
Outrage as Working with Children Check only takes 30 minutes and requires a simple online form
A major spotlight has this week been put on child safety tools after a man was charged with 70 offences at a Melbourne childcare centre.
Childcare worker Joshua Brown, 26, has been charged in relation to eight victims who attended a Point Cook childcare centre between April 2022 and January 2023.
A Working with Children Check usually handles state-by-state but involves a national police check and a review of reportable workplace misconduct.
Previously, the check has been a key safety tool used to ensure kids are being kept safe.
The Herald Sun compared the online form with Victoria's Responsible Service of Alcohol course, which requires up to 10 hours of training in order to become certified.
A number of childhood sexual abuse advocates, including Australian Childhood Foundation survivor Emma Hakansson, 25, said it was 'laughable' that governments considered the current checks acceptable.
'The adult who sexually abused me also had a WWCC,' she said in a report in the publication.
'The WWCC could be a tool to arm safe adults with training to keep children safe, and it's absurd we trust adults with children without any training, while training is required to serve alcohol, even to handle food.'
On Friday, journalists Luke Bona and Susie O'Brien joined Nat Barr on Sunrise to discuss the relative ease in meeting the Working with Children Check requirement.
Both called for tougher regulations.
'The story that has sparked all this is the most horrific thing,' Bona said.
'Remember, everybody is presumed innocent until proven guilty, but the spotlight is certainly on the safety and welfare of our children.
'The safety of our children is the most important thing we can offer, and we must provide.
'So, I take my hat off to Hetty Johnson from Bravehearts who's going to form her own course.
'But it's got to be mandatory, because the message is, we've got to keep kids safe at all costs.'
This week, journalist Susie O'Brien reported that educators facing serious allegations can still work in childcare centres for up to two years due to regulatory issues.
They are often allowed to work during the investigation.
'The comparison between the RSA and the Working with Children Check is really interesting, because you can be fined $10,000 for serving someone drunk,' O'Brien began.
'You probably lose your job, find it hard to get another job.
'But you can be a childcare worker who molests a toddler.
'Yes, you will lose your job, but you can continue working in other centres for up to two years, while they and decide if you're guilty or not, particularly in this state, but other states as well.
'It can take up to two years for a predator to be removed from childcare centres, and that is a massive problem.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


7NEWS
4 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Why the next 28 days are crucial for Erin Patterson after being found guilty of killing three people in mushroom murder
Erin Patterson has just 28 days to launch an appeal against her conviction after a jury found her guilty on three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder in a Victorian court on Monday. Patterson's estranged husband Simon's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, 70, and aunt Heather Wilkinson, 66, all died in hospital days after Patterson served them beef wellington laced with death cap mushrooms in July 2023. Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson also fell seriously ill from the deadly lunch but survived. The jury's guilty verdicts came after seven days' deliberation at the end of an 11-week trial in the Victorian town of Morwell, in the LaTrobe Valley. Following the verdict, Patterson was transferred back to Melbourne's Dame Phyllis Frost Centre where it is believed she is being held in protective custody. On Sunrise on Tuesday, criminal defence lawyer Ruth Parker and former homicide detective Charlie Bezzina spoke about a possible appeal from the convicted murderer. 'Technically the rule is that you have 28 days to appeal your conviction. But, realistically, the court will grant leave to appeal out of time for such big cases, where there is so much evidence and transcript,' Parker told hosts Natalie Barr and Matt Shirvington. 'Ultimately, I think that if she has the option to appeal she will.' Both Parker and Bezzina said Patterson was looking at a significant sentence. 'We haven't seen a case like this where there have been three people killed at the same time, in circumstances such as these, where they haven't gotten life (in prison),' Parker said. 'The issue will be whether she gets a parole period or non-parole period. 'I think there's a way to go with this one. She can definitely appeal out of time. The focus for her lawyers will be trying to get her the least possible sentence.' Bezzina said life in prison would be difficult for Patterson. 'It would be quite difficult, the fact of being segregated. There is code in the prison system about attacking or causing harm to children and the elderly. So, ultimately, she's not going to do her time easy,' Bezzina said. 'I think given the fact one murder count carries life imprisonment, I would expect the three life imprisonments, possibly with a very high parole date. 'She'll get parole. I would be very surprised if she gets life with no parole. I think parole will be set. 'The judge will have to take into account her whole circumstances when she gives their plea material and how she will be undergoing sentence. 'It will be a difficult time for her. 'That's a long time she will be suffering in jail. So, ultimately, we will be interested to see what the Justice comes back with.' Patterson on the stand Parker said while it was unusual for Erin Patterson to take the stand to give evidence, in this case it was necessary. 'Unfortunately, they (the defence) were put in a position where she had clearly lied to police during her record of interview,' Parker said. 'The only way they were going to get her version across or the version that the defence were promoting was to call her, and to put these things to her. 'But it must have been a terribly stressful situation, calling your own client is always deeply uncomfortable. 'She was in the witness box for a number of days. But unfortunately, I think that that was the only choice that they had.' Evidence Bezzina praised the detective work in the case. 'They had to go with their best case possible,' Bezzina said. 'This involved a lot of medical evidence, toxicology evidence, so forth and so on and witnesses also. 'You go where the evidence takes you and we have electronic evidence, we saw them bring in the dog from the Federal Police to look for electronic devices. 'We have the phones ... ultimately, very, very significant because the police know the high burden to prove a case beyond reasonable doubt. 'This was one of the massive cases, and ultimately, they're responsible to the family and to the community of Victoria to give them answers and bring someone to justice.' Complex case Parker said she had previously thought the complex case could end in a hung jury. 'I don't think I ever really formed that view (we'd get a guilty verdict) until the verdict,' Parker said. 'It was an unusual case in the sense there were lots of conflicting accounts. 'Ultimately the jury (felt) beyond reasonable doubt on the evidence collected she was guilty of murder on three counts and attempted murder on another.'

Sky News AU
5 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Erin Patterson accused of tampering with prison food and making inmate sick while in maximum security waiting for trial
An inmate has accused Erin Patterson of tampering with her food and making her sick as the mushroom cook was behind bars waiting for her high-profile trial. The mother-of-two on Monday afternoon was found guilty by a jury of murdering her three relatives of her estranged husband - Don and Gail Patterson and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson - by serving them a poisonous beef wellington lunch in July 2023. She was also found guilty for the attempted murder of Heather's husband, Ian Wilkinson, a local church pastor who survived following a lengthy stint in hospital. Patterson spent her first night behind bars as one of the worst female Australian killers. According to The Herald Sun citing sources, the mushroom cook, 50, is not liked among other inmates inside Dame Phyllis Frost Centre, a maximum security jail for women. The source claimed prisoners had fallen out with Patterson, with one inmate alleging a meal prepared inside the prison had been tampered with which made her sick. After the complaint, Patterson was placed in the "slot", a cell where she was isolated for up to 22 hours a day with minimum contact as the allegation was investigated. No further action was believed to be taken over the incident, which happened as she was awaiting trial, but could not be reported on, The Herald Sun said. Supporters of Patterson had hoped for a different outcome. Photos outside the family in Leongatha, a small Victorian town in the state's south-east, showed black tarp set up, a likely move to shield the mother-of-two from the media if she was found not guilty by the jury and allowed to return to the family home. A "legal notice" was also attached with cable ties to the gate. "Please be advised the owner of this property hereby gives notice to all members of the media or any person employed or contracted to any media organisation, that you are not permitted to enter any part of this property as marked by the boundary fence," it read. The prosecution during the trial argued Patterson's lunch was intentionally laced with death cap mushrooms, but the defence denied the poisonings were intentional. Patterson's estranged husband Simon was invited to the lunch, but pulled out of the gathering the day before. The prosecution said Patterson concocted a cancer diagnosis to lure her guests over for lunch as she needed advice on how to break the medical news to her children. The court heard from various witnesses during the trial, including the killer herself, as well as members of the Patterson family, police officers and medical experts. On Monday afternoon, Patterson's friend Ali Rose Prior briefly spoke to the media as she left the courthouse following the guilty verdict. "I'm saddened, and it is what it is," Ms Prior told reporters. Asked if she was anticipating that Ms Patterson would be found not guilty, Mr Prior said she "didn't have any expectations". "The justice system has to be what it is," she said. Asked how she thought Patterson would have felt in that moment the verdict was delivered, Ms Prior said "I don't know" adding she would see her friend "soon". The court previously heard that Patterson maintained a good relationship with her former in-laws even after her separation from Simon in 2015. However, Patterson and Simon's relationship deteriorated around 2022 when the pair began disputing over child support and other expenses. About a week after the lunch, police conducted a search of Patterson's Leongatha home and seized a number of items, including a computer. Digital forensic experts told the trial an analysis of the seized computer showed the device had accessed an online social science network in 2022 called iNaturalist, where people have previously shared sightings of death cap mushrooms. During her testimony, Patterson claimed she bought the fresh mushrooms used in the beef wellington from Woolworths, as well as dried ones from an Asian grocer in Melbourne's south-east. She had stored the dried mushrooms in a Tupperware container. Patterson told the court she had dehydrated and foraged for mushrooms in the past, and feared some may have mistakenly been mixed into her beef wellington meal. The mushroom cook and her legal team have 28 days to appeal the verdict, but if she chooses not to then the next court appearance will be for her sentencing.


Perth Now
2 days ago
- Perth Now
Leader's shock after childcare bombshell
Nationals Leader David Littleproud says it is 'frightening' that potential sex offenders are allowed to continue working with children while under police investigation. A bombshell Herald Sun report revealed on Sunday that a man convicted of accessing nearly 1000 images of child abuse material visited multiple childcare centres while awaiting prosecution for some three years. At one centre, he taught children about 'ancient tools such as boomerangs, stones and ochre clay' and 'Aboriginal dance and ochre painting' despite police flagging him as potentially dangerous. The man, Ron Marks, was allowed to continue working with children because had not been charged. Mr Littleproud, responding to the report on Sunday, called for 'common sense' changes to child safety in childcare. Nationals Leader David Littleproud has called for 'common sense' to guide changes to child safety in childcare centres. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia 'It's frightening, and as a father who sent his children to childcare, you do it in good faith that they're going to be safe,' he told the program. 'I get that we have this principle of presumption of innocence in this country, but we also have this thing called common sense. 'And if someone who's working with children is charged and you're not normally charged unless there's significant evidence, you still have that presumption. 'But you should take the precautionary principle and you shouldn't be allowed to go near children – that's common sense.' Last week, detectives arrested and charged a 26-year-old Joshua Dale Brown with more than 70 offences, including child rape and possession of child abuse material. He was a worker at a childcare centre and had a working with children check. Joshua Brown worked at multiple centres across Victoria, the police have revealed. Facebook Credit: Supplied Childcare worker Joshua Brown worked at the Point Cook childcare centre. NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia Education Minister Jason Clare has vowed to introduce legislation that would let Canberra cut federal funds to childcare centres that 'aren't up to scratch' on children's safety. 'It has taken too long for governments to act,' he told Seven's Sunrise on Thursday. 'This is sickening and it demands serious action. We've already taken action around mobile phones in childcare centres and mandatory reporting. 'But there's more that we have to do – there's a lot more we have to do.'