Vivendi rejects EU charges it breached merger rules in Lagardere acquisition
"Vivendi denies the allegations put forward by the European Commission. It will thoroughly review the statement of objections and respond with detailed arguments, with the aim of being cleared of all allegations and securing the closure of the investigation," Vivendi said in a statement.
The European Commission earlier on Friday said it had sent a statement of objections to Vivendi, which it said might have broken merger rules by implementing the acquisition of Lagardere before receiving approval for the deal.
The Commission two years ago opened an investigation into the possible infringement of EU merger rules, which could result in a hefty fine.
It said it had now informed Vivendi of its preliminary view that the company breached the notification requirement and the 'standstill obligation' set out in the EU Merger Regulation, as well as the conditions and obligations attached to the Commission's June 2023 decision to clear the transaction.
"This document sets out the provisional findings of the European Commission's investigation and merely marks the opening of the adversarial phase of the procedure. At this stage, it does not establish any infringement, nor does it entail any sanction," Vivendi said.
The company risks a fine of as much as 10% of its global annual turnover if found guilty of breaching EU antitrust rules.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
28 minutes ago
- The Sun
Of all the harebrained schemes to smash migrant smugglers, Labour's new One In One Out plan is worst of all – here's why
HOME SECRETARY Yvette Cooper has a new plan to stop the migrants flooding into this country but is not going to tell you about it. It isn't about the numbers. They're calling the plan One-in, One-out but that isn't about the numbers, either. 4 4 More than 25,400 illegal migrants have crossed the Channel this year alone — 50 per cent more than last year — but that's not about the numbers, apparently. Ms Cooper isn't inclined to even reveal how many of them will be sent back to France under the new scheme, because to do so would only aid the people smugglers, or so she claims. Yesterday we had the rather ludicrous launch of a new policy that doesn't even do what it says on the tin. The Government's hope that this gimmick — for that is plainly what it is — will convince anyone the vile people-smuggling gangs will simply give up trafficking their lucrative quarries is wildly deluded. Taxpayer's expense Any examination of the new system makes it immediately obvious that there is no chance of it working. The Home Secretary said yesterday that, as of this week, migrants arriving illegally on to our shores will be detained then returned to France. Ms Cooper said detained 'within days' and returned 'within weeks'. But how, exactly? It was what she didn't say that was of far more interest. For example, where will they be detained? As far as we know, there are no workable detention centres anywhere near Dover. Small boat migrant found dead riddled with bullets on French coast after being gunned down 'by people smugglers' And Manston, the current holding area 20 miles away, is already over capacity. Ms Cooper has not volunteered any information as to where the arrivals will go. Neither has she suggested how long they will be held in detention, whether they will go through a court process or, indeed, whether they will be able to access legal services at the taxpayer's expense. As if all that wasn't bad enough, there is simply no explanation at all of how the migrants will be 'returned'. Will they all be packed into the back of a lorry? Will Border Force take them back to France on their boats? Or will it be down to the RNLI? One-in, One-out, it may be called, but not one clue is being given as to its likely success Perhaps the migrants will be put on the Eurostar or flown out of the country on one of those chartered jets. You might as well throw a dice or toss a coin. One-in, One-out, it may be called, but not one clue is being given as to its likely success. The Home Secretary has conceded there 'might' be legal challenges in some cases. So it's then back to the old right to a family life, under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The public, of course, are under no illusions. 4 4 My listeners and readers gave me their verdict about all this yesterday. 'If it's 50,000 in and 50,000 out, they get replaced by another 50,000, so it's still 50,000 more,' said one wise caller. Despite Ms Cooper's claim that this is not about the numbers, the increasingly frustrated and fed-up citizens of this country are very clear that it is. She has conceded that only about 50 migrants will be exchanged per week in the initial pilot stage of the programme — which is due to run for only 11 months. That represents just one in 17 of the current small-boat arrivals on to our shores. And so, obviously, the numbers do matter. Ms Cooper says that the replacement migrants will be fully documented and legitimised. In effect, they will qualify to come and live here because they can prove who they are and that they have family here. Does she really think that system won't be abused? Asylum seekers in France can now apply online to come to Britain. So, you can only imagine the numbers that will flock to the French coast in the hopes of a successful application. In one fell swoop, the Government has taken away the risk of dying in the Channel — instead encouraging the migrants to fill out a form. Harebrained schemes And who will assess the suitability of the applicants? Will a family of four from Libya get precedence over two teenage brothers from Eritrea? And if their application is successful, where will they live? A migrant hotel? Social housing? An army camp? Of all the harebrained schemes to smash the gangs, stop the boats, fix the system and secure our borders — yes, Sir Keir Starmer has promised to do all four — this is perhaps the worst of all. It brings yet more people into the country with no perceived skills or reason to be here. It adds fuel to an already tense situation, up and down the country. And it will almost certainly fail to do what it is meant to do. Aside from that, it'll cost more billions of pounds of our money. I'm not in. I'm out.
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Aston Villa close in on £30.5m deal for Nice forward Evann Guessand
Aston Villa are close to making the Nice forward Evann Guessand their first major summer signing. Villa have agreed a package worth €35m (£30.5m) for the Ivory Coast international. Villa have scheduled a medical for Guessand on Wednesday and plan to sign the 24-year-old to a long-term contract. The France-born player scored 12 goals in 32 appearances in Ligue 1 last season and scored his first international goal in March. His arrival would be a boost to Unai Emery's attacking options, with Ollie Watkins the only bona fide striker in the Villa squad. Like Donyell Malen, Guessand's versatility makes him an attraction option for Villa. Villa have had to be mindful of profitability and sustainability regulations this summer and their only other first-team signing so far is the experienced goalkeeper Marco Bizot, who was signed as a No 2 from Brest. Zépiqueno Redmond, signed from Feyenoord, could depart on loan. Uncertainty continues to surround Emiliano Martínez, who is thought to be keen on exploring a fresh challenge. Watkins has been the subject of interest from rivals but Villa do not wish to sell. Villa also want to trim their squad and offload fringe players such as Àlex Moreno and Leander Dendoncker. Meanwhile, Liverpool midfielder Tyler Morton has joined Lyon in a £15m deal. The 22-year-old, who came through the academy ranks at Liverpool, had interest from several European and Premier League clubs this summer but opted to pursue more regular first-team football in France. Liverpool have also negotiated a 20% sell-on clause in any future transfer. The Premier League champions are well stocked in central midfield and Morton's opportunities may have been further limited next season by the return of Stefan Bajcetic, plus the development of James McConnell and Luca Stephenson.
Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain already has a de facto wealth tax
New figures from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research show that Chancellor Rachel Reeves is on course to miss her borrowing targets by over £40bn, again raising the prospect of fresh tax hikes this autumn. There are few prizes on offer for guessing where the minds of Labour MPs will turn. Yet between inheritance tax, council tax, stamp duty, capital gains, corporation tax, and the tax on interest, there is scarcely an element of an individual's portfolio which isn't in some way squeezed to fund the ever-expanding welfare state. An additional 120,000 people are predicted by HMRC to pay income tax on the interest on their savings this year, bringing the total number paying to 2.64 million. Some of this is due to higher returns; another component, however, is down to the freeze in tax thresholds, driving down the inflation adjusted value of the tax-free limit. Britain is not a country blessed with an excessive level of private savings and with the Government actively attempting to boost investment, it might be thought that penalising one of the channels through which funds can be lent to firms would be discouraged. Such analysis, however, reckons without the obsessive equalising instinct which has taken root in Westminster. With the Government apparently fixated on the curious objective of divorcing living standards from economic contributions entirely, the need for tax revenue today is taking precedence over the need to provide for tomorrow. The result of this short-sighted creation of a hostile environment for wealth will surely be to further undermine the sustainability of the public finances in the long run.
