No duty concessions to US on agri, dairy, GM foods: An explainer
New Delhi, Aug 2 (PTI) India has toughened its stance on extending duty concessions on agri products, dairy and GM foods in the proposed bilateral trade agreement (BTA) with the US.
With the US not able to finalise a deal with India so far, US President Donald Trump on Thursday announced imposition of an additional 25 per cent import duty on Indian goods entering American markets from August 7.
Earlier, this duty was to be imposed from August 1. The President has also not specified the penalty which he has announced on India for buying crude oil and military equipment from Russia.
Here is a list of Q&A (questions and answers) to explain reasons behind India's stand and impact of US tariffs on labour-intensive sectors: * What is the India-US bilateral trade agreement (BTA)? – India and the US entered into negotiations for a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial BTA in March 2025 with a target to complete the first tranche/phase of the pact by fall (October-November) of 2025.
So far, five rounds of talks have been completed. For the next round, the US team, headed by Assistant US Trade Representative for South and Central Asia Brendan Lynch, is visiting India from August 25.
* What is the aim of the BTA? – Normally in a trade agreement, two trading partners either significantly reduce or eliminate import duties on the maximum number of goods traded between them. Besides, they ease norms to promote trade in services and increase two-way investments.
The India-US BTA is aimed at more than doubling the bilateral trade to USD 500 billion by 2030 from the present USD 191 billion.
*What are the major demands of the two countries from each other in the BTA? – The US wants duty concessions on certain industrial goods, automobiles, especially electric vehicles, wines, petrochemical products, agri goods, dairy items, apples, tree nuts, and genetically-modified crops.
India is seeking the removal of this additional tariff (25 per cent now) and cut in tariffs on steel and aluminium (50 per cent), auto sector (25 per cent), labour-intensive sectors, such as textiles, gems and jewellery, leather goods, garments, plastics, chemicals, shrimp, oil seeds, grapes, and bananas.
*How much tariff is imposed by the US on Indian goods at present? – India's average import duty is about 17 per cent, while the US' is 3.3 per cent. On April 2, the US announced to impose 26 per cent duty (16 per cent reciprocal tariff and 10 per cent baseline tariff). At present, only the baseline tariff is in force. It is over and above the existing import duty on Indian goods.
For example, before April 2, the Indian textiles were attracting a 6-9 per cent tariff in America. With the baseline tariff, it rose to 16-19 per cent. But from August 7, the sector will attract a 31-34 per cent duty. The baseline tariff will be replaced by 25 per cent duty notified on July 31 by the White House.
However, certain products are exempted from these tariffs such as pharmaceutical, electronics and energy products.
* From when the 25 per cent duty will come into force? – The duty, announced this week, will come into force from August 7 (9.30 am IST). The executive order has also clarified that goods in transit until October 5, 12:01 am eastern daylight time (EDT), or 09:30 am IST, will be subject to a 10 per cent tariff, provided that such goods have entered into transit before August 7 12:01 am EDT.
*Why India is not ready to provide duty concessions on dairy, agri and GM foods? – Agri: Farm livelihoods are at stake. This is a politically and economically sensitive area as over 700 million people in India's rural economy are dependent on the sector. If India removes tariffs, cheap, subsidised US grains could flood Indian markets during global price crashes.
Unlike the US, where agriculture is corporatised, Indian farming is a livelihood issue. Tariffs are essential to protect small farmers, manage price volatility, and ensure food security.
Dairy: India wants to safeguard its small farmers. GTRI stated that the US argues that India's GM-free feed certification and facility registration protocols effectively bar American dairy imports.
'Indian rules prohibit imports from animals fed with animal-derived feed'�for example, butter from a cow fed meat'�due to religious sensitivities. India considers this policy non-negotiable," GTRI has said.
GM Food: These are created by inserting specific genes, often from bacteria, viruses, other plants, or occasionally animals, into a plant's DNA to introduce new traits, such as pest resistance or herbicide tolerance.
Allowing the import of GM products such as soybean meal and distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) for animal feed would affect India's agricultural exports to the EU, a key destination for Indian exporters. PTI RR ANU ANU
view comments
First Published:
August 02, 2025, 13:15 IST
News agency-feeds No duty concessions to US on agri, dairy, GM foods: An explainer
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
8 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Godrej Properties plans its largest-ever bond issue: Report
Godrej Properties, the real estate unit of India's Godrej Industries, is set to tap the corporate bond market later this month with its largest issue to date, three sources aware of the matter said. ADVERTISEMENT The real estate developer is likely to raise around 20 billion rupees ($230 million) through the sale of shorter duration bonds, with a maturity of three to five years, the sources said last week. "The company could look to tap the market after the central bank's monetary policy decision this week, in the hope that yields ease further," one of the sources said. All the sources requested anonymity as the talks are private. Godrej Properties did not reply to a Reuters email seeking comment. The bonds are rated 'AA+', and this will be the company's first bond issuance in nearly a year. Last September, it had raised around 650 million rupees through the sale of five-year bonds at an annual coupon of 8.50%. ADVERTISEMENT Godrej Properties has borrowed 25 billion rupees through bonds since September 2023. The upcoming sale would take its outstanding issuances to 45 billion rupees. The Mumbai-based firm last month acquired around 50 acres of land for premium plotted residential units in the Indian state of Chhattisgarh. ADVERTISEMENT ($1 = 87.2300 Indian rupees) (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
Time of India
8 minutes ago
- Time of India
Congress – singing the tune of Pakistan
Keshav Upadhye, a young, dynamic and prominent face, has been working with the Bharatiya Janata Party for over two decades. In 2014, the then state president Devendra Fadnavis had appointed Upadhye as the spokesperson in his team. Owing to his journalistic background and better understanding of the socio-economic issues of the state, Upadhye made a mark as a spokesperson in a short span. He articulates the views of the party and aggressively defends the party on various platforms including the Marathi and Hindi national news channels. Keshav Upadhye worked for the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) and after completing his degree in Journalism from Ranade Institute, Pune, he began his career as a journalist with daily Pudhari, Loksatta and Mumbai Tarun Bharat. Knowing the pulse of the news, he writes on varied topics and on various platforms like the newspapers, blogs and other social media platforms. He was involved in two study groups formed by the Rambhau Mhalgi Prabodhini in 2006 to study the naxalite movement and its adverse impact on the development of Chhatisgarh. The Prabodhini later published this report. He was also a part of the Prabodhini's fact-finding committee formed to study the Solapur riots. LESS ... MORE Parliament recently held a discussion on 'Operation Sindoor', a joint operation by the Indian armed forces against terrorist outfits in Pakistan. Entire opposition including Congress were consistently demanding a discussion in Parliament on this issue. Congress' prince Rahul Gandhi and his sidekicks were also alleging that the government is not ready to discuss this subject in the parliament. The Modi government refuted the opposition's allegation by discussing this issue in detail. Rahul Gandhi's objection that Prime Minister Narendra Modi is not speaking a word on this matter also turned out to be totally false. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar also shed light in detail on various aspects related to 'Operation Sindoor' and the subsequent developments. This helped expose Congress' pro Pakistan stand in front of the nation once again. Congress' prince, while speaking in Lok Sabha, questioned why the action by armed forces against Pakistan was stopped and also bragged that the bravery and courage should have been shown like his grandmother Indira Gandhi. There is absolutely no doubt that Mrs Indira Gandhi showed the courage of breaking Bangladesh from Pakistan and making it an independent nation in 1971. Jan Sangh, the main opposition party at that time, had given its complete support to Indira Gandhi. The world could see the proud picture of the entire opposition standing in solidarity behind Indira Gandhi. The same picture was expected during the time of 'Operation Sindoor'. However, the behaviour of opposition parties over the last eleven years has shown time and again that they do not hesitate to take even an anti-national stand just to oppose Modi. Prime Minister Narendra Modi completely exposed the Congress' stand during his speech in the Lok Sabha. Senior Congress leader P Chidambaram, while speaking on this matter in Rajya Sabha, showed another example of his love for Pakistan by raising a question 'Why do you assume that they came from Pakistan?' At the same time Praniti Shinde, daughter of another senior Congress leader and former Union Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde, while making her point in Lok Sabha insulted the Indian armed forces by calling 'Operation Sindoor' a 'Tamasha' performed only for the media. She revealed Congress' traditional love for Pakistan by blatantly lying that the government is not giving information on how many terrorists were killed in 'Operation Sindoor'. In the press conference held immediately after 'Operation Sindoor', the Indian armed forces had clearly stated that the only purpose behind this operation was to destroy terrorist camps in Pakistan. In this operation India targeted 4 terrorist camps located 100 km inside Pakistan and destroyed 5 camps in POK with great precision. Officials of the Indian armed forces had informed in a press conference in New Delhi that the bases of the terrorist organizations Jaish-e-Mohammed and Lashkar-e-Taiba have been destroyed. Despite that, a public representative like Praniti Shinde in Lok Sabha by asking questions like 'what exactly was achieved by this operation' and calling 'Operation Sindoor' a 'Tamasha', cast a doubt on the actions of the Indian armed forces. Congress has this old habit of insulting the armed forces. Pakistan launched missile attacks targeting civilian settlements in India after 'Operation Sindoor'. However, the Indian armed forces repelled all these attacks. After that the Indian armed forces showed its strength by targeting army bases in Pakistan. Terrified by these attacks, Pakistan pleaded with India to stop the attacks. The Indian armed forces had also clearly stated that they have temporarily stopped 'Operation Sindoor' at Pakistan's request as the aim of teaching Pakistan a lesson had been achieved. Leaders of the ruling party, ministers at centre were not briefing the media throughout this period. All the briefings regarding this operation, losses suffered by Pakistan in this operation were officially done by representatives of the Indian armed forces itself. A modern technique of PowerPoint presentation was used while sharing information about this operation. In spite of this Congress leaders have no shame in doubting the bravery of the Indian armed forces by making statements like what was achieved through 'Operation Sindoor' at the supreme level like Lok Sabha. Few days back, Rahul Gandhi had demanded information on the number of aircrafts shot down by Pakistan in 'Operation Sindoor'. The Indian armed forces had already given a clear explanation on this. Pakistan's Prime Minister had made the ridiculous claim that their army had shot down Indian planes. However, the government of Pakistan failed to provide a single evidence of this. Instead of demanding information about the damage done to Pakistan, Rahul Gandhi was asking for the information on the number of Indian aircrafts that were shot down. Today, Rahul Gandhi is making childish remarks like asking why 'Operation Sindoor' was stopped?, Modi Government lacks courage to take action against Pakistan, but he will conveniently forget that no action was taken against Pakistan after the Mumbai attacks in 2008 despite the readiness of Indian armed forces only because of the weak stand taken by Sonia Gandhi. Rahul Gandhi also forgot that his grandmother unconditionally released over one lakh Pakistani soldiers. The prince is even oblivious to the fact that he is speaking the language of Pakistan just to oppose Modi and BJP. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Time of India
8 minutes ago
- Time of India
Retail investors dump 68% of Nifty stocks chasing smallcap crorepati dreams. Is this a trap?
Indian retail investors are selling their holdings in Nifty50 companies. They are seeking higher returns in small and mid-cap stocks. This trend is driven by impatience and the desire for quick profits. Experts warn against this strategy. They cite risks like volatility and poor governance. Institutional investors are buying the bluechip stocks that retail investors are selling. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What's the psychology behind the sell-off? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The smallcap gamble The experts highlight a minefield of specific, often overlooked, dangers: Crippling Volatility and Liquidity Traps: "Smallcaps are inherently more volatile than largecaps, with lower liquidity and higher sensitivity to market or economic shocks," explains Karthick Jonagadla. This means portfolios can "magnify portfolio swings and potential losses." Sheth adds a critical point about exit strategy: "Smallcaps can be hard to exit in downturns. If there's a market correction or panic, these stocks fall harder and faster—and may not recover as easily." Questionable Quality and Governance: The mad dash for returns often means due diligence is ignored. "Many small and midcap companies may lack the transparency, consistent performance, and robust governance standards that bluechip stocks maintain," Jonagadla warns. "Retail investors chasing rallies often ignore these critical qualitative factors." The Peril of Herding and Stretched Valuations: When everyone rushes into the same few stocks, it creates a bubble. "As more retail investors crowd into the same set of smallcaps, these stocks can become highly overvalued, exacerbating the risk of a sharp correction when sentiment reverses," says Jonagadla. Sheth confirms that many of these stocks are now trading at "stretched valuations, without matching earnings support," exposing investors to severe valuation compression risk. In a high-stakes gamble for explosive returns, a vast army of retail investors has systematically shedded its holdings in India's most formidable bluechip companies. Driven by a potent cocktail of impatience, profit-booking, and the intoxicating allure of finding the next multibagger , they are abandoning the perceived safety of Nifty50 stock to chase the "crorepati" dream in the volatile, high-octane world of small and mid-cap numbers from the June 2025 quarter show that retail investors have pared stakes in 34 of 50 companies constituting the Nifty index, which means 3 out of every 4th bluechip stock saw small investors taking a bearish move is made all the more dramatic by the fact that many of these discarded giants have been stellar performers. Investors have been selling shares in companies like Bajaj Finance, which has rocketed 28.5% year-to-date, and defence stalwart BEL, up an impressive 29%. This paradox suggests a conscious, aggressive strategy: cash in the steady gains from the giants and redeploy the winnings onto the riskier, but potentially more rewarding, terrain of the broader is driving millions of investors to collectively turn their backs on stability? Market experts point to a confluence of powerful behavioral Sheth , Head of Market Perspectives & Research at SAMCO Securities , identifies a core sentiment of frustration. "Looking at the investment behaviour of the retail investors in the recent past, it seems that they are fed up with the ongoing consolidation in the largecap stocks," he observes, adding that this phase of sideways movement has been "unduly prolonged." For investors seeing small-caps deliver triple-digit returns elsewhere, the steady, single-digit churn of a largecap leader can feel like impatience is fertile ground for the fear of missing out, or FOMO. Karthick Jonagadla , Founder of Quantace Research, says retail investors may be exiting bluechip Nifty stocks in favor of smallcap and midcap names, hoping to capture outsized gains in those segments.'The outperformance of these lesser-valued segments in previous cycles can generate a fear of missing out (FOMO), often leading retail participation to surge in already rallying stocks,' he concurs, noting, "Retail tends to follow trends, and the recent outperformance of broader markets may have created a FOMO effect. Stocks that already ran up are being assumed to continue that momentum."For many, the decision is also tactical. Anand K Rathi, Co-Founder of MIRA Money, sees this as a "classic case of profit booking." He elaborates that it's a "common behavioral pattern where investors—retail or HNIs—tend to exit well-performing bluechip stocks to preserve gains and rotate capital into areas they believe have higher near-term upside or appear undervalued."However, Rathi issues a stern warning against this seemingly savvy move. "Investors frequently lose out on long-term wealth building while using this strategy," he cautions. "They enter risky equities without considering fundamentals and sell winners too soon, only to see their earlier holdings grow even more. Such reactionary investing, motivated more by short-term stories than by long-term convictions, may backfire."The exodus of retail investors has created a fascinating divergence when contrasted with the behavior of institutional "smart money." While retail sold, mutual funds increased their holdings in 33 Nifty companies, and foreign institutional investors (FIIs) were net buyers in schism is starkly visible at the individual stock level. In IndusInd Bank, retail investors shed a significant 1.10% of their holdings. In the same period, FIIs saw a buying opportunity, aggressively increasing their stake by a massive 4.16%. A similar story played out in BEL, where a 0.72% retail exit was met with a 1.01% FII institutional conviction suggests a fundamentally different thesis. While retail chases short-term momentum, institutions appear to be capitalizing on the availability of high-quality assets, perhaps seeing long-term value where retail sees limited near-term upside. Jonagadla notes that some retail investors may be selling because they believe "further upside is now limited" in Nifty stocks that have already run Apurva Sheth offers another layer of nuance. The decline in direct share ownership might not be a complete abandonment of blue-chips. "Some of the reduced direct ownership in largecaps may also be explained by a shift to SIPs and mutual fund investing," he suggests. "Retail may prefer managed portfolios, especially in volatile markets, leading to declining individual holdings even in top-quality names."While the chase for multibaggers is exhilarating, market veterans are nearly unanimous in their warnings about the dangers of this strategy. They describe it as "classic late-cycle optimism" and a gamble that exchanges stability for fragility."This is a serious risk during bullish times," states Anand K Rathi. "It may seem profitable to sell largecaps with solid fundamentals and reallocate a significant portion to smallcaps but doing so exposes investors to high volatility and concentration risk."Apurva Sheth echoes this sentiment, emphasizing the danger for the average investor. "It's a significant risk, especially for inexperienced or emotionally driven investors," he says. "By exiting diversified bluechips (like RIL, HDFC Bank), retail is exchanging stability for fragility."Perhaps the most significant risk is the abandonment of a proven wealth-creation strategy. "Historical returns demonstrate that a core allocation to quality bluechip stocks underpins long-term wealth creation," reminds Jonagadla. "Sudden portfolio shifts based on short-term momentum can compromise overall diversification, making portfolios riskier than what retail investors may realize."Anand K Rathi stresses that this behavior can be self-destructive. "From the perspective of portfolio construction, these tactics have the potential to sabotage long-term objectives," he says. The very act of selling a steady compounder to buy a speculative asset can be the costliest mistake an investor Anand K Rathi aptly concludes, investors should build their portfolios with a clear principle in mind: "Balance, not blind rotation is the key.": Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)
