Meta may face daily fines over pay-or-consent model, EU warns
HighlightsMeta Platforms may incur daily fines if European Union regulators determine that its proposed changes to the pay-or-consent model do not adhere to an antitrust order issued in April. The European Commission has warned that continuous non-compliance with the Digital Markets Act could lead to penalties amounting to 5% of Meta's average daily worldwide turnover. Meta Platforms has criticized the European Commission for allegedly discriminating against the company, asserting that its user choice model remains a legitimate business structure in Europe.
Meta Platforms
may face daily fines if EU regulators decide the changes it has proposed to its
pay-or-consent model
fail to comply with an
antitrust order
issued in April, they said on Friday.
The warning from the
European Commission
, which acts as the
EU competition
enforcer, came two months after it slapped a 200-million-euro ($234 million) fine on the U.S. social media giant for breaching the
Digital Markets Act
(DMA) aiming at curbing the power of Big Tech.
The move shows the Commission's continuing crackdown against Big Tech and its push to create a level playing field for smaller rivals despite U.S. criticism about the bloc's rules mainly targeting its companies.
Daily fines for not complying with the DMA can be as much as 5% of a company's average daily worldwide turnover.
The EU executive said Meta's pay-or-consent model introduced in November 2023 breached the DMA in the period up to November 2024, when it tweaked it to use less personal data for targeted advertising. The Commission has been scrutinising the changes since then.
The model gives
Facebook
and
Instagram
users who consent to be tracked a free service that is funded by
advertising revenues
. Alternatively, they can pay for an ad-free service.
The EU competition watchdog said Meta will only make limited changes to its pay-or-consent model rolled out last November.
"The Commission cannot confirm at this stage if these are sufficient to comply with the main parameters of compliance outlined in its non-compliance Decision," a spokesperson said.
"With this in mind, we will consider the next steps, including recalling that continuous non-compliance could entail the application of periodic penalty payments running as of 27 June 2025, as indicated in the non-compliance decision."
Meta accused the Commission of discriminating against the company and for moving the goalposts during discussions over the last two months.
"A user choice between a subscription for no ads service or a free ad supported service remains a legitimate business model for every company in Europe - except Meta," a Meta spokesperson said.
"We are confident that the range of choices we offer people in the EU doesn't just comply with what the EU's rules require - it goes well beyond them."
"At a time when there are growing voices across Europe to change direction and focus on innovation and growth, this signals that the EU remains closed for business."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
Hunt for AI supremacy: Meta poaches more OpenAI researchers as talent war rages on
Tensions between the two companies have simmered publicly for months. OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman previously claimed that Meta was offering '100 million signing bonuses' to tempt his employees away read more Mark Zuckerberg-led Meta's campaign to lure away some of OpenAI's top researchers appears to be continuing at pace, with several high-profile names reportedly switching sides in what has become one of Silicon Valley's most intense rivalries. After the Wall Street Journal reported that three researchers had left OpenAI for Meta earlier this week, TechCrunch confirmed that Trapit Bansal, an influential figure in OpenAI's research ranks, had also joined the company. Now, The Information has named four more hires from OpenAI: Shengjia Zhao, Jiahui Yu, Shuchao Bi and Hongyu Ren. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The new appointments follow Meta's launch of its Llama 4 AI models in April. The models were met with a mixed response, with some reports suggesting they had not met the expectations of CEO Mark Zuckerberg. The company was also criticised over how it used an earlier version of Llama in a benchmark widely cited in AI performance comparisons. OpenAI, Meta tensions continue Tensions between the two companies have simmered publicly for months. OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman previously claimed that Meta was offering '100 million signing bonuses' to tempt his employees away, though he added that 'so far, none of our best people' had accepted. Meta's chief technology officer Andrew Bosworth later addressed the remarks in an internal note, telling staff that while such figures may have been discussed at senior levels, 'the actual terms of the offer' were more complex. The race to secure top-tier talent has become increasingly fierce, as tech giants seek an edge in developing powerful foundation models and generative AI systems. Meta's latest recruitment wave suggests that, while some key OpenAI figures have resisted its advances, the company is steadily building its own cadre of AI researchers in hopes of catching up.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
The ‘Big' reason why you must carefully read Facebook and Instagram's terms and conditions
After years of training its generative AI models on billions of public images from Facebook and Instagram , Meta is reportedly seeking access to billions of photos users haven't publicly uploaded, sparking fresh privacy debates. While the social media giant explicitly states it is not currently training its AI models on these private photos, the company has declined to clarify whether it might do so in the future or what rights it will hold over these images, a report has said. The new initiative, first reported by TechCrunch on Friday (June 27) sees Facebook users encountering pop-up messages when attempting to post to Stories. These prompts ask users to opt into "cloud processing," which would allow Facebook to "select media from your camera roll and upload it to our cloud on a regular basis." The stated purpose is to generate "ideas like collages, recaps, AI restyling or themes like birthdays or graduations." The report notes that by agreeing to this feature, users also consent to Meta's AI terms, which permit the analysis of "media and facial features" from these unpublished photos, alongside metadata like creation dates and the presence of other people or objects. Users also grant Meta the right to "retain and use" this personal information. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Meta used public, not private, data train its generative AI models According to The Verge, Meta recently acknowledged that it used data from all public content published on Facebook and Instagram since 2007 to train its generative AI models. Although the company stated it only used public posts from adult users over 18, it has remained vague about the precise definition of 'public' and what constituted an 'adult user' in 2007. Meta public affairs manager , Ryan Daniels, has reiterated to the publication that this new 'cloud processing' feature is not currently used for training its AI models, a, told The Verge, "[The story by the publication] implies we are currently training our AI models with these photos, which we aren't. This test doesn't use people's photos to improve or train our AI models," Maria Cubeta, a Meta comms manager, was quoted as saying. Cubeta also described the feature as 'very early,' innocuous, and entirely opt-in, stating, "Camera roll media may be used to improve these suggestions, but are not used to improve AI models in this test." Furthermore, while Meta also said that opting in grants permission to retrieve only 30 days' worth of camera roll data at a time, Meta's own terms suggest some data retention may be longer. 'Camera roll suggestions based on themes, such as pets, weddings and graduations, may include media that is older than 30 days,' Meta's says. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold After 1 Year: Is It STILL My Daily Driver? (Long-Term Review) AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
Meta snags more OpenAI talent after Sam Altman says his best people are not leaving
Meta is doubling down on its artificial intelligence ambitions, intensifying its hiring spree by luring a growing number of researchers from rival OpenAI. Over the past few weeks, Meta has quietly poached several high-profile AI scientists from OpenAI, including Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, and Xiaohua Zhai, all based at OpenAI's Zurich office. Trapit Bansal, a key figure in OpenAI's research team, also recently joined Meta. But this is not it. The Information revealed that four additional researchers, Shengjia Zhao, Jiahui Yu, Shuchao Bi, and Hongyu Ren, have also made the switch to Meta, adding further fuel to speculation about aggressive recruitment flurry of departures from OpenAI has drawn attention from across the tech industry, not least because of a viral claim made by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman that Meta was dangling signing bonuses worth up to $100 million to attract top talent. While Altman suggested that none of OpenAI's "best people" had accepted the offer, employees are moving to Meta in just a blink. At an all-hands meeting held shortly after Altman's remarks went public, Meta's Chief Technology Officer Andrew Bosworth addressed employee questions head-on. According to The Verge, Bosworth pushed back strongly, accusing Altman of dishonesty and exaggeration. 'He's known to stretch the truth,' Bosworth said, adding that while Meta might offer substantial packages for certain roles, the idea of a blanket $100 million sign-on was 'wildly misleading.' Bosworth clarified that only a 'very, very small number' of extremely senior individuals might receive compensation packages in that ballpark—and even then, it wouldn't take the form of a straightforward signing bonus. 'It's far more complex than a one-off cheque,' he credibility to Bosworth's rebuttal, the researchers at the centre of the controversy—Beyer, Kolesnikov, and Zhai—took to X (formerly Twitter) to confirm they had joined Meta, but dismissed the $100 million figure as 'fake news.' Their collective denial further underscores the murky nature of compensation disclosures in Silicon Valley's high-stakes AI timing of these hires is particularly notable. Meta recently unveiled its Llama 4 family of AI models, which received a lukewarm reception compared to expectations reportedly set by CEO Mark Zuckerberg. The company's AI strategy has faced criticism, especially concerning benchmark transparency and performance metrics. In this context, the addition of elite researchers from OpenAI may be a strategic move to bolster Meta's AI credibility and future himself appears to be taking a hands-on approach. Reports suggest he has personally reached out to AI professionals with lucrative offers and is spearheading efforts to bring in talent from across the sector. During the internal meeting, Bosworth hinted that more high-level recruits from OpenAI were on the way, though he declined to reveal further a separate push to expand its AI footprint, The Wall Street Journal reported that Meta has invested $14 billion in Scale AI, a startup founded by Alexandr Wang. - Ends
