No EU toast raised with single malta: CJEU verdict spells end for 'Golden Passport' scheme
The scheme led to 'commercialisation of the grant of nationality of a member state and, by extension, of [EU] citizenship', which breaches EU rules relating to citizenship and the principle of sincere cooperation.
Every person holding the nationality of a member state shall be an EU citizen and enjoy the rights, and be subject to the duties, provided for in the treaty.
These rights shall be exercised under conditions and limits defined by the treaties and by measures adopted under them.
Assist each other in carrying out tasks flowing from the treaties.
Take appropriate measures to ensure fulfilment of obligations arising from the treaties or resulting from acts of EU institutions.
Refrain from any measure that would jeopardise attainment of EU objectives.
(Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of www.economictimes.com .)
In April, Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) held Malta's investor-citizenship scheme (ICS) - 'golden passports' - to be a contravention of EU laws. This was the only remaining EU member state that still operated a golden passport programme.ICS was adopted under Article 10(9) of the Maltese Citizenship Act, and the Granting of Citizenship for Exceptional Services Regulations 2020, which allowed foreign investors to be naturalised as citizens of Malta upon fulfilment of certain conditions, principally of a financial nature. Such schemes are called ' citizenship by investment ' (CBI). CJEU's impugned order comes days after the EC initiated legal proceedings against Malta after revelations that Maltese passports had allegedly been sold to Russians, who were later sanctioned due to the Russia-Ukraine war.Malta defended its competence in regulating citizenship matters. While the court recognised this, it also held that:According to Article 20 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU):Article 9 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) similarly states that every citizen of a member state shall be an EU citizen. Also, Article 4(3) of TEU puts forth the principle of sincere cooperation, under which the EU and member states shall:Notably, CJEU's order contradicts advocate general Anthony Collins' opinion from 2024, in which he remarked that 'holding the scheme to be illegitimate would upset the carefully crafted balance between national and EU citizenship, leading to a wholly unlawful erosion of member states' competence'.CBI was launched after Malta's integration into the EU and its adoption of the euro, which exposed Malta's economy to the 2008 financial crisis and the euro crisis of 2009. After this, Malta first came up with the idea of CBI in the form of the Individual Investor Programme (IIP) in 2013. Under it, an investor (citizenship buyer) was required to make a non-refundable contribution to Malta's National Development and Social Fund.A minimum non-refundable donation of ₹6 lakh was required for a 36-mth naturalisation period, while ₹7.5 lakh could fast-track naturalisation to only a year. IIP was open for applications until September 30, 2020, after which it was replaced by 2020 regulations and the Maltese Citizenship by Naturalisation for Exceptional Services by Direct Investment scheme.With its success, Malta has continued to promote the scheme. Valletta has now become home to many licensed agencies and legitimate brokers that peddle citizenship of their country (and, by extension, that of the EU). Its concurrent rise in notoriety stems from the fact that by selling its citizenship, Malta is transacting EU citizenship - opening the proverbial door to non-EU nationals to enter the union's political bloc and economic markets.CBI's implications have been deep, perverse and expansive. Countries such as Malta are arguably transacting more than just an entitlement or a bundle of rights, leading to unexpected triggers and worries. The issues around national sovereignty, market access, free trade, visa-free travel and global security are just the tip of the iceberg.Whether it's the issue of absconsion, tax avoidance, shifting wealth or even waging wars, one can witness a systematic and institutional decoupling of the state from its citizenry. This is a proven nightmare for polity and governance.The writer is a Delhi-based lawyer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
an hour ago
- Deccan Herald
China fears US will turn focus on it if Russia suffers defeat in Ukraine war: Report
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning on Friday parried the question about Wang's comments on the Russia-Ukraine war at a media briefing here, reiterating Beijing's stand on the conflict. Wang is currently on a tour of the EU.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
India is negotiating trade deals with countries on its own terms: Goyal
Days ahead of America's 9 July reciprocal tariff deadline, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said that India is negotiating trade agreements with countries on its own terms, emphasising that "national interest will always be supreme." 'India is negotiating with different countries—EU (European Union), New Zealand, US (United States), Oman, Chile, and Peru. An FTA is possible only when both countries benefit; it should be a win-win agreement, and when India's interests are protected, national interest will always be supreme. If we get a good deal, and our interests are protected, India is ready to do deals with developed nations,' Goyal told reporters on the sidelines of an event. On 2 April, the Trump administration had announced reciprocal tariffs, including a 26 per cent levy on Indian goods. It subsequently paused the implementation for 90 days to allow time for negotiations, while retaining a universal 10 per cent tariff on all countries. Thereafter, India and the US decided to finalise an interim deal, or the first part of a broader bilateral trade agreement (BTA), before 9 July, the 90-day pause deadline. If a deal between both countries doesn't materialise, India will face a 26 per cent reciprocal tariff from the US after 9 July. Intense negotiations have been going on between both sides over the past week. A trade delegation from New Delhi, led by chief negotiator and Commerce Department Special Secretary Rajesh Agrawal, has been in Washington, DC since 27 June, in an attempt to finalise an interim deal before 9 July. The team extended its stay until Thursday to sort out the key points of contention. During the talks, the Indian side hardened its stance on issues related to the 'sensitive' agriculture sectors, as negotiations for a trade deal with the US continued. Additionally, New Delhi has repeatedly stated that agriculture and dairy remain major 'red lines' in its negotiations with the US. 'Negotiations are not contingent on any date…our interest is— we should get sustained preference over other competing countries in areas of our interest. If we get that, we will be happy to do a deal,' a government source said. India's key areas of interest include lower tariffs for labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, leather, and automobile components. As part of the deal, India has been pushing hard for the removal of reciprocal tariffs. The source also indicated that Washington is unlikely to offer any relief on the additional tariffs on steel. Earlier this week, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar stated, "There will have to be a give and take. Just like the US or people in the US may have views about India, people in India have views about the US too. We'll have to find a kind of meeting ground. I believe it's possible." On the other hand, the US administration has been saying that a trade deal with India will be finalised soon. On 26 June, US President Donald Trump indicated that a "very big" trade agreement with India may be signed soon. 'We just signed (a trade deal) with China. We are not going to make deals with everybody… But we're having some great deals. We have one coming up, maybe with India, a very big one, where we're going to open up India,' he said.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
ED attaches ₹34 crore assets linked to actor Ranya Rao in gold smuggling probe
NEW DELHI: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has attached assets worth ₹34.12 crore in connection with its money laundering probe into the alleged gold smuggling syndicate involving Kannada actor Ranya Rao, the agency said on Friday. ED attaches ₹ 34 crore assets linked to actor Ranya Rao in gold smuggling probe 'ED, Headquarter Investigative Unit-II, New Delhi has provisionally attached immovable properties valued at ₹34.12 crore under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in a case involving transnational gold smuggling and laundering of its proceeds by Harshavardini Ranya alias Ranya Rao and her associates. The attached assets include immovable properties located in Bengaluru and Tumkur districts of Karnataka,' ED said in a statement. The financial crimes probe agency said it has identified proceeds of crime worth ₹55 crore in the smuggling so far. ED is among several central agencies - along with the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Directorate of Revenue and Intelligence (DRI) - that are looking into a larger conspiracy into the gold smuggling racket. Its probe is based on a CBI case filed on March 7 this year following a complaint by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI). DRI intercepted Rao, stepdaughter of a director general of police rank officer, on March 3 at Kempegowda International Airport, Bengaluru, with 14.213 kg of concealed 24-carat foreign-origin gold, valued at ₹12.56 crore. A search of her residence resulted in the recovery of ₹2.67 crore in unaccounted Indian currency and gold jewellery worth ₹2.06 crore. On Friday, the agency said its probe revealed that 'Ranya Rao, in active collusion with Tarun Konduru Raju and others, orchestrated a well-structured operation for smuggling gold into India'. 'Gold was procured from suppliers based in Dubai, Uganda, and other jurisdictions, and payments were made through hawala channels in cash, thereby circumventing legal financial systems. False customs declarations were filed in Dubai, fraudulently declaring the destination of gold shipments as Switzerland or the USA, while the actual travel of the gold smugglers was to India. Dual sets of travel documents were used i.e. one for the declared export destination and the other for their actual arrival in India, to evade scrutiny and facilitate smuggling through Indian airports,' ED said. Further, ED investigation has revealed that the smuggled gold was sold in India to jewellers and other local entities, and the proceeds were subsequently laundered through further hawala remittances abroad to finance repeat consignments for smuggling more gold into India. 'Evidence retrieved from the seized mobile phones and forensic extraction of digital devices, have revealed detailed coordination with foreign gold suppliers, hawala operators, and Dubai-based customs agents. Ranya Rao's involvement in generating, possessing, and circulating proceeds of crime was further corroborated by her digital footprint, which includes invoices, export declarations, foreign remittance records, and recorded chats establishing her active role in the smuggling syndicate,' the agency said. In May, ED raided 16 locations, including educational institutes linked to Karnataka home minister G Parameshwara and some hawala and forex dealers in this case. ED recorded Rao's statement during which she denied knowledge of the seized gold and other assets; however, her claims were demonstrably contradicted by seized physical evidence, including customs documents bearing her name, travel and purchase records, and digital conversations, the agency statement said. 'Despite the seizure of 14.2 kg of smuggled gold and associated assets by DRI, the total proceeds of crime identified during ED's investigation have been quantified at ₹55.62 crore. This includes approximately ₹38.32 crore identified through analysis of the evidence gathered during the investigation by ED e.g. foreign invoices, customs declarations, and hawala-linked remittances,' ED added. 'It has also emerged during investigation that Ranya Rao was assisted at the airport upon her arrival in India, and the possible involvement of public servants in facilitating her illicit activities is under scrutiny,' it said. As a substantial portion of the proceeds of crime had been layered and reinvested into immovable assets to project them as untainted, ED said it has provisionally attached four properties of equivalent value belonging to Ranya Rao. These include a residential house in Victoria Layout, Bengaluru; a residential plot in Arkavathi Layout, Bengaluru; industrial land in Tumkur District; and agricultural land in Anekal Taluk, with a combined fair market value of ₹34.12 Crore. 'Further investigation is under progress to trace the remaining proceeds of crime and identify other individuals and entities involved in the syndicate,' it said.
