logo
Azerbaijan warns against children attending religious ceremonies, sparking rights concerns

Azerbaijan warns against children attending religious ceremonies, sparking rights concerns

JAMnewsa day ago

Children and religious rituals in Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan's Ministry of Internal Affairs and the State Committee for Work with Religious Organisations have issued a joint warning, stating that some parents are bringing underage children to religious ceremonies — particularly memorial gatherings — and stressed that children's physical and psychological safety must be taken into account in such situations.
In the official statement, parents are urged to consider that participation in such mass ceremonies is 'inadvisable' and are called on to show particular sensitivity in cases that may contradict the law.
However, the statement has raised questions in the context of human rights, freedom of religion, and children's rights. JAMnews has analysed the situation from multiple perspectives.
Legal expert: 'The limits of the ban are unclear'
Khalid Bagirov | photo: RFE/RL
Lawyer Khalid Bagirov argues that vague and abstract wording in government restrictions creates legal uncertainty and opens the door to abuse.
In a comment to JAMnews, he stated:
'If a parent of Shia faith wants to bring their child to an Ashura ceremony, that is their right. The state must clearly define what exactly is being prohibited: mourning rituals, self-flagellation, chest-beating? Or merely presence? Such legal ambiguity is unacceptable.'
Bagirov also refers to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, emphasising that raising children in accordance with parents' religious beliefs is a fundamental right.
In his view, the government's approach is part of a broader, systemic policy of restricting the rights of the Shia community in Azerbaijan. He points to Ashura processions in regions like Lankaran, which raise concern among the authorities — but, he argues, at the heart of that concern lies the issue of freedom of peaceful assembly.
'Under the pretext of regulating religious rituals, the state is attempting to limit the freedom of assembly and public processions.'
Bagirov adds that if such vague and restrictive measures continue, increased police control near mosques and bans on minors entering with their parents could soon follow.
Believer: 'This is a continuation of the hostile attitude toward the Shia community'
Alemdar Bunyatov | photo: Meydan TV
Alemdar Bunyatov, representative of the Muslim Unity Movement in Europe, views the issue in a broader context.
Speaking to JAMnews, he said the policy reflects a systemic and hostile attitude by the Azerbaijani authorities toward the Shia community:
'This is not just about religious ceremonies. It's part of a long-standing hostile policy toward people who identify as Shia. Now, under the pretext of protecting children, they are targeting the religious rights of families.'
Bunyatov also stressed that such an approach is rooted in double standards. He questioned:
'What exactly is so concerning about a child being present at a mourning ceremony alongside adults that it warrants a ban? These people are part of society too — how can participation in such rituals possibly harm a child's upbringing?'
Militarist propaganda in schools
In Azerbaijan, there is a growing practice of introducing military-themed propaganda in schools from an early age. Officially promoted patriotic campaigns centre on the cult of martyrdom, alongside events and lesson formats that emphasise military symbolism.
The authorities offer no critical commentary on these activities — on the contrary, such rhetoric is presented as a model of patriotism. This highlights the selective nature of official warnings regarding religious rituals: on one hand, state-approved and even state-promoted militarist and emotional narratives; on the other, administrative warnings against personal religious practices.
Social worker: 'The state should keep equal distance from both religious and military rhetoric'
Sanubar Heydarova | photo: personal archive
Social worker Sanubar Heydarova approaches the issue from the perspective of child psychology.
In an interview with JAMnews, she emphasised that to understand the authorities' concerns about children attending religious ceremonies, one must also consider parallel practices:
'From an early age, children in Azerbaijani schools are exposed to military rhetoric filled with images of blood, martyrdom, war, people crushed by tanks. This can be psychologically damaging. Yet the state presents it as patriotism and sees no threat in it.'
Heydarova believes that if the government truly wants to protect children from harmful influences, its approach should be comprehensive and balanced, not selective. She proposes an alternative model for cultivating civic values:
'Children should be taught that loving your country means not littering, volunteering, caring for public property. Patriotism cannot be measured only through war.'
In her view, schools should offer neutral, objective religion classes, where children receive information about different faiths. This, she argues, helps develop an informed and healthy capacity to make decisions about religious participation.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran's Grand Strategy by Vali Nasr: book review
Iran's Grand Strategy by Vali Nasr: book review

Evening Standard

time12 hours ago

  • Evening Standard

Iran's Grand Strategy by Vali Nasr: book review

We should, nevertheless, be wary about foretelling the end of a 46-year-old regime whose demise has been predicted for decades. To say it has weathered plenty of storms is an understatement. Most devastating among them was undoubtedly the Iran-Iraq War of 1980-1988, which resulted in up to 250,000 Iranian deaths, embedding the tradition of Shia martyrdom even deeper in the national psyche. From the nadir of this conflict emerged the narrative of 'sacred defence', an expression repeated more than 100 times in this book. Beyond that landmark war against Saddam Hussein's Iraq, the regime has battled with Israel, Saudi Arabia and the US for almost half a century, demonstrating considerable pragmatism, tactical flexibility and, ultimately, finely honed instincts for regime survival.

Azerbaijan warns against children attending religious ceremonies, sparking rights concerns
Azerbaijan warns against children attending religious ceremonies, sparking rights concerns

JAMnews

timea day ago

  • JAMnews

Azerbaijan warns against children attending religious ceremonies, sparking rights concerns

Children and religious rituals in Azerbaijan Azerbaijan's Ministry of Internal Affairs and the State Committee for Work with Religious Organisations have issued a joint warning, stating that some parents are bringing underage children to religious ceremonies — particularly memorial gatherings — and stressed that children's physical and psychological safety must be taken into account in such situations. In the official statement, parents are urged to consider that participation in such mass ceremonies is 'inadvisable' and are called on to show particular sensitivity in cases that may contradict the law. However, the statement has raised questions in the context of human rights, freedom of religion, and children's rights. JAMnews has analysed the situation from multiple perspectives. Legal expert: 'The limits of the ban are unclear' Khalid Bagirov | photo: RFE/RL Lawyer Khalid Bagirov argues that vague and abstract wording in government restrictions creates legal uncertainty and opens the door to abuse. In a comment to JAMnews, he stated: 'If a parent of Shia faith wants to bring their child to an Ashura ceremony, that is their right. The state must clearly define what exactly is being prohibited: mourning rituals, self-flagellation, chest-beating? Or merely presence? Such legal ambiguity is unacceptable.' Bagirov also refers to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, emphasising that raising children in accordance with parents' religious beliefs is a fundamental right. In his view, the government's approach is part of a broader, systemic policy of restricting the rights of the Shia community in Azerbaijan. He points to Ashura processions in regions like Lankaran, which raise concern among the authorities — but, he argues, at the heart of that concern lies the issue of freedom of peaceful assembly. 'Under the pretext of regulating religious rituals, the state is attempting to limit the freedom of assembly and public processions.' Bagirov adds that if such vague and restrictive measures continue, increased police control near mosques and bans on minors entering with their parents could soon follow. Believer: 'This is a continuation of the hostile attitude toward the Shia community' Alemdar Bunyatov | photo: Meydan TV Alemdar Bunyatov, representative of the Muslim Unity Movement in Europe, views the issue in a broader context. Speaking to JAMnews, he said the policy reflects a systemic and hostile attitude by the Azerbaijani authorities toward the Shia community: 'This is not just about religious ceremonies. It's part of a long-standing hostile policy toward people who identify as Shia. Now, under the pretext of protecting children, they are targeting the religious rights of families.' Bunyatov also stressed that such an approach is rooted in double standards. He questioned: 'What exactly is so concerning about a child being present at a mourning ceremony alongside adults that it warrants a ban? These people are part of society too — how can participation in such rituals possibly harm a child's upbringing?' Militarist propaganda in schools In Azerbaijan, there is a growing practice of introducing military-themed propaganda in schools from an early age. Officially promoted patriotic campaigns centre on the cult of martyrdom, alongside events and lesson formats that emphasise military symbolism. The authorities offer no critical commentary on these activities — on the contrary, such rhetoric is presented as a model of patriotism. This highlights the selective nature of official warnings regarding religious rituals: on one hand, state-approved and even state-promoted militarist and emotional narratives; on the other, administrative warnings against personal religious practices. Social worker: 'The state should keep equal distance from both religious and military rhetoric' Sanubar Heydarova | photo: personal archive Social worker Sanubar Heydarova approaches the issue from the perspective of child psychology. In an interview with JAMnews, she emphasised that to understand the authorities' concerns about children attending religious ceremonies, one must also consider parallel practices: 'From an early age, children in Azerbaijani schools are exposed to military rhetoric filled with images of blood, martyrdom, war, people crushed by tanks. This can be psychologically damaging. Yet the state presents it as patriotism and sees no threat in it.' Heydarova believes that if the government truly wants to protect children from harmful influences, its approach should be comprehensive and balanced, not selective. She proposes an alternative model for cultivating civic values: 'Children should be taught that loving your country means not littering, volunteering, caring for public property. Patriotism cannot be measured only through war.' In her view, schools should offer neutral, objective religion classes, where children receive information about different faiths. This, she argues, helps develop an informed and healthy capacity to make decisions about religious participation.

Kenny MacAskill: Donald Trump bombing Iran is illegal and insane
Kenny MacAskill: Donald Trump bombing Iran is illegal and insane

The National

time6 days ago

  • The National

Kenny MacAskill: Donald Trump bombing Iran is illegal and insane

The greatest Scottish football player of my lifetime was more noted for his reticence rather than his eloquence, instead, letting his feet do the talking on the pitch and his tactics when in management. But it sure isn't funny when the president of the United States, a nuclear power with a formidable arsenal, states 'maybe I will, maybe I won't' when playing as a cat would with a mouse but about a strike on Iran. Now he's gone and done it let's be clear this is both illegal and insane. It's a clear breach of international law and threatens all of humanity with destruction. This wasn't an off-the-mike gaffe as with Ronald Reagan and his crass quip about commencing bombing Russia in FIVE minutes. READ MORE: John Swinney calls for 'diplomatic solution' after US bombs Iran Trump's was a premeditated statement seeking not just to put pressure on the Iranian regime but to demand its unconditional surrender. It was playing with the lives of tens of millions of people both in Iran and around the globe. Bullying and bombastic just doesn't cover it. Those in this country who have been craven or sycophantic to the US president are finding that they get nothing in return from him or his oligarchic mates. The office of a democratically elected president has to be respected even if he demeans it. But no more than that. State visits, let alone invites to his supposed ancestral lands are simply humiliating. No evidence has been found that Iran is planning to create a nuclear bomb. That doesn't come from me or even from international agencies but instead from US military intelligence. Of course, the Iranian regime isn't pleasant and many there, if not most, yearn for change. No doubt there's a few in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps who would love to have a nuclear bomb but the fact of the matter is they don't, and the evidence shows they're not even planning it. The rhetoric from US hawks and neo-cons is false and about endless war and US domination. Forcing regime change is wrong and illegal. US American intervention may simply stiffen the regime as folk rally to the flag. Israel's attacks are not on the ayatollahs but on the people of Iran. They're the ones suffering and any regime change would likely be for the worse. There's plenty of evidence for that across the Middle East. Moreover, the art of diplomacy is also about dividing your enemies, but this is uniting Shia and Sunni. As with Iraq disaster beckons for both the Middle East and the world. Of course, the Israeli playbook was to try to tip the United States into the war it started but cannot win on its own, and to take the eyes of the world off the genocide it is perpetrating in Gaza. Time will tell if they succeed with the former but it's working on the latter. News coverage on the BBC has been about attacks on Israeli hospitals causing no deaths while civilians die by the hundreds in Iran and life as we know it ended in Gaza. Job half done for Netanyahu and his cronies. What's happening in Iran isn't just a worsening of the risk but part of the Israeli plan. It's why the independence movement must be unequivocal in its opposition to the American escalation and increase its calls for an ending of the genocide in Gaza and the ethnic cleansing throughout the Occupied Territories. Starmer's Labour Government is the most supine and craven in living memory. Harold Wilson at last had the courage to reject Lyndon BJohnsons requests and probably demands for even a token force in Vietnam. Blair was joined at the hip with Bush in a shared enterprise for which the UK received nothing other than scorn in the US and contempt around the world. Now Starmer simply submits the news clips showed him scrambling to pick up papers which Trump had dropped. He's have been as well prostrating himself and licking Trumps boots. Condemnation not endorsement of Trumps actions is what's required. But what's happening in Scotland? The SNP were to be commended for their voice in Westminster on Palestine. But on Iran things have become strangely muted. Meanwhile, as the barbarity on the ground in Gaza worsens, the UK Government seeks to proscribe protesters while aiding the genocide enablers. Holyrood should be speaking out loud and clear – not in our name. It's not Kneecap (above) or Palestine Action who are the threat to our society and planet but those complicit and colluding in the genocide and war. We should be ceasing fuelling US war planes at Prestwick not deplatforming an Irish rap band at a music event. The old SNP and CND were once almost synonymous. Sadly, in many cases now war hawks have supplanted the old stalwarts. The united opposition to nuclear weapons is now questioned by some and even abandoned by a few. But the wider Independence movement remains true to the maxim of Bairns not Bombs. It must speak out ever louder now – no war for Trump and Israel.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store