
‘It's coming': OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says humanoid robots may disrupt jobs soon
'If you look at the history of the world, technological-driven job change, when one class of jobs goes away and another one pops up, that's very consistent, it's punctuated. But that's just been happening for a long time. And the thing that is different this time is just the rate with which it looks like it will happen,' Altman said.
He made these remarks in an appearance on 'The Circuit with Emily Chang', a programme on Bloomberg Originals, where the pair discussed the unprecedented demand for AI compute and the conceptualisation of the $500 billion-dollar Stargate project.
Beyond the wide-ranging impact of AI on jobs, Altman also warned about breakthroughs in humanoid robot development. 'I don't think the world has really had the humanoid robots moment yet, and I don't think that's very far away […] What happens when the humanoid robots get here? I mean, obviously do a lot of jobs,' he said.
Altman also highlighted the acceleration of scientific research and discovery as one of the most exciting possibilities he sees with AI. 'I think 2025 will be a world where we have agents do a lot of work, things we already know how to do. I'm hopeful that 2026 will be a big year of new scientific progress,' he said.
The AI industry leader was also careful not to give the impression that he knows exactly what the future holds. 'Do I think I could have sat here in 1905 and told you what we were about to discover in physics, and that 40 years later we would, like, have an atomic bomb? Definitely not,' he told Bloomberg's Emily Chang.
Here are a few other highlights from the nearly 20 minute-long interview.
At the beginning of the year, US President Donald Trump announced what might be the most ambitious infrastructure project in the country's history since NASA's first missions to the moon. This initiative known as the Stargate Project is actually a joint venture among OpenAI, Microsoft, Nvidia, Arm, Oracle, Softbank, and other corporate partners aiming to invest $500 billion to build out AI infrastructure such as data centers, energy plants, power lines, and more in the US over the next four years.
The first data centre under the project is already under construction in Texas and will be dedicated to training OpenAI's next AI models. In the Bloomberg interview, Altman revealed 'Stargate' started out as an internal codename based on the early layouts of the data centres.
He described the project as 'a complex supply chain with a lot of partners and obviously a lot of capital.' 'We used to think a lot about the compute we would need to train the models. And what we didn't used to think about was how much people were going to use these models. It just turned out people want to use the models much more than we imagined,' he said while talking about how the $500 billion infrastructure project was conceptualised.
When asked about the need for more compute and infrastructure, Altman pointed to the surge in inference demand sparked by the recent trend of AI-generated Ghibli-style images. 'Making an image is not a low compute task. We had to do a lot of very unnatural things. We had to borrow compute capacity from research. We had to slow down some other features because it's not like we have hundreds of thousands of GPUs sitting around just spinning idly,' he said.
'But if we had more GPUs, we would be more able to handle demand surges like this and we wouldn't have to put such restrictions on other features,' Altman added.
When asked why OpenAI couldn't get the required compute from its biggest investor, Microsoft, Altman said, 'We do get a lot of great stuff from Microsoft but I think this is more than any one company can deliver. Microsoft will do a lot of compute for us. I'm very happy about that.'
In response to a question about DeepSeek's breakthrough in developing cost-efficient LLMs, Altman said, 'I think the DeepSeek team is very talented and did a lot of good things. I don't think they figured out something way more efficient than what we figured out.'
OpenAI has previously alleged that DeepSeek may have ripped off its technology to develop its AI models through a process called distillation. Altman further emphasised that the company continues to make strides in terms of efficiency. 'We will have better chips. We will have better energy sources. We'll have better algorithms. We will optimise,' he said.
On whether OpenAI could become a financially viable company, Altman said, 'We are definitely doing something unprecedented. But, it doesn't mean something can't go wrong.' He also acknowledged that the ChatGPT-maker would be in a difficult financial position if users stopped paying for AI services.
He identified access to the best infrastructure layer and best top of the stack as OpenAI's biggest advantages over its competitors.
On what Trump's re-election as US president means for the AI industry, Altman said that he was optimistic. 'I think he [Trump] will get to make some of the most important decisions anyone in the world has gotten to make related to AI […] One thing that's really impressed me about President Trump is his ability to understand the whole industry and all the changes so quickly.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
9 minutes ago
- Business Standard
AI agents are here: What they are capable of and where things can go wrong
We are entering the third phase of generative AI. First came the chatbots, followed by the assistants. Now we are beginning to see agents: systems that aspire to greater autonomy and can work in 'teams' or use tools to accomplish complex tasks. The latest hot product is OpenAI's ChatGPT agent. This combines two pre-existing products (Operator and Deep Research) into a single more powerful system which, according to the developer, 'thinks and acts'. These new systems represent a step up from earlier AI tools. Knowing how they work and what they can do – as well as their drawbacks and risks – is rapidly becoming essential. From chatbots to agents ChatGPT launched the chatbot era in November 2022, but despite its huge popularity the conversational interface limited what could be done with the technology. Enter the AI assistant, or copilot. These are systems built on top of the same large language models that power generative AI chatbots, only now designed to carry out tasks with human instruction and supervision. Agents are another step up. They are intended to pursue goals (rather than just complete tasks) with varying degrees of autonomy, supported by more advanced capabilities such as reasoning and memory. Multiple AI agent systems may be able to work together, communicating with each other to plan, schedule, decide and coordinate to solve complex problems. Agents are also 'tool users' as they can also call on software tools for specialised tasks – things such as web browsers, spreadsheets, payment systems and more. A year of rapid development Agentic AI has felt imminent since late last year. A big moment came last October, when Anthropic gave its Claude chatbot the ability to interact with a computer in much the same way a human does. This system could search multiple data sources, find relevant information and submit online forms. Other AI developers were quick to follow. OpenAI released a web browsing agent named Operator, Microsoft announced Copilot agents, and we saw the launch of Google's Vertex AI and Meta's Llama agents. Earlier this year, the Chinese startup Monica demonstrated its Manus AI agent buying real estate and converting lecture recordings into summary notes. Another Chinese startup, Genspark, released a search engine agent that returns a single-page overview (similar to what Google does now) with embedded links to online tasks such as finding the best shopping deals. Another startup, Cluely, offers a somewhat unhinged 'cheat at anything' agent that has gained attention but is yet to deliver meaningful results. Not all agents are made for general-purpose activity. Some are specialised for particular areas. Coding and software engineering are at the vanguard here, with Microsoft's Copilot coding agent and OpenAI's Codex among the frontrunners. These agents can independently write, evaluate and commit code, while also assessing human-written code for errors and performance lags. Search, summarisation and more One core strength of generative AI models is search and summarisation. Agents can use this to carry out research tasks that might take a human expert days to complete. OpenAI's Deep Research tackles complex tasks using multi-step online research. Google's AI 'co-scientist' is a more sophisticated multi-agent system that aims to help scientists generate new ideas and research proposals. Agents can do more – and get more wrong Despite the hype, AI agents come loaded with caveats. Both Anthropic and OpenAI, for example, prescribe active human supervision to minimise errors and risks. OpenAI also says its ChatGPT agent is 'high risk' due to potential for assisting in the creation of biological and chemical weapons. However, the company has not published the data behind this claim so it is difficult to judge. But the kind of risks agents may pose in real-world situations are shown by Anthropic's Project Vend. Vend assigned an AI agent to run a staff vending machine as a small business – and the project disintegrated into hilarious yet shocking hallucinations and a fridge full of tungsten cubes instead of food. In another cautionary tale, a coding agent deleted a developer's entire database, later saying it had 'panicked'. Agents in the office Nevertheless, agents are already finding practical applications. In 2024, Telstra heavily deployed Microsoft copilot subscriptions. The company says AI-generated meeting summaries and content drafts save staff an average of 1–2 hours per week. Many large enterprises are pursuing similar strategies. Smaller companies too are experimenting with agents, such as Canberra-based construction firm Geocon's use of an interactive AI agent to manage defects in its apartment developments. Human and other costs At present, the main risk from agents is technological displacement. As agents improve, they may replace human workers across many sectors and types of work. At the same time, agent use may also accelerate the decline of entry-level white-collar jobs. People who use AI agents are also at risk. They may rely too much on the AI, offloading important cognitive tasks. And without proper supervision and guardrails, hallucinations, cyberattacks and compounding errors can very quickly derail an agent from its task and goals into causing harm, loss and injury. The true costs are also unclear. All generative AI systems use a lot of energy, which will in turn affect the price of using agents – especially for more complex tasks. Learn about agents – and build your own Despite these ongoing concerns, we can expect AI agents will become more capable and more present in our workplaces and daily lives. It's not a bad idea to start using (and perhaps building) agents yourself, and understanding their strengths, risks and limitations. For the average user, agents are most accessible through Microsoft copilot studio. This comes with inbuilt safeguards, governance and an agent store for common tasks. For the more ambitious, you can build your own AI agent with just five lines of code using the Langchain framework.


Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang predicts: AI will create more millionaires in five years
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently called AI the 'great technology equaliser of all time'. Speaking at an All-In podcast hosted by American venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya, Huang explained that in the era of AI, 'everybody is a programmer'. He further stated that the traditional gatekeeping of coding languages like C++, Python has faded, adding people now just need to talk to AI. 'Everybody is an artist now; everybody is an author now,' Jensen Huang said. Jensen Huang: 'AI will create more millionaires in 5 years' During the podcast, Jensen Huang also talked about the impact of AI on jobs. 'AI in my case is creating jobs; it causes people to create things that other people would like to buy. It drives more growth, more jobs, and all that goes together. AI is the greatest technology equaliser of all time,' the Nvidia CEO said. He forecasted that 'AI will create more millionaires in five years than the internet did in 20,' adding that he is worried that we are not moving fast enough to create jobs. Jensen Huang further warned that those who are not using AI will lose their job to someone with the knowledge of AI. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indonesia: Unsold Sofas Prices May Surprise You (Prices May Surprise You) Sofas | Search Ads Search Now Undo Huang further predicted that in the future, every country will operate two factories – one physical and other digital. He gave an example of Elon Musk 's EV company Tesla, saying 'Tesla builds cars in one factory, and in another, it builds the AI that powers them'. In a related news, Huang discussed the scale of impact that small, focused teams of AI researchers can have and how Nvidia's success has translated into significant financial rewards for those in leadership. 'I've created more billionaires on my management team than any CEO in the world. They're doing just fine. Don't feel sad for anybody at my layer.' Jensen Huang said. He was responding to a question on the effectiveness and value of smaller AI teams. 'But the important big idea is that the impact of 150 or so AI researchers, with funding behind them, can probably create,' he noted. Jensen Huang gave examples of OpenAI which originally started with around 150 employees and China's DeepSeek which also has a similar workforce. Samsung Galaxy Watch8: AI on Your Wrist


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
US-China set to resume Stockholm talks: From Xi-Trump meet to tariff truce, here's what to expect
Top U.S. and Chinese economic officials are resuming trade talks in Stockholm on Monday, aiming to extend a temporary truce by 90 days and prevent a new round of sharply higher tariffs. With an August 12 deadline approaching, analysts say a short-term pause is more likely than a breakthrough on core economic disputes. Without a deal, U.S. duties could revert to triple-digit levels, posing risks to global supply chains. The talks follow a major U.S.-EU trade agreement on Sunday, in which the European Union accepted a 15% tariff on most of its goods exports to the U.S. and pledged $750 billion in energy purchases and $600 billion in investments. No such deal is expected from the U.S.-China side. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Data Science PGDM Degree Operations Management healthcare CXO Leadership Others Project Management Digital Marketing Finance Management MBA Technology Healthcare Product Management Data Science others Public Policy Skills you'll gain: Duration: 30 Weeks IIM Kozhikode SEPO - IIMK-AI for Senior Executives India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 11 Months IIT Madras CERT-IITM Advanced Cert Prog in AI and ML India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 10 Months E&ICT Academy, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati CERT-IITG Prof Cert in DS & BA with GenAI India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 30 Weeks IIM Kozhikode SEPO - IIMK-AI for Senior Executives India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 11 Months E&ICT Academy, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati CERT-IITG Postgraduate Cert in AI and ML India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 11 Months E&ICT Academy, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati CERT-IITG Postgraduate Cert in AI and ML India Starts on undefined Get Details 'We're very close to a deal with China. We really sort of made a deal with China, but we'll see how that goes,' said President Donald Trump on Sunday, before announcing the EU agreement. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like You might be interested Undo Here's what to expect from US-China meet According to a South China Morning Post report, both sides may agree to hold off on new tariffs or export restrictions for three more months. The U.S. Treasury declined to comment. Meanwhile, Financial Times reported that Washington has paused new export curbs on tech products to avoid disrupting negotiations, though Reuters could not verify that independently. Earlier discussions in Geneva and London focused on reversing retaliatory tariffs and restoring trade in rare earth minerals and AI chips. However, structural issues—such as China's export-led model and U.S. tech controls—remain unresolved. Live Events Also Read: US, China to launch new talks on tariff truce extension, easing path for Trump-Xi meeting 'I'd be surprised if there is an early harvest on some of these things but an extension of the ceasefire for another 90 days seems to be the most likely outcome,' Reuters quoted Scott Kennedy of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, as saying. There is also speculation about a possible Trump-Xi meeting in late October. Sun Chenghao of Tsinghua University said such a summit could support mutual concessions. 'The future prospect of the heads of state summit is very beneficial to the negotiations because everyone wants to reach an agreement or pave the way in advance,' Sun said. Beijing is expected to push for easing of U.S. tariffs and tech export controls. China argues that fulfilling past U.S. purchase commitments would help reduce the $295.5 billion trade deficit recorded in 2024.