Trump warns US will attack Iran's nuclear sites again 'if necessary'
Trump issued the warning in a social media post on Monday after Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told Fox News that Tehran could not give up its nuclear enrichment programme, even though it was damaged by US strikes.
"It is stopped because, yes, damages are serious and severe. But obviously, we cannot give up on enrichment because it is an achievement of our own scientists. And now, more than that, it is a question of national pride," Araghchi said.
On his Truth Social platform, Trump referenced Araghchi's comments about the nuclear sites being severely damaged and said: "Of course they are, just like I said, and we will do it again, if necessary!"
The US carried out strikes on Iran's Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities on 22 June, assisting Israel, which had already been trading missile fire with Tehran since 13 July.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Iran responded to the strikes by firing ballistic missiles at the US's al-Udeid military base in Qatar. Washington and Doha were informed at least one day earlier about the choreographed strikes.
Shortly after, the US announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, capping 12 days of unprecedented fighting.
Since then, several news sites have questioned the extent of the damage on the Iranian nuclear sites.
CNN cited an early US intelligence assessment which suggested that the strikes set back Iran's nuclear programme only by months, rather than destroying it.
And on Thursday, NBC News reported that one of Iran's nuclear sites was severely damaged, but two other facilities were only degraded to the point that the Islamic Republic could restart uranium enrichment at them within months.
Trump has said that the US and Iran will meet to restart negotiations. However, on Wednesday, he told reporters that he was "in no rush to talk because we obliterated their site".
For its part, Iran is scheduled to meet Britain, France and Germany in Istanbul on Friday, to discuss its nuclear programme, with Tehran accusing European powers of scuppering a landmark 2015 nuclear deal.
The 2015 agreement, reached between Iran and UN Security Council permanent members Britain, China, France, Russia and the US, plus Germany, imposed curbs on Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief.
However, it unravelled in 2018 when the United States, during Trump's first term, unilaterally withdrew and reimposed sweeping sanctions.
Though Europe pledged continued support, a mechanism intended to offset US sanctions never effectively materialised, forcing many western firms to exit Iran and deepening its economic crisis.
"Iran holds the European parties responsible for negligence in implementing the agreement," said foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei ahead of Friday's talks in Istanbul on the deal's future.
Western powers, led by the United States and backed by Israel, have long accused Tehran of secretly seeking nuclear weapons.
Iran has repeatedly denied this, insisting its nuclear programme is solely for civilian purposes such as energy production.
Tehran and Washington held five rounds of nuclear talks starting in April, but a planned meeting on 15 June was cancelled after Israel launched strikes on Iran, triggering a 12-day conflict.
"At this stage, we have no intention of speaking with America," Baqaei said Monday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Iran and European powers resume nuclear talks in Istanbul
Iran and European powers have begun talks in Istanbul over Tehran's nuclear programme, before a deadline to reimpose UN sanctions in September. Iran's nuclear negotiators and deputy foreign ministers, Kazem Gharibabadi and Majid Takht-Ravanchi, met in closed-door discussions with political directors from the foreign ministries of the UK, France and Germany at the Iranian consulate in Istanbul. These were the first in-person talks between Iran and the European countries, known as the E3, since the 12-day Israel-Iran war in June, and subsequent US air strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Last Friday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told foreign ministers from the E3 that they have no grounds to reactivate UN sanctions after they threatened to do so unless there is progress in nuclear talks. Speaking in Tehran on Thursday night, Mr Araghchi said his country's positions would be 'completely clear" in Friday's talks. "The Islamic Republic of Iran, while advancing its peaceful nuclear programme, has always been ready to adopt confidence-building measures", he added. 'Especially after the recent war, it is important for them [the E3] to understand that the Islamic Republic of Iran's position remains unshakable, and that our uranium enrichment will continue', the Tasnim news agency quoted Mr Araghchi as saying. The negotiations centre on the so-called snapback mechanism, which would allow remaining parties to the 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and world powers to reimpose UN sanctions on Tehran that are due to expire in the autumn. While the US left the 2015 nuclear deal in President Donald Trump 's first term, the E3, as well as China and Russia, are still parties to the agreement. In the deal's dispute resolution clauses, any of those parties can trigger a unilateral reimposition of UN sanctions, which include arms embargoes, asset freezes and restrictions on Iran's missile and nuclear programmes. Iranian officials have claimed repeatedly that European nations do not have the right to reimpose UN sanctions because they breached commitments under the 2015 deal and adopted what Tehran saw as pro-Israeli stances during the war in June. If the snapback process is not used and UN embargoes expire in October, Iran could in theory advance its nuclear programme without international restrictions, although remaining US sanctions would likely still complicate any such efforts. Clock ticking on sanctions Analysts and diplomats have said European powers could offer Iran an extension to the deadline. Without one, Germany, France and the UK must decide whether to activate the snapback process 30 days before the curbs expire completely on October 18. An extension would allow time for negotiations between Tehran and Washington in an attempt to reach a deal over Iran's nuclear programme, and impose limits on that activity in exchange for sanctions relief. Such a move would probably come in exchange for commitments from Iran to co-operate with international nuclear inspectors and re-engage in talks with the US. Iran said this week that it agreed to host a technical team from the UN nuclear watchdog to discuss future co-operation, while cautiously signalling openness to renewed talks with the US. The development comes after Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian this month ended co-operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency and said it could only be restored if the agency addressed Tehran's concerns over perceived bias. "A snapback extension remains a difficult means to an even more difficult end – securing new US-Iran negotiations and a new nuclear deal," Ellie Geranmayeh, a senior fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, wrote in an analysis on the snapback mechanism this week. "But Europeans need to be fully invested in this process." Iranian officials have voiced scepticism over an extension. 'We oppose it,' Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei told state media on Friday. The talks in Istanbul are an opportunity for European countries 'to make up for their previous unconstructive approaches that have tarnished Europe's credibility', he added. Iran and the US held five rounds of negotiations in Rome and Oman this year, before a sixth round was cancelled when Israel attacked Iran in June. The talks had also faltered over Iran's rights to uranium enrichment, which Tehran wants to continue, with possible limits. The US position hardened during the talks and Washington wants to deny Iran any nuclear enrichment capacity under a deal. Tehran insists its nuclear programme is for strictly peaceful purposes and denies seeking to develop a bomb. But uranium enrichment levels of up to 60 per cent, far exceeding the needs of civilian purposes, have raised suspicions in the West that Iran wants to build a weapon.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
India and Israel meet to deepen military ties in sign of solidarity amid Gaza atrocities
India and Israeli military officials have pledged to deepen and strengthen military ties even as images of Israel's engineered starvation of Palestinians continue to send shockwaves around the world. More than 59,000 Palestinians have been killed as a result of Israel's war on Gaza, which several countries, as well as many international rights groups and experts, now qualify as an act of genocide. More than 115 Palestinians, including 80 children, are estimated to have died from starvation in the past month, including 15 who died of malnutrition on Monday. Earlier this week, more than two dozen countries, including France and the UK, condemned "the drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food', further calling for Israel's war on Gaza to end. But as global condemnation and calls for an arms embargo on Israel mounted this week, on Wednesday, India's defence secretary and the director general of Israel's Ministry of Defence met in New Delhi and "agreed to further strengthen bilateral defence cooperation with a long-term perspective". The meeting between Shri Rajesh Kumar Singh and the Israel's deputy chief of staff, Major General Amir Baram, signalled, once more, Delhi's intention to remain committed to supporting Israel diplomatically and economically even as Israel loses the support of some of its staunchest allies. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters In the statement released by the Press Information Bureau (PIB) on Wednesday, Delhi said its defence secretary "reiterated India's zero tolerance approach to terrorism and condemned the October 7, 2023 terrorist attacks in Israel and called for the release of all hostages." It also narrated Israel's "support for India's fight against terrorism". The statement said the visit by the Israeli deputy chief of staff "marks a pivotal step in India-Israel defence relations and reinforces both sides' commitment to enhance their strategic partnership," the statement added. Flurry of meetings The meeting comes as part of a flurry of diplomatic and economic exchanges between the two states over the past several weeks. On Wednesday, Delhi's Mayor Raja Iqbal Singh held a meeting with Israeli Ambassador Reuven Azar in the capital, in which Singh reiterated the country's commitment to stand with Israel "during these difficult times'. Singh is reported to have added that both countries shared a 'strong relationship based on friendship, cooperation, and mutual respect'. According to reports, the duo discussed using Israeli expertise to improve healthcare, education, parks, and solid waste management in Delhi. 'With Israel being a technologically advanced country, this kind of exchange of ideas and experiences will further strengthen the functioning of the corporation,' Delhi's Commissioner Ashwani Kumar said. The mayor's comments were promptly slammed by Indian activists based in Delhi. A letter circulating amongst activists described Singh's comments as "a cruel, cold-blooded joke in the face of rivers of Palestinian blood." 'Mayor Singh's disgraceful declaration that he 'stands with Israel in difficult times' is nothing short of a moral betrayal and a distortion of truth' - letter from Indian activists " Mayor Singh's disgraceful declaration that he 'stands with Israel in difficult times' is nothing short of a moral betrayal and a distortion of truth," a letter signed by several activists in India read. "Whose 'difficult times' is he speaking of? It is not Israel but the people of Palestine who are enduring the most horrific times - relentless bombings, the destruction of hospitals, schools, homes, and the systematic blocking of essential food, water, and medical supplies. "It is Israel that has unleashed a barbaric campaign of mass murder - targeting children, women, the elderly, and unarmed civilians without the slightest regard for international law or basic humanity," the letter condemning the mayor's comments, added. The latest meetings come just two weeks after the Israeli government said it was finalising an Investment Protection Agreement (IPA) with India. IPAs are meant to address the risk of investing in each other's countries at a time of rising insecurity. Commenting on the IPA, Abdulla Moaswes, a Palestinian writer and academic based in the UK, told Middle East Eye the Indian government was using its ties with Israel to project "diplomatic victories to its voter base, amongst whom support for Israel is a popular sentiment". India is the world's largest importer of Israeli weapons and Delhi is also emerging as a major co-producer of Israeli weapons. Activists in India have been urging their government to impose an arms embargo after it discovered that Delhi had sent combat drones as well as an AI weapons system in aid of Israel's war effort. In December, Delhi said it would be guided by its "national interest" before reconsidering the transfer of weapons or arms sales to Israel.
Crypto Insight
2 hours ago
- Crypto Insight
Golden visas are shrinking for crypto investors
Governments globally are rethinking so-called 'golden visa' programs that allow wealthy investors, including crypto executives, to secure residency or citizenship. Golden visa programs let applicants secure citizenship after investing a sum, often in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, in a local investment fund or real estate. While this can stimulate local economic development and attract talent from around the globe, some jurisdictions are rethinking the strategy. In May, Malta's golden passport program was ruled illegal by an EU court. The EU Commission said that Malta's Exceptional Investor Naturalisation (MEIN) program was commercializing European citizenship. Cyprus and Bulgaria ended their golden visa programs in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Global citizenship in the form of multiple passports may be attractive for crypto investors, especially as different countries implement more friendly tax and regulatory regimes for crypto. But getting that second or even third passport is becoming more difficult. Golden visa programs get stricter as crypto investors seek citizenship Golden visa regimes have often been touted as a solid way for countries to boost economic development. Alessandro Palombo, co-founder and CEO of Bitizenship — an advisory firm working with Portugal's golden visa program — told Cointelegraph, 'It's a mutually beneficial exchange: Countries gain investment and growth, while investors secure residency rights, enhanced mobility and, in some cases, a path to citizenship.' When US President Donald Trump unveiled his plan for a 'Trump Gold Card,' granting 'green card privileges plus,' he said that the program would bring wealthy people to the US who would be 'spending a lot of money, paying a lot of taxes, employing a lot of people.' This can be particularly true for smaller countries with limited opportunities for economic development. But critics and observers have flagged the potential for these programs to be abused. In the aforementioned case of Bulgaria, members of the European Parliament raised concerns that the program created an incentive for corruption and money laundering. According to Al Jazeera, the program's main beneficiaries were from China, Russia and the Middle East. The sudden entrance of rich investors and high earners can also lead to economic problems for residents. On April 3, Spain canceled its golden visa over concerns about skyrocketing housing costs locals couldn't afford. The path to citizenship through Spain's golden visa program was an investment in the real estate market, and lawmakers believed that the program was contributing to the crisis. The golden visa program in Portugal, which has long been touted as the premier crypto hub of Europe, is also getting stricter. Palombo said, 'Portugal is moving toward more restrictive policies, including tightening residency and citizenship eligibility.' Whether it comes from security and money laundering concerns, particularly after the beginning of the Russia-Ukraine war, or due to the economic problems of suddenly injecting a large amount of wealthy investors into a community, gold visa options are winding down. Why golden visa programs appeal to crypto investors Golden visa programs can be particularly enticing for wealthy globe-trotting crypto investors as they provide the benefits of residence, and often citizenship, of a country while imposing next to no residency requirements. In some cases, applicants are required to spend as little as five days per year in a country while still receiving the benefits of citizenship. Furthermore, some golden visa programs have integrated crypto directly into their investment schemes. In Portugal, the Bitcoin Eco Golden Visa lets investors get exposure to Bitcoin and local companies through an investment fund while getting the benefits of the Portuguese golden visa scheme. El Salvador, the first country to recognize Bitcoin as legal tender, also passed a law in 2023 granting citizenship to anyone who invests $1 million in Bitcoin or Tether's USDt. In Italy, Bitizenship is launching a golden visa route that would allow investors to get a route to Italian residency by investing 250,000 euros in a local Bitcoin startup. There is clearly appetite for crypto-related visa programs, particularly in countries with existing crypto-friendly regimes. Hype about a possible new crypto-related golden visa program led to a publicity nightmare earlier this month when the TON Foundation made a premature announcement of a golden visa regime it's reportedly developing for the UAE. The TON Foundation, the organization behind the network started by encrypted messenger Telegram, announced in early July that investors could secure a '10-year Golden Visa with a one-time $35,000 processing fee' in addition to staking $100,000 on The Open Network blockchain for three years. The UAE's Federal Authority for Identity, Citizenship, Customs and Port Security, the Securities and Commodities Authority and the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority issued a joint statement denying the announcement. TON later clarified that the announcement was premature and that it was working independently with a 'licensed partner' to develop the scheme, with final approval ultimately resting with UAE regulators. Options for investment may be expanding within existing golden visa regimes, like the Bitcoin Eco Golden Visa in Portugal or the crypto startup option in Italy. However, overall, the trend is moving toward fewer and stricter regulations around such visa schemes. Since 2020, at least nine countries have scrapped their golden visa programs: the UK, Ireland, the Netherlands, Spain, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Montenegro, Moldova and Malta. Palombo said, 'What's possible today may become legally impossible within months or weeks. This pattern is accelerating. Golden visas, once abundant, are fast becoming scarce.' Source:
