Thousands gather to protest as Zelenskyy signs bill weakening anti-corruption agencies
By HANNA ARHIROVA and VASILISA STEPANENKO
Thousands of people gathered in Kyiv and other cities across Ukraine on Tuesday to urge the president to veto a controversial bill that threatens anti-corruption infrastructure. It marked the first major rally against the government in more than three years of war.
Ukraine 's parliament passed legislation that will tighten oversight of two key anti-corruption agencies, which critics say could significantly weaken their independence and give President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's circle greater sway over investigations. Zelenskyy signed the bill into law, according to the parliament's website late Tuesday.
Fighting entrenched corruption is crucial for Ukraine's bid to join the European Union and maintain access to billions of dollars in Western aid. The legislation's passage has triggered public outrage in Ukraine, with some saying it appeared to be a greater moral blow than the routine Russian drone and missile attacks.
The changes would grant the prosecutor general new authority over investigations and cases handled by the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO).
'In effect, if this bill becomes law, the head of SAPO will become a nominal figure, while NABU will lose its independence and turn into a subdivision of the prosecutor general's office,' the agencies said in a joint statement on Telegram.
In a post on X, the EU's Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos expressed concern over the vote in the parliament, called the Rada, calling it 'a serious step back.'
Kos added: 'Independent bodies like NABU & SAPO are essential for Ukraine's EU path. Rule of Law remains in the very center of EU accession negotiations."
While rallies have taken place during the war in Ukraine, they have largely focused on the return of prisoners of war or missing people. Protests, however, remain a traditional form of public pressure in Ukraine, where two previous revolutions were victorious for the public.
'Corruption is a problem in any country, and it must always be fought,' said Ihor Lachenkov, a blogger and activist who urged people to join the protest through his social media platforms, which reach more than 1.5 million followers.
'Ukraine has far fewer resources than Russia in this war," he said. "If we misuse them, or worse, allow them to end up in the pockets of thieves, our chances of victory diminish. All our resources must go toward the fight.'
The Ukrainian branch of Transparency International criticized parliament's decision, saying it undermines one of the most significant reforms since what Ukraine calls its Revolution of Dignity in 2014 and damages trust with international partners.
The group urged Zelenskyy to veto the law, warning that otherwise he would share responsibility with the Rada for "dismantling Ukraine's anti-corruption infrastructure.'
Many protesters carried signs reading 'Veto the law,' 'Protect the anti-corruption system, protect Ukraine's future,' or simply 'We are against it.'
The mood of anger and frustration among the war-weary Ukrainians prevailed in the crowd. Some protesters accused Ukraine's leadership of prioritizing loyalty and personal connections over the fight against corruption.
'Those who swore to protect the laws and the Constitution have instead chosen to shield their inner circle, even at the expense of Ukrainian democracy,' said veteran Oleh Symoroz, sitting in a wheelchair because both his legs were amputated after he was wounded in 2022.
'Instead of setting an example of zero tolerance for corruption, the president is using his power to take control of criminal cases involving his allies,' he said.
On Monday, Ukraine's domestic security agency detained two NABU officials on suspicion of links to Russia and searched other agency employees on unrelated allegations.
Zelenskyy's office didn't respond to a request for comment. Last week, the president carried out a reshuffle of his wartime Cabinet, a move widely viewed as further consolidating power within his inner circle.
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Today
42 minutes ago
- Japan Today
Hunger must never be 'weapon of war': UN chief
By Dylan GAMBA UN chief Antonio Guterres on Monday said food must not be used as a weapon of war as world leaders gathered for a food summit in Africa, where 280 million people face hunger and starvation. The African Union, for its part, urged donors to provide greater support for the world's poorest continent, which is struggling with poverty, unrest and the effects of climate change. "Hunger fuels instability and undermines peace. We must never accept hunger as a weapon of war," Antonio Guterres told the UN Food Systems Summit (UNFSS) in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa via video link. "Climate change is disrupting harvests, supply chains and humanitarian aid," he said. "Conflict continues to spread hunger from Gaza to Sudan and beyond," he warned amid a severely deteriorating crisis in Gaza, whose population of more than two million is facing famine and malnutrition. The World Health Organization has warned malnutrition in the occupied Palestinian territory has reached "alarming levels" since Israel imposed a total blockade on Gaza on March 2. In late May, it began allowing a small trickle of aid to resume but more than 100 NGOs have warned that "mass starvation" was spreading in the besieged territory. Millions going hungry The summit takes place against the backdrop of aid cuts by the United States and other Western nations that are badly affecting much of the developing world. Mahmoud Ali Youssouf, head of the African Union's executive commission, said food insecurity was on the rise across Africa, blaming "climate shocks, conflicts and economic disruptions". "At this crucial moment, how many children and mothers on the continent are sleeping hungry?" he asked. "Millions, certainly. The urgency of the situation is beyond doubt." Youssouf said that more than 280 million Africans were malnourished, with "nearly 3.4 million... on the brink of famine". Roughly 10 million people had been displaced due to drought, floods and cyclones, he added. Youssouf urged AU member states to devote 10 percent of their gross domestic product to agriculture to help foster "nutritional resilience". "But we cannot do this alone. We call on our partners to honour their commitments to finance and support African solutions," he said. Sudan is "the largest humanitarian catastrophe facing our world and also the least remembered", Othman Belbeisi, the regional director of the UN's migration agency, IOM, told reporters last week. Since April 2023, Sudan has been torn apart by a power struggle between army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and Mohamed Hamdan Daglo, commander of the rival paramilitary Rapid Support Forces. The fighting has killed tens of thousands and displaced more than seven million people. © 2025 AFP
The Diplomat
3 hours ago
- The Diplomat
India Closes Landmark Trade Pact With UK
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi with his U.K. counterpart Keir Starmer during Modi's two-day visit to the U.K. on July 23-24, 2025, when the two sides signed a key trade pact. India and the United Kingdom signed a landmark trade pact, the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit on July 23-24. The pact opens a new chapter in bilateral economic relations against the backdrop of rising geopolitical uncertainty and economic flux stemming from the U.S. announcement of unilateral tariffs. The agreement, which contains almost 30 chapters, has been described as 'forward-looking' and the 'largest' India has negotiated in terms of complexity and depth. It covers trade in goods and services, telecommunications, digital trade, financial and professional services, labor mobility, environment, and social issues like labor rights and development cooperation, as well as support for small and medium enterprises. Hailing the agreement as a 'blueprint for shared prosperity,' Modi said that it would reduce the 'cost of doing business' and enhance 'confidence of doing business' between the two economies, even as it strengthens the global economy. U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer described the CETA as 'historic' and pointed out that it would 'boost wages and living standards' in the two countries. 'It will bring down the prices of Indian clothes, shoes, foods for British citizens,' he said. The agreement with the U.K., the world's sixth-largest economy, is particularly significant for India as its pacts with two other major developed economies, the U.S. and the European Union (EU), are still under negotiation. The CETA could therefore serve as the template in these negotiations. In addition, India's deal with the U.K. would help undercut arguments that paint India — the world's fourth largest economy — as isolationist or obstructive when it comes to trade matters. U.S. President Donald Trump has frequently called India a 'tariff king' – a scathing commentary on what he views as India's high tariffs protecting its domestic markets and industries. Days after the CETA was signed, Indian Commerce Secretary Sunil Barthwal pointedly said that India was capable of facing competition and was not a 'tariff king,' with average tariffs for the U.K. set to drop to 3 percent from the current 15 percent. With India's economic profile rising, the Indian government would like to be seen as trade-friendly, welcoming of investors, and an easier place to do business. India's budget 2025-26 contained a slew of measures, including the setting up of a new committee to review regulatory reforms in the non-financial sector with the aim of strengthening trust-based economic governance to improve ease of doing business. Discussions for a pact between India and the EU began in 2007. But they floundered in 2013, and it was only in 2022 that negotiations were resumed. Meanwhile, India began trade discussions with the U.S. during Trump's first term in office (2017-2021). Talks resumed after Trump returned to the White House in January 2025. India's trade with the U.S. in 2024 totaled almost $130 billion; trade with the EU was $155 billion (132 billion euros) during the same period. With the U.K., India's bilateral trade is about $56 billion, with both countries pledging to double this number by 2030. With the deal with the U.K. in the bag, India now has 16 trade agreements in place, including those with Australia and the United Arab Emirates. A closer look at the CETA reveals that India has managed to protect its interests while exhibiting flexibility to accommodate demands from the U.K. An Indian government statement said that the CETA provides for the elimination of almost 99 percent of tariff lines, accounting for almost the entire value of Indian exports to the U.K. It will significantly enhance market access and boost the competitiveness of Indian textiles, marine products, leather, footwear, sports goods, toys, gems and jewelry, besides fast-growing sectors like engineering goods, auto components, and organic chemicals. Most of these sectors are labor-intensive, employing millions of workers. By securing zero duties in these areas, India has ensured its exports remain competitive. For instance, in the case of textiles, the CETA guarantees that Indian exports retain their advantage vis-à-vis those from other textile-exporting nations like Bangladesh or Vietnam. Analysts have pointed out that finding an alternative market for Indian marine products, including shrimps, in the U.K. through the CETA means that India is ringfencing this sector from future economic and political shocks that could come its way from markets like China. Given India's mostly tense ties with Beijing, finding alternative markets is an imperative that the CETA addresses. Dairy products and edible oils have been kept out of the ambit of the pact, while almost all of Indian agricultural products and processed food items will now have zero import duties when entering the U.K. market. This protects India's sensitive farm sector — agriculture and allied activities that contribute to 16 percent of India's GDP and support 46 percent of the population, according to Indian Finance Ministry data. A second key feature of the CETA is that India has agreed to loosen controls that will allow U.K. firms into its previously closely guarded government procurement market. British companies will be free to bid for 40,000 Indian government contracts worth about $40 billion, provided the firms fulfil a 20 percent local content sourcing criterion. This move aligns India with global norms on public procurement. However, certain sectors like defense and agriculture remain outside the ambit of the CETA. India has also committed to greater transparency by agreeing to publish information related to procurement on government portals. Some strategic sectors, like defense, are out of the purview of this, but still, the move is seen as a significant gesture toward the United Kingdom. The CETA does not exempt India from the U.K.'s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), which aims to tax carbon-intensive products. This could affect India's exports of iron, steel and fertilizers. India has said it would retaliate should the U.K. impose this measure from early 2027. The pact also provides for increased mobility of Indian professionals by simplifying access requirements and allowing easier movement of contractual service providers, business visitors and independent professionals. A separate Double Contributions Convention that was signed alongside the CETA will eliminate the need for Indians in the U.K. to pay social security contributions in both countries, simultaneously, for a period of three years. This is expected to benefit some 75,000 Indians working in the U.K. Analysts Nisha Taneja and Nirlipta Rath of the New Delhi-based Indian Council for Research on International Economic Research have said that CETA sets 'a progressive benchmark for the country's future trade negotiations.' According to Bidisha Bhattacharya, a senior research consultant at the Chintan Research Foundation, the signing of the CETA is 'not a retreat from protectionism but a recalibration of India's trade strategy.' It involved using strategies like phased liberalization, minimum pricing thresholds, and value addition rules. By doing so, 'India is carefully walking the line between global integration and domestic resilience,' Bhattacharya wrote in a recent article. This was not India embracing multilateralism offered on unfavorable terms but India seeking bilateral agreements with high-income economies that offered reciprocal access, she pointed out. With the World Trade Organization looking increasingly irrelevant and dysfunctional, it's natural for countries to look for bilateral or regional arrangements that secure their access to key global markets. Though it is a late entrant, India seems to be learning to play the game, albeit slowly.
Nikkei Asia
3 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
Trump sets deadline of 10 or 12 days for Russia to act on Ukraine war
TURNBERRY, Scotland (Reuters) -- U.S. President Donald Trump set a new deadline on Monday of 10 or 12 days for Russia to make progress toward ending the war in Ukraine or face consequences, underscoring frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin for the 3-1/2-year-old conflict. Trump has threatened both sanctions on Russia and buyers of its exports unless progress is made. The fresh deadline suggests the U.S. president is prepared to move forward on those threats after previous hesitation to do so. Speaking in Scotland, where he is holding meetings with European leaders and playing golf, Trump said he was disappointed in Putin and shortening a 50-day deadline he had set on the issue earlier this month. "I'm going to make a new deadline of about ... 10 or 12 days from today," Trump told reporters during a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. "There's no reason in waiting... We just don't see any progress being made." There was no immediate comment from the Kremlin. In a post on X, former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev, a close ally of Putin, said Trump was playing "a game of ultimatums" that could lead to a war involving the U.S. Medvedev wrote: "Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with [Trump's] own country." Ukraine welcomed Trump's statement. Andriy Yermak, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's chief of staff, thanked Trump in a social media post for "standing firm and delivering a clear message of peace through strength." Trump, who has expressed annoyance also with Zelenskyy, has not always followed tough talk about Putin with action, citing what he deems a good relationship that the two men have had previously. On Monday, Trump indicated he was not interested in more talks with Putin. He said sanctions and tariffs would be used as penalties for Moscow if it did not meet Trump's demands. "There's no reason to wait. If you know what the answer is going to be, why wait? And it would be sanctions and maybe tariffs, secondary tariffs," Trump said. "I don't want to do that to Russia. I love the Russian people." Ukraine had proposed a summit between Putin and Zelenskyy before the end of August, but the Kremlin has said that timeline was unlikely and that a meeting could only happen as a final step to clinch peace. Russia's foreign ministry said on Saturday that if the West wanted real peace with Ukraine, it would stop supplying Kyiv with weapons. Trump has repeatedly voiced exasperation with Putin for pursuing attacks on Ukraine despite U.S. efforts to end the war. Trump has played up successes in other parts of the world where the United States has helped to broker peace agreements and has been flattered by some leaders who suggest he should be given the Nobel Peace Prize. "I'm disappointed in President Putin," Trump said on Monday. "I'm going to reduce that 50 days that I gave him to a lesser number because I think I already know the answer what's going to happen." Trump, who is also struggling to achieve a peace deal in Gaza, has touted his role in ending conflicts between India and Pakistan as well as Rwanda and Congo. Before returning to the White House in January, Trump campaigned on a promise to end Russia's conflict with Ukraine in a day. "We thought we had that settled numerous times, and then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kyiv and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever," Trump said. "And I say that's not the way to do it."
