Sambit Patra skips meeting with 21 Manipur MLAs, returns to Delhi
During his two-day visit to the state, Patra met several key figures including former chief minister N. Biren Singh, Speaker Th. Satyabrata, and Governor Ajay Kumar Bhalla.
Patra's visit to Manipur was aimed at holding crucial meetings with BJP legislators amid the ongoing political uncertainty in Manipur. President's Rule was imposed in the state on February 13 on the fourth day after N Biren Singh resigned as chief minister.
On the second day of his visit, Patra held a closed-door meeting with MLA Nemcha Kipgen at her residence in Kangpokpi. Kipgen is among the signatories demanding a separate administration in the form of a Union Territory.
Later, Patra also met representatives of the Committee on Tribal Unity (CoTU) and the Kuki Women's Union. During the meeting, CoTU submitted a memorandum highlighting urgent concerns of the Kuki-Zo communities.
The memorandum reiterated the demand for a 'separate administration' and called for protection of tribal areas through the implementation of constitutional safeguards under Article 371C, and the Fifth and Sixth Schedules of the Constitution. It also called for recognition of tribal land rights.
Additional demands included the imposition of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act across Manipur, a second round of talks with the Ministry of Home Affairs to be held separately with the Kuki-Zomi Council and the Meitei community, and restrictions on free movement at the current juncture. The memorandum stated that if civil society organisations representing the Meitei are mandated, the Kuki groups would be willing to sign a cessation of hostilities and initiate dialogue.
After concluding his engagements in Kangpokpi, Patra returned to Imphal and then departed for New Delhi on Tuesday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
8 minutes ago
- The Print
Malegaon blast probe politics will simmer till Maharashtra polls
A trial court in Mumbai gave its judgment on the case Thursday, acquitting all seven accused, including former Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Pragya Singh Thakur, saying there was strong suspicion, but not enough evidence to convict them. And, the most unfortunate part is that nobody seems to be interested in finding out, least of all the government. An explosive went off during the holy month of Ramadan in Maharashtra's Malegaon in 2008. Six people died. Almost a hundred others were injured. It's been 17 years, but in the eyes of the judiciary, there are still no answers as to who was responsible for the attack. The court ordered compensation of Rs 2 lakh to the families of those who died in the attack, and Rs 50,000 for the families of those injured. But it is too little, too late. The Malegaon blast case has, after all, been a victim of politics, and justice or closure has been the biggest casualty. For this reason, the Malegaon blast verdict is ThePrint's 'Newsmaker of the Week.' 'Saffron terror' politics The Malegaon case has been in the public discourse for 17 years, more for the politics surrounding it than for any significant details regarding the investigation process. The probe in the immediate aftermath of the blasts, under the Maharashtra Anti Terrorism Squad (ATS) and its former chief Hemant Karkare, had led to the arrests of a bunch of Hindutva activists, including Pragya Singh Thakur, as well as Lt Colonel Prasad Purohit, an Army officer. The accused were said to be linked to a Hindu fundamentalist group, Abhinav Bharat. India had seen a fair number of terror attacks across the country in 2008, raising questions on the efficiency of the home ministry under the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government. The initial revelations in the Malegaon probe gave a political opportunity to the Congress to turn the narrative. The party raised red flags on terrorism allegedly sponsored by Hindutva organisations, with some senior leaders such as P Chidambaram, Digvijaya Singh, and Sushilkumar Shinde using the word 'saffron terror'. They blamed the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) for allegedly encouraging such fringe Hindutva groups. These strong statements had at the time sparked a debate on how the term 'saffron terror' defames the entire Hindu religion and how terror should not be seen through the lens of any religious colour. The BJP and RSS, meanwhile, slammed the Congress for allegedly trying to appease the minorities. Karkare was killed in the 2008 Mumbai attacks. His death too became politically controversial as the Union Minority Affairs Minister AR Antulay, a Congressman from Maharashtra, suggested that there could be a larger controversy behind the IPS officer's death. Thursday's verdict came as vindication for the BJP's political narrative, with party leaders blaming the Congress for allegedly casting Hindus in a bad light, asking for an apology. It was ironic. The government's law enforcement agency had lost a case. It had failed to show sufficient evidence to get a conviction, despite having 17 years, over ten of which were under a BJP-led government at the Centre. And yet, those in power were celebrating. Also read: Fauja Singh's death shows Indian roads remain a national emergency—474 lives lost every day Opposition busy trying to get script right After the verdict, several Congress leaders asked if Pragya Singh Thakur and others are now acquitted, then who was behind the blast? However, the question was blunted by their more emphatic attempts at distancing the Congress from the term 'saffron terror'. Talking about 'saffron terror' in a Hindu-majority democracy had hurt the Congress even back then. In today's scenario, where the BJP has been working with every small spiritual and religious outfit on the ground to consolidate the Hindutva voter base, the consequences could be even worse. So, one after the other, leaders of the Congress tried to make all the right noises, loudly speaking about how they had never coined the term 'saffron terror,' how terror has no religion, and how Congress condemns all acts of terror. The question that should have been the loudest of all—who committed the crime—came out barely as a whimper. The Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray) questioned the failure of the government's law enforcement agencies with two back-to-back acquittals in terror cases—first the 2006 Mumbai train blasts and now the 2008 Malegaon blast. However, it stopped short of asking or even suggesting that the National Investigation Agency (NIA) should appeal against the trial court's decision in a higher court. After all, back in 2008, when the Shiv Sena was still undivided under Bal Thackeray's leadership and was a BJP ally, it had openly supported the Malegaon blast accused. On one occasion, party workers had even showered flower petals over the accused outside a Nashik courtroom. Last month, after the Bombay High Court tore into the Maharashtra ATS over the 2006 Mumbai train blasts probe and acquitted all 12 accused, all of whom were Muslims, the Maharashtra government promptly appealed in the Supreme Court. Now that an NIA trial court has done the same in the Malegaon blast case, neither the government nor the agency has shown any urgency in appealing to a higher court. The NIA has said it will decide whether to appeal after studying the order. The political pandemonium will continue as Maharashtra gears up for urban and rural local body polls sometime next year. For the victims and their families, any closure still seems to be a long way off. (Edited by Ratan Priya)
Indian Express
8 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Among issues debated in Madhya Pradesh assembly – why a swimming pool has been unused since 2011
A swimming pool constructed at a cost of over Rs 1.5 crore in Madhya Pradesh's Burhanpur remains unused years after its inauguration due to flawed site selection and poor planning, Urban Development and Housing Minister Kailash Vijayvargiya told the state Assembly. In response to a question raised by BJP MLA Archana Chitnis, the minister confirmed that the project was approved in 2011 under the Backward Regions Grant Fund and the School Education Department. The total approved cost was Rs 1.35 crore, which rose to Rs 1.49 crore after the tender. The actual expenditure incurred was over Rs 1.51 crore. However, the facility has never been used. In his written reply, Vijayvargiya said, 'The swimming pool has not been used from the date of inauguration… It has not been used due to leakage in the pool tank…' MLA Archana Chitnis raised a series of questions, including whether the contractor was experienced, why a site without water was approved, and whether the conditions of the tender were altered. 'How can a swimming pool be operated without a water source? Who is responsible for such a short-sighted decision?' she asked, demanding a thorough investigation and accountability. The minister said the location selected for the swimming pool had no permanent source of water. 'In order to determine the responsibility for the said mistake, an inquiry committee has been constituted by the Directorate of Urban Administration and Development,' he said. The committee, formed on March 27 this year, is chaired by the Superintendent Engineer of the Ujjain Division. However, delays in submitting the report have led to a show cause notice being issued to officials. 'A show cause notice has been issued to the concerned persons and to the Commissioner of Municipal Corporation Burhanpur, letter dated 22.07.2025, regarding not taking action against the responsible persons within the time limit,' the minister said.
Hans India
8 minutes ago
- Hans India
India all set to get new V-P on Sept 9
New Delhi: The election for the post of Vice President will be held on September 9, the poll authority announced on Friday. The notification for the vice presidential election will be issued on August 7 and the last date for filing nomination papers will be August 21. The polling, if required, shall take place in room number F-101, Vasudha, on the first floor of Parliament building on September 9 between 10 am and 5 pm. The results will be announced on the same day. The post of the vice president fell vacant after the resignation of incumbent Jagdeep Dhankhar on July 21. The Election Commission has appointed the Rajya Sabha Secretary General as the Returning Officer and two officials of Rajya Sabha Secretariat as Assistant Returning Officers for the vice presidential election. The Electoral College for the vice presidential election comprises members of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. The nominated members of the Rajya Sabha too are eligible to vote in the vice presidential election. The electoral college for the vice presidential election comprises 233 elected members of the Rajya Sabha, 12 nominated members of the Rajya Sabha and 543 members of the Lok Sabha. There are five vacancies in the Rajya Sabha and one in the Lok Sabha, pegging the effective strength of the electoral college at 782. The ruling National Democratic Alliance has a comfortable edge in the ensuing poll. The 543-member Lok Sabha has one vacant seat -- Basirhat in West Bengal -- while there are five vacancies in the 245-member Rajya Sabha. Of the five vacancies in the Rajya Sabha, four are from Jammu and Kashmir, and one from Punjab. The seat from Punjab was vacated after Aam Aadmi Party leader Sanjeev Arora quit following his election to the state assembly in a bypoll last month. The effective strength of both the Houses together is 782 and the winning candidate will require 391 votes, considering that all eligible voters exercise their franchise. In the Lok Sabha, the BJP-led NDA enjoys the support of 293 of the 542 members. The ruling alliance has the support of 129 members in the Rajya Sabha (effective strength 240), assuming that the nominated members vote in support of the NDA nominee. The ruling alliance has the support of total 422 members. A person cannot be elected as the vice president unless he is a citizen of India, has completed 35 years of age and is qualified for election as a member of the Rajya Sabha. A person is also not eligible if he holds any office of profit under the government of India or a state government or any subordinate local authority.
