logo
Hungary for trouble: Why Orbán must inevitably choose between the US and China

Hungary for trouble: Why Orbán must inevitably choose between the US and China

Euractiva day ago
Viktor Orbán and Donald Trump share many similarities: both are virulently anti-immigrant; both love Russia; both are suspicious of Ukraine; and both purport to defend 'traditional values' against 'globalist elites', 'woke culture', and the liberal 'virus'.
One critical area where the Hungarian leader and his American counterpart sharply disagree, however, is China. Indeed, the fundamental irreconcilability of their attitudes towards Beijing could soon spark a falling out between the two 'good friends' every bit as explosive as the recent bust-up between Trump and former 'first buddy' Elon Musk.
Since regaining his country's premiership in 2010, Orbán has worked assiduously to boost economic and trade ties with Beijing, welcoming investments by Chinese electric vehicle makers, battery manufacturers, and telecommunication firms.
Trump, by contrast, has accused the world's second-largest economy of 'raping' America and is currently wielding Washington's economic and military clout to pressure its trading partners to cut China from their supply chains.
These key differences, which mostly simmered beneath the political surface during Trump's first term, are increasingly boiling over into the public sphere.
In April, America's top envoy to Budapest warned the Central European country about the 'strategic challenge' posed by China to the West, and urged Hungary to preserve 'control over [its] own future'.
Later that month, Donald Trump Jr, the US president's eldest son, similarly called on Hungarian business leaders to sever ties with China so as not to leave Washington 'economically vulnerable to countries that are not our allies'.
Rather than buckling to US pressure, however, Budapest has doubled down. Just days after Trump Jr's visit, the country's economy minister said Hungary doesn't 'see an investment potential from the US that would be on par with China'.
In mid-May, its deputy trade minister also stressed that Hungary's relations with China are a 'red line' that Budapest will 'definitely not' cross to avoid Trump's sweeping tariffs on EU exports, which could rise to 30% from 1 August.
The remarks came just days after China had vociferously condemned the UK's own trade deal with Washington. 'Cooperation between states should not be conducted against or to the detriment of the interests of third parties,' Beijing warned. A perplexing poll But this presents a puzzle. If ties between Washington and Budapest are becoming increasingly fractious, why was Hungary the only one of the EU's 27 member states to vote against the European Commission's proposed €93 billion retaliatory package on US goods this week, which will enter into force on August 7 if no deal is agreed?
Similarly, why was Hungary the only EU country to oppose a previous €21 billion list in April, which was later suspended and merged with a second list to create this week's larger package? If Budapest has, in fact, opted to side with Beijing rather than Washington, shouldn't it support retaliation against the US?
Although no official explanation for its vote was forthcoming, Hungarian officials have previously argued that retaliating – or even threatening to retaliate – against Trump will only 'provoke' the self-proclaimed 'Tariff Man' into imposing even harsher levies on Europe.
While such concerns should certainly not be dismissed, they cannot plausibly explain Budapest's vote. Other export-oriented EU countries are just as worried (if not more worried) about the risks of escalation; yet they note, correctly, that such concerns must be balanced against the risks of looking weak – and, hence, inviting further US duties.
Furthermore, Budapest's reluctance to retaliate is flatly contradicted by its own call earlier this month for the Commission, which oversees EU trade policy, to 'reciprocate' Washington's own 'aggressive' negotiating tactics.
In fact, Hungary's vote is most likely a desperate attempt to thread the geopolitical needle by appeasing Beijing and Washington – and angering Brussels – in one fell swoop.
First, the vote signals to Beijing that Budapest does not support Brussels' negotiations with Washington, which will likely lead to the EU's imposition of restrictions on Chinese exports and investment into Europe.
Second, by opposing retaliation, Hungary is hoping to earn geopolitical capital from Washington that it could subsequently 'cash in' by maintaining close trade and economic ties with Beijing, without triggering condemnation from the US.
Third, and more broadly, the vote also signals Hungary's distaste for Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen's increasingly anti-China rhetoric, which was on full display during the profoundly underwhelming EU-China summit in Beijing earlier this week. A geopolitical tragedy Unfortunately, the circle simply cannot be squared. Hungary, a country of just 10 million people who account for just over 1% of the EU's total economic output, is ultimately powerless to prevent the inexorable fracturing of the global economy, which is driven by geopolitical forces – in particular the US-China rivalry – far beyond its control.
Furthermore, Budapest is similarly incapable of altering the EU's political, financial, and (especially) military dependence on the US – and, conversely, China's growing reliance on Russia – that will almost inevitably force the bloc to hitch itself to Washington over the coming decades.
Such a scenario has a certain ring of tragedy about it. Indeed, like any great tragedy, Hungary itself appears acutely aware of its fate.
'The United States is imposing a new tariff – or world trade – reality,' Deputy Trade Minister Levente Magyar said earlier this month. 'What we can do is make the best of it.'
Sadly, Hungary won't be able to make much of it at all.
Economy News Roundup
Europe to forge 'pragmatic' ties with China. Ursula von der Leyen said on Thursday that Brussels will seek to 'rebalance' its economic relationship with Beijing and pressure the world's second-largest economy to end its war in Ukraine. Speaking to reporters following an EU-China summit in Beijing, von der Leyen added that the issue of Chinese 'overcapacities' has become 'even more urgent' in the context of Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs, which have alarmed European exporters and sparked fears of cheap Chinese products being redirected and dumped on Europe. Read more.
The European Central Bank (ECB) holds interest rates at the same level for the first time in more than a year. Thursday's move, which comes amid persistent concerns about the impact of US tariffs on eurozone growth and the inflation outlook, means the ECB's key interest rate remains at 2%: half the record high of 4% reached in 2023 and held for much of 2024. 'We are in this 'wait and watch' situation,' ECB President Christine Lagarde told reporters, adding that 'the jury is out as to how quickly the uncertainty will be cleared under present circumstances'. Read more.
Economic activity across the eurozone grows to the highest levels in almost a year. The eurozone's provisional composite Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI), which measures overall activity in manufacturing and services across the single currency area, rose from 50.6 to 51.0 between June and July – an eleven-month high that pushed the index further above the 50-point mark separating growth from contraction. 'The eurozone economy appears to be gradually regaining momentum,' said Cyrus de la Rubia, chief economist at Hamburg Commercial Bank (HCOB), which compiles the index together with S&P Global. Read more.
EU hopeful that Trump will greenlight Japan-style trade deal. EU diplomats believe that the US president will approve an agreement before his threatened 30% blanket levy on EU goods enters into force on 1 August. The deal would largely mirror the one Washington struck with Tokyo earlier this week, which left a 15% tariff in place on cars and most other goods. Olof Gill, EU Commission spokesperson for trade, told reporters on Thursday that a deal with Washington is now "within reach".
EU countries approve €93 billion US counterpunch. The list comprises two previously separate packages that Brussels merged on Wednesday to make its US countermeasures 'clearer, simpler, and stronger', as the bloc races to strike an agreement with Washington before Trump's 30% tariff on EU goods enters into force. All member states except for Hungary voted in favour of the package, which would hit a wide range of American goods, including aircraft, cars, wine, and medical and electrical equipment. The duties will enter into effect on 7 August if no deal with Washington is agreed. Read more.
Germany urges Brussels to threaten 'trade bazooka' on Washington. 'As we are now in the final phase of negotiations, the right time has come from the perspective of the German government for the Commission to consider the use of this anti-coercion instrument (ACI),' a senior German government official said on Wednesday. The move marked a sharp escalation of the EU-US trade war and a stunning reversal of Berlin's previous call for a 'quick and simple' deal with Washington. The ACI – the EU's most powerful trade weapon – would legally empower the Commission to impose a wide range of retaliatory measures on Washington, including investment restrictions, the withdrawal of intellectual property protections, and tariffs on goods as well as services. Read more.
(ow)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hungary's Orban says he will not back EU budget unless funds released
Hungary's Orban says he will not back EU budget unless funds released

Euractiv

time6 hours ago

  • Euractiv

Hungary's Orban says he will not back EU budget unless funds released

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán threatened on Saturday to torpedo the European Union's new seven-year budget unless Brussels unlocks all suspended EU funds. The nationalist leader has for years clashed with Brussels over issues including migration, LGBTQ rights, and what critics see as eroding democracy in Hungary. The EU has suspended billions of euros earmarked for Hungary while a rule-of-law dispute drags on. "The approval of the new seven-year budget requires unanimity and until we get the remaining (frozen) funds, there won't be a new EU budget either," Orbán said in a speech at a summer university in the Romanian town of Baile Tusnad. The European Commission has proposed a €2 trillion EU budget for 2028-2034, with a focus on economic competitiveness and defence. Orbán also criticised the EU for supporting Ukraine and accused Brussels of planning to install a "pro-Ukraine and pro-Brussels government" in Hungary at next year's vote. He also accused EU leaders of risking a trade war with US President Donald Trump's administration that Europe "cannot win." "The current leadership of the EU will always be the last to sign deals with the United States and always the worst deals," Orbán added, urging a change in the bloc's leadership. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will meet Trump on Sunday in Scotland in search of a trade deal. Orbán, who has dominated the past four national elections, faces a tough new opposition challenger Peter Maygar. His centre-right Tisza party has a firm lead over the ruling Fidesz in most polls at a time of economic stagnation. Magyar told a rally on Saturday that Hungary must be firmly anchored in the EU and NATO military alliance, and promised to secure all suspended EU funds if his party wins in 2026. "Hungary is an EU member and our relations as allies cannot be built on a political style of putting a spoke in the wheel," Magyar said, adding that while Tisza cannot support the proposed EU budget in its current form, it would be open to negotiations. "We need to make a clear and firm decision that our place has been and will be in Europe," Magyar said, criticising Orbán's close relations with Russia. (de)

FIREPOWER: Kubilius to present EU leaders with 2030 war plan
FIREPOWER: Kubilius to present EU leaders with 2030 war plan

Euractiv

time11 hours ago

  • Euractiv

FIREPOWER: Kubilius to present EU leaders with 2030 war plan

Take a free trial of Euractiv Pro to get FIREPOWER in your inbox. Good afternoon and welcome back to Firepower, This week we sat down with Andrius Kubilius, the EU's commissioner for defence and space, in his office which is decorated with miniature satellites. More on that below. We also have updates on Parliament's rapporteurs for the defence omnibus regulation, and what topics Parliament's security and defence committee plans to dig into in the coming months. Finally, don't miss out on the latest moves to repurpose huge sums from EU cohesion funds for the defence industry, a controversial idea that shifts money away from civilian priorities. We also look at the Commission's ambition to directly handle contracts with arms manufacturers. INTERVIEW: Andrius Kubilius plans to brief EU leaders on what's needed by 2030 EU defence chief Andrius Kubilius told Firepower that he's making a checklist to prepare Europe for a possible war by 2030, which he plans to have ready to present to EU leaders by October. The key questions, as he put it to us: 'What kinds of projects we are going to develop, what is the calendar and what are the financial resources needed?' A top goal, Kubilius told us, is to give Europe its own high-end military systems to kill the continent's excessive reliance on US-made kit, especially when it comes to satellites for secure communication, in-air refuelling, surveillance aircraft and more. That'll come at a hefty price. Europeans are promising to budget billions more for defence in the coming years. But to do what? There are numerous options on the market, and spending must be optimised. 'Spending from the EU budget is an instrument to incentivise member states to spend trillions in a more effective way to go for joint procurement,' he said. This autumn, Kubilius hopes to start a broader discussion about creating a 'European Defence Union'. In his view, the UK, Norway and Ukraine should be a part of it. Launching that kind of a project means more reflecting on equipment needs, adequate financing and regulations. Speaking in his office, Kubilius suggested that those three non-EU countries could join the EU's secure telecommunications constellation system, IRIS², as well: 'I would not be opposed.' Kubilius also gave us his views on how to use the SAFE loans, what the European defence industry should look like in the future and more. Look for more from our interview with Kubilius on Monday. The SAFE Corner SOFT DEADLINE. EU countries officially have until Tuesday to tell the Commission if they're interested in taking loans from the €150 billion SAFE funding mechanism to buy arms, and to detail just how much €€€ they're interested in. But don't fret if you're not ready – it's a soft deadline, a Commission official told Firepower, with late applications still considered. TRACKER. Kubilius told us 20 countries are interested in borrowing €100 billion. Firepower's count of participants includes Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czechia, Estonia, France, Ireland, Lithuania, Poland and Romania. Austria, Finland, Slovakia, Slovenia are still thinking. Greece, Italy, Latvia, Portugal are likely to want the cash. Denmark is unlikely to request it. Germany and Sweden are expected to join procurement deals but not request the loans. The Netherlands is not interested in the loans either. FRANCE, we're hearing, is considering a very modest amount. That would signal support for the made-in-the-EU programme without adding too much extra debt to France's already strained finances. Meanwhile, POLAND is planning on using SAFE money for procurement, but notably including solo deals in addition to joint European contracts, two people told Firepower. One of the two sources also said Warsaw is considering using SAFE cash to pay for orders already signed earlier this year. Going it alone is allowed for one year under SAFE rules, and there is no limit to how much of the €150 billion overall pot can go to single-country purchases. But the move undermines the fundamental SAFE concept of seeding European procurement cooperation, as some of our sources complained. The UNITED KINGDOM has shown interest in the programme, but is still waiting for the Commission and EU countries to decide on the terms for allowing British firms to get involved. The EU executive is expected to set out the basis for talks with the UK to the Council next week, two diplomats said. The KEY HURDLE to drafting a proposal has been defining what is 'fair', both in terms of how much of a SAFE-funded military product British defence firms can produce, and how much the UK government needs to contribute to Brussels, three people told Firepower. The Commission does not have a template or equation to objectively calculate the UK's contribution to the plan, an official of the EU executive recognised, which means some EU countries have felt free to push the Commission in different directions. Patriots drama incoming After a bunch of countries said they were ready to buy more US equipment to help speed up Ukraine's air defence fortifications, Germany said it was open to "contribute to providing" another five Patriot missile-defence systems to Ukraine early in the week (Kyiv reportedly already operates six). But that was before the country's defence minister Boris Pistorius made it clear they would need the US to backfill German military stocks within a few months to actually move forward with the delivery, as the US promised. Romania previously did the same thing by pledging its batteries as long as they were replaced by allies. The waiting list for a Patriot system or missile runs years, though, and there are still serious questions about whether the US can pressure industry to deliver faster, or if Washington is ready to tap into its own stocks to help Europe. FCAS family drama has Brussels reconsidering participation There's been plenty of drama this summer around the French-German-Spanish FCAS next-generation fighter jet programme, including public feuding among top aerospace contractors. The latest? Belgium is now trying to join the programme – and promptly saw the Dassault Aviation CEO and the country's defence minister publicly sniping at each other. "The timing of a Belgian membership request appears suboptimal,' Alain De Neve, aerospace expert at the Belgian Centre for Security and Defence Studies, told Firepower. 'FCAS is nearing a decisive moment: either a major industrial realignment will occur to save the 2045 timeline, or the programme may unravel into divergent national or bilateral efforts.' The German and French defence ministers, meanwhile, met on Thursday to discuss FCAS and acknowledged there's a long list of questions that need to be sorted out by the end of the year. On your radar Berlin backs Paris against EU Commission's plan to review arms export control Germany and France are united in their belief that Brussels has absolutely no role to play on weapons exports decisions, as the defence ministers from both countries made clear on Thursday. This will bolster France's opposition, which Euractiv first reported earlier this spring, against the EU executive's repeated proposal. In other news: NO MONEY FOR DEFENCE START-UPS? Some key EU countries are sceptical of shifting EU cash earmarked for civilian start-ups through the European Innovation Council's accelerator (EIC) to fund defence projects instead, according to draft Council conclusions. The Council 'invites' the Commission to 'explain the proposed extension of the EIC accelerator programme to dual use applications in view of the geopolitical situation', the document reads. The idea featured both in the Commission's proposed start-up scale-up strategy and in an earlier proposal in April, before von der Leyen put the spotlight on the EU supporting defence start-ups at the NATO summit last month. WHO'S THE HOLD-UP? Five countries – Austria, Germany, Ireland, Malta and the Netherlands – are not fully on board with letting the EIC invest its money in defence projects instead of civilian initiatives, sources told Firepower. That concern has become one of the last sticking points in negotiations over the Commission's 'mini omnibus' pitched in April, one source close to the file told Firepower. EPF DYNAMICS. The Commission has long offered to handle contracts with defence firms to buy defence equipment for third countries directly via its FPI (foreign policy instrument) and so changing the way the off-budget European Peace Facility fund operates – an idea EU countries are now warming up to, according to a person involved in the talks. Shifting purchasing responsibility from EU countries to the Commission would remove the informal supervision over contracts that capitals currently exercise, but could open the door to a more transparent procurement process. OMNIBUS RAPPORTEURS. The European Parliament is looking at who's going to lead the negotiations on the dense slate proposals from the Commission, known as the 'defence omnibus', to simplify EU rules for the defence industry. Firepower is hearing that MEPs plan to split talks over the package into three parts, each of them led by three different rapporteurs, from S&D, EPP and Renew. PARLIAMENT'S HOMEWORK. The Parliament's defence committee is planning three own-initiative reports next year, according to committee plans discussed earlier this month: 'European defence readiness 2030: assessment of needs', 'Tackling barriers to the single market for defence' and 'Flagship European defence projects of common interest'.

Commission seeks EU court nod for ECHR bid after years of gridlock
Commission seeks EU court nod for ECHR bid after years of gridlock

Euractiv

timea day ago

  • Euractiv

Commission seeks EU court nod for ECHR bid after years of gridlock

Commission moves to break 15-year impasse on EU's accession to Strasbourg-based human rights court Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Nicoletta Ionta Euractiv Jul 25, 2025 20:14 2 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. The European Commission has decided to seek a formal opinion from the EU's top court to clear the path for the bloc's long-overdue accession to the European Court of Human Rights, after years of deadlock. (aw) Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Topics

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store