Trump warns US will attack Iran's nuclear sites again 'if necessary'
Trump issued the warning in a social media post on Monday after Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told Fox News that Tehran could not give up its nuclear enrichment programme, even though it was damaged by US strikes.
"It is stopped because, yes, damages are serious and severe. But obviously, we cannot give up on enrichment because it is an achievement of our own scientists. And now, more than that, it is a question of national pride," Araghchi said.
On his Truth Social platform, Trump referenced Araghchi's comments about the nuclear sites being severely damaged and said: "Of course they are, just like I said, and we will do it again, if necessary!"
The US carried out strikes on Iran's Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities on 22 June, assisting Israel, which had already been trading missile fire with Tehran since 13 July.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Iran responded to the strikes by firing ballistic missiles at the US's al-Udeid military base in Qatar. Washington and Doha were informed at least one day earlier about the choreographed strikes.
Shortly after, the US announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, capping 12 days of unprecedented fighting.
Since then, several news sites have questioned the extent of the damage on the Iranian nuclear sites.
CNN cited an early US intelligence assessment which suggested that the strikes set back Iran's nuclear programme only by months, rather than destroying it.
And on Thursday, NBC News reported that one of Iran's nuclear sites was severely damaged, but two other facilities were only degraded to the point that the Islamic Republic could restart uranium enrichment at them within months.
Trump has said that the US and Iran will meet to restart negotiations. However, on Wednesday, he told reporters that he was "in no rush to talk because we obliterated their site".
For its part, Iran is scheduled to meet Britain, France and Germany in Istanbul on Friday, to discuss its nuclear programme, with Tehran accusing European powers of scuppering a landmark 2015 nuclear deal.
The 2015 agreement, reached between Iran and UN Security Council permanent members Britain, China, France, Russia and the US, plus Germany, imposed curbs on Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief.
However, it unravelled in 2018 when the United States, during Trump's first term, unilaterally withdrew and reimposed sweeping sanctions.
Though Europe pledged continued support, a mechanism intended to offset US sanctions never effectively materialised, forcing many western firms to exit Iran and deepening its economic crisis.
"Iran holds the European parties responsible for negligence in implementing the agreement," said foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei ahead of Friday's talks in Istanbul on the deal's future.
Western powers, led by the United States and backed by Israel, have long accused Tehran of secretly seeking nuclear weapons.
Iran has repeatedly denied this, insisting its nuclear programme is solely for civilian purposes such as energy production.
Tehran and Washington held five rounds of nuclear talks starting in April, but a planned meeting on 15 June was cancelled after Israel launched strikes on Iran, triggering a 12-day conflict.
"At this stage, we have no intention of speaking with America," Baqaei said Monday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
an hour ago
- Gulf Today
Fearful of Trump's wrath, Congress abdicates its authority
Carl P. Leubsdorf, Tribune News Service The first six months of President Donald Trump's second administration have brought an unprecedented expansion of presidential power. They've also brought an unprecedented abdication of congressional authority. Fearful of incurring Trump's wrath — and perhaps primary opposition — Republican lawmakers have voted to confirm unqualified nominees, and rubber-stamped Medicaid cuts they acknowledged would hurt their constituents, often after proclaiming publicly they would never do so. Oversight committees, which are supposed to police the executive branch's management of legislation, are ignoring the administration's unconstitutional dismantling of statutory agencies and programmes — and complaining about the federal judges who are seeking to protect them. Some members who represent swing districts or states with thousands of Medicaid recipients may face the wrath of voters next year. All of them should. There's no question which member of Congress put on the year's most hypocritical legislative performance. Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri spent two months righteously condemning pending GOP proposals to cut Medicaid, noting it serves over one million Missourians. For Republicans 'to build our 'big, beautiful bill' around slashing health insurance for the working poor,' he wrote in The New York Times, 'is both morally wrong and politically suicidal.' He then voted for it, citing a modest addition funding rural hospitals. Then, he introduced a bill to repeal some of the Medicaid cuts, an empty gesture destined never to see the light of day — or the Senate calendar. Hawley was not the only GOP senator casting a damaging vote while expressing reservations. Sen. Lisa Murkowski gained some concessions for her Alaska constituents, then voted for the Trump package while expressing doubts about what she was doing. 'While we have worked to improve the present bill for Alaska,' she said, 'it is not good enough for the rest of our nation — and we all know it.' To be clear: the Senate would have rejected it had either Hawley or Murkowski voted on their stated principles. There was even less GOP resistance when the administration asked Congress to cancel $9 billion it had previously voted for, most for health and food aid to poor countries, the remainder for public radio and television. Though the cuts will shut small public radio outlets in many states, most Republican senators kept silent as Democrats denounced their impact. Only two, Maine's Susan Collins and Murkowski, opposed the measure, safe votes since the administration had enough support without them. The Senate's hypocrisy was matched in the House. Sixteen Republicans vowed resistance to the Medicaid cuts drafted by the House Budget Committee. 'Protecting Medicaid is essential for the vulnerable constituents we were elected to represent,' they wrote GOP leaders. 'Therefore, we cannot support a final bill that threatens access to coverage or jeopardizes the stability of our hospitals and providers.' Signatories were Reps. David Valadao and Young Kim, Ca.; Juan Ciscomani, Az.; Rob Bresnahan Jr., Pa.; Chuck Edwards, NC; Andrew Garbarino, Michael Lawler and Nicole Malliotakis, NY; Jen Kiggans and Robert Wittman, Va.; Jefferson Van Drew, NJ; Don Bacon, Ne; Dan Newhouse, WA.; Zach Nunn and Mariannette Miller-Meeks, Ia.; and Jeff Hurd, Co. But all 16 subsequently backed it after gaining an increase in the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction, which benefits mainly middle- and upper-income taxpayers. All 16 later acquiesced in even more sweeping Medicaid cuts added by the Senate. Legislative issues were not the only places where GOP senators abandoned stated principles amid administration pressure. Senators Bill Cassidy of Louisiana and Joni Ernst of Iowa cast the decisive votes to confirm the two most manifestly unqualified Trump Cabinet secretaries after obtaining promises the two nominees abandoned once approved. Cassidy said Secretary of Health and Services-nominee Robert F. Kennedy Jr., if confirmed, 'will maintain the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' recommendations without changes.' Soon after taking office, Kennedy removed all 17 panel members, replacing some with outspoken critics of government-mandated immunization for the nation's children. Ernst expressed concern about Secretary of Defense-nominee Pete Hegseth's stated opposition to women in combat roles and sought a commitment to having a senior-level military official dedicated to sexual assault response and prevention. 'Women will have access to ground-combat roles, given the standards remain high,' Hegseth testified. While he has not reversed the Obama administration's decision placing women in combat roles, he announced a review of physical fitness standards that could have that effect. Hegseth has not yet announced an official to monitor sexual assault issues, but he has continued his purge of high-level women officers, most recently removing the US Naval Academy's first female superintendent. Both Cassidy and Ernst face re-election races in 2026, and both feared Trump-endorsed primary challenges. In fact, some Trump supporters sought to pressure Ernst before she backed Hegseth — including a column by a potential primary foe, Iowa state Attorney General Brenda Bird. GOP-led congressional committees have been no better. The principal House investigative committee, which spent the last two years unsuccessfully trying to find a way to impeach Joe Biden, has switched its focus to whether the former president's declining health led aides to exercise his duties, despite the lack of evidence they did. Rather than probe the current administration's manifest irregularities, they're investigating hearsay about the prior one. One thing the past six months have shown is that, when casting votes or confirming nominees, there is little difference between so-called 'conservative' Republicans and so-called 'moderate' ones. When it comes to backing Trump, they are all on board.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
How right-wing America is falling out of love with Israel
A recent report from CNN revealed that in just eight years, Democratic voters in the United States had reversed their views on Israel. In 2017, Democrats sympathised more with Israel over the Palestinians by 13 percent. In 2025, Democrats sympathised more with Palestinians by 43 percent. That is an unprecedented swing in so short a time. In many ways, this completed a trend that has been building for years, as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has openly embraced the Republican Party, leading the once solid, bipartisan support for Israel to split along party lines. Until now, Israel could always count on rock-solid support among Republicans and senior Democratic leaders, as proven by President Joe Biden's unstinting support for Israel's genocidal war in Gaza. That bet seemed even surer as President Donald Trump, with his fanatical Christian Zionist base, returned to office. But it turns out that support among Republicans is not so solid. In recent weeks, there has been increasing evidence that support for Israel among conservatives is fraying significantly. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Last month, a Quinnipiac poll found that 64 percent of Republicans sympathised more with Israel than with the Palestinians. That sounds like a lot - until you consider that just one year earlier, that number was 78 percent in the same poll. Sympathy for Palestinians did not increase: only 7 percent said they sympathised with Palestinians. So the drop was solely due to a declining view of Israel. The dynamic is not confined to polls by any means. Negative attitudes There has long been a sector of the American right wing that holds negative attitudes towards Israel. For the most part, that attitude has little to do with sympathy for Palestinians. Rather, it stems from either isolationism, antipathy towards Jews, or some combination of the two. Both of those tendencies have been magnified recently. Though the amendment to cut Israeli military aid received only six votes, the fact that it came from within Trump's camp was a shock The roiling, revived controversy over serial sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein's mysterious client list has rocked Trump and, for the first time in a decade, shaken support among parts of his MAGA base. The president who once seemed to be made of Teflon - immune to every controversy - is finally showing signs of vulnerability to a scandal he himself long tried to weaponise against Democrats. Similarly, some of Trump's most vocal and racist supporters have come out strongly against him on matters concerning the Middle East. Tucker Carlson, the former Fox News pundit who once called Iraqis "primitive monkeys" and promoted antisemitic theories that Jews were facilitating the entry of undocumented immigrants to undermine "white America" - known as the "Great Replacement Theory" - has become an increasingly vocal critic of Trump's policies. This reached new heights when Trump threatened, and then followed through with, bombing Iran. In a viral interview with far-right Senator Ted Cruz, Carlson ridiculed the senator for blindly backing the policy while knowing nothing about Iran. The criticism of Trump was blatant. Another long-time Trump supporter, Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene from Georgia, has broken ranks with Trump on Israel. Greene, a known conspiracy theorist, Islamophobe, and antisemite, who once posited that space lasers operated by Jews started a catastrophic fire in California, recently brought an amendment to the Defence Appropriations Bill that, among other things, would have stripped half a billion dollars from Israel's annual funding for its Iron Dome missile system. Unsurprisingly, the amendment received only six votes in support. But that it came from within Trump's camp was a shock. The only other Republican to support it, Congressman Thomas Massie, is not in Trump's good graces. Greene's amendment did receive support from four progressive Democrats. Notably, it stirred anger at leading progressive Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who opposed the amendment, arguing that the Iron Dome - which gives Israel the ability to attack others without significant fear of retaliation - is a purely defensive weapon. Her progressive community clearly disagreed. Still, the fact that a proposal to cut military aid to Israel received bipartisan support and originated with Republicans was notable. Israel targeting churches Into this mess came a high-profile Israeli attack on the Holy Family Catholic Church in Gaza City. It was at least the sixth attack on a church in Gaza since 7 October 2023, but this one caught the attention of the US. Just days earlier, an attack by Israeli settlers on a church in the West Bank village of Taybeh also drew attention. The Church of al-Khader (St George), which dates back to the fifth century, was damaged when settlers attempted to burn it to the ground. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war Israel has been evasive about the incident and has yet to arrest anyone in connection with the attack. It claims that the settlers were trying to put out the fire and that the arsonists are unknown. Few outside of the settlers' supporters put much faith in that account, given well-documented Israeli settler hostility to Palestinian Christians. US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee condemned the attacks on Palestinian churches - a remarkable shift for a man who has long defended Israel against virtually every allegation, no matter how well documented. Why do evangelical Protestants hate Palestinians? Read More » "It doesn't matter whether it's a mosque, a church, a synagogue," he told reporters. "It's unacceptable to commit an act of sacrilege by desecrating a place that is supposed to be a place of worship." Huckabee has never spoken out about the more than 960 mosques that Israel had damaged or destroyed in Gaza as of January 2025. But the attack on the Holy Family Church has resonated. Right-wing pundits have expressed outrage and frustration at Israel's attack on the church, with few believing Israel's claim that it was an artillery misfire. US Senator Lindsey Graham, another staunch supporter of Israel, expressed similar concern: "When you have Christian churches under siege in Gaza and the West Bank, it needs to stop," he told Jewish Insider. "You're not helping your cause by allowing people to abuse Christian holy sites," he added, warning that such actions could undermine Israel's ability to maintain support in the United States. "You're losing me," said influential conservative pundit Michael Knowles. "The Israeli government is really screwing up. This horrific war must come to a complete end." Epstein fallout Another issue that has exposed a growing rift within Trump's base is the resurfacing of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal and the president's close personal friendship with the convicted sex offender. Epstein was finally jailed for his crimes in 2019 and was found dead in his cell, ostensibly by suicide, a little more than a month later. For a variety of reasons - some more substantial than others - many suspect Epstein was murdered. The connection between Epstein and Israel is now gaining traction in right-wing circles Given that he was trafficking underage girls for sex and is known to have handed those girls over to at least some very prominent global figures, the roots of the theory are obvious, even if some of the speculation remains wild and unsubstantiated. A purported list of clients that Epstein allegedly maintained is at the centre of the controversy, although it is not at all clear that the list exists. For years, Trump and others within his circle - such as the pro-Trump lawyer and pro-Israel zealot Alan Dershowitz - hinted that there were prominent Democratic figures on that list. Trump detractors, naturally, pointed to his long-time friendship with Epstein, along with various videos and photos of them together at Epstein's parties, as proof that Trump had something to hide. Adding fuel to the speculation is the fact that Epstein's accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, was the daughter of Robert Maxwell, who also died under mysterious circumstances and was widely believed - though never proven - to have been associated with the Israeli spy agency Mossad. (The media tycoon received a grand state funeral in Israel's Mount of Olives cemetery, attended by senior Israeli leaders.) The connection between Epstein and Israel is now gaining traction in right-wing circles. All of these factors are converging and revealing a deepening split on Israel from the right. A Pew Research poll in April found that 50 percent of Republicans aged 18 to 49 have a negative view of Israel - a 15 percent jump from 2022. Of course, Republican megadonors like Miriam Adelson and others will continue to pump as many dollars as they deem necessary to maintain solid support for Israel. But in the end, money in politics is only worth as much as the votes it can buy. Netanyahu made a bet years ago that if he were more brazenly brutal and radical in his oppression of Palestinians and aggression towards Israel's neighbours, solid support among Republicans - bolstered by the American pro-Israel lobby on both sides of Congress - would compensate for losing liberal Democratic voters. That looks like an increasingly poor bet today. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Filipino Times
2 hours ago
- Filipino Times
Trump to Visit Manila for 2026 ASEAN Summit
United States President Donald Trump has confirmed his attendance at the 44th ASEAN Summit to be hosted by the Philippines in 2026, Philippine Ambassador to the U.S. Jose Manuel Romualdez revealed in an interview with NewsWatch Plus. The commitment came during a conversation between the two following an official luncheon held in Washington as part of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s recent visit to the United States. Romualdez recalled asking Trump directly if he would attend the summit in Manila. 'Yes, I will definitely go,' Trump reportedly replied, according to the ambassador. Trump had previously stated in the Oval Office during a media engagement, 'If I'm invited, I'll go.' President Marcos formally extended the invitation, solidifying expectations that Trump will visit the country as part of the summit. The Philippines is set to host the 44th ASEAN Summit in 2026, which will coincide with two major milestones in PH-U.S. relations—the 80th anniversary of diplomatic ties and the 75th year of the Mutual Defense Treaty (MDT). The high-level summit will serve as a platform to strengthen regional cooperation and reaffirm longstanding alliances among member states and key partners like the United States. In his arrival statement from Washington, President Marcos described Trump's anticipated visit as a 'reaffirmation of our historic alliance.' He emphasized the importance of U.S.-Philippine relations, noting that the Mutual Defense Treaty remains a key pillar of the country's security framework. 'The United States is our oldest and only treaty ally,' Marcos said. 'This visit and summit will mark another chapter in our shared strategic interests.' Ask ChatGPT
