Kyiv mayor Vitali Klitschko: 'Putin only understands force' – DW – 07/17/2025
On July 14, US President Donald Trump gave his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin another 50 days to reach a peace deal with Ukraine. He also threatened to impose secondary tariffs on Russia's trading partners if the ceasefire failed to materialize. DW spoke to Kyiv's mayor Vitali Klitschko about what he thinks Ukraine needs in order to protect itself and the challenges the Ukrainian capital faces today.Vitali Klitschko: I don't understand why they've been given these 50 days now. During these 50 days, the Russians can gather up strength. During these 50 days, the Russians can kill even more civilians. I am convinced that tough sanctions have to be imposed, as this would act as a deterrent.
I am convinced that we too should make use of this period. We believe that during these 50 days we'll be able to obtain even more of the modern weapons that we lack, from our partners. And we are grateful to our partners.
I am convinced that Putin only understands the language of force. He respects those who are strong and doesn't care about the weak. So we must be strong. Only together, and by joining forces, can we be strong. We are counting on our partners for more support, tough sanctions and arms supplies.I am not currently prepared to disclose how many Patriot and other air defense systems we have. One thing I can say is that we'll only be able to say "enough" when the war is over. Today, our city and other cities in Ukraine are constantly exposed to massive combined attacks. Air defense is a key challenge for every city — not just the capital.How can we deal with the consequences when more than 30 people lost their lives last week? They cannot be brought back. Buildings have been destroyed, and it will take months, perhaps years, to rebuild them. We are doing our best to help everyone who requires assistance but our resources are limited. I'll admit openly that despite modern technology and weapons, we won't be able to fully guarantee the safety of everyone in the capital and the other cities of Ukraine if these massive attacks continue. Today in Ukraine, everyone is risking their lives. There can be a drone strike at any moment and new victims. That is why every Ukrainian has only one wish, and one question: When will this end?
We hope to be able to end the war through diplomatic means. But let's be honest. The diplomatic route doesn't suit Putin, or even many Ukrainians. We'll never say that the part of Ukraine currently occupied by Russia no longer belongs to the Ukrainians. It is our country, our state, that we are defending. It's very difficult to agree to give up part of our territory. Yes, that would be a so-called "compromise" but still...
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 videoMore than 1,600 residential buildings have been destroyed. More than 300 civilians have been killed. The total number of destroyed buildings is about 3,000. There has been destruction in all of the city's districts. I've asked myself this crucial question more than once: What is the point of attacking a peaceful city and killing peaceful people? To destroy critical infrastructure, to deprive people of electricity, water and heating? I've thought about this long and hard. There is only one answer: To spread panic, to trigger depression and fear in people so that they all pack their bags, go somewhere in Europe, leave the country, and leave it to the attacker. There is no other answer to this question.It is mainly money from the city's budget. We are also applying for funds from the state budget. To rebuild destroyed buildings for example. If the damage is so extensive that people cannot live somewhere, we pay their rent. We provide assistance when kindergartens and schools are destroyed, and so far over 200 educational facilities have been destroyed. Children must go to school, and the local budget has to shoulder the cost, which is a lot of money. We are now building air-raid shelters, something we have never done before — the war has forced us into doing this. Of course, the situation is difficult. The economy is not working, the logistical infrastructure has been destroyed, and there is a shortage of labor for reconstruction, as hundreds of thousands of people have been mobilized to defend the country. We face numerous challenges, the greatest of which is the restoration of lifesaving systems.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Germany updates: Merz seeks to win over investment – DW – 07/21/2025
Chancellor Merz is meeting top executives in Berlin to urge bosses to invest and breathe life into a floundering economy. Follow DW for more. Chancellor Friedrich Merz is welcoming executives from top German firms on Monday, hoping to rally fresh investment after two years of recession. Around 30 companies — including big hitters like Siemens and Deutsche Bank — are expected to present projects under the "Made for Germany" push to restore confidence in the economy. While the government has approved billions in tax relief and a €500-billion ($580 billion) fund for infrastructure and climate, Berlin says public money alone won't be enough. from the DW newsroom, overlooking the Rhine River in Bonn — the former capital of West Germany. You join us as Chancellor Friedrich Merz gets ready to woo some of Germany's biggest business bosses to help get the sluggish economy back on its feet. Top names like Siemens and Deutsche Bank are expected talks in Berlin, along with more than a dozen other DAX-listed giants. About 30 firms are set to join what's being billed as a major push to rebuild investor confidence in the country's economic future. Merz is under pressure after two back-to-back years of recession and little sign that 2025 will turn things around. Follow along for the latest on what Germany is talking about on Monday, July 21.
Int'l Business Times
15 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
European Powers Plan Fresh Nuclear Talks With Iran
European powers plan fresh talks with Iran on its nuclear programme in the coming days, the first since the US attacked Iranian nuclear facilities a month ago, a German diplomatic source told AFP on Sunday. Britain, France and Germany, known as the E3, "are in contact with Iran to schedule further talks for the coming week", the source said. The trio had recently warned that international sanctions against Iran could be reactivated if Tehran does not return to the negotiating table. Iran's Tasnim news agency also reported that Tehran had agreed to hold talks with the three European countries, citing an unnamed source. Consultations are ongoing regarding a date and location for the talks, the report said. "Iran must never be allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon. That is why Germany, France and the United Kingdom are continuing to work intensively in the E3 format to find a sustainable and verifiable diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear programme," the German source said. Israel and Western nations have long accused Iran of seeking to develop nuclear weapons, a charge Tehran has consistently denied. On June 13, Israel launched a wave of surprise strikes on its regional nemesis, targeting key military and nuclear facilities. The United States launched its own set of strikes against Iran's nuclear programme on June 22, hitting the uranium enrichment facility at Fordo, in Qom province south of Tehran, as well as nuclear sites in Isfahan and Natanz. Iran and the United States had held several rounds of nuclear negotiations through Omani mediators before Israel launched its 12-day war against Iran. However, US President Donald Trump's decision to join Israel in striking Iranian nuclear facilities effectively ended the talks. The E3 countries last met with Iranian representatives in Geneva on June 21 -- just one day before the US strikes. Meanwhile on Sunday, Russian President Vladimir Putin held a surprise meeting in the Kremlin with Ali Larijani, top adviser to Iran's supreme leader on nuclear issues. Larijani "conveyed assessments of the escalating situation in the Middle East and around the Iranian nuclear programme", Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said of the unannounced meeting. Putin had expressed Russia's "well-known positions on how to stabilise the situation in the region and on the political settlement of the Iranian nuclear programme", he added. Moscow has a cordial relationship with Iran's clerical leadership and provides crucial backing for Tehran but did not swing forcefully behind its partner even after the United States joined Israel's bombing campaign. Iran and world powers struck a deal in 2015 called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which placed significant restrictions on Tehran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief. But the hard-won deal began to unravel in 2018, during Trump's first presidency, when the United States walked away from it and reimposed sanctions on Iran. European countries have in recent days threatened to trigger the deal's "snapback" mechanism, which allows the reimposition of sanctions in the event of non-compliance by Iran. After a call with his European counterparts on Friday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the Western allies had no grounds for reactivating sanctions. "If EU/E3 want to have a role, they should act responsibly and put aside the worn-out policies of threat and pressure, including the 'snap-back' for which they (have) absolutely no moral (or) legal grounds," Araghchi said on X. However, the German source on Sunday said that "if no solution is reached over the summer, snapback remains an option for the E3". Iran last week said there would be no new nuclear talks with the United States if they were conditioned on Tehran abandoning its uranium enrichment activities. "If the negotiations must be conditioned on stopping enrichment, such negotiations will not take place," Ali Velayati, an adviser to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was quoted as saying by the state news agency IRNA.
DW
19 hours ago
- DW
Israel: Hostage families voice mistrust in own government – DW – 07/20/2025
With 50 hostages still in Gaza 21 months after the Hamas attacks on Israel, their relatives continue to grow frustrated. Some are losing faith that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will strike a deal to bring them home. On a windy evening in Jerusalem, a few dozen protesters gathered in front of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office. According to reports, the protest took place at short notice because at the same time meetings between Israel's most highly-ranked politicians were happening in that same building, discussing the most recent developments in the indirect negotiations with Palestinian militant group Hamas on a ceasefire deal that would result in some of the Israeli hostages returning home. Some of the protesters held a big air balloon above their heads in the shape of the yellow ribbon, the symbol adopted by campaigners calling for the hostages' release. On the balloon were white stickers with various numbers written on them with a black marker pen: 155, 344, 356. These numbers represent the number of days since October 7, 2023, when the hostages were taken. This started when Rachel Goldberg-Polin, whose son Hersh was murdered in August 2024 by Hamas in Gaza, appeared in interviews with a sticker and a number on it to raise awareness for the hostages' plight. As of July 2025, this number has surpassed 650. "The era of selection is over," reads one of the signs, referring to the choice process which determines who will be released and who will have to stay in Gaza's tunnels until another deal is struck. The story of Carmel Gat shows just how significant the risk to a hostage's life in Gaza is. Gat was kidnapped from her home during the incursion in southern Israel that Hamas led on October 7, 2023. Israel, the United States, the European Union and others designate Hamas a terrorist group,. She was supposed to be among those released as part of the first hostage deal in November 2023 between Israel and Hamas that saw over 100 captives in Gaza freed and 240 Palestinian prisoners released. But when the truce collapsed, she remained in Hamas captivity. After Gat survived 328 days, Israeli soldiers found her and five other Israeli hostages dead in a tunnel in southern Gaza — the autopsy report revealed she and the other hostages were shot at close range. Gat was 40 years old. Her cousin, Gil Dickman, has become one of the most vocal supporters of a deal for the release of the remaining hostages. He told DW that the current state of the negotiations feels like "deja vu." "A year ago (in July 2024), many family members of hostages were with Netanyahu in Washington, DC, myself included. The only difference is that Carmel and five other hostages were alive back then," Dickman recalled. "Carmel could have returned had Netanyahu made the right call." Yehuda Cohen's son, Nimrod, is one of the some 20 hostages believed to be still alive — 30 others are thought to be dead. In a conversation with DW, Yehuda Cohen outlined how he lost his trust that the Israeli government would bring the hostages home. "I don't have any trust in my own government, I don't trust Netanyahu," he said. "I only have trust in the American administration that it will force Netanyahu into sealing a deal." This hope — that the US may yet force through a deal — is prevalent among campaigners in Israel. At the protest in Jerusalem, many signs called on US President Donald Trump, rather than Netanyahu, to do everything in his power to bring the hostages home. Cohen lists the reasons for the mistrust in the Netanyahu government, including the insistence on Israel staying in the Philadelphi Corridor, a narrow strip of land on the border between the Gaza Strip and Egypt, and Netanyahu's aides allegedly leaking classified documents to , a German tabloid, to influence public opinion in Israel in favor of the Netanyahu government's position. According to Cohen, the list of reasons for hostage families not to trust the Israeli government is "very long." While Netanyahu told the hostages' family members that an offer to bring all hostages home in one deal "was never an option," Hamas officials went on record on several occasions emphasizing their interest in a deal that would return the remaining hostages and bring about an end to the war in Gaza. "It is our government that insists on a selection process between the hostages," says Dickman, calling this reckoning "painful to apprehend." Still, both Cohen and Dickman agree that any deal bringing hostages back is a good thing. "Even a partial deal means my son's turn is getting closer," Cohen said. The Israeli public is no stranger to hostage situations, whether it is the Sabena Flight 171 hijacking in 1972 by the Black September Organization, Hamas's kidnapping and killing of Israeli soldier Nachshon Wachsman in 1994 or the group's abduction of Gilad Shalit in 2006. As a result, the principle that no one is left behind became deeply rooted in Israeli society over the years. Dickman believes that while the Israeli public supports this ethos, the same cannot be said of the country's government. "This is a government politically controlled by people whose ethos is, in my eyes, more jihadist than Israeli," he said, referring specifically to the far-right parts of Netanyahu's coalition, primarily National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who both want Palestinians to leave Gaza and Jewish settlements to return there. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "Their goals involve land, not human life, and they consider their goals sacred," he says, adding that the demand for the return of the 50 hostages is also about Israel's future. "It's about whether this country will become such that is willing to sacrifice life — mine, yours — for so-called 'sacred' targets, or rather a country where life is sacred." Yehuda Cohen struck a similar tone: "We have a prime minister who's only committed to himself," he said. "You have people in this government who openly support those who abuse prisoners, which results in the risk of revenge against my son. There's no solidarity in this society; it's each one to their own." According to Yehuda Cohen, the only way to bring his son home is to keep fighting for the hostages' release and the end of the war, whether that means speaking to the media or protesting outside Netanyahu's office.
