White House defends firing of jobs official
Trump had BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer sacked on Friday, despite no evidence of any wrongdoing, after a report showed hiring slowed in July and was much weaker in May and June than previously reported.
Trump, in a post on his social media platform, alleged that the figures were "RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad".
Trump again criticised McEntarfer on Sunday, saying he would name a new commissioner in the next three or four days.
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CBS that Trump had "real concerns" about the BLS data, while Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said the president "is right to call for new leadership".
Hassett said on Fox News Sunday the main concern was Friday's BLS report of net downward revisions showing 258,000 fewer jobs had been created in May and June than previously reported.
Trump accused McEntarfer of faking the jobs numbers, without providing any evidence of data manipulation.
The BLS compiles the closely watched employment report as well as consumer and producer price data.
The BLS gave no reason for the revised data but noted "monthly revisions result from additional reports received from businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the recalculation of seasonal factors".
McEntarfer's firing added to growing concerns about the quality of US economic data and came on the heels of a raft of new tariffs on dozens of trading partners, sending global stock markets tumbling as Trump presses ahead with plans to reorder the global economy.
Critics, including former leaders of the BLS, slammed Trump's move and called on Congress to investigate McEntarfer's removal, saying it would shake trust in a respected agency.
"It undermines credibility," said William Beach, a former BLS commissioner and co-chair of the group Friends of the BLS.
"There is no way for a commissioner to rig the jobs numbers," he said on CNN's State of the Union.
Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers also criticised McEntarfer's firing.
"This is a preposterous charge. These numbers are put together by teams of literally hundreds of people following detailed procedures that are in manuals," Summers said on ABC's This Week.
White House economic advisers have on defended President Donald Trump's firing of the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, rejecting criticism it could undermine confidence in official US economic data.
Trump had BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer sacked on Friday, despite no evidence of any wrongdoing, after a report showed hiring slowed in July and was much weaker in May and June than previously reported.
Trump, in a post on his social media platform, alleged that the figures were "RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad".
Trump again criticised McEntarfer on Sunday, saying he would name a new commissioner in the next three or four days.
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CBS that Trump had "real concerns" about the BLS data, while Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said the president "is right to call for new leadership".
Hassett said on Fox News Sunday the main concern was Friday's BLS report of net downward revisions showing 258,000 fewer jobs had been created in May and June than previously reported.
Trump accused McEntarfer of faking the jobs numbers, without providing any evidence of data manipulation.
The BLS compiles the closely watched employment report as well as consumer and producer price data.
The BLS gave no reason for the revised data but noted "monthly revisions result from additional reports received from businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the recalculation of seasonal factors".
McEntarfer's firing added to growing concerns about the quality of US economic data and came on the heels of a raft of new tariffs on dozens of trading partners, sending global stock markets tumbling as Trump presses ahead with plans to reorder the global economy.
Critics, including former leaders of the BLS, slammed Trump's move and called on Congress to investigate McEntarfer's removal, saying it would shake trust in a respected agency.
"It undermines credibility," said William Beach, a former BLS commissioner and co-chair of the group Friends of the BLS.
"There is no way for a commissioner to rig the jobs numbers," he said on CNN's State of the Union.
Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers also criticised McEntarfer's firing.
"This is a preposterous charge. These numbers are put together by teams of literally hundreds of people following detailed procedures that are in manuals," Summers said on ABC's This Week.
White House economic advisers have on defended President Donald Trump's firing of the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, rejecting criticism it could undermine confidence in official US economic data.
Trump had BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer sacked on Friday, despite no evidence of any wrongdoing, after a report showed hiring slowed in July and was much weaker in May and June than previously reported.
Trump, in a post on his social media platform, alleged that the figures were "RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad".
Trump again criticised McEntarfer on Sunday, saying he would name a new commissioner in the next three or four days.
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CBS that Trump had "real concerns" about the BLS data, while Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said the president "is right to call for new leadership".
Hassett said on Fox News Sunday the main concern was Friday's BLS report of net downward revisions showing 258,000 fewer jobs had been created in May and June than previously reported.
Trump accused McEntarfer of faking the jobs numbers, without providing any evidence of data manipulation.
The BLS compiles the closely watched employment report as well as consumer and producer price data.
The BLS gave no reason for the revised data but noted "monthly revisions result from additional reports received from businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the recalculation of seasonal factors".
McEntarfer's firing added to growing concerns about the quality of US economic data and came on the heels of a raft of new tariffs on dozens of trading partners, sending global stock markets tumbling as Trump presses ahead with plans to reorder the global economy.
Critics, including former leaders of the BLS, slammed Trump's move and called on Congress to investigate McEntarfer's removal, saying it would shake trust in a respected agency.
"It undermines credibility," said William Beach, a former BLS commissioner and co-chair of the group Friends of the BLS.
"There is no way for a commissioner to rig the jobs numbers," he said on CNN's State of the Union.
Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers also criticised McEntarfer's firing.
"This is a preposterous charge. These numbers are put together by teams of literally hundreds of people following detailed procedures that are in manuals," Summers said on ABC's This Week.
White House economic advisers have on defended President Donald Trump's firing of the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, rejecting criticism it could undermine confidence in official US economic data.
Trump had BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer sacked on Friday, despite no evidence of any wrongdoing, after a report showed hiring slowed in July and was much weaker in May and June than previously reported.
Trump, in a post on his social media platform, alleged that the figures were "RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad".
Trump again criticised McEntarfer on Sunday, saying he would name a new commissioner in the next three or four days.
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CBS that Trump had "real concerns" about the BLS data, while Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said the president "is right to call for new leadership".
Hassett said on Fox News Sunday the main concern was Friday's BLS report of net downward revisions showing 258,000 fewer jobs had been created in May and June than previously reported.
Trump accused McEntarfer of faking the jobs numbers, without providing any evidence of data manipulation.
The BLS compiles the closely watched employment report as well as consumer and producer price data.
The BLS gave no reason for the revised data but noted "monthly revisions result from additional reports received from businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the recalculation of seasonal factors".
McEntarfer's firing added to growing concerns about the quality of US economic data and came on the heels of a raft of new tariffs on dozens of trading partners, sending global stock markets tumbling as Trump presses ahead with plans to reorder the global economy.
Critics, including former leaders of the BLS, slammed Trump's move and called on Congress to investigate McEntarfer's removal, saying it would shake trust in a respected agency.
"It undermines credibility," said William Beach, a former BLS commissioner and co-chair of the group Friends of the BLS.
"There is no way for a commissioner to rig the jobs numbers," he said on CNN's State of the Union.
Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers also criticised McEntarfer's firing.
"This is a preposterous charge. These numbers are put together by teams of literally hundreds of people following detailed procedures that are in manuals," Summers said on ABC's This Week.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
34 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Miners shine as ASX jumps after Wall Street rally
On Wall Street, Idexx Laboratories helped lead the way and soared 27.5 per cent after the seller of veterinary instruments and other healthcare products reported a stronger profit for the northern spring than analysts expected. It also raised its forecast for profit over the full year. Tyson Foods likewise delivered a bigger-than-expected profit for the latest quarter, and the company behind the Jimmy Dean and Hillshire Farm brands rose 2.4 per cent. They helped make up for a nearly 3 per cent loss for Berkshire Hathaway, after Warren Buffett's company reported a fall in profit for its latest quarter from a year earlier. The drop-off was due in part to the falling value of its investment in Kraft Heinz. The pressure is on US companies to deliver bigger profits after their stock prices shot to record after record recently. The jump in stock prices from a low point in April raised criticism that the broad market had become too expensive. Stocks are coming off their worst week since May not so much because of that criticism but because of worries that Trump's tariffs may be hitting the US economy following a longer wait than some economists had expected. Job growth slowed sharply last month, and the unemployment rate worsened to 4.2 per cent. Trump reacted to Friday's disappointing jobs numbers by firing the person in charge of compiling them. He also continued his criticism of the Federal Reserve, which could lower interest rates to pump adrenaline into the economy. The Fed has instead been keeping rates steady this year, in part because lower rates can send inflation higher, and Trump's tariffs may increase prices for US households. Friday's stunningly weak jobs report did raise expectations on Wall Street that the Fed would cut interest rates at its next meeting in September. That caused Treasury yields to slump in the bond market, and they eased a bit more on Monday. The yield on the 10-year Treasury slipped to 4.19 per cent from 4.23 per cent late Friday. 'In our view, if the Fed starts to cut rates at its September meeting, we believe this would be supportive for markets,' according to David Lefkowitz, head of US equities at UBS Global Wealth Management. Loading Such hopes, combined with profit reports from big US companies that have largely come in better than expected, could help steady a US stock market that may have been due for some turbulence. Before Friday, the S&P 500 had gone more than a month without a daily swing of 1 per cent, either up or down. This upcoming week may feature fewer fireworks following last week's jobs report and profit updates from some of Wall Street's most influential companies. This week's highlights will likely include earnings reports from Disney, McDonald's and Caterpillar, along with updates on US business activity. On Wall Street, American Eagle Outfitters jumped 23.6 per cent after Trump weighed in on the debate surrounding the retailer's advertisements, which highlight actor Sydney Sweeney's great jeans. Some critics thought the reference to the blonde-haired and blue-eyed actor's 'great genes' may be extolling a narrow set of beauty standards. 'Go get 'em Sydney!' Trump said on his social media network. Wayfair climbed 12.7 per cent after the retailer of furniture and home decor said accelerating growth helped it make more in profit and revenue during the northern spring than analysts expected.
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Trump dealt a blow as the world is flooded with oil
Even without that next tranche of capacity, OPEC+'s increase in output this year will hit a market that is expected to be over-supplied by as much as 2 million barrels a day in the fourth quarter of this year The current Brent oil price is about $US68 a barrel but analysts from major banks like JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs have forecast oil prices of around $US60 a barrel by the end of the year. The shift in OPEC+ strategy could be regarded as self-destructive. The key Middle Eastern producers have very low production costs (the Saudi's are less than $US15 a barrel) but need prices ranging from about $US65 a barrel (United Arab Emirates) to $US80 to $US85 a barrel (Saudi Arabia) to balance their budgets. Flooding the market with more oil will almost inevitably push prices down. Having accepted reality, however, the cartel is now trying, again, to implement a strategy it has attempted twice before – first between 2014 and 2016 and then in 2020 – where it tried to take market share away from the US shale producers by driving the price below their production costs. It underestimated the dynamic nature of the shale producers who, after an initial drop in their production, cut their costs and increased their productivity at a startling rate. Will OPEC+ be any more successful this time? Loading The US producers are more returns-focused than they were during those earlier episodes and, with some of the major basins' reserves depleting, more likely to respond to a lower oil price by mothballing their wells. Already, with West Texas Intermediate prices around $US66 a barrel, there are about 46 fewer rigs operating onshore in the US than there were a year ago. Trump might want the US companies to 'drill, baby, drill,' but a recent Dallas Federal Reserve Bank survey showed most would reduce their drilling if the US price fell towards $US60 a barrel. Breakeven costs for US producers average around the mid-$US60 dollars a barrel. There could be something of a safety valve for both the core OPEC producers and the US shale oil sector. This Friday is the deadline Trump has set for Russia to agree a ceasefire in Ukraine, with Trump threatening secondary tariffs of 100 per cent on Russia's oil customers if it doesn't comply. India which, with China and Turkey, has been one of the major buyers of Russian oil during the conflict, has been specifically targeted by Trump. Russia's new production target will be 9.45 million barrels a day next month. Any material reduction its oil sales would create space for the increased production of other OPEC+ members and take some of the pressure off oil prices. Absent the withdrawal of Russian supply, even if Russia is eventually able to find a workaround (as it has throughout the war in Ukraine and the sanctions regime the G7 has imposed), the outlook for demand in the near term isn't great. China's economy has been spluttering and is further threatened by Trump's trade wars. The US economy has weakened sharply because of, initially, the uncertainty Trump's trade and immigration policies and his assault on government agencies have created and now the reality and increasing economic impacts of his tariffs. The global economy will slow as a result of Trump's assault on global trade. Some of the faster-growing economies, and those most dependent on imported energy – the Asian, South American and African developing economies – are, perversely, among those facing the most punitive tariffs. Having accepted reality, OPEC+ is now opening the spigots. While lower oil prices might help keep a lid on inflation rates, particularly the US inflation rate, and provide some offset for those import-dependent economies from the effects of Trump's tariffs, the trade-off will be reduced economic growth. The longer-term outlook for oil is clouded. OPEC believes demand, fuelled by developing economies, will continue to grow through to 2050, rising from just over 100 million barrels a day to 123 million barrels a day. The International Energy Agency believes demand, impacted by electric vehicles and electrification more widely, will peak at about 105 million barrels a day in 2030. Loading While the long-term outcome matters for the members of the cartel, who are still overly reliant on oil revenue despite increasingly urgent attempts to diversify their economies, it's the near term outlook for oil prices that matters for an increasingly messy and threatened global economy. It also matters for Trump's economic strategy, as articulated by his Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent. Bessent's '3-3-3' strategy has three major components. He aims to reduce the federal deficit to 3 per cent of gross domestic product, raise GDP growth to 3 per cent per year and add 3 million barrels per day of domestic oil production. Thanks to Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' which could increase US deficits by about $US3.4 trillion over the next decade, the impact of his tariffs on US inflation and growth (already running at less than half the rate achieved last year) and OPEC+'s flooding of the market with increased oil supply, each of those objectives (which never looked likely or added up to a coherent strategy) now seem wildly unrealistic.
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Trump dealt a blow as the world is flooded with oil
Even without that next tranche of capacity, OPEC+'s increase in output this year will hit a market that is expected to be over-supplied by as much as 2 million barrels a day in the fourth quarter of this year The current Brent oil price is about $US68 a barrel but analysts from major banks like JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs have forecast oil prices of around $US60 a barrel by the end of the year. The shift in OPEC+ strategy could be regarded as self-destructive. The key Middle Eastern producers have very low production costs (the Saudi's are less than $US15 a barrel) but need prices ranging from about $US65 a barrel (United Arab Emirates) to $US80 to $US85 a barrel (Saudi Arabia) to balance their budgets. Flooding the market with more oil will almost inevitably push prices down. Having accepted reality, however, the cartel is now trying, again, to implement a strategy it has attempted twice before – first between 2014 and 2016 and then in 2020 – where it tried to take market share away from the US shale producers by driving the price below their production costs. It underestimated the dynamic nature of the shale producers who, after an initial drop in their production, cut their costs and increased their productivity at a startling rate. Will OPEC+ be any more successful this time? Loading The US producers are more returns-focused than they were during those earlier episodes and, with some of the major basins' reserves depleting, more likely to respond to a lower oil price by mothballing their wells. Already, with West Texas Intermediate prices around $US66 a barrel, there are about 46 fewer rigs operating onshore in the US than there were a year ago. Trump might want the US companies to 'drill, baby, drill,' but a recent Dallas Federal Reserve Bank survey showed most would reduce their drilling if the US price fell towards $US60 a barrel. Breakeven costs for US producers average around the mid-$US60 dollars a barrel. There could be something of a safety valve for both the core OPEC producers and the US shale oil sector. This Friday is the deadline Trump has set for Russia to agree a ceasefire in Ukraine, with Trump threatening secondary tariffs of 100 per cent on Russia's oil customers if it doesn't comply. India which, with China and Turkey, has been one of the major buyers of Russian oil during the conflict, has been specifically targeted by Trump. Russia's new production target will be 9.45 million barrels a day next month. Any material reduction its oil sales would create space for the increased production of other OPEC+ members and take some of the pressure off oil prices. Absent the withdrawal of Russian supply, even if Russia is eventually able to find a workaround (as it has throughout the war in Ukraine and the sanctions regime the G7 has imposed), the outlook for demand in the near term isn't great. China's economy has been spluttering and is further threatened by Trump's trade wars. The US economy has weakened sharply because of, initially, the uncertainty Trump's trade and immigration policies and his assault on government agencies have created and now the reality and increasing economic impacts of his tariffs. The global economy will slow as a result of Trump's assault on global trade. Some of the faster-growing economies, and those most dependent on imported energy – the Asian, South American and African developing economies – are, perversely, among those facing the most punitive tariffs. Having accepted reality, OPEC+ is now opening the spigots. While lower oil prices might help keep a lid on inflation rates, particularly the US inflation rate, and provide some offset for those import-dependent economies from the effects of Trump's tariffs, the trade-off will be reduced economic growth. The longer-term outlook for oil is clouded. OPEC believes demand, fuelled by developing economies, will continue to grow through to 2050, rising from just over 100 million barrels a day to 123 million barrels a day. The International Energy Agency believes demand, impacted by electric vehicles and electrification more widely, will peak at about 105 million barrels a day in 2030. Loading While the long-term outcome matters for the members of the cartel, who are still overly reliant on oil revenue despite increasingly urgent attempts to diversify their economies, it's the near term outlook for oil prices that matters for an increasingly messy and threatened global economy. It also matters for Trump's economic strategy, as articulated by his Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent. Bessent's '3-3-3' strategy has three major components. He aims to reduce the federal deficit to 3 per cent of gross domestic product, raise GDP growth to 3 per cent per year and add 3 million barrels per day of domestic oil production. Thanks to Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' which could increase US deficits by about $US3.4 trillion over the next decade, the impact of his tariffs on US inflation and growth (already running at less than half the rate achieved last year) and OPEC+'s flooding of the market with increased oil supply, each of those objectives (which never looked likely or added up to a coherent strategy) now seem wildly unrealistic.
