French petition against return of bee-killing pesticide passes 1mn
The so-called "Duplomb law" has stirred public anger for permitting a return of acetamiprid -- a chemical known to be toxic to pollinators such as bees and to ecosystems. It was adopted on July 8 but has not yet come into effect.
A 23-year-old master's student launched the petition against the law on July 10, with support quickly snowballing with the backing of many including actors and several left-wing lawmakers. More than 500,000 people signed it in 24 hours from Saturday and Sunday alone.
The law's proponents however argue farmers face too much regulation in France as is, and allowing them to use acetamiprid again would help reduce the constraints they face.
National Assembly Speaker Yael Braun-Pivet on Sunday ruled out abandoning the legislation, named after the conservative lawmaker who proposed it, as it would "save a certain number of our farmers".
The petition's author, Eleonore Pattery, who describes herself as "a future environmental health professional", called the new law a "scientific, ethical, environmental and public health aberration".
"It represents a frontal attack on public health, biodiversity, the coherence of climate policies, food security, and common sense," she said.
- 'Bee killer' -
Acetamiprid has been banned in France since 2018, but remains legal within the European Union.
The insecticide is particularly sought after by beet and hazelnut growers, who say they have no alternative against pests and face unfair competition.
On the other hand, beekeepers have branded the chemical "a bee killer". French scientists who have studied its disorientating effects on bees confirm it is toxic to them.
Its effects on humans are also a source of concern but, in the absence of large-scale studies, its risks remain unclear.
The petition calls for the "immediate repeal" of the law and a "citizen-led consultation involving health, agricultural, environmental and legal stakeholders".
Launched on July 10, two days after the Senate adopted the text, it had already passed 500,000 signatures on Saturday.
- Appeal to Macron -
Petitions do not in themselves trigger a review or repeal of the legislation but unprecedented public support may prompt renewed parliamentary discussion on the matter.
Under French rules, if a petition reaches 500,000 verified signatures, the National Assembly may choose to hold a public debate limited to the content of the petition itself.
Speaker Braun-Pivet told the broadcaster franceinfo on Sunday she would be in favour of such a debate, but lawmakers "could not in any case go back on the law which has been voted through".
President Emmanuel Macron does have the power to send the text back for deputies to re-examine it, and on Sunday Green party leader Marine Tondelier appealed to him to do just that in a video posted online.
In late June, ahead of the law's passage, several thousand demonstrators -- including farmers, environmental organisations and scientists -- rallied across France calling for the bill to be withdrawn.
are/jj/gv
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
The Pacific celebrates a historic ruling on climate change
A historic ruling the International Court of Justice has unanimously found states are legally obliged to protect the environment from the impacts of climate change for current and future generations. Palau's President Surangel Whipps Jr says that the "third country nationals" that would be transferred to Palau under a draft proposal are asylum seekers. The Port Moresby Nature Park successfully bred in captivity PNG's national bird the Raggiana Bird of Paradise. Auckland University academic secures $487,000 Pacific health postdoctoral fellowship to figure out how to tackle rheumatic fever. The Pasifika Film Fest and Doc Society has announced eight projects from across the region that have been selected for the inaugural. 'Climate Story Lab Pacific', which will be held in Fiji next month.
The Advertiser
6 hours ago
- The Advertiser
EU may get 15 per cent tariff deal with US: reports
The European Union is heading towards a trade deal with the United States that will result in a broad 15 per cent tariff on EU goods imported into the US, avoiding a harsher 30 per cent levy slated to be implemented from August 1, two EU diplomats say. The rate, which could also extend to cars, would mirror the framework agreement the United States struck with Japan. Officials from the European Commission, which negotiates trade deals on behalf of the 27-member bloc, briefed EU envoys on the state of talks with their US counterparts. US President Donald Trump would ultimately make any final decision on a deal, however. Under the outlines of the potential deal, the 15 per cent rate could apply to sectors including cars and pharmaceuticals and would not be added to long-standing US duties, which average just under five per cent. There could also be concessions for sectors like aircraft, lumber as well as some medicines and agricultural products, which would not face tariffs, the diplomats said. The US administration does not, however, appear willing to lower its current 50 per cent tariff on steel, they said. The Commission said earlier on Wednesday that its primary focus was to achieve a negotiated outcome to avert the threatened 30 per cent tariffs. At the same time it planned to submit counter-tariffs on 93 billion euros ($A166 billion) worth of US goods to EU members for approval. A vote is expected on Thursday although no measures would be imposed until August 7. Germany supported the EU readying countermeasures, a government representative said. If Trump's 30 per cent tariffs are implemented, EU diplomats also said there was broad support among European governments to activate wide-ranging so-called "anti-coercion" measures, which would allow the bloc to target US services and other sectors. The EU appears to be following in the footsteps of Japan, whose agreement with the United States is the most significant Trump has struck since launching his tariff offensive in April. European shares climbed about one per cent, led by car stocks, following the US-Japan announcement. One stand-out feature of that deal was that the same 15 per cent rate applies to cars, compared to the current US tariff of 27.5 per cent, something the EU may want for its own car exports. The US imported vehicles and automotive parts valued at more than $US55 billion ($A84 billion) from Japan last year. EU exports were 47.3 billion euros. Far fewer US cars were sold into the EU or Japanese markets. EU officials say the US has shown little sign of budging on car tariffs but the Japan deal could hint at flexibility. "Whatever the Japanese got will become the minimum for the EU negotiating objectives," said Simon Evenett, professor of geopolitics and strategy at IMD Business School. The European Union is heading towards a trade deal with the United States that will result in a broad 15 per cent tariff on EU goods imported into the US, avoiding a harsher 30 per cent levy slated to be implemented from August 1, two EU diplomats say. The rate, which could also extend to cars, would mirror the framework agreement the United States struck with Japan. Officials from the European Commission, which negotiates trade deals on behalf of the 27-member bloc, briefed EU envoys on the state of talks with their US counterparts. US President Donald Trump would ultimately make any final decision on a deal, however. Under the outlines of the potential deal, the 15 per cent rate could apply to sectors including cars and pharmaceuticals and would not be added to long-standing US duties, which average just under five per cent. There could also be concessions for sectors like aircraft, lumber as well as some medicines and agricultural products, which would not face tariffs, the diplomats said. The US administration does not, however, appear willing to lower its current 50 per cent tariff on steel, they said. The Commission said earlier on Wednesday that its primary focus was to achieve a negotiated outcome to avert the threatened 30 per cent tariffs. At the same time it planned to submit counter-tariffs on 93 billion euros ($A166 billion) worth of US goods to EU members for approval. A vote is expected on Thursday although no measures would be imposed until August 7. Germany supported the EU readying countermeasures, a government representative said. If Trump's 30 per cent tariffs are implemented, EU diplomats also said there was broad support among European governments to activate wide-ranging so-called "anti-coercion" measures, which would allow the bloc to target US services and other sectors. The EU appears to be following in the footsteps of Japan, whose agreement with the United States is the most significant Trump has struck since launching his tariff offensive in April. European shares climbed about one per cent, led by car stocks, following the US-Japan announcement. One stand-out feature of that deal was that the same 15 per cent rate applies to cars, compared to the current US tariff of 27.5 per cent, something the EU may want for its own car exports. The US imported vehicles and automotive parts valued at more than $US55 billion ($A84 billion) from Japan last year. EU exports were 47.3 billion euros. Far fewer US cars were sold into the EU or Japanese markets. EU officials say the US has shown little sign of budging on car tariffs but the Japan deal could hint at flexibility. "Whatever the Japanese got will become the minimum for the EU negotiating objectives," said Simon Evenett, professor of geopolitics and strategy at IMD Business School. The European Union is heading towards a trade deal with the United States that will result in a broad 15 per cent tariff on EU goods imported into the US, avoiding a harsher 30 per cent levy slated to be implemented from August 1, two EU diplomats say. The rate, which could also extend to cars, would mirror the framework agreement the United States struck with Japan. Officials from the European Commission, which negotiates trade deals on behalf of the 27-member bloc, briefed EU envoys on the state of talks with their US counterparts. US President Donald Trump would ultimately make any final decision on a deal, however. Under the outlines of the potential deal, the 15 per cent rate could apply to sectors including cars and pharmaceuticals and would not be added to long-standing US duties, which average just under five per cent. There could also be concessions for sectors like aircraft, lumber as well as some medicines and agricultural products, which would not face tariffs, the diplomats said. The US administration does not, however, appear willing to lower its current 50 per cent tariff on steel, they said. The Commission said earlier on Wednesday that its primary focus was to achieve a negotiated outcome to avert the threatened 30 per cent tariffs. At the same time it planned to submit counter-tariffs on 93 billion euros ($A166 billion) worth of US goods to EU members for approval. A vote is expected on Thursday although no measures would be imposed until August 7. Germany supported the EU readying countermeasures, a government representative said. If Trump's 30 per cent tariffs are implemented, EU diplomats also said there was broad support among European governments to activate wide-ranging so-called "anti-coercion" measures, which would allow the bloc to target US services and other sectors. The EU appears to be following in the footsteps of Japan, whose agreement with the United States is the most significant Trump has struck since launching his tariff offensive in April. European shares climbed about one per cent, led by car stocks, following the US-Japan announcement. One stand-out feature of that deal was that the same 15 per cent rate applies to cars, compared to the current US tariff of 27.5 per cent, something the EU may want for its own car exports. The US imported vehicles and automotive parts valued at more than $US55 billion ($A84 billion) from Japan last year. EU exports were 47.3 billion euros. Far fewer US cars were sold into the EU or Japanese markets. EU officials say the US has shown little sign of budging on car tariffs but the Japan deal could hint at flexibility. "Whatever the Japanese got will become the minimum for the EU negotiating objectives," said Simon Evenett, professor of geopolitics and strategy at IMD Business School. The European Union is heading towards a trade deal with the United States that will result in a broad 15 per cent tariff on EU goods imported into the US, avoiding a harsher 30 per cent levy slated to be implemented from August 1, two EU diplomats say. The rate, which could also extend to cars, would mirror the framework agreement the United States struck with Japan. Officials from the European Commission, which negotiates trade deals on behalf of the 27-member bloc, briefed EU envoys on the state of talks with their US counterparts. US President Donald Trump would ultimately make any final decision on a deal, however. Under the outlines of the potential deal, the 15 per cent rate could apply to sectors including cars and pharmaceuticals and would not be added to long-standing US duties, which average just under five per cent. There could also be concessions for sectors like aircraft, lumber as well as some medicines and agricultural products, which would not face tariffs, the diplomats said. The US administration does not, however, appear willing to lower its current 50 per cent tariff on steel, they said. The Commission said earlier on Wednesday that its primary focus was to achieve a negotiated outcome to avert the threatened 30 per cent tariffs. At the same time it planned to submit counter-tariffs on 93 billion euros ($A166 billion) worth of US goods to EU members for approval. A vote is expected on Thursday although no measures would be imposed until August 7. Germany supported the EU readying countermeasures, a government representative said. If Trump's 30 per cent tariffs are implemented, EU diplomats also said there was broad support among European governments to activate wide-ranging so-called "anti-coercion" measures, which would allow the bloc to target US services and other sectors. The EU appears to be following in the footsteps of Japan, whose agreement with the United States is the most significant Trump has struck since launching his tariff offensive in April. European shares climbed about one per cent, led by car stocks, following the US-Japan announcement. One stand-out feature of that deal was that the same 15 per cent rate applies to cars, compared to the current US tariff of 27.5 per cent, something the EU may want for its own car exports. The US imported vehicles and automotive parts valued at more than $US55 billion ($A84 billion) from Japan last year. EU exports were 47.3 billion euros. Far fewer US cars were sold into the EU or Japanese markets. EU officials say the US has shown little sign of budging on car tariffs but the Japan deal could hint at flexibility. "Whatever the Japanese got will become the minimum for the EU negotiating objectives," said Simon Evenett, professor of geopolitics and strategy at IMD Business School.
AU Financial Review
8 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Top UN court says countries can be sued on climate change
The International Court of Justice issued a strongly worded opinion Wednesday (Thursday AEST) saying that states must protect people from the 'urgent and existential threat' of climate change, a major moment for the global environmental movement and for the countries at greatest risk of harm. It was the first time that the court, which is the United Nations' highest judicial body, has weighed in on climate change. The unanimous opinion said that the failure of nations to take action to protect the climate system may constitute 'an internationally wrongful act.' It also found that protection of the environment is 'a precondition' for ensuring human rights and cited government support of fossil-fuel production as a potential violation of these principles. Although the International Court of Justice has no mechanism to enforce an advisory opinion like this on nations, as a statement of legal principles the findings nevertheless could have far-reaching influence on litigation in courts around the world as well as on international negotiations over climate policy and funding. The United Nations General Assembly requested the opinion after a spirited, yearslong campaign organised by law students from Vanuatu and other Pacific islands. That led to a two-week hearing in December at which more than 100 countries, organisations and experts addressed the court. The court's 15 judges were asked to address two main questions, including what countries are obliged to do, under existing international laws and treaties, to protect the climate system and environment from greenhouse gases; and what the legal consequences are if, by their acts or omissions, they have caused significant harm. The panel is based in The Hague. Powerful fossil fuel producers, including the United States and Saudi Arabia, argued before the court that the 2015 Paris accord, in which nearly all countries agreed to limit greenhouse gases, was sufficient to address climate change. Since then, President Donald Trump has withdrawn the United States from the Paris Agreement. The court's opinion went further than many lawyers had expected. The judges found that all states have the obligation to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial times, a threshold laid out in the Paris Agreement. Environmental groups hailed the decision. 'This decision gives moral and legal heft to all of us around the world fighting for the swift transition off fossil fuels,' said Jean Su, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's energy justice program.
