German Automakers Discussing U.S. Tariff Deal, What You Need to Know
Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz, and BMW are leading talks with Washington over a tariff deal involving German automakers receiving credits for vehicles they export from America to other countries, which would lower or offset the tariffs on cars they import into the U.S. from Germany. America is the European Union's (EU) fifth-largest vehicle export destination after China, Japan, Britain, and Turkey, according to Reuters, but the U.S. is the largest export destination for German cars. Mercedes-Benz is expanding its U.S. production by manufacturing its GLC SUV at its Alabama plant starting in 2027, BMW is considering adding shifts at its Spartanburg plant in South Carolina, and Volkswagen's Audi mulls over producing some vehicles in the U.S.-a plan predating the Trump administration. Germany's leading automakers are aiming for talks with the U.S. Department of Commerce to result in a tariff deal in June.
The potential new and current investments that the Commerce Department is reviewing from German automakers are worth billions of dollars. BMW CEO Oliver Zipse said that the manufacturer's Spartanburg plant supports 43,000 jobs and contributes over $26 billion yearly. While many European automakers withdrew their 2025 financial forecasts, BMW is backing its March projections alongside Ferrari, which also stood by its 2025 earnings forecast. However, BMW's decision to stick with its 2025 guidance is partially based on the idea that some tariffs will go into reverse from July at the latest. BMW finance chief Walter Mertl said: "We are noticing that things are moving, developing, and being negotiated everywhere. Accordingly, our reading, based on all the networks that we have at our disposal, is that we assume that something will change in July," Just Auto reports. The German automaker's 2025 outlook includes earnings on par with 2024 and an operating margin in the car segment of 5-7%, according to Reuters.
The head of Germany's auto lobby, Hildegard Müller, highlighted in an interview with Politico that Germany produces about 840,000 vehicles annually within the U.S. for both the American market and exports, with 140,000 total employees. In addition to BMW's Spartanburg plant, Mercedes-Benz's Tuscaloosa, Alabama factory has been operating since 1997, resulting in approximately four million vehicles produced. Volkswagen's Chattanooga plant, which opened in 2011, built 175,000 cars in 2023. Müller also pointed out that building a U.S. automotive plant, even if you're quick, takes one or two years, and companies are losing money fast. U.S. tariffs are causing manufacturers like BMW to lose $11.3 million daily and impacting about €67 billion ($76 billion) of EU automotive exports, Euronews reports.
Automakers like Volkswagen, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz are pushing for a U.S. tariff deal with the selling point that German automakers receive credits based on the number of vehicles Germany produces in America to reduce the two countries' car market trade deficit. However, if the tariffs stay in place, powerful voices in the automotive industry, like Hildegard Müller, noted that these policies can lower the pressure that U.S. car manufacturers face to be innovative, weakening their international competitiveness in the medium term.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why USA Rare Earth Stock Fell Today
China and the U.S. have apparently signed a trade deal that will free up rare earth magnet exports from China. USA Rare Earth doesn't yet make magnets, but wants to. For the time being, the company has no revenue and no profit. 10 stocks we like better than Usa Rare Earth › Shares of USA Rare Earth (NASDAQ: USAR) stock fell an unlucky 13% through 1:30 p.m. ET Friday. And why? Well, last night President Trump announced the signing of a trade deal with China, and this morning, China's Ministry of Commerce confirmed the news, stating its intention to "approve export applications for items subject to export control rules," as CNBC just reported. China's referring first and foremost to applications for the export of rare earth magnets. And the reason this is bad news for USA Rare Earth is that the company is itself trying to break into the rare earth biz, by mining, processing, and supplying rare earths extracted from a mine in Sierra Blanca, Texas. Any increase in cheap rare earth exports from China could torpedo USA Rare Earth's business model, which is really predicated on China not allowing rare earth exports, such that rare earth sourced from within the U.S. will be the only way U.S. companies can access the products at all. Still, a couple caveats are worth pointing out. First and foremost, USA Rare Earth -- which only formed in 2019 -- doesn't actually mine any rare earths itself... yet. The company has no revenue, operating profit, or free cash flow whatsoever. Its entire $40 million net profit over the past year came from the "gain on fair market value of financial instruments" it holds. As such, it doesn't really matter what China does (or doesn't do) until USA starts producing some rare earths of its own, and proves itself a viable business. Unless and until that happens, I consider the stock entirely speculative -- and probably a sell. Before you buy stock in Usa Rare Earth, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Usa Rare Earth wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $704,676!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $950,198!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 175% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Rich Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why USA Rare Earth Stock Fell Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
PCE Inflation Increased In Line With Expectations
It's been an eventful week in terms of stock market information, leading to new all-time highs — or very near — on the major indexes. That doesn't mean all the news was great; it does mean that the biggest potential headwinds have thus far missed the marketplace, and may have already blown past us. Take tariffs, for instance. On April 9th, as indexes were falling off a cliff for a week of trading, President Trump pushed pause on his reciprocal tariff initiatives — +20% for the EU, +25 for auto imports, +49% on Vietnam, etc. — for 90 days. Yesterday, just a couple weeks from the end of that 90 days, a White House spokeswoman said those tariff deadlines were 'not critical.' Market participants rejoiced, taking this news to mean those reciprocals have been removed completely. It hasn't led to any firm trade deals with any of the U.S.'s trading partners, and now with the reciprocal tariff threat removed, they may not come at all. The U.S. has put a +10% tariff on imported goods, which so far looks to be absorbed reasonably well in the economy. There is also a framework of a new trade deal with the UK, but based on the circumstances that followed, we may expect no hard news coming on this front, either. The other threat this week came from tensions in the Middle East between Israel and Iran, into which the U.S. engaged last weekend, bombing nuclear development sites within Iran. Uncertainty gripped the markets to start the week, but as each day passes without a major international incident traced to this series of events, investors have grown comfortable in its bullishness. Pre-market futures are up this morning again. The Dow has amassed +160 points, the S&P 500 +20 and the Nasdaq +85 points. Bond yields are down nearly 20 basis points (bps) from this time a week ago: the 10-year today stands at +4.26%, the 2-year +3.73% and the 30-year — which gained prominence after tipping +5% a couple weeks ago — stoutly holds at +4.82%. This morning, the latest Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) report has been released. For the month of May, the headline PCE Index month over month was in-line with expectations at +0.1%. This matches the previous month's unrevised headline, as well. Year over year PCE was also as expected: +2.3%. The prior month was revised up 10 bps to +2.2%. Stripping out volatile food and energy prices, the core PCE level month over month reached +0.2% — higher than the +0.1% expected and the highest level since February. Core PCE year over year reached +2.7%, following +2.6% in April — both of which are +10 bps higher than anticipated. However, on Personal Income for May we swing to a negative -0.4% from an expected +0.3%, the first negative print since September of 2021, when the Covid pandemic was finally winding down. It also amounts to a big drop from the downwardly revised +0.7% the previous month. Personal Spending swung to -0.1% from an estimated +0.1%, while Real Spending sank to -0.3% from 0.0% projected. Here's how this data might be chalked up to tariff distortions: those earlier higher-than-normal levels in February, March and April were pretty clearly a pull-forward of tariff realities to come. Today's big drop in spending likely has less to do with a weakening consumer than it does an unwinding of those earlier pre-tariff stockpiles. Now, with tariff levels beginning to disappear, we may expect a smoothing-out of this data over time. Finally, Consumer Sentiment from the University of Michigan survey came in as expected for June at 60.5. This follows something of a trough the prior three months, which struck three-year lows in April and May at 52.2. Both the assessment of current conditions and future expectations jumped from somewhat depressed prior levels. For now, attention pivots back to Capitol Hill, where Republican senators continue to toil over forging a Big Beautiful tax-cut and anti-immigration Bill to present to President Trump by the 4th of July — one week from today. It seems from this vista to be an uphill slog; for one reason, the changes made in the Senate means the revised bill may not re-pass the House. But if they somehow do get this bill over the finish line, it will bring profound changes to the market. Perhaps this helps explain why markets are trading at all-time highs, as well? Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Bank of America says tariffs might spark a ‘reshoring' boom—but experts say it might be a double-edged sword for the economy
Evidence of a U.S. manufacturing slowdown is mounting, according to the Bank of America Institute. Tariffs could help reduce that slowdown and bring more advanced production back stateside, but improving productivity might happen without increasing employment. President Donald Trump has been adamant his tariffs will bring factory jobs back to American shores. Higher import taxes will likely push manufacturers to move operations back to the U.S., according to Bank of America economists, but so-called reshoring might incentivize firms to put more robots than humans on the assembly line. A lack of skilled labor and high costs remain big impediments as companies come home, BofA warns. Automation might be the key to unlocking reshoring, potentially boosting the sluggish productivity of American manufacturers without meaningfully increasing employment. Evidence of a slowdown in the sector is mounting, according to a recent report from the Bank of America Institute. New orders for manufactured durable goods fell in April, while the famous manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index has signaled a contraction since March. Focusing on small businesses, BofA's internal client data shows deposit growth from manufacturers has also declined. 'It's possible, right, that these [tariffs] could support momentum going forward and potentially reverse some of that slowdown, especially for certain subsectors within the industry,' the report's author, BofA economist Taylor Bowley, told Fortune. 'But tariff costs and labor issues do exist.' Reshoring has been all the rage in corporate America after Trump's first trade war with China—and the COVID-19 pandemic—highlighted risks to global supply chains. The Biden-era CHIPS and Inflation Reduction Acts, meanwhile, heavily subsidized companies willing to make semiconductors and clean energy technology in the U.S. While U.S. manufacturing accounts for just 8% of total employment, reshoring has created 2 million jobs in the past 15 years, according to a May note from BofA economists. Half of those new positions have been created in the past five years, they noted, though the trend has slowed since peaking in 2022. In a survey of 56 analysts across the bank, covering roughly 1,200 firms worth over $38 trillion in market cap, roughly 60% said production will continue to move back to the U.S.—at least modestly—if tariffs remain high. Those following industrials and manufacturing expect the greatest shift to the U.S. There are still obstacles to coming back stateside, though. In the BofA survey, 54% of the analysts said issues finding skilled workers would be a significant impediment for companies. Higher labor costs are one of the primary reasons manufacturers shifted away from the U.S. in the first place, Bowley said. While a 2024 survey from the Cato Institute found 80% of Americans think the country would benefit from increasing manufacturing employment, just a quarter believe they would be better off individually working in a factory. If firms struggle to fill positions, Bowley said, they are forced to figure out how to improve productivity without hiring people. 'And that's where this conversation around automation and productivity comes in,' she said. Two-thirds of respondents to the BofA survey said any production shift to the U.S. would require significantly more automation than an offshore factory. That makes more advanced industries the best candidates for moving back to the U.S., BofA economists said, like auto assembly and high-end furniture. 'Millions and millions of human beings screwing in little, little screws to make iPhones,' as Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick suggested? Not so much. Meanwhile, Lutnick's ability to continue making trade deals might matter most to small businesses. They account for 98% of American manufacturing, according to the U.S. Small Business Administration, and many rely on cheap imports. 'A lot of them depend on a specific part—for example, to complete their manufacturing process—that simply isn't made domestically,' Bowley said. Therefore, for smaller manufacturers, tariff uncertainty makes planning capital expenditures especially difficult, even if their products become more competitive domestically. With profit margins and productivity lagging other industries in the U.S., passing price hikes on to consumers is the obvious response. However, if firms need to absorb some of the cost to keep customers, Bowley said, reducing inventories, operations, or headcount are other potential options. 'Reshoring in that aspect for smaller firms is kind of a double-edged sword,' she said. Nonetheless, sales are expected to grow in the coming months, Bowley said. But businesses might start feeling the squeeze, she added, when inventories start running low in the second half of the year. This story was originally featured on Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
