logo
The Chase is pulled off air in ANOTHER ITV schedule shake-up this week

The Chase is pulled off air in ANOTHER ITV schedule shake-up this week

The Sun2 days ago
THE CHASE is being pulled off air this week, in a huge ITV schedule shake-up.
The popular quiz show will experience disruption to its regular schedule to make way for coverage of the UEFA Women's Euros.
Hosted by Bradley Walsh, the ITV show usually airs at 5pm on ITV One every weekday, with a celebrity special on every Saturday.
However, on Monday, July 7, the show will now be shown at its usual time slot.
Disruptions due to sporting events
This is because of the Spain vs Belgium game, with coverage for the 5 pm kick-off match starting at 4:15.
Instead, a second celebrity special will be broadcast at 5:30pm on Sunday, July 12.
The Chase will return to its 5pm time slot on Tuesday, July 8.
Last month, The Chase was taken off air to make way for coverage of Royal Ascot.
The quiz show was cancelled for the entire week to make way for the horse racing event.
Soaps also affected by TV shake-up
Soap fans will be disappointed to hear that both Coronation Street and Emmerdale will be affected by schedule changes this week.
Coronation Street is usually on TV on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays, from 8pm to 9pm.
However, there will be no episodes on Monday and Wednesday this week, to make way for the women's Euros.
The Chase fans left screaming as player gets 'ridiculously easy' question wrong - but would you know the answer-
Instead an episode will air at 9pm on Thursday, with Friday's episode on air as normal.
Emmerdale will also not be airing on Monday or Wednesday, to make way for the Portugal vs Italy and France vs Wales games.
EastEnders fans have also had to deal with schedule shakeups recently, with the BBC soap off air for eight days, from July 1 to July 9.
This is due to coverage of Wimbledon.
2
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wimbledon's electronic line-calling woes continue as boos greet latest malfunction
Wimbledon's electronic line-calling woes continue as boos greet latest malfunction

The Guardian

time28 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Wimbledon's electronic line-calling woes continue as boos greet latest malfunction

Wimbledon was forced to explain yet another issue with the live electronic line-calling system on Tuesday after it malfunctioned again, only a day after it had expressed confidence that the problems that led to an embarrassing error on Sunday had been fixed. The latest incident occurred in the quarter-final between Taylor Fritz and Karen Khachanov. Serving at 0-15 in the opening game of the fourth set, Fritz missed his first serve, which was correctly called out. He then landed his second serve but when he hit his next forehand, which landed around four feet in, the automated system called 'fault', thinking it was a serve. The second serve had not been registered by the speed gun and the umpire, Louise Azemar-Engzell, was quickly on the phone to the control room. 'Ladies and gentleman, we will be replaying the last point due to a malfunction. The system is now working,' she said, to a smattering of boos from the crowd on No 1 Court. A Wimbledon spokesperson said the mistake had occurred because the ballboy was still on court when Fritz started his serve. 'The player's service motion began while the [boy] was still crossing the net and therefore the system didn't recognise the start of the point. As such the chair umpire instructed the point be replayed.' Wimbledon replaced line judges with automated live-calling this year and the incident on Tuesday is the latest in a string of issues, which peaked on Sunday when the system failed to call a backhand by Britain's Sonay Kartal that landed clearly long, which should have given Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova a 5-4 lead in the first set. At the time, the Russian accused the tournament of home bias but her anger abated as she went on to win the match. Tournament organisers said the technology had been turned off by mistake on that section of the court. Subsequently they 'removed the ability for Hawk-Eye operators to manually deactivate the ball tracking'. Khachanov said afterwards that he preferred having human line judges. '[The question] is why this is happening,' he said. 'Is it just like error of the machine or what's the reason? Sometimes it's scary to let machine do what they want.' Sign up to The Recap The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action after newsletter promotion Fritz, however, preferred the automated system. 'In that situation it helped me because I got a first serve out of it,' he said. 'There's going to be some issues here and there. To be honest, I still think it's much better to just have the electronic line calling as opposed to the umpires because I do like not having to think about challenging calls in the middle of points. I think it's a better system.'

Disgruntled ex-employee's fury after boss sends him an outrageous text request
Disgruntled ex-employee's fury after boss sends him an outrageous text request

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Disgruntled ex-employee's fury after boss sends him an outrageous text request

A fired employee has sparked a humorous debate after exposing a shameless request from his former boss. The text message seemed genuine and polite, however it has transpired that this particular manager was asking the man to come back and train his own replacement just days after being let go. In a now-viral TikTok video, British career expert Ben Askins shared the shocking text message exchange that left thousands of viewers gobsmacked, with many dubbing the boss's request 'delusional' and 'ridiculous.' The clip, which has amassed more than 175,000 views, shows the boss pleading with the sacked staffer to return and train the new hire on the company's ticketing system. Outrageously, he was offering nothing more than a coffee in exchange. 'This boss was really pushing his luck!' Ben captioned the video. 'Situations like this can be easily avoided,' after he too seemed shocked by the lack of regard the boss had for the ex-worker. 'Hey, I know this probably isn't the best time to ask, but we're struggling with the new ticketing process. Is there any chance you could come in and run the new guy through it?' the employer messaged over text. To which the disgruntled ex-employee clapped back: 'Are you having a laugh? You fired me last week?' Lacking any regard for their feelings the employee replied: 'I know, but I wouldn't ask if it wasn't important. It shouldn't take you long. I know this is awkward, I promise you will get a coffee for the favour.' In the video, Ben chimed in adding his own opinion on the matter, joking that a mere coffee for his time was 'quite alright, then,' as he laughed. Surprisingly, the ex-employee replied with an olive branch to help, but felt remuneration was only fair for his time: 'I will do it. But I want it to be a remote tutorial, and I will charge you for half a day.' 'Remote is fine, but half a day's pay? This will only take a few minutes?' the employer replied, clearly surprised at the request. 'That is the deal.' Begrudgingly his terms were met, but not without a small dig at his audaciousness of actually being remunerated for his time and effort: 'Fine, but I am disappointed this is the way you are playing this,' the boss replied. Ben, who frequently posts career advice and work-related scenarios, was stunned by the entitlement on display. 'Firstly, let's be very clear,' he said. He does not have to do this favour. So the fact that he's charging is completely okay. 'He's giving up his time. He really doesn't have to do it, so the idea that this boss doesn't think he should pay is absolutely ridiculous.' He continued by saying that the text exchanges was 'a good example of why companies need proper training guides and onboarding processes - so you don't end up in situations like this.' Hundreds of Ben's viewers weighed in on the text exchange too, and they didn't hold back. The comments under the video lit up with support for the ex-employee, with many saying he should've asked for far more than just half a day's pay. 'Half a day? I'd charge them my consultancy fee and it would be astronomical,' one user wrote. 'I wouldn't even answer the message,' said another. 'At this point he's not under contract, he's a consultant. He can charge what he wants.' 'I'd reply two words and the second word would be 'off,' joked one. 'Half a days pay? He doesn't work there no more so his days pay is zero and half of 0 is 0.' While some users said they would've hung up or blocked the boss altogether, others applauded the ex-employee's cool-headed professionalism, particularly for negotiating remote work and payment. The viral saga has become a cautionary tale for workers everywhere, especially in industries where employees are often expected to go above and beyond, even after being let go, it seems.

Reviving the lost art of learning and reciting poetry
Reviving the lost art of learning and reciting poetry

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

Reviving the lost art of learning and reciting poetry

J. Alfred Prufrock certainly makes for more ­pleasurable listening than the Shipping Forecast or the typical dire warnings about warm weather. Those tuned in to Radio 4 before 8am on Tuesday will have enjoyed Freddie Fox, scion of the acting dynasty, reciting TS Eliot in tremendous tones — the morning spread out against the sky. The occasion for this recital was a fine one. Monday marked this year's finals of Poetry by Heart, a national competition for reciting poetry. Pupils from across England descended on ­Shakespeare's Globe to recite their favourite ­stanzas. Some 200,000 children have taken part in the competition since it was founded in 2013, supported by Andrew Motion, the poet laureate at the time, to encourage the teaching of poetry. • The power of poetry for kids Reciting poetry is something of a lost art. The compulsory requirement for students to learn poems was scotched from the curriculum in 1944. Yet in 2012, it made a surprise return to the English syllabus. Some teachers complained it was an outdated practice, yet the success of the Poetry by Heart competition suggests they were wrong. Plus, according to a study by Cambridge University, there are benefits to reciting poetry. Its Poetry and Memory Project concluded that those who memorised poems found it provided a useful container for thoughts, a comfort zone for the brain that helped forge new emotional connections. And which poem did it find was most commonly known for recital? The Owl and the Pussy-Cat. Fox, a patron of Poetry by Heart, explained why knowing great poems is important. 'It's a compass, a road map when it's in your head to navigate the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune … a way of giving words to those problems when you don't quite perhaps have the words yourself.' The pupils who appeared at the Globe can thank the work of Poetry By Heart for reviving this lost life skill.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store