logo
‘Flood insurance is not just for coastal or high-risk areas,' expert says: What homeowners need to know

‘Flood insurance is not just for coastal or high-risk areas,' expert says: What homeowners need to know

CNBC2 days ago
As Texas begins to assess the toll of catastrophic flash floods over the July Fourth weekend, experts say the devastation underscores the importance of flood insurance.
More than 100 people have died as a result of the floods along the Guadalupe River in Texas' Hill Country, with scores more still missing. Search and rescue efforts in affected areas continue. President Donald Trump on Sunday signed a federal disaster declaration for Kerr County, which was heavily impacted.
Accuweather estimated the disaster caused $18 billion to $22 billion in damage and economic losses.
More from Personal Finance:Check these 3 things in your home insurance policyTrump's 'big beautiful bill' doesn't eliminate taxes on Social Security benefitsTax changes under Trump's 'big beautiful bill' — in one chart
Residents may not be in for an easy financial recovery. Homeowners insurance policies typically explicitly exclude floods, requiring separate flood insurance coverage.
Only about 2.5% of homeowners in Kerr County had flood coverage, according to Loretta Worters, a spokeswoman for the Insurance Information Institute.
Nationwide, about 3.3% of households had a government flood insurance policy as of late 2024, according to a Value Penguin analysis. But experts say many homeowners would benefit from such coverage.
"Flood insurance is not just for coastal or high-risk areas," Worters said.
Texas is one of the most flood-prone areas in the U.S., Worters said — flash floods, river overflows and tropical storms result in billions of dollars in insured losses per year.
"Flooding in Texas has become a growing threat," she said.
But it's a nationwide risk. Over the past 20 years, 99% of U.S. counties have experienced a flood event, according to the National Flood Insurance Program by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. About 40% of NFIP claims are from outside high-risk zones.
While floods can be bigger risks in areas near bodies of water, they can happen anywhere, "even on a mountaintop," Worters said.
"Every home can be exposed," she said.
For example, in 2024, Hurricane Helene caused massive flooding in mountainous areas such as Asheville, North Carolina. Less than 1% of households there were covered by the NFIP, according to a report by the Swiss Re Institute.
Parts of central North Carolina also experienced flash floods over the July Fourth weekend, as Tropical Storm Chantal made its way inland. "This historic weather event caused flooding like we haven't seen in several decades in the central part of the state," Joey Hopkins, North Carolina's transportation secretary, said in a press release Tuesday.
Insurers tend to avoid covering risks that produce "highly correlated losses" that can be "catastrophic in nature," said Daniel Schwarcz, a law professor at the University of Minnesota Law School who focuses on insurance law and regulation. Floods are one such disaster, as are earthquakes.
"When it affects one person dramatically, it often affects many, many people dramatically," he said.
About 90% of all presidentially declared U.S. natural disasters involve flooding, per FEMA.
Residents might have water damage coverage included in their homeowners policy, which can cover events such as pipe bursts, said Karl Susman, president and principal insurance agent of Susman Insurance Services, Inc. in Los Angeles.
But such provisions do not cover damage from rising water levels, experts say.
"When you have sudden, intense flooding that's caused by heavy rain in a short period of time, that's a flash flood," Worters said. "That's something that would not be covered on your regular homeowners [policy]."
Because standard policies often explicitly exclude flooding, if you want coverage, you'll need a standalone policy.
You can get flood insurance from FEMA's NFIP, which is considered the primary source of flood coverage in the U.S. The NFIP typically covers up to $250,000 in damages to a residential property and up to $100,000 on the contents.
As of 2024, the NFIP has more than 4.7 million flood insurance policies in force, providing coverage in excess of $1.28 trillion, according to FEMA.
If you have an expensive home or expect more severe damage to your property, consider asking an insurance agent about so-called "excess flood insurance," Worters said. Such policies are written by private insurers that cover losses over and above what's covered by the NFIP, she said.
If you decide to get coverage through the NFIP, keep in mind that there is usually a 30-day waiting period before the new policy goes into effect.
NFIP may not be your only option. Some private insurers now offer standalone flood insurance policies as risk modeling and actuarial projections — or financial estimates for future events — have improved, said Worters.
According to a recent report by LendingTree using 2023 nationwide data from S&P Global, the average cost for private flood insurance is $98 a month. A separate report by NerdWallet using 2025 NFIP rates found that the average flood insurance through FEMA costs $75 a month.
Keep in mind, however, that the price you pay for coverage will depend on factors including where you live. Compare all the options available to you in your area, as they can be "drastically different" in cost, said Susman.
Schwarcz said homeowners can sometimes get cheaper policies through private insurance companies as they use different mechanisms from the NFIP.
"You want to look in both places," he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tariffs will hit harder in the coming months, with traders growing weary of the trade drama, Morgan Stanley's CIO says
Tariffs will hit harder in the coming months, with traders growing weary of the trade drama, Morgan Stanley's CIO says

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Tariffs will hit harder in the coming months, with traders growing weary of the trade drama, Morgan Stanley's CIO says

Tariff pain will be felt more acutely in the coming months, Mike Wilson says. The Morgan Stanley CIO predicts three consequences from tariffs that could show up this quarter. Stocks could take a hit as investors wait for more concrete trade deals to materialize, Wilson said. Morgan Stanley's chief investment officer says investors are growing weary of the trade drama, warning that tariffs' negative impacts could start showing up for companies and in markets soon. Mike Wilson, the chief US equity strategist at Morgan Stanley, said he foresaw a slew of consequences stemming from President Donald Trump's tariffs, which could begin to impact markets as soon as the third quarter. Investors have stayed relatively calm so far this week, despite Donald Trump escalating his trade war. The president announced fresh tariffs on more than 20 countries this week, a separate 50% tariff on copper imports, and pushed out his original deadline to August 1. "I would say, 'Here we go again,'" Wilson said, speaking to Bloomberg on Friday about the latest tariff announcements. Here's what Wilson sees ahead. Investors are familiar with Trump's tariff negotiating playbook after seeing the president whipsaw on his trade policy during Liberation Day, Wilson said. "I mean, this is President Trump's style. He goes hard, and then he, you know, he doesn't back off completely, but it's a back-and-forth," Wilson said. But traders hungry for more concrete trade deals could soon grow tired of the drama, Wilson said. Trump — whose team once pushed the idea of 90 trade deals in 90 days — hasn't nailed down many deals with trading partners yet. "That's not going to work forever. Eventually we have to get to some deals," Wilson said. "There will become a point of exhaustion, is the way I like to think about it." Corporations have been shielded from the impact of tariffs so far, thanks to businesses relying on existing inventory to sell products to consumers. But that could change in the next few months, Wilson said. Smaller corporations could be especially affected in third quarter earnings season, he added, as they don't have as much pricing power to be able to pass along the cost of tariffs to consumers. "It hasn't begun to flow through to pricing or margins. But that we think begins to change in the third quarter, and that could be the catalyst, because stocks will react to a hit in margins," he added. Inflation could also begin to creep higher in the third quarter as tariffs finally start to work their way through the economy, Wilson speculated. Tariffs are widely thought to raise inflation, as companies can hike prices to offset the cost of import duties. That could also push out the market's expectations for interest rate cuts, as the Fed will look to keep rates elevated if inflation grows hotter. "Perhaps we get a spike in inflation, which, you know, then causes the Fed to sound more hawkish, and the market will care about that for sure," Wilson added. Read the original article on Business Insider

Trump administration ramps up pressure on Powell as Fed holds rates steady
Trump administration ramps up pressure on Powell as Fed holds rates steady

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump administration ramps up pressure on Powell as Fed holds rates steady

The Trump administration appears to be ramping up pressure on Jerome Powell to step down as Federal Reserve chair, with one federal agency issuing a statement voicing support for his departure. President Donald Trump, who nominated Powell as Fed chair in 2017, has frequently voiced dissatisfaction with the Fed's recent 'wait-and-see" approach to lowering interest rates, calling instead for rates to quickly drop from 4.25% to 4.5% to as low as 2.25%. In June, Trump called Powell a "stupid person" who has "done a poor job," adding that he's called the Fed chair "every name in the book" to try to get him to cut rates. He added, "Nothing works." Powell has also come under fire from Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought, who suggested Powell has 'grossly mismanaged the Fed' and misled Congress about an 'ostentatious' headquarters remodel. Powell has previously defended the project, calling some of the more extravagant descriptions 'misleading and inaccurate' during a June testimony before the Senate Banking Committee. The administration's pressure tactics appeared to continue July 11, when William Pulte, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency and chairman of the Board of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, said in a statement Powell's resignation would be 'the right decision for America, and the economy will boom.' Buying a house: Fannie and Freddie may use new credit scores. Will it help you get a mortgage? Pulte referenced "reports" that Powell is 'considering resigning.' When asked for confirmation, the Fed declined to comment but directed USA TODAY to the many times Powell has said he intends to serve his term, set to end May 2026. Pulte's statement comes ahead of the central bank's July 29-30 meeting. The CME FedWatch, which tracks the likelihood of a rate cut based on futures prices, says there's a roughly 93% chance rates hold steady at 4.25% to 4.5% after the meeting. In June, the Fed held interest rates steady for its fourth straight meeting and kept its forecast for two cuts in 2025. Officials project they'll lower rates by a half percentage point this year to a range of 3.75% to 4%. While lower rates would juice the economy and help reduce federal debt interest payments, Powell has said the Fed wants to see how tariffs impact inflation before cutting rates. Trump in June said he's already looking for Powell's replacement, but he may have to wait if Powell doesn't step down voluntarily. A May Supreme Court ruling downplayed Trump's ability to fire Powell, noting that the Fed is "a uniquely structured, quasi-private entity" and unlike other independent agencies with members subject to terminations decided by the president. Contributing: Paul Davidson This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump administration ramps up pressure on Fed chair Jerome Powell

Trump's big beautiful bill to boost economy, but tariffs pack bigger punch: MS
Trump's big beautiful bill to boost economy, but tariffs pack bigger punch: MS

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's big beautiful bill to boost economy, but tariffs pack bigger punch: MS

President Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill' has been hailed as the fiscal shot in the arm that could restore U.S. economic exceptionalism. But as the ink dries on this transformative legislation, Morgan Stanley is sounding a note of caution: the looming August 1 tariffs, along with a tightening immigration stance, threaten to sap much of the bill's intended fiscal boost. While the fiscal bill, expected may improve the growth prospects of the U.S. economy in the short run, it "will not be sufficient to offset the direct and indirect effects of tariffs and immigration controls,' Morgan Stanley economists said in a recent note. The combined effects of the administration's policies, the analysts add, will yield 'a slow-growth, firm-inflation economy." As well as the hit from potential reciprocal tariffs, the economists also downplay the muscle that will added to the economy from the bill."Those looking for a significant fiscal impulse to growth from the OBBB [big beautiful bill] are likely to be disappointed," Morgan Stanley economics said in a recent note. "We add only 0.2pp to our growth projection in 2026," they added. Earlier in the year, the threat of 'Liberation Day' tariffs sent jitters through financial markets, but a temporary reprieve lowered the effective tariff rate to a more 'digestible' 13% to 14%, the economists said. Now, with reciprocal tariffs set to be reinstated against about 20 trading partners—including South Korea and Japan—and a 50% tariff slapped on copper, the effective rate is poised to jump to 17% to 18% if the measures take effect as planned. on Aug. 1. The weeks until the looming August deadline provide 'potential off ramps," but the risk is clear: higher tariffs could keep inflation elevated well into 2026, and may not show up in the data until late 2025—just as the impulse from the first round of tariffs begins to fade. The economists warn that 'the higher tariffs go, the more the US risks adverse outcomes for activity and employment." The crackdown on immigration, meanwhile, paired with protectionist trade policies, is flagged as a structural risk to growth as the hit to the labor market likely dampens productivity and innovation, compounding the drag from tariffs. As the second half of 2025 unfolds, markets are bracing for volatility. The hope is that fiscal stimulus will provide a cushion, but the real test will be whether the private sector can overcome the headwinds from trade and labor restrictions. Related articles Trump's big beautiful bill to boost economy, but tariffs pack bigger punch: MS Canada hits pause on tariff hike as Trump extends trade deadline - Politico 'Beautiful Bill' to provide slight GDP boost through 2027, Morgan Stanley says Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store