No notice, no consultation: Kepong MP demands answers over sudden SST hike on A4 paper from July 1
He said the move, made without prior notice or consultation, has caught the industry and consumers off guard, disrupting contracts and causing losses to suppliers who are now forced to absorb the cost increase.
'Many companies had signed contracts to supply A4 paper, including to government departments, based on tender prices set a year ago,' Lim said in a statement here.
'How are they expected to continue supplying at the old prices when the tax rate has suddenly increased?'
The DAP questioned the lack of transparency behind the implementation, criticising the government for not announcing the tax hike earlier and for keeping stakeholders in the dark.
He also urged disciplinary action against officials involved in drafting the policy without consultation, suggesting they should face demotions to experience the consequences of abrupt decision-making.
Lim called on the government to provide a transition period of two to three months to allow the industry and consumers time to adjust.
He warned that such unilateral decisions could undermine investor confidence and damage Malaysia's economic reputation.
He stressed that the practice of introducing policy changes without notice must end to preserve transparency, accountability, and good governance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Borneo Post
an hour ago
- Borneo Post
Tax policy must not leave indigenous communities behind, PBDS warns
Dr John Brian Anthony KUCHING (July 7): Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak (PBDS) has voiced deep concern over the implementation of the Sales and Services Tax (SST) effective July 1, warning that the policy risks could intensify economic hardship for the rural Dayak population in Sarawak. PBDS Permanent Chairman, Dr John Brian Anthony, stressed that the broad application of the SST could further marginalise indigenous communities, who are already struggling with low income levels, high living costs, and limited infrastructure. 'While we understand the government's need to strengthen national revenue through taxation, such fiscal policies must not come at the expense of the socio-economic wellbeing of rural Sarawakians,' said Dr John in a statement. He noted that many rural Dayaks depend on subsistence farming, manual labour, and small-scale trade, making them particularly vulnerable to price increases resulting from the SST. Dr John further explained that this impact is in stark contrast to urban communities, which have more diversified economic opportunities. He also criticised the lack of targeted exemptions and the absence of meaningful consultation with native leaders prior to the tax's implementation. 'There was no proper consultation with indigenous stakeholders. A one-size-fits-all approach shows a serious disconnect from realities on the ground,' he asserted. He also cautioned that the SST may undermine the inclusive development goals outlined under the Malaysia Madani framework. For that, he called upon the federal and Sarawak governments to introduce exemptions for essential goods and services used in rural areas, and to establish a Rural Economic Impact Assessment Committee to examine how national fiscal measures affect indigenous populations. He also called for increased in rural subsidies, development grants, and continuous engagement with Dayak leaders and civil society organisations in policy development. 'Economic justice is integral to indigenous rights, while development cannot be considered fair if it leaves the rural poor behind,' he said. 'Dayak voices matter and PBDS demands inclusive fiscal policies,' he added, reiterating the party's commitment to defending indigenous interests.
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
‘Jobless but happy': Vietnam's mass state layoffs stir mix of relief and uncertainty
HANOI, July 7 — Sipping green tea in his garden of roses, ex-communist party official Nguyen Van Cuong says he is 'jobless but happy' after Vietnam cut 80,000 state roles this week. But fretting at home after leaving public employment once considered a job-for-life, Nguyen Thi Thu told AFP she feels 'empty' over a future that is no longer certain. Vietnam is in the midst of a dramatic remaking of its state apparatus, with 100,000 positions slated to be scrapped as Hanoi seeks to streamline bureaucracy and boost the economy. On Monday, 80,000 roles were slashed as most of the Southeast Asian nation's provinces and cities were merged. Feelings are mixed among newly unemployed apparatchiks — communist party officials whose jobs were once guaranteed. 'It's really a waste for the state to lose one like myself,' said 56-year-old Cuong, who served in Bac Giang province outside Hanoi. Bac Giang was merged into a neighbouring province's administration. The government said those caught in the overhaul would either be made redundant or offered early retirement. Cuong told AFP he could have remained in his post — or even been promoted — but chose to accept a $75,000 (RM316,575) payoff for his remaining six years after a 30-year state career. 'It's time to rid myself of so much complexity in state politics,' he said. The mass reorganisation overseen by Vietnam's top leader To Lam echoes steps taken by US President Donald Trump and Argentine leader Javier Milei to take an axe to government spending towards 'efficiency'. Don't know what's next Former district-level secretary Thu admits she may not have been able to manage the burdens of the job as management prioritised performance. The 50-year-old felt she had no option but to resign when her office was relocated to the Mekong delta province of An Giang, more than 70 kilometres (44 miles) from her home. 'I resigned, not because I wanted to quit my job,' Thu said. 'It's better to resign rather than waiting for a dismissal order.' Vietnam — a global manufacturing hub — recorded economic growth of 7.1 percent last year and is aiming for eight percent this year as it vies for 'middle-income country' status by 2030. But the country is facing headwinds from key trade partner the United States. Trump threatened a 46 percent tariff before settling on a 20 percent rate in a deal announced on Wednesday — a levy five times the rate before he took office the second time. Vietnam's deputy finance minister said the new administrative structure would bring 'strong scale to connect strong business and economic infrastructure' and create 'greater socio-economic development'. Lam, the Communist Party general secretary, said Monday that 'the decision to reshape the nation is a historical landmark with strategic meaning' aiming 'to continue our path towards a socialist country... for people's happiness'. But for Thu, the way forward is now unclear. 'I don't know what to do next,' she said. Scrolling carefree on his phone and chatting with friends online, Cuong said he had few regrets over his voluntary redundancy. He feels like Vietnam may be the one missing out on what he has to offer. 'I could still contribute more to the state sector,' he said. — AFP
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Is public transport meant to turn a profit? Five countries show it's not that simple
KUALA LUMPUR, July 7 — Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's administration said at the launch of the Kuala Lumpur Local Plan 2040 that public transport will be the backbone of all future development plans, amid growing calls to curb Malaysia's overreliance on private cars. The assertion again sparked a debate about who will fund these projects. Public transportation systems in Malaysia have long depended on government subsidies. But over the years, the discourse around public transit has included support for privatisation, the thinking being profitability — or at least break even — would make operators innovate and become more financially independent. Experiences of other countries, however, show that the issue around public transport funding is usually more complicated. Some countries have tried privatisation, but not all have enjoyed positive outcomes. 'Public transport is a social service' In Malaysia, policymakers are divided, although many are inclined to view public transport as a social service that should be financially backed by taxpayers. 'In my experience, return on investment is not the issue. The issue of efficiency and funds for expansion of services normally arises,' said Rajiv Risyakaran, the pro-public transport Bukit Gasing state assemblyman who had been involved in Selangor's city and town planning. 'I don't expect public transport to break even or be profitable. It's a social service the government provides for the people, and it's a net cost to the government. So, are there countries where public transport operators make money? Malay Mail looks at five countries with arguably the best public transportation systems, and analyses open-source information to see if operators there are financially self-reliant or subsidy-dependent. People walk past signs for the Tokyo Metro underground system inside Shimbashi Station in central Tokyo in this file photo taken on October 21, 2024. — AFP pic Japan Japan's public transport systems, particularly its rail networks, are known to be among the most efficient in the world. The train operations, including the famous Shinkansen (bullet train), are incredibly punctual with minimal delays. Japan's rail networks, among the world's most complex, were initially operated by public and private companies, but in the 1980s, policy favouring car ownership plunged the government-run entity Japanese Railways (JR) into heavy debt. This pushed JR to privatise by splitting into regional-based companies (JR East, JR West, JR Central and JR Kyushu) that gave it flexibility to tailor the unique needs of the service areas. Today, the Japanese privatisation programme is the exception in terms of profitability. But ticket sales are not the only income source. A key to its success is diversification into real estate and retail businesses around its stations, according to the World Bank. A file photograph shows public busses in Singapore. — TODAY pic Singapore Singapore's public transport system is internationally renowned, and public transport operators like SBS Transit in Singapore have shown to make profits according to media reports citing financial records. But Singapore operates through a unique model where the government often owns the infrastructure, such as tracks and stations, and the operators lease or run services on it. This helps manage the massive capital expenditure. Switzerland The Swiss public transport network, which includes rail systems, taxis, and buses has a total length of 24,500 kilometres and has more than 2,600 stations and stops, some even cutting across the Swiss Alps. The Swiss Federal Railways (SBB), the national railway operator, has seen a return to profit in recent years after pandemic-related losses, according to official statements published on a government website, but like Japan, much of the profit comes from diversification of income sources like rentals from real estate and its energy divisions. Generally, public transport operators there still rely on government subsidies to stay afloat, with half of their operating costs funded by taxpayers. Germany Germany's public transport system is a mix of public and private ownership, with the federal government, state governments, and private companies all playing a role. Local public transport, including buses, trams, and some regional trains, is primarily managed by state governments and municipalities. Deutsche Bahn (DB) is the main railway provider, a state-owned company, but it operates as a private entity and faces competition from other private companies such as SWEG, ODEG, and Flixtrain. Still, many of the operators rely heavily on federal subsidies. In 2021, at least 11.6 billion euros in federal funds were reported to have been invested in public transport, with more promised annually starting in 2025. Over the years, there has been growing criticism over the funding model. Travellers wait at the Eindhoven Airport. — AFP pic Netherlands Dutch public transport is frequently ranked among the best in the world for being well-organised, efficient, reliable, and covers the entire country. Its transport system is known for its integration of trains, buses, trams, and metros, making it easy to travel between cities and within urban areas. Like Germany and Switzerland, Dutch public transport operators rely heavily on government subsidies. But unlike Germany, there is strong public support for financial assistance of public transit systems because they view it as a social service first. Public transport in the Netherlands is funded through a combination of ticket revenue, government subsidies, and sometimes regional or local government contributions.
