Vance casts tie-breaking votes to move forward $9.4B rescissions package — which would defund PBS and NPR — in Senate
The Senate deadlocked, 50-50, on two procedural votes to start debate on the multibillion-dollar spending clawback package before Vance's votes advanced the measure requested by the White House.
Three Republicans – Sens. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) – joined all Democrats in opposition to the bill.
3 Vance's votes moved the $9.4 billion spending cut package forward in the Senate.
The package, approved by the House of Representatives last month, axes approximately $8.3 billion previously allocated to the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and $1.1 billion to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which partially finances National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS).
A proposed $400 million cut to the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) program is expected to be scrapped via an amendment before the bill comes up for a final vote.
'There was a lot of interest from our members on doing something on PEPFAR,' Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) told reporters after a meeting with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Russ Vought. 'That's reflected in the substitute.'
'We hope that if we can get this across the finish line in the Senate, that the House will accept that one small modification that ends up making the package about a $9 billion rescissions package,' Thune added.
3 Collins argued that senators haven't been told by the White House what specific programs will be axed.
AP
Collins defended her 'no' vote by arguing OMB didn't provide senators with details about what programs would be scrapped as a result of the clawback.
'The rescissions package has a big problem – nobody really knows what program reductions are in it,' she said in a statement. 'That isn't because we haven't had time to review the bill. Instead, the problem is that OMB has never provided the details that would normally be part of this process.'
Collins cited $2.5 billion in proposed cuts to the 'Development Assistance account,' which she said, 'covers everything from basic education, to water and sanitation, to food security – but we don't know how those programs will be affected.'
3 The Senate now has 10 hours to debate the bill before adding amendments and voting on the final measure.
The Maine Republican also described the cuts to public broadcasters as 'excessive' and expressed concern that PBS viewers would lose access to 'popular programs like 'Antiques Road Show' and 'Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood.''
'I share the frustration with the biased reporting by NPR, and I would support defunding it,' Collins continued. ' Nevertheless, local TV and radio stations continue to provide important coverage.'
She noted that CPB funding in Maine supports the state's emergency alert network and allows high school basketball games to air on television.
'We should know exactly what programs are affected and the consequences of recissions,' Collins stressed.
The Senate now has at least 10 hours to debate the measure before amendments are voted on and a final vote takes place.
The House, which narrowly passed the measure in a 214-212 vote in June, would then need to consider the changes the Senate makes to the bill.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Black America Web
8 minutes ago
- Black America Web
Stacey Abrams Warns Companies Dropping DEI, ‘It Costs You'
Source: Paras Griffin / Getty Throughout this year, we've seen company after company announce they're dropping diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives to comply with the Trump administration's assault on anything that benefits anyone who isn't a straight, white man. While DEI removals may currently be a politically expedient move, lawyer and former Georgia Representative Stacey Abrams believes businesses will face long-term consequences for abandoning DEI. According to Fortune, Abrams talked at length about DEI during a July 11 panel at the NYU School of Law. 'This notion that simply complying a little bit stops at the water's edge is antithetical to every history we have ever written, and it costs you,' Abrams said. 'It may not cost you in the short term, but in the long term.' Abrams is currently running America Pride Rises, an organization dedicated to preserving and expanding DEI initiatives across the country. Abrams pointed out these companies are 'not operating in silos,' as customers are paying attention to these moves and are choosing where to spend their dollars accordingly. 'I'm also less sympathetic to multi-billion dollar corporations that are concerned about losing a few contracts when they're willing to sacrifice whole communities for that purpose,' Abrams added. Consumers are already showing their disapproval through consumer boycotts. Target spent much of the last decade presenting itself as an inclusive brand, supporting Black brands and LGBTQ culture. In the wake of George Floyd's murder, the company announced a commitment to DEI initiatives and causes benefiting the Black community (interestingly enough, Target's original statement announcing the commitment has been scrubbed from its website). Yet only a week after Trump's second term began, Target announced it was ending its DEI initiatives. Six months later, Target is feeling the backlash to the move. Target is the target of several ongoing consumer boycotts, to the point that Target revealed a first-quarter profit loss to investors in May. Despite consumer boycotts becoming so pronounced, companies are listing them as potential risks to investors, despite executives saying DEI initiatives are a net good, and despite polls showing companies keeping their DEI initiatives have better consumer reputations, that hasn't stopped companies from announcing they're dropping DEI initiatives. Only last week, mobile carrier T-Mobile announced it was dropping its DEI programs 'not just in name, but in substance.' T-Mobile was seeking approval from the FCC over two acquisitions, which it received shortly after the announcement. FCC Chair Brendan Carr is currently under investigation by House Democrats in the Energy and Commerce Committee for potentially weaponizing his ability to authorize acquisitions to pressure companies into dropping their DEI programs. While we've seen company after company give in to the Trump administration's assault on progress and free speech, Abrams pointed out Costco as a company that's continued to stand firm on its values despite the political climate. 'Costco has always been grounded in this responsibility. Therefore, irrespective of the change, they never had to change their policies, they never had to promote who they were. They simply are. And we can see the distinction between Costco and other institutions,' Abrams said. Unlike Target, Costco's shareholders voted to maintain the company's commitment to DEI initiatives, and unlike Target, Costco actually exceeded its expected quarterly earnings. Wow, not alienating a substantial portion of your consumer base actually results in higher sales. Who would've guessed that? SEE ALSO: Survey: High-Level Business Execs Say DEI Is Necessary Poll Shows Companies Maintaing DEI Intiatives Have Better Reputations SEE ALSO Stacey Abrams Warns Companies Dropping DEI, 'It Costs You' was originally published on
USA Today
8 minutes ago
- USA Today
Gen Z men, women have a deep political divide. It's made dating a nightmare.
Kelly Shea's date showed up half-an-hour late to the bar where they were supposed to meet, and things only got worse from there. When he finally arrived, Shea, a now-23-year-old who was studying international politics at the University of Delaware at the time, says they got to talking. She asked him one of her go-to, first-date questions: What is your most controversial take? "I do believe that everybody has, deep down inside them, a controversial take," she says. "This man, he first was like, 'I don't have any.' And I was like, 'That's not true. Tell me what comes to mind.' And then he thinks about it for a second, and he was like, 'Oh, I think being gay is wrong.' " 'Banksying': This new dating trend is leaving people baffled and heartbroken It's because of instances like this that Shea, who describes herself as solidly left-wing, draws a hard line when it comes to dating and politics: If someone's on the far-right, she's not interested. If someone's moderate or center-right − in the vein of John McCain or Mitt Romney, she says − she might give them a chance. "Politics is definitely a factor in my dating," Shea says. "If someone matches with me, or not matches with me but they like my profile or whatnot, and it says 'conservative,' I will absolutely 'X' them. I do think I'm OK with a difference in political opinions to a certain extent. I draw a line when it comes to certain issues, such as human rights." She's not alone. What health & wellness means for you: Sign up for USA TODAY's Keeping It Together newsletter In addition to the many pitfalls of online dating, Gen Z is also having to navigate a dating landscape marked by steep political polarization between men and women. An April poll by NBC News found the partisan divide between men and women ages 18 to 29 to be wider than that of any other age range, with 53% percent of Gen Z women identifying as Democrats, compared to just 35% of Gen Z men. On the flip side, 38% of young men surveyed called themselves Republicans, versus just 20% of young women. The political gender divide is yet another romantic hurdle for a generation that's having less sex and burned out on dating apps. "It's easier to align yourself with a political identity now than it was maybe back then, because of technology, and I do think it funnels you into certain sects," Shea says. "So I do think it fragments and segments people, making it harder to find common ground when it comes to dating." How politics is impacting dating for Gen Z Politics has become an increasingly fraught topic in the realm of dating, with many unwilling to date across the aisle. A 2020 Pew Research report found 71% of Democrats said they probably or definitely would not date someone who voted for Trump. About half of Republicans − 47% − said they probably or definitely wouldn't date someone who voted for Biden. Among Gen Z, the political polarization between men and women showed itself prominently during the 2024 presidential election. On election day, Gen Z men turned out for Trump, with 49% of them voting for him and 47% voting for Harris, according to NBC News exit polling. Trump also gained ground with Gen Z women, though that same exit polling showed 61% of these voters still went for Harris. The conservative swing among young men hasn't been lost on daters, either. "I have seen an uptick in men displaying that they're conservative (on dating apps)," Shea says. This is true even in liberal dating markets, says Kimberly Bizu, a 28-year-old who hosts "Rich Little Brokegirls," a podcast about modern womanhood. Bizu, who identifies as center-left says that, even in blue cities, many young men hold conservative views, even if they don't discuss them. "A lot of people in New York, in LA, they wear these liberal masks socially, while still holding more conservative views behind closed doors," Bizu says. "I know some of my friends who are likely conservative would never admit it publicly." Right-leaning men have noticed the divide too. Winn Howard, a former United States Marine Corps infantry officer who's now getting a dual masters at Georgetown University, re-entered the dating scene in February, after getting out of a long-term relationship. Though he's on the dating app Hinge, he says he rarely uses it, preferring to meet women in person, where it's easier to get know someone beyond the limited information on a dating app profile. Still, "I have noticed on the dating apps, probably more often than not, I come across female profiles that will have their political view," he says. "And, in DC, I feel like I definitely come across liberal more often." Howard, who is 30 and labels himself center-right, says he's opening to dating liberal women and believes finding common ground is an important part of dating. "I'm still a huge, huge proponent and believer in bipartisanship and meeting in the middle, and that's how the two-party system is supposed to work," he says. "So that is how I approach dating. I think just because someone is on the left, and I'm more towards the right, that's not a dealbreaker for me." Should liberals and conservatives date each other? Relationship experts agree it's certainly possible for people with opposing political views to have a thriving romance − so long as they still share core values and treat each other with respect. For Bizu, she says it's important to get to know someone beyond politics. After all, she says most people don't fall neatly into conservative and liberal categories. She finds that acknowledging this nuance can be a good way to find commonality while holding fast to your values. "Honestly, when someone has a bigoted opinion super early on, it typically and usually comes from either the far right or the far left," she says. "At that point, it's less about politics, and it's more about this complete lack of nuance or compassion. And, for me personally, I just feel like, if you're not curious or open to understanding different perspectives, then I am not interested in building a deeper connection." More: The rise of Trump bros and why some Gen Z men are shifting right It's also important to remember Gen Z is still young − and many of its members could change their views with time. Because of this, Bizu encourages fellow Gen Zers to stay open-minded when it comes to dating. "Be open to understanding different perspectives," she says. "Especially Gen Z, we're only at the beginning, right? We're still building our careers and our networks, and I think it's way more important to open yourself up to as many fulfilling relationships as possible, even if that means like, hey, maybe we hold different political views, but we could definitely get something out of this relationship."
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Pence: ‘Time has come' to release Epstein files
Former Vice President Mike Pence on Wednesday joined calls for the Trump administration to release more files in the case involving disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. In an interview on CBS News's 'The Takeout,' Pence called for greater transparency out of the White House, while stressing the importance of protecting the names of victims involved. 'The time has come for the administration to release all of the files regarding Jeffrey Epstein's investigation and prosecution,' he told host Major Garrett. 'It's important that we protect the names of the victims,' he continued. 'They should be excluded from any disclosure, but whether or not the facts justify charges, I think that anyone who participated or was associated with this despicable man ought to be held up to public scrutiny. Pence added, 'I just think we ought to get the facts to the American people. I mean, I've always believed in transparency.' A number of prominent Trump supporters, including prominent members of Congress, have called for the administration to release more information related to the Epstein case. Even some staunch allies of the president, like far-right activist Laura Loomer and Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), have been critical of the administration's handling of the files and called for a special counsel to investigate. But Trump has consistently pushed back against the criticism and on Wednesday wrote a lengthy Truth Social post, in which he dismissed the uproar over the Epstein files as a 'scam' perpetuated by Democrats and suggested he no longer welcomed his backers who have called for more transparency around the documents. 'Their new SCAM is what we will forever call the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax, and my PAST supporters have bought into this 'bulls‑‑‑,' hook, line, and sinker,' Trump posted. 'They haven't learned their lesson, and probably never will, even after being conned by the Lunatic Left for 8 long years.' The Justice Department and FBI issued a joint memo last week that said Epstein did not have a client list and confirmed he died by suicide — not due to foul play as many suspected — in his New York City jail cell in 2019. The findings incensed members of the MAGA movement, who have for years pushed conspiracy theories about Epstein's death and claims that prominent Democrats would be named on a client list. Their report also seemingly contradicts messaging from Attorney General Pam Bondi earlier this year when she said the list was 'sitting on my desk' for review. Trump has praised Bond i for her work on the case in recent days and told his base to move on.
