logo
Assam forest land used for camps without approval, action ordered against official

Assam forest land used for camps without approval, action ordered against official

India Todaya day ago
The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change has directed legal action against Assam's Special Chief Secretary MK Yadava for serious violations of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. The violations pertain to the unauthorised diversion of protected forest land in Assam to build Commando Battalion Camps without securing the mandatory prior approval from the Central Government.According to official documents, Yadava, who was then serving as Principal Chief Conservator of Forests and Head of Forest Force, allegedly permitted the diversion of 28 hectares in Geleky Reserved Forest under the Sivasagar Division and 11.5 hectares in Innerline Reserved Forest under the Hailakandi Division for non-forest purposes. The Ministry has now empowered Divisional Forest Officers in Assam to initiate legal proceedings against him.advertisementThe construction projects, undertaken by the Assam Police Housing Corporation Ltd., proceeded without Central clearance. Inspections carried out by the Ministry's Regional Office in Shillong confirmed that large-scale permanent construction had already taken place in both forest areas. The August 2024 inspection of Geleky Reserved Forest found that nearly 80 percent of the structures for the Commando Battalion Camp had been completed.
A similar site visit in March 2024 at Innerline Reserved Forest revealed that around 500 workers and multiple heavy vehicles were engaged in construction activity spread across 11.5 hectares. The plinth area of buildings under construction was estimated at 30,000 square metres.The Advisory Committee acknowledged the importance of deploying security forces to protect forests, but reiterated that diversion of forest land requires prior approval from the Central Government, as laid out in Rule 11.8 of the Forest (Conservation) Act and the updated 2023 rules and guidelines.Yadava's justification for the construction - citing forest protection concerns - was deemed unsatisfactory and 'not legally tenable' by the Ministry. Under Rule 15(2) of the Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Rules, 2023, the Central Government has directed the State Government to initiate prosecution.Divisional Forest Officers have been given 45 days to file complaints and submit action-taken reports, with the Assam Government required to provide monthly updates to the Ministry's Shillong office.The matter is further complicated by a conflict of interest. As Special Chief Secretary, Yadava now holds a position that may influence whether legal proceedings against him are approved - raising questions over institutional accountability.While the National Green Tribunal has closed the Damchera camp case after a post-facto clearance, the Geleky case remains pending before the tribunal's Kolkata bench.- EndsMust Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CCI directs UltraTech Cement, Dalmia Bharat to furnish financial records
CCI directs UltraTech Cement, Dalmia Bharat to furnish financial records

Time of India

time30 minutes ago

  • Time of India

CCI directs UltraTech Cement, Dalmia Bharat to furnish financial records

NEW DELHI: Fair trade regulator CCI has directed Aditya Birla firm UltraTech, which now owns south-based cement firm India Cements , along with two other makers and their executives to submit financial documents, after its Director General in its investigations found contravention of competition norms. The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has also directed Dalmia Bharat Cements and Shree Digvijay Cements to submit their audited financial statement, including balance sheet and profit and loss account, within eight weeks of the order. It has directed UltraTech to submit the financial statements of its subsidiary India Cements for five years from FY15 to FY19, while Dalmia Bharat Cements and Shree Digvijay Cements for nine years, from FY11 to FY19. Besides, CCI has also directed their executives to submit detailed financials and income tax records for five years, along with formal responses to the investigation report. An email sent to UltraTech Cements remained unanswered till the time of filing the story. Dalmia Bharat, in a regulatory filing, said CCI is yet to hear it in the matter or pass any formal order. "DCBL remains committed to full regulatory compliance and is cooperating with the authorities," it said. The CCI direction came over a complaint filed by ONGC alleging cartelisation in its tenders. Following this, the fair trade regulator had on November 18, 2020, directed its probe unit Director General to look into the issue. The DG had submitted its investigations report on February 18, 2025, in which found contraventions of the competition regulations. It had found that Ultratech's subsidiary India Cements, along with Shree Digvijay Cement and Dalmia Cement, with a middleman named Umakant Agarwal, engaged in anti-competitive collusion. Later, CCI on May 26, 2025, considered the investigation report and in a four-page order also directed the cement manufacturer to submit income derived from sales to alleged contraventions by the PSU. The CCI notice also mentioned if there is non-furnishing of the financial details or incomplete/false information, within the time frame by the companies, then they would be liable under section 45 of the Act. Earlier, in December 2024, UltraTech Cements had acquired 32.72 per cent stake from promoters and promoter group entities of India Cements Ltd. The Aditya Birla Group firm, which already had acquired a 22.77 per cent stake from the market, became the promoter of the Tamil Nadu-based company.

High Court notices to Telangana govt
High Court notices to Telangana govt

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

High Court notices to Telangana govt

Telangana High Court on Friday (July 4, 2025) issued notices to the State government in a PIL petition over failure of officials to enforce the provisions of Telangana Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act-1973. The bench of Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul and Justice Renuka Yara instructed the State government to file its response within four weeks over the issues raised in the PIL plea. Singur Jalasadhana Committee (Alladurg of Medak) president Kanchari Brahmam wrote a letter to the High Court stating that some individuals were floating companies and buying lands on large scale. These huge agricultural land masses were being kept idle, defeating the purpose of using them for agricultural production or growing crops for food production. The said special Act was supposed to check such misuse of land but the authorities were not acting upon the issue. The High Court converted the letter into PIL plea and issued notices to the government.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store