Tariffs trigger price hikes: Shoes, clothing and toys to get more expensive this summer
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Trump tells Walmart to 'eat the tariffs' instead of raising prices
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Saturday that Walmart should "eat the tariffs" instead of blaming duties imposed by his administration on imported goods for the retailer's increased prices.
Consumers can expect big price spikes to hit clothing and shoes this year, according to the latest forecast from the Budget Lab at Yale, a non-partisan research center.
Consumers saw inflation hit a four-year low, as the consumer price index rose year-over-year by 2.3% in April.
Skyrocketing prices might not be top of mind for many consumers this spring, especially in light of significantly lower gas prices at the pump in early May. But many economists warn that consumers should get ready to pay more for some things as soon as summer.
So maybe it isn't a bad idea to start thinking about back-to-school shopping even before summer vacation begins.
Some shoppers might want to keep an eye on Memorial Day sales to knock some gifts off a Christmas list. Sure, it sounds strange. But it's one more weird twist in the new economic realities associated with much higher tariffs in 2025 on many goods that consumers buy.
Spikes in shoe prices could get people talking
Can we expect to see price hikes of 15% or more on shoes or a sweater? Maybe.
If so, we could be talking about the kind of consumer indignation we saw when egg prices soared. Eggs are up 18% over the last four months or 49% in a year, according to Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at The Budget Lab at Yale University.
Price hikes related to tariffs are not showing up yet in many goods, like clothing, because the items aren't perishable and retailers continue to sell some "pre-tariff inventory," Tedeschi told the Detroit Free Press.
But consumers can expect big price spikes to hit clothing and shoes this year, according to the latest forecast from the Budget Lab at Yale, a nonpartisan research center that provides analysis of federal policy proposals for the U.S. economy.
Shoe prices are expected to be 15% higher and apparel prices are expected to be 14% higher in the short run, according to the Budget Lab. And those prices could increase more in the long run.
The report issued May 12 estimated the effects of all U.S. tariffs and foreign retaliation implemented in 2025 through May 12, including the effects of the lower rates with China, the deal with the United Kingdom, and the auto tariff relief that could apply to automakers.
Right now, it's hard to judge whether we'll see a flood of price hikes at every store or shortages on the shelf.
"We saw during the avian flu crisis that not all grocery stores hiked egg prices," Tedeschi said. "Some simply chose to run out of eggs. So, price rises in the end might look less painful than some feared, but that doesn't necessarily mean that consumers haven't been hurt in other ways."
Consumer protection: Crackdown on hidden fees when booking hotels and buying tickets hits in time for summer
Overall, we could see an average per household consumer loss of $2,800, the Budget Lab reported, as a result of higher tariffs. The price level from all 2025 tariffs rises by 1.7% in the short run.
Tariffs are viewed by economists as regressive taxes. How much individual households will actually see their real incomes, or after-tax incomes, fall will vary based on their spending patterns and what tradeoffs a consumer is willing to make, such as substituting a brand that didn't face a price hike.
How soon will some prices go up?
Exactly when we'll pay higher prices on individual items will vary. Some prices on some items could go up anywhere from a week to a couple of months.
"When the United States imposed tariffs on Chinese washing machines in January 2018," Tedeschi said, "consumer washing machine prices didn't rise until April that year, due to a combination of retailer inventory and supply chain lags."
Hallmark surprised those who collect Keepsake ornaments by advising customers that they will pay more than the listed price in the 2025 Dream Book, which was handed out at stores in April. Prices were raised in early May.
In a statement sent to the Free Press, Hallmark said: "We are committed to maintaining fair pricing across our portfolio and are fortunate to manufacture 75% of our core products in our Kansas-based manufacturing facilities, including greeting cards and gift wrap." But Hallmark acknowledged that it "made the necessary decision to adjust pricing on select imported products from our gift and ornament collections that are impacted by the current economic climate."
On May 15, Walmart said it would have to start raising prices on many goods later in May and June to address higher costs associated with tariffs. Already, the company said, the price of bananas at Walmart rose to 54 cents a pound, up from 50 cents, thanks to higher tariffs.
The Budget Lab analyzed the May 12 tariff rates as if they stayed in effect in perpetuity. We all know the tariff story remains ongoing.
As of May 12, the U.S. and China agreed to a temporary reduction in tariffs for 90 days, as negotiations continue.
"The May 12 changes to the China rate alone reduce the negative economic impact of all 2025 tariffs to date by 40%," according to the Budget Lab.
Even so, the Trump trade war has meant that U.S. consumers still face an overall average effective tariff rate of 17.8%, the highest since 1934, according to the estimates from the Budget Lab. Without the lower China tariffs — but with a trade deal between the U.S. and the U.K. and newly proposed auto rebates — the average effective tariff rate would have been 27.6%.
Should you rush to buy to avoid tariffs?
Consumers could have a bit of calculating to do when it comes to how much they might be willing to buy early and how willing they might be to hold off shopping.
"The problem with trying to bulk purchase items in a time of uncertainty is that many other consumers are doing it, too," Tedeschi said.
"This increase in demand can itself lead to the very higher prices consumers are trying to avoid."
He added that it is substantially uncertain where China tariffs in particular are going to end up over the summer.
"It's easy to imagine them rising or falling from the current 30%," Tedeschi said.
"That said, if there are significant tariffs on China still in place this summer, it's highly likely they will put upward pressure on apparel and electronics prices for back-to-school shopping."
His advice: Don't panic buy. Take more time to research and comparison shop, including researching import content for potential large purchases like appliances and cars.
And he said: "Pay attention to the news and the data; ignore the noise and the vibes."
Dolls, microwaves and more to see price hikes
Over the next few months, experts say, consumers could experience sticker shock when they shop for a long list of items. Tariffs are not just about higher prices on many cars or trucks.
Jason Miller, who keeps a close eye on inventories as an associate professor of logistics in the department of supply chain management at Michigan State University's Eli Broad College of Business, noted that there's lag between when products are imported and when they hit store shelves.
But he expects that price tags on many goods will start reflecting the impact of tariffs by June and July.
Consumers, he said, likely will see price hikes on clothing and apparel; footwear; toys and games; and small electrical appliances, including microwaves, toasters and mixers.
Price hikes, he said, might also be expected for various household items for bathrooms, including items made of plastic; children's car seats and strollers, and some types of furniture.
For items like toys, Miller said, percentage increases in the double-digit range seem probable. The same's true, he said, with car seats and strollers currently.
All are items where China plays a major role in exporting goods to the United States.
The Toy Association, which has more than 900 members, is urging the U.S. government to grant a reprieve from tariffs on toys imported from China to make sure toys available for the holiday season. The Toy Association wants U.S. leaders to secure "zero for zero" tariffs on toys through bilateral negotiations with trading partners.
Trump famously stated: "Maybe the children will have two dolls instead of 30 dolls." And Trump added: "Maybe the two dolls will cost a couple of bucks more than they would normally."
The New York Post ran a Page One cover May 1 declaring: "Skimp on the Barbie."
Miller doesn't expect many supply chain snarls in the weeks ahead, as a rush of imports into the United States is expected now.
"The biggest unknown now," Miller said, "is what happens with the remaining reciprocal tariffs ... at the end of the 90-day July pause."
"The other unknown," Miller said, "is what happens to domestic demand for manufacturing." Regional Federal Reserve Bank manufacturing surveys showed significant weakening of new orders in the past few months, especially in April, including upward pressure on the cost of imported materials and supplies.
As of May 13, a 10% tariff on goods entering the U.S. is to stay in place but, according to Reuters, U.S. officials remain in talks with several countries to lower additional tariffs imposed by Trump. The 10% tariff was imposed on nearly all countries by Trump on April 2.
Inflation isn't bad now
Consumers saw inflation hit a four-year low, as the consumer price index rose year-over-year by 2.3% in April, according to the May 13 report by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Prices fell on some items in April, including airline tickets, used cars and trucks.
Used car and truck prices were down 0.5% month over month in April, following a 0.7% drop in March. Year-over-year used vehicle prices were up 1.5% in April.
Gasoline prices were down 0.1% month over month, following a 6.3% drop in March and a 1% decline in February. Gas prices were down 11.8% over 12 months through April, according to the Labor Department.
PNC Chief Economist Gus Faucher noted in his report that consumers saw little indication in the April CPI report of tariffs causing higher goods prices. But he warned that tariffs are likely to drive prices and inflation up over the next few months.
"Even with the recent agreement between the Trump administration and China to reduce the most onerous import taxes, tariffs against all U.S. trading partners are much higher than they were at the beginning of 2025," Faucher said.
Diane Swonk, KPMG's chief economist, noted in a report: "This could be the last benign inflation report for a while."
Make no mistake, consumers and business remain extremely uncertain about what's next when it comes to tariffs.
On May 8, for example, major footwear manufacturer Wolverine Worldwide stated in its earnings report that it would not provide a full-year 2025 outlook as a result of "uncertainty around tariffs and related macro-economic conditions." The company, which is based in Rockland, also then said that it is withdrawing its 2025 guidance issued on Feb. 19.
Wolverine Worldwide stated in its footnotes that risk factors ahead include price increases, risks associated with foreign sourcing, tariffs, as well as economic conditions, such as inflationary pressures, employment rates and interest rates.
Wolverine Worldwide shoe brands include Merrell, Saucony, Hush Puppies, Chaco and Stride Rite. Wolverine Worldwide is also the global footwear licensee of the Cat and Harley-Davidson brands.
What will happen next when it comes to tariffs?
How much of the higher tariffs will be passed along directly to consumers remains unknown — and we don't know just yet where tariffs will end up.
"The recent de-escalation with China to lower tariffs from 145% to 30% for 90 days is welcome news," according to an economic outlook issued May 13 by KPMG.
"That will help to restart trade between the two countries, but it is unclear whether tariffs will rise or drop at the end of the pause."
The KPMG report indicated that the Federal Reserve "is not expected to cut rates until December due to a bout of stagflation, a period of rising inflation coupled with escalating unemployment."
We've not dealt with the troubling mix of a sluggish economy and high inflation at the same time since the 1970s.
"Uncertainty is just off the charts," said Charles Ballard, professor of economics emeritus at Michigan State University.
Even the tariffs under the 90 day pause, he said, are much more restrictive than what was in place months ago.
"Trade barriers were very low when President Trump took office. He has contended again and again that other countries put up severe barriers to American exports. There is very little truth to that," Ballard said.
Some cases exist, he said, such as Canadian tariffs on dairy products. "But for the most part, we had low tariffs on imports from other countries, and other countries had low tariffs on our exports."
Overall, though, he said, American businesses are feeling whiplash as the expected tariffs have changed quickly in 2025.
Does a company go ahead and place an order, Ballard asked, knowing that it may face a very different tariff when it is filled from what it faces now?
Baby strollers, baby car seats, cellphones, laptops and toys, he said, are some of the items that face the greatest uncertainty.
Shopping for back-to-school or Christmas now might be a good idea, Ballard said, if you're concerned about shortages or higher prices.
"But it's very hard to predict exactly where the prices will be, because we don't know what the policy will be in the future," Ballard said.
Contact personal finance columnist Susan Tompor: stompor@freepress.com. Follow her on X @tompor.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
3 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump ordered purge of ‘unpatriotic' signage from national parks. How one California spot complied
Four years ago, National Park Service employees seeking to provide a more robust look at the history of Muir Woods National Monument in Marin County began the 'History Under Construction' exhibit. The concept of the work was to expand an existing sign featuring a timeline detailing the preservation of Muir Woods. Employees placed caution tape on the sign within Founder's Grove and used yellow sticky notes to add facts and dates that were missing from the original timeline. Among the information added were the efforts of Indigenous people who originally maintained the land, as well as the role of women in creating the national monument. A letter on the plaque assured passersby that 'everything on this sign is accurate, but incomplete. The facts are not under construction, but the way we tell history is.' But, as of this month, the yellow notes are no more. The expanded exhibit became the first in the nation to be altered following an executive order by President Trump in March to rid park signage of any language he would deem unpatriotic. The president's aim was to restore federal sites that he said had been changed since 2020 to perpetuate a 'false reconstruction of American history' including 'improper partisan ideology.' The Muir Woods change was first reported by SF Gate. Elizabeth Villano, a former park ranger who helped create the new version of the sign, criticized the move, writing in a post on Medium that the Trump administration 'is actively censoring American history from the public.' She said the goal of the project was to make sure nothing on the original sign was erased, but to add details so people could see the difference in how history was told and how it could be expanded to include more voices. 'We wanted to tell the true story of the woods in a way that helped people learn from the past, and apply those lessons towards a brighter future,' she wrote. 'Despite this care not to erase history, here I am, watching history be erased.' A spokesperson for the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, which includes Muir Woods, could not immediately be reached for comment on Wednesday. Before the notes were added in 2021, the first date included in the sign's timeline, called 'Path to Preservation,' was the establishment of the first national park in the United States, Yellowstone, in 1872. The next was 1892 when the Sierra Club was founded in San Francisco with John Muir as the first president. But staff at the time found that some key information was missing from the timeline, namely the work of the Coast Miwok and Southern Pomo people who tended to the land before Europeans arrived in North America. They also included the first campaign to save the region launched by a women's club in 1904. Of course, not all the information added to the timeline was positive. Staff detailed Spanish missionaries exploiting the work of Indigenous people in the Bay Area to build California missions and congressional actions stripping Coast Miwok people of title to their ancestral lands, including Muir Woods. The revised timeline didn't shy away from pointing out the complex legacies of key figures who helped spearhead the creation of the national monument. It noted that John Muir referred to Indigenous people using racist language in his diary, which was published years before his death, and pointed out William Kent's vote in Congress to prevent non-citizens from owning or leasing land. The rangers didn't cast blame for the omissions, saying that the expanded narratives were reflective of increasing diversity among park service employees in the years since the timeline was first unveiled. 'From redwood conservation to the legacy of the country's founders, American stories are enriched by complexity, dimension, and challenge. It's not our job to judge these stories or promote a singular narrative. As national park rangers, it is our mandate to tell complete stories that reflect who we are as a society. And as Americans, it's important that we hear them,' according to a National Park Service post about the changes. Trump's executive order directed the Department of the Interior to identify any public monuments, memorials, statues or markers that had been removed or changed since 2020 to 'perpetuate a false reconstruction of American history,' minimize the value of historical events or figures or include 'improper partisan ideology' and to reinstate prior monuments. The order also directed officials to ensure that monuments do not contain content that disparages Americans. Instead, the monuments should focus on 'the greatness of the achievements and progress of the American people or, with respect to natural features, the beauty, abundance, and grandeur of the American landscape,' the order states. Critics have said Trump's directive demands a rose-colored view of more complex events that make up American history. Villano, the former park ranger, wrote in the Medium essay that it's disparaging to Americans to take away people's ability to think critically and have a better understanding of history. 'Why doesn't the White House want you to see a more complete version of history? Maybe it's because, when we see ourselves in history, we realize that we can reshape it,' she wrote. 'For a government like this, that must feel like a threat. It doesn't benefit people in power to understand that anyone can be a part of history.'


Axios
3 minutes ago
- Axios
Exclusive: Massie leans into Trump defiance in first TV ad
Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie is using his first TV ad to highlight his call for the release of documents related to the investigation of the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Why it matters: Massie is showing that he plans to lean into his defiance of President Trump, who is backing a primary challenge to the Republican congressman. What they're saying: "Look, it's simple: They're attacking me because I'm holding the Washington machine accountable," Massie says in the 30-second spot. In the ad, Massie points to his vote against the Trump-backed COVID relief package in 2020, and to his opposition to Trump's "big, beautiful bill." "Now, I'm leading the charge to force a vote on the complete Epstein files," he also says. Massie is one of 11 House Republicans to call for the release of Epstein-related files, though the Trump administration has said it opposes further disclosures related to the investigation. Zoom in: Trump has vowed to campaign against Massie, and his political operation has aired two ads targeting the congressman. The president's team is also recruiting a primary challenger to Massie, and has spoken with state Sen. Aaron Reed about running. It has also conducted polling indicating that Massie would be vulnerable to a Trump-backed challenge. Between the lines: Massie, who occupies a Trump-friendly central Kentucky district, does not say Trump's name in the spot.


Hamilton Spectator
4 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Bondi facing Democratic calls to testify following report she told Trump she was in Epstein files
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General Pam Bondi is facing Democratic calls to testify before Congress following a newspaper's revelation that she told President Donald Trump that his name appeared in the files of the Jeffrey Epstein sex-trafficking investigation. The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday that Bondi told Trump his name was among many high-profile figures mentioned in the files, which the Justice Department this month said it would not be releasing despite a clamor from online sleuths, conspiracy theorists and members of Trump's base. Trump's personal ties to Epstein are well-established and his name is already known to have been included in records related to the wealthy financier, who killed himself in jail in 2019 as he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges. Sen. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, responded to the report by calling on Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee. 'We need to bring Bondi and Patel into the Judiciary Committee to testify about this now,' Schiff said in a video posted on X. The Justice Department declined to comment on the report but issued a joint statement from Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche saying that investigators had reviewed the records and 'nothing in the files warranted further investigation or prosecution.' 'As par of our routine briefing, we made the president aware of the findings,' the statement said. The mere inclusion of a person's name in Epstein's files does not imply wrongdoing and he was known to have been associated with multiple prominent figures, including Trump. Over the years, thousands of pages of records have been released through lawsuits, Epstein's criminal dockets, public disclosures and Freedom of Information Act requests. They include a 2016 deposition in which an accuser recounted she spent several hours with Epstein at Trump's Atlantic City casino but didn't say if she met Trump and did not accuse him of any wrongdoing. Trump has also said he once thought Epstein was a 'terrific guy' but they later had a falling-out. White House spokesman Steven Cheung on Wednesday said the reports were 'nothing more than a continuation of the fake news stories concocted by the Democrats and the liberal media.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .