Thom Tillis: Bolo for YOLO
A bolo, the number that looks like a shoelace held together with a little belt buckle, is nothing to wonder about when you see it on a politician from the Southwest. Barry Goldwater, Mr. Arizona, took to it naturally. So did Ben Nighthorse Campbell, the Northern Cheyenne senator. And when you see very un-bolo looking politicians in the West, like Colorado Gov. Jared Polis, slip on the strings, that's an act of conformity, not rebellion.
But Tillis represents North Carolina in the Senate, and while he moved around a lot as a kid, his roots are solidly in the Southeast. Fitting in for him means developing strong opinions about pork barbecue and college basketball, not dressing like Clint Eastwood in 'Coogan's Bluff.' North Carolina has a substantial Cherokee population, and while the bolo has Native roots, it is very much Western wear.
About the same time some weeks ago that I noticed Tillis sporting a bolo, I heard a rumor from a few sources that he wasn't going to seek reelection. I wouldn't say that I dismissed it, but I figured it was mostly wishful thinking from Democrats and MAGA Republicans.
In his two terms, Tillis has been a frustration to both of those groups. Tillis nicked Democratic Sen. Kay Hagan by a point and a half in 2014, one of the furthest reaches of the red wave that washed over the country that year. Six years later in his reelection bid, Tillis, an incumbent Republican running in a presidential election year and whose Democratic opponent got caught in a lurid scandal weeks before the vote, couldn't muster a margin of victory of even 2 full points. It was all evidence to Democrats that they could win that seat back.
Red on the presidential level since 2012, North Carolina has continued to make a habit of electing Democrats statewide, including popular former two-term Gov. Roy Cooper — the same person Democrats were hoping would take on Tillis in 2026. It would be hard to beat Tillis, but a midterm electorate and a popular Democrat? You'd have to call it at least a toss-up. Without Tillis? Not exactly a cakewalk, but definitely a much easier race for Democrats, especially if the cuckoo North Carolina GOP picked a radical nominee.
Which, of course, is exactly what those MAGA Republicans were thinking about in hoping Tillis wouldn't run. He had defied his party on several key points in the Trump era, notably in opposition to President Trump's efforts to restrict trade and in favor of a comprehensive immigration deal during the Biden administration. Tillis, very much a Chamber of Commerce kind of Republican, was anathema to MAGA. He would be primaried for sure, but given the wild and wooly nature of the state GOP — a party that nominated Mark Robinson for governor last year — Tillis might well be able to endure.
With him gone, it would throw open the nominating process to a veritable cable-news greenroom full of Trump-friendly candidates, including potentially the president's own daughter-in-law, Fox News host Lara Trump.
I could understand why MAGA and the Democrats would both want Tillis to not seek a third term, but he was certainly not acting like someone who was going to take a powder.
In January, Tillis sounded like he might be a real problem for the new Trump administration's Cabinet picks. He had expressed plenty of misgivings about some of the choices but ended up walking the plank on all of them: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for Health and Human Services, Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence, and even Pete Hegseth for the Pentagon after working behind the scenes to scuttle his confirmation.
When a politician is eating crow in those quantities, it can only mean one thing: He's trying to keep his job. Like Sen. John Cornyn in Texas, Tillis had all the markings of a normie Republican trying to pick his way through a minefield of a primary without ruining his chances for the general election.
But then in May, something changed. Tillis not only said he would vote against the president's pick to be the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, but shamed his colleagues into opposing Ed Martin because of Martin's involvement in the events of Jan. 6, 2021, and subsequent support for the rioters.
What a Republican facing a competitive primary challenge is supposed to do in a case like that is mumble into his lapel something about the president's agenda, vote yes and dream of better days ahead.
But then again, he's also supposed to wear a long, silk necktie, preferably with a modest pattern in a muted hue, not a strap of leather with a knot of metal at the top.
So I should have put it all together: the bolo, the Martin vote, the rumor. This was a guy who was ready to stop being afraid and start causing trouble. In announcing his retirement at the same moment he was announcing his opposition to a reconciliation package that manages to be both fiscally irresponsible and harsh on benefits Tillis, sporting the bolo of course, was embracing his maverick moment.
As a lame duck, he's got a year and a half to vote his conscience and be whatever kind of senator he thinks he should have been all along. Add in some other wild cards like Sens. Rand Paul (Ky.), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and John Curtis (Utah), things could get interesting in a Senate where Republicans can only afford to lose three votes and keep a simple majority.
Then there's Susan Collins of Maine, who automatically became the most vulnerable Senate Republican with Tillis's announcement. She's in the same position in which he found himself prior to Sunday, but in a deep blue state. That makes her primary election easier since there isn't much of a Republican Party in Maine outside of her, but it makes her general election that much harder.
I wonder if she ever thinks about slipping on a bolo herself.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
8 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
UN council authorizes continuing vigilance of attacks by Yemen's Houthi rebels on Red Sea shipping
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The U.N. Security Council on Tuesday authorized continued reporting on attacks on ships in the Red Sea by Yemen's Houthi rebels, who have defied its previous demands to immediately halt all such attacks. The vote in the 15-member council was 12-0 with Russia, China and Algeria abstaining because of attacks against Yemen in violation of its sovereignty, a clear reference to U.S. airstrikes against the Houthis who control most of northern Yemen. The Trump administration has carried out the strikes because of the group's attacks on shipping in the Red Sea, a crucial global trade route, and on close ally Israel. The resolution, cosponsored by the United States and Greece, extends the requirement that U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres provide monthly reports to the Security Council about Houthi attacks in the Red Sea until Jan. 15, 2026. Acting U.S. Ambassador Dorothy Shea said the resolution recognizes the need for continued vigilance 'against the Iran-backed Houthi terrorist threat.' She cited the two latest attacks by Houthis against civilian cargo vessels, the MV Magic Seas and the MV Eternity C, which caused both vessels to sink and led to the loss of innocent seafarers and saw crew members taken hostage. 'The United States strongly condemns these unprovoked terrorist attacks, which demonstrate the threat that the Houthis pose to freedom of navigation and to regional economic and maritime security,' Shea said, reiterating the council's demand for an immediate halt to Houthi attacks and the release of all crew members kidnapped from the Eternity C. The assaults represent the latest chapter of the rebels' campaign against shipping over the war in Gaza that began with Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023 surprise attack in southern Israel. They also come as Yemen's nearly decadelong war drags on in the Arab world's poorest country, without any sign of stopping. Greece's U.N. Ambassador Evangelos Sekeris said the Houthi attacks have continued to fuel mistrust in the international maritime community, stressing that security and freedom of navigation are essential for the stability of global supply chains and economic development. 'If the Red Sea region — a critical international maritime route — becomes even more degraded, it will expose the international community to more acute security risks and economic uncertainty,' he warned. Russia's deputy U.N. ambassador Dmitry Polyansky said Moscow abstained because language in the previous resolution demanding a halt to Houthi attacks was arbitrarily interpreted to justify 'the use of force affecting the territory of the sovereign state of Yemen.' 'We stand convinced that any steps aimed at stabilizing the situation in Yemen and around Yemen should be taken in political and diplomatic ways,' he said. China's deputy U.N. ambassador Geng Shuang said his country abstained because 'certain countries took military action against Yemen, which seriously impacted the Yemeni peace process and exacerbated tensions in the Red Sea.' The Houthis have been launching missile and drone attacks against commercial and military ships in the region in what the group's leadership has described as an effort to end Israel's offensive against Hamas in Gaza. Shuang called tensions in the Red Sea 'a major manifestation of the spillover from the Gaza conflict.' Russia's Polyansky also stressed the link between normalizing the situation in the Red Sea and the need for a ceasefire in Gaza and release of all hostages. Algeria's deputy U.N. ambassador Toufik Koudri, whose country is the Arab representative on the Security Council, expressed regret the Yemen resolution demanding an immediate halt to Houthi attacks made no mention of the Gaza war, which he called 'one of the catalytic factors.' 'The Security Council cannot disregard the clear nexus between the attacks in the Red Sea and the aggression against the Palestinian people in Gaza and the deep feelings that resulted from the brutal massacres committed against innocent civilians,' he said.


San Francisco Chronicle
9 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Alert: Adelita Grijalva wins Democratic nomination for U.S. House in Arizona's 7th Congressional District special primary election
WASHINGTON (AP) — Adelita Grijalva wins Democratic nomination for U.S. House in Arizona's 7th Congressional District special primary election.


New York Post
15 minutes ago
- New York Post
Vance casts tie-breaking votes to move forward $9.4B rescissions package — which would defund PBS and NPR — in Senate
Vice President JD Vance cast two tie-breaking votes in the Senate Tuesday to move forward a $9.4B rescissions package — which would rip federal funding from PBS and NPR — in the upper chamber. The Senate deadlocked, 50-50, on two procedural votes to start debate on the multibillion-dollar spending clawback package before Vance's votes advanced the measure requested by the White House. Three Republicans – Sens. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) – joined all Democrats in opposition to the bill. 3 Vance's votes moved the $9.4 billion spending cut package forward in the Senate. The package, approved by the House of Representatives last month, axes approximately $8.3 billion previously allocated to the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and $1.1 billion to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which partially finances National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). A proposed $400 million cut to the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) program is expected to be scrapped via an amendment before the bill comes up for a final vote. 'There was a lot of interest from our members on doing something on PEPFAR,' Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) told reporters after a meeting with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Russ Vought. 'That's reflected in the substitute.' 'We hope that if we can get this across the finish line in the Senate, that the House will accept that one small modification that ends up making the package about a $9 billion rescissions package,' Thune added. 3 Collins argued that senators haven't been told by the White House what specific programs will be axed. AP Collins defended her 'no' vote by arguing OMB didn't provide senators with details about what programs would be scrapped as a result of the clawback. 'The rescissions package has a big problem – nobody really knows what program reductions are in it,' she said in a statement. 'That isn't because we haven't had time to review the bill. Instead, the problem is that OMB has never provided the details that would normally be part of this process.' Collins cited $2.5 billion in proposed cuts to the 'Development Assistance account,' which she said, 'covers everything from basic education, to water and sanitation, to food security – but we don't know how those programs will be affected.' 3 The Senate now has 10 hours to debate the bill before adding amendments and voting on the final measure. The Maine Republican also described the cuts to public broadcasters as 'excessive' and expressed concern that PBS viewers would lose access to 'popular programs like 'Antiques Road Show' and 'Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood.'' 'I share the frustration with the biased reporting by NPR, and I would support defunding it,' Collins continued. ' Nevertheless, local TV and radio stations continue to provide important coverage.' She noted that CPB funding in Maine supports the state's emergency alert network and allows high school basketball games to air on television. 'We should know exactly what programs are affected and the consequences of recissions,' Collins stressed. The Senate now has at least 10 hours to debate the measure before amendments are voted on and a final vote takes place. The House, which narrowly passed the measure in a 214-212 vote in June, would then need to consider the changes the Senate makes to the bill.