Over 97,000 criminals convicted under ‘Operation Conviction' since July 2023: U.P. government
'Launched on July 1, 2023, Operation Conviction has proven to be a game-changer, leading to the conviction of 97,158 criminals between July 2023 and mid-June 2025. Out of 1,14,029 identified cases, 74,388 cases were disposed of and convictions were secured in 69,422 cases, underscoring the administration's commitment to turning action into results. Under the campaign, 68 criminals were sentenced to death, 8,172 received life imprisonment, 1,453 were sentenced to over 20 years [in prison], and 87,465 were given up to 20 years imprisonment,' a statement by the State government read.
'Operation Conviction' focused on organised crime, with 395 accused belonging to dreaded gangs convicted in 272 cases involving the top 10 notorious criminals, the statement said. 'In a major success against the mafia, 29 out of 69 identified mafias were convicted, reaffirming that the crackdown is not limited to petty offenders,' it said.
In cases of crimes against children, under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 17 accused were sentenced to death, and 619 received life imprisonment. 'Of the 68 total death penalties, 17 were under POCSO, 48 for heinous crimes, and 3 under the ACL Act,' the statement said.
'On average, 143 identified cases were resolved, and 187 criminals convicted each working day,' the U.P. government's statement said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
17 minutes ago
- United News of India
To curb drug smuggling Maha govt will bring amendment to MCOCA: CM Fadnavis
West Mumbai, July 2 (UNI) Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis today announced that his government will bring in an amendment to the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) during the ongoing monsoon session of the assembly to curb drug smuggling. While replying to a question in the House, the chief minister said in the existing law Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985 which deals with drug peddlers, the accused persons get bail in most of the cases and resume their criminal acts. So a strict law is required to curb such activities . The Chief Minister also said that a separate NDPS unit has been set up in every police station in the state and officers and other personnel have been appointed in it. Coordination committees have also been set up at the district level. He added that the police have taken action in a large number of cases over the last two and a half years. UNI AAA SSP Tags: #To curb drug smuggling Maha govt will bring amendment to MCOCA: CM Fadnavis
Hindustan Times
19 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Monster in my eyes': Huge uproar as Diddy verdict fumes netizens, but will he spend 20 years behind bars?
Sean "Diddy" Combs's bombshell federal trial in sex trafficking case resulted in a conviction for transportation to engage in prostitution but not for sex trafficking or racketeering, igniting uproar on social media. Diddy was found guilty of two prostitution-related offenses and faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. He faces a maximum term of 10 years for each count of conviction, which may potentially sum up to 20 years.(File/AFP) A Manhattan jury, including eight men and four women, sent a letter to the judge stating that they had unanimously decided all of the charges. A memo sent to the court stated, 'We have not reached a verdict on count 1 because we have unpersuadable jurors on both sides.' The charge is under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, which is usually used to convict drug cartels and gangs. Diddy was found guilty of two prostitution-related offenses and faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. He faces a maximum term of 10 years for each count of conviction, which may potentially sum up to 20 years. A combination of guilty and not guilty verdicts here Racketeering conspiracy: not guilty Sex trafficking of Cassie Ventura: not guilty Transportation for prostitution of Ventura and others: guilty Sex trafficking of woman known as "Jane": not guilty Transportation for prostitution of "Jane" and others: guilty The founder of Bad Boy Records was first charged with conspiring to commit racketeering, sex trafficking by force, deception or coercion, and transportation to engage in prostitution, all of which carried a possible penalty of life in prison. Also Read: Kate Middleton, Prince William get massive Royal power from King Charles in fresh snub to Prince Harry; What is it? Diddy may be sentenced to months not years: expert According to an expert, Diddy is probably going to get a term of months rather than years. The rapper is expected to receive a far lesser sentence under the law on federal sentencing than the maximum of 20 years he faces for the two prostitution crimes he was found guilty of Wednesday morning, stated former federal prosecutor Mitchell Epner, NY POST reported. However, Combs has already been imprisoned for approximately ten months since his detention on September 16 and may have already completed the most of his term when he is sentenced, which is probably going to happen in a few months. Epner also stated that he thinks Combs' motion for bail may be granted by Judge Arun Subramanian. 'I think that the court may grant it, given that Sean Combs has been held in MDC – one of the worst prisons in America and likely would serve any additional sentence at a low security prison or possibly even a barracks-style camp,' the attorney claimed. Netizens react to Diddy verdict Meanwhile, several netizens expressed rage over the Diddy trial verdict, with one writing: 'The verdict for Diddy is a message to all women that they are not believed. Sorry to the women out there. The victims especially, they deserved better.' 'Diddy found not guilty on the biggest charges, Donald Trump doing the devil's work in office, and Andrew Tate still alive…….God help us,' another wrote. 'Diddy a monster in my eyes, no matter what the outcome of this trial is,' a third user commented.
News18
38 minutes ago
- News18
Undressing Girl Despite Protest 'Attempt to Rape', Rules Allahabad High Court
Last Updated: The court found that it had been proved by the prosecution that the victim was forcibly kidnapped by the appellant with intention of marrying and having intercourse with her The Allahabad High Court on July 1, 2025, upheld the conviction of a man for attempting to rape a girl after forcibly abducting and detaining her for nearly 20 days, holding that the offence of attempt to rape is made out even if attempt to penetration does not occur clearly, as long as intent and overt acts are established. The Court distinguished the case from the Supreme Court's findings in Tarkeshwar Sahu vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) (2006), where the top court had set aside the conviction under Section 376/511 of the IPC (attempt to rape) recording a finding that the accused had neither undressed himself nor even asked the prosecutrix to undress so there was no question of penetration. The top court had said that 'in the absence of any attempt to penetrate, the conviction under Section 376/511 IPC is wholly illegal and unsustainable". The bench of Justice Rajnish Kumar emphasised that the ruling in the said case was not applicable to the case at hand as here the victim had stated not only in her statement under Section 164 CrPC before the magistrate but in evidence before the trial court also that the appellant had undressed her, however on her protest, he could not do intercourse. The single judge bench referred to the Supreme Court's judgment in Pandharinath vs. State of Maharashtra (2009) where it was held that if the accused-appellant had removed the victim's clothes and he had not rebutted this statement of the prosecutrix in his examination-in-chief, it was definitely a case of attempt to rape. In every crime, there is first, the intention to commit, secondly, preparation to commit it, and thirdly, the attempt to commit it. If the third stage, that is 'the attempt' is successful, then the crime is complete. If the attempt fails, the crime is not complete, but the law punishes the person attempting the Act under Section 511 IPC, the high court said, referring to the Supreme Court's ruling in Koppula Venkat Rao vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004). The court found that in the present case, it had been proved by the prosecution that the victim was forcibly kidnapped by the appellant with intention of marrying and having intercourse with her. The appellant with the said motive kept her at the residence of his relative for about 20 days, where he not only outraged her modesty but also attempted rape by undressing her, however, he could not do so due to victim's protest. 'Nothing could be extracted from her (the victim) in cross-examination, which may create any doubt on her version or about the veracity of her evidence," the single judge bench noted. Further, since the FIR was lodged by the girl's mother on August 31, 2004, 21 days after the girl went missing, the appellant argued that the delay pointed to fabrication and that the incident was consensual. However, the court rejected both claims, stating that the delay had been explained and that such delays are not unusual in cases involving sexual assault due to societal stigma. Therefore, finding no illegality or infirmity in the trial court's order, the court dismissed the appeal against conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376/511 and 354 of the IPC.
