logo
EU may allow carbon credits from developing nations to count towards climate goals

EU may allow carbon credits from developing nations to count towards climate goals

The Guardian01-07-2025
European member states may be allowed to count controversial carbon credits from developing countries towards their climate targets, the European climate commissioner has said as states meet for a crucial decision on the issue.
The EU will discuss on Wednesday its target for slashing carbon dioxide by 2040, with an expected cut of 90% compared with 1990 levels, in line with the bloc's overarching target of reaching net zero by mid-century.
If agreed by member states, and passed by the EU parliament, that goal is then supposed to be translated into an international target – known as a nationally determined contribution (NDC) – pegged to 2035, under the Paris agreement.
But green groups are furious over proposals that would allow part of the target to be made up from buying carbon offsets from overseas. They argue that the EU should meet its targets domestically: more than 130 groups wrote to express 'extreme concern' over the proposals last month.
Gareth Redmond-King, the international lead at the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit thinktank, said: 'There is no need for them to use credits. If such a major emitter is not going as far as they demonstrably could with emissions cuts, then the overall global ambition is lower than it could be. This would risk undermining the EU's reputation for climate leadership at a time when that leadership is most needed.'
Wopke Hoekstra, the EU climate commissioner, told the Guardian that developing countries were keen to gain EU financing through carbon credits, for projects such as tree planting or forest restoration, and that it was possible to ensure that such offsets resulted in genuine emissions reductions. He said the possibility of allowing this was 'potentially very attractive'.
'The planet doesn't care about where we take emissions out of the air,' he said. 'You need to take action everywhere, but it certainly also helps to do that both here and elsewhere.'
He said developing countries in Africa and Latin America were interested in carbon credit projects. 'There is huge appetite from our friends in the global south,' he said.
But such projects would have to be in addition to actions developing countries were already taking to meet their own emissions targets, rather than replacing them. 'If it is additional, I think it is a great idea,' he said. 'And what we will not have a shortage of is ambition to do stuff at the same time in Europe. There's no one who doubts the very significant level of ambition [for emissions cuts within the EU].'
Hoekstra acknowledged there had been problems in the past with carbon credits that were found to be worthless. 'It all stands or falls with the integrity of such a system, where certification, verification [of carbon credits], is absolutely essential,' he said. 'But humanity has solved more difficult problems.'
Wednesday's talks on a 2040 emissions target could also be derailed by a small number of member states, led by France, mooting 'decoupling' the domestic target from the NDC. They argue that the NDC, with its 2035 emissions target, could be delivered in September without the 2040 figure being agreed, implying that a less ambitious 2040 goal could be agreed at a later date.
Hoekstra was firm. 'We will come up this Wednesday with our 2040 climate target, and from that we will derive an ambitious NDC,' he said. 'And I am confident that we will deliver that exact number by September, as we were asked for by the secretary general of the UN.'
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
All countries are expected to lay out their NDC before Cop30, the crunch climate summit in Brazil this November, but few have yet done so. China's NDC will be crucial, especially as Donald Trump has taken the US out of the Paris agreement.
Hoekstra blasted China for planning to build new coal-fired power plants, which he said was 'against what was agreed at Cop28', when countries resolved to 'transition away from fossil fuels'. He said: 'Building new ones is a very bad idea.'
It is unlikely that the NDCs presented at Cop30 in Belem will be sufficient to prevent temperatures breaching the vital threshold of 1.5C above preindustrial levels contained in the Paris agreement.
The Brazilian hosts of the meeting have said NDCs will not be negotiated at Cop30. But Hoekstra said the summit must come up with an answer for how to bridge any gap between the commitments made and the 1.5C limit.
'It's difficult to leave that proverbial elephant in the room and not discuss it. We do need to have political space to discuss the impact of the NDCs and the way forward.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Europeans open to buying US arms for Ukraine under Trump plan but need details
Europeans open to buying US arms for Ukraine under Trump plan but need details

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Europeans open to buying US arms for Ukraine under Trump plan but need details

BRUSSELS, July 15 (Reuters) - Several European countries said on Tuesday they were willing to buy U.S. arms for Ukraine under a scheme announced by U.S. President Donald Trump, although arrangements still needed to be worked out. Trump said on Monday that Washington will supply Patriot air defence systems, missiles and other weaponry to Ukraine for its war against Russia's invasion and that the arms would be paid for by other NATO countries. But much remains undisclosed, including the amounts and precise types of weapons to be provided, how quickly they would be supplied and how they would be paid for. U.S. officials have suggested that European countries will be willing to give up some of their own stocks of weapons for Ukraine and then buy replacements from the United States. But some of the countries involved say they still don't even know what is being asked of them. Such a move would get weapons to Ukraine more quickly but would leave donor countries' defences more exposed until new systems are ready. "We are ready to participate. Of course we can't do it on our own, we need others to partner up – but we have a readiness,' Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen told reporters in Brussels on Tuesday ahead of a meeting of European Union ministers. Speaking alongside Trump at the White House on Monday, NATO chief Mark Rutte said that Germany, Finland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Canada want to be part of the new initiative. Many of those countries have been among the biggest military aid donors to Ukraine, either overall or per capita. Asked whether Denmark could give U.S. arms from its own stocks as part of the scheme, Rasmussen said: 'We don't have these kind of systems – the Patriot systems – so if we should lean in, and we are absolutely ready to do so, it will be (with) money and we have to work out the details.' European ministers said they would now need to examine how new purchases of U.S. weapons could be paid for. In many cases, that seems likely to involve countries teaming up to buy U.S. weapons systems. "Now we need to see how together we can go in and finance, among other things, Patriots, which they plan to send to Ukraine," Sweden's Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard told Swedish radio. In Brussels, Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp said his country is looking into the plan 'with a positive inclination'. Asked about the scheme, Norwegian Defence Minister Tore Sandvik told Reuters that Oslo was 'in close dialogue with Ukraine' on military aid and 'air defence remains a high priority for Ukraine and for the Norwegian military support'. 'Norway has contributed to significant amounts of air defence for Ukraine, including co-financing the donation of a Patriot system and missiles,' he said. The Finnish Defence Ministry said Helsinki 'will continue to provide material support to Ukraine'. "The details of the U.S. initiative ... are not yet known and we are interested to hear more about them before we can take more concrete lines on this issue,' it said.

UniCredit taps Wise Platform for cross-border retail payments service
UniCredit taps Wise Platform for cross-border retail payments service

Finextra

timean hour ago

  • Finextra

UniCredit taps Wise Platform for cross-border retail payments service

Italian bank UniCredit has partnered Wise to develop an international payment service for retail customers. 0 UniCredit is the first major bank in Europe to tap into the Wise Platform, which is powered by more than 70 licenses and six direct connections to payment systems globally, enabling cross-border payments to some 160 countries and over 40 currencies, with 65% of transfers settled in 20 seconds or less. From this month, Italian retail customers will be able to enables international transfers from euros into several foreign currencies, with the same speed and simplicity as domestic payments, from the bank's app. Initially, payments can be sent to recipients in selected countries, including the UK (GBP), Switzerland (CHF), Hong Kong (HKD), Singapore (SGD) and India (INR), with more currencies in development. The service will be rolled out to customers in other countries in the near future. Raphael Barisaac, global head, payments and cash management, UniCredit, says: 'Our customers expect simple, fast and transparent solutions at an affordable cost, even when it comes to complex transactions such as international wire transfers. This new service was created to meet exactly these needs and represents a fundamental step in this direction.'

SARAH VINE: The difference between William and Harry is that one has Kate to soothe his mental anguish... the other has Meghan to rub salt into his wounds
SARAH VINE: The difference between William and Harry is that one has Kate to soothe his mental anguish... the other has Meghan to rub salt into his wounds

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

SARAH VINE: The difference between William and Harry is that one has Kate to soothe his mental anguish... the other has Meghan to rub salt into his wounds

There are many practical – and constitutional – reasons why it makes sense for the Palace to explore a rapprochement with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. As A. N. Wilson argued so cogently in yesterday's Daily Mail, 'fractured dynasties do not survive', and when the crown eventually passes to Prince William, it would be infinitely better if Harry and Meghan were inside the tent rather than on the outside causing mayhem.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store