, requesting that it put the directive on hold, as enforcing the prohibition would be 'premature and potentially counterproductive' due to 'operational and infrastructural challenges'. 'Address tech. issues' In its order, the CAQM allowed more time for the Delhi government 'to address the technological gaps in implementation of ANPR (automatic number plate recognition) system and align enforcement across the NCT of Delhi with the enforcement in five HVD districts of NCR i.e. Gurugram, Faridabad, Ghaziabad, Gautam Buddha Nagar and Sonipat w.e.f. 01.11.2025'. The Central panel directed the transport departments of Delhi and the NCR States to conduct installation, trials, and training of the ANPR system ahead of the scheduled ban and ensure 'strict compliance [of the ban on refuelling of overage vehicles] through effective enforcement measures'. 'Have ample time' The Delhi Petrol Dealers Association said the decision by the CAQM will give retailers of the nearly 400 fuelling stations in the city ample time to implement the anti-pollution measure. 'It will allow the government to address technical issues and carry out trial runs at petrol pumps,' said Nischal Singhania, the DPDA president. Meanwhile, RWA representatives called for a relook at the definition of overage vehicles. 'Referring to private vehicles as 'overage' or 'end of life' without any pollution check does not make sense. A robust and transparent PUC (Pollution Under Control) system can keep polluting vehicles, new or old, away from the roads,' said B.S Vohra, president of the East Delhi Federation of RWAs.


The Hindu
35 minutes ago
- The Hindu
How long can a suspect be kept in jail, HC asks Delhi Police in 2020 riots case
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday questioned the Delhi Police as to how long accused persons can be kept in jail while remarking that five years have elapsed since the February 2020 riots, yet the arguments on the framing of charges have still not been concluded. A Bench of Justices Subramonium Prasad and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar made the remark while hearing the bail plea filed by Tasleem Ahmed, an accused charged under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act in the north-east Delhi riots 'larger conspiracy' case. 'Five years have gone by. Even arguments on the charge have not been completed. In matters like this, with 700 witnesses, how much time can a person be kept inside [jail]?' said the Bench. The court's remarks came after the accused's advocate, Mehmood Pracha, sought relief for his client on the grounds of parity in relation to the co-accused in the trial. 'He [Ahmed] was arrested on June 24, 2020... He has already spent five years,' Mr. Pracha argued, citing the examples of co-accused Devangana Kalita, Asif Iqbal Tanha and Natasha Narwal, who were granted bail in 2021 on the grounds of delay in the trial proceedings. Special Public Prosecutor Amit Prasad contended that the prosecution could not be blamed for the delay, as there were several occasions when the matter was adjourned on the request of accused persons. The hearing will resume on Wednesday. 'Larger conspiracy' case The 'larger conspiracy' case is among the many pertaining to the riots and is so named because the Delhi police have claimed that the communal violence was part of a 'deep-rooted conspiracy'. Key accused in the case include former Delhi councillor Tahir Hussain and student activists Umar Khalid and Khalid Saifi.