logo
Whistleblowers say warnings about patient safety at Northern Beaches Hospital were ignored

Whistleblowers say warnings about patient safety at Northern Beaches Hospital were ignored

Whistleblowers from Sydney's Northern Beaches Hospital say repeated warnings about unsafe conditions have been ignored for years, as internal documents reveal a system in crisis.
Senior doctors have raised alarms about dangerously low levels of junior medical doctors, inadequate equipment, and failing technology since 2018.
They say many of those warnings were ignored, with internal documents revealing direct harm to patients.
A senior anaesthetist wrote that after hours there was no capacity within their team to deal with a third patient, whether that be an emergency caesarean or epidural, and that essential equipment was often left broken, with staff told to "steal one from another theatre".
In late 2023, 18 emergency department specialists formally warned Healthscope management that patient safety and staff wellbeing was at risk due to dangerously low night staffing, and severe access block with very sick patients being left in the waiting room and other unmonitored environments due to a lack of beds.
"We have all seen direct harm to patients from these occurrences and will expect further major harm if these issues are not resolved promptly," the group wrote.
Dr Patrick Coleman, a nephrologist who has worked at the hospital since its opening, said the crisis was predictable.
"It was never going to work.
"We were ignored. But that's exactly what happened."
Northern Beaches Hospital is run by private operator Healthscope, which collapsed into receivership last month.
The 37 hospitals they run across Australia are now for sale.
Northern Beaches Hospital delivers public hospital services under a controversial public-private partnership.
NSW Health Minister Ryan Park told 7.30 the government was negotiating to bring the hospital into public hands, but warned it would not be cheap.
"There will be significant costs, without a doubt. We'll probably have to change the way in which it's staffed, there's likely to be issues with their IT system that we have to address – those two things alone are likely to be significant, we understand that," Mr Park said.
Healthscope CEO Tino La Spina welcomed the NSW government's plan to take over the hospital but warned the hospital system across Australia was in trouble, saying there was a "chronic underfunding of the private hospital sector by the private health insurers".
He says he is proud of Northern Beaches Hospital's overall performance record.
"We continue to operate a safe hospital there," he said.
"All of the key performance measures suggest that we are a safe hospital and safer than others in New South Wales."
Sydney's Northern Beaches were once served by two smaller public hospitals at Manly and Mona Vale.
But as the region's population grew, frontline staff said they were running on fumes.
"Manly and Mona Vale were getting death by 1,000 cuts," respiratory physician Keith Burgess said.
In 2014 the NSW Liberal government announced the two hospitals would be shut and replaced with a single, more modern facility, delivered through a public-private partnership (PPP).
It was a model with a troubled past. Previous PPP hospitals nationally had failed, including in Mildura, Victoria and Port Macquarie in New South Wales. But Professor Burgess said he was willing to give it a go.
His colleague Dr Coleman was optimistic at first.
"I thought, 'Hallelujah, finally we're going to have a new hospital,'" Dr Coleman said.
He joined the new hospital's medical advisory committee, eager to help shape the way the hospital would run.
But in the months leading up to the hospital opening, Dr Coleman raised urgent concerns.
He warned management their plan to hire too few junior doctors was dangerous for a facility expected to treat large numbers of older, more complex patients.
"It was patently obvious that the model that was proposed was utterly absurd," he told 7.30.
But he says his warnings were dismissed.
"I wasn't getting a response. I felt that I was wasting my time," he said.
Frustrated, he resigned from the medical advisory committee but kept raising the alarm.
"I said it verbally. I said it at meetings and I said it in writing. It didn't make any difference."
The hospital finally opened on October 30, 2018. The early days were rocky.
Within 48 hours the CEO quit. The anaesthetics department threatened a walkout and, according to Professor Burgess, conditions on the wards were chaotic.
"The Healthscope team hadn't stocked the shelves and a whole lot of the basic equipment was not available in the wards," he said.
Within eight months a parliamentary inquiry was launched into the hospital's operations and management.
Healthscope apologised and promised improvements.
In the years since, the Northern Beaches Hospital has been repeatedly engulfed in crises.
In February the family of two-year-old Joe Massa went public after his tragic death following critical delays in care at this hospital.
The backlash was swift. The NSW government proposed a ban on any future public-private hospital partnerships.
And in April the family of deceased toddler Harper Atkinson told 7.30 their story.
Emergency doctor Cliff Reid says his colleagues in the emergency department are bearing the brunt of public fury.
"Our team has been called 'baby killers'. A junior doctor has had a threat of her tyres being slashed as she was walking into the department," Dr Reid said.
"Nurses have been spat on … all following recent negative publicity in the media about the hospital."
He said the community should trust the care they receive at the hospital.
Despite the concerns he has continued to raise Dr Coleman says patients receive an excellent level of care at the hospital, considering the low numbers of staff, when compared to other hospitals in the area.
However, he says it comes at a cost with staff stretched to breaking point.
7.30 has obtained internal hospital records and written staff testimonies that reveal the extent of the crisis.
In October 2024, a senior emergency physician warned the ED was fully staffed with junior doctors only 9 per cent of the time, which is just over 15 hours a week, and that the situation was expected to worsen this year.
Dr Reid has defended the hospital's executive, saying some of these concerns have been addressed.
"From a clinical service delivery point of view our emergency department is very highly performing, has amazing staff, an incredible high culture, a dedicated team that saves lives every day," he said.
Mr La Spina denied the hospital's problems were due to cost cutting.
"We will never, and I repeat never, put profits ahead of patient care, ever," he told 7.30.
"It's what we're all about here and we've got amazing clinicians that come to work every single day to give their best."
A second parliamentary inquiry into Northern Beaches Hospital is now underway.
And while submissions are confidential, 7.30 has obtained more distressing staff testimonies.
One anaesthetist wrote that staffing levels in their department were very unsafe and that on one occasion "we had absolutely zero capacity to deal with any emergency at all during a normal weekday".
He warned that after hours "there is no capacity for a third patient, whether it be for an emergency caesarean or an epidural for a woman in labour".
Trainee supervision is also falling far below national standards, according to the submission.
He wrote that anaesthetist trainees were supervised only 4 per cent of the time instead of the ANZCA (Australia New Zealand College of Anaesthetists) recommended 80 per cent, or a bare minimum of 50 per cent supervision.
The department's equipment was also highlighted, with the anaesthetist documenting that the hospital was failing to replace broken or missing essential equipment.
"We were told if we don't have one to just try and steal one from another theatre," he wrote.
Ultrasound access for their department was documented as dangerously inadequate, as the unit had only two for 16 theatres, instead of the usual one per operating theatre.
"The cardiac anaesthetists have taken to stealing and deliberately hiding the ultrasound machines 'in case' they need it," he said.
The only other ultrasound technology available to their department is critically outdated.
The anaesthetist wrote that a sales representative once confessed to him that Northern Beaches Hospital bought the cheapest model and that "it is the only hospital in the world to buy this model".
Staff have raised concerns about inadequate technology since before the hospital opened its doors in October 2018.
However 7.30 can reveal that many of those issues persist, even seven years on.
In the medical staff council's submission to the auditor-general inquiry, it said that Riskman — the technology used to monitor adverse events — is grossly underused due to being excessively time-consuming and that the data obtained and used by Healthscope to reflect safety records may not be accurate.
Keith Burgess, president of the medical staff council, told 7.30 he had never used Riskman.
"Certainly I can't think of any senior doctor who has acknowledged that they've used it," he said.
Following the death of Joe Massa, the an independent review recommended critical changes were needed for the hospital's electronic medical records (EMR) system.
Dr Coleman says the EMR has had some improvements but it continues to be problematic to this day.
"The EMR system was constantly crashing. There were times when the EMR system was crashed for hours at a time," he said.
"Nobody can access the patient's medications. They can't alter the medications, they can't prescribe medications, they can't look at the patient's observations."
He says NSW Health and the local health district absolved itself of responsibility of the operation of the hospital and it should now be held accountable.
Watch 7.30, Mondays to Thursdays 7:30pm on ABC iview and ABC TV
Do you know more about this story? Get in touch with 7.30 here.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Private Health insurer Bupa agrees to repay $35 million over incorrectly rejected claims
Private Health insurer Bupa agrees to repay $35 million over incorrectly rejected claims

ABC News

time42 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Private Health insurer Bupa agrees to repay $35 million over incorrectly rejected claims

One of Australia's largest private health insurers has agreed to pay back tens of millions of dollars to thousands of members who had hospital claims incorrectly rejected. Bupa has admitted to engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct and making false or misleading representations by advising members they were not entitled to private health insurance benefits when they were. Bupa reached an agreement with the ACCC on a proposed penalty of $35 million for incorrectly assessing thousands of mixed coverage and uncategorised item claims and related eligibility checks over a five-year period. The company also admitted to engaging in unconscionable conduct relating to its assessment of 388 mixed coverage claims, which included treatment that was covered under a member's private health insurance policy as well as treatment that was not covered under their policy. In a statement, Bupa APAC CEO Nick Stone said the issue should "never have happened" and the company was "deeply sorry for failing to get things right for our customers". Bupa, is Australia's second largest private health insurer and has more than four million members. It has already started compensating affected members, medical providers and hospitals and has so far paid $14.3 million with more than 4,100 affected claims. ACCC Chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said the consumer watchdog had accepted Bupa's undertaking to continue compensating affected parties. "Bupa's conduct ... caused harm to consumers some of whom delayed, cancelled or went without treatment for which they were, at least partially, covered under their health insurance policies," Ms Cass-Gottlieb said. Bupa said the errors occurred as a result of inaccurate or unclear instructions, training or guidance which meant Bupa didn't always make correct assessments of claims and eligibility checks or act quickly enough to fix issues. Any customers who believe they may have had a historical claim or eligibility check incorrectly assessed can can visit or call Bupa on 134 135. Australian private health insurance industry's peak representative body, Private Healthcare Australia has been contacted for comment.

Do larger breasts increase breast cancer risk? What experts really say
Do larger breasts increase breast cancer risk? What experts really say

News.com.au

time3 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Do larger breasts increase breast cancer risk? What experts really say

It is a question often asked but rarely answered clearly: does having larger breasts increase your risk of breast cancer? As breast cancer cases in young Aussie women increase at a concerning rate, this question has never been more pressing. According to leading breast cancer surgeon and researcher Dr Sanjay Warrier, the answer is more nuanced than a simple yes or no. 'Breast size in itself is not considered a direct or independent risk factor for breast cancer,' Professor Warrier told 'The assumption that larger breasts may increase risk lacks strong clinical evidence and is not supported by robust data.' However, he urges women with larger breasts to still be proactive about their health, especially if they have other contributing risk factors such as a family history of breast cancer, a sedentary lifestyle, or hormonal influences. Breast density a more important factor More importantly, breast tissue composition, specifically breast density, plays a far more significant role in breast cancer risk than size alone, Prof Warrier said. The BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) density scale is used to classify breast tissue, with categories C and D indicating higher density. Women with smaller breasts can still have high breast density, which is why it's important to check the scale. High-density breast tissue is associated with a slightly increased risk of cancer and can make tumours more difficult to detect on standard mammograms, as dense tissue appears white on imaging, which is the same colour as potential tumours. For women with larger breasts, tumours may also be more difficult to detect, sometimes leading to delayed diagnosis. In these cases, contrast-enhanced mammography or a MRI is often recommended for improved clarity. Other factors to consider Prof Warrier also highlighted that women with a higher Body Mass Index (BMI), which may correlate with larger breast size, are at a statistically higher risk of developing breast cancer, especially after menopause. 'Higher body weight means more fat tissue, which in turn increases oestrogen levels, leading to a higher risk of hormone receptor-positive breast cancers,' he said. 'Hormonal exposure across a woman's lifespan, including early menarche, late menopause, and hormone replacement therapy, also elevates risk by increasing the duration of oestrogen exposure.' A preventive approach The key takeaway is that breast size alone does not determine your cancer risk. It's the broader picture of lifestyle, hormonal exposure, weight, family history, and breast density that matters. Prof Warrier advises women of all body types to adopt a preventive approach to breast health, incorporating self-examinations, regular screenings, a wholefood diet, physical activity, and limiting alcohol and processed food intake. Taking a personalised approach to breast cancer screening is also increasingly regarded as best practice. New research proves promising While standard population-based screening generally begins at age 50, emerging evidence suggests that earlier and more frequent screening may benefit those at higher risk. Landmark studies such as the PROCAS trial in the UK and the ROSA Project in Victoria are exploring risk-based models that take these variables into account. These studies are helping to shape new guidelines for tailored screening strategies. This may not only lead to earlier detection but also reduce the need for aggressive treatments and improve overall outcomes by catching cancers at a more manageable stage. Breast cancer diagnoses on the rise It comes as breast cancer diagnoses continue to rise among young women in Australia. Breast cancer is estimated to be the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women aged 20-39, and every day around three women under 40 are diagnosed with breast cancer. Breast cancers in young women tend to have different characteristics and poorer survival outcomes compared with older women, making early detection vital. If you have concerns about your breast cancer risk, make an appointment with your GP to discuss your personal situation and the best screening options for you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store