Is the new ‘Superman' film about Gaza?
The story follows the superhero to the fictional US-backed country of Boravia, which is attempting to occupy neighbouring impoverished Jarhanpur, which is also fictional.
Some posts online claim that the imagery in the film is highly reminiscent of images from Gaza. People making these claims reference scenes such as one where a child holds a flag in the face of an invasion, and elements such as a border fence against a landscape that looks like the Palestinian territory.
Boravia conducts a high-tech military operation against Jarhanpur, whose inhabitants are portrayed by Middle Eastern, South Asian, and Black actors. Meanwhile, the Boravians are played by white actors.
The Consulate General of Israel in Los Angeles appeared to respond to the film with two Facebook posts reading 'Real Superheroes' alongside images that seem to be of the Israeli army.
Production started before 7 October
However, production, costume design, and casting for 'Superman' actually began in April 2023. Meanwhile, storyboarding took place in May, and screen tests took place in June; all before Hamas attacked Israel on 7 October 2023.
James Gunn, the American director of 'Superman', has also said in interviews that the script was completed before 7 October. He has insisted that there are no direct references to Israel and Palestine. Gunn did concede that the movie is 'about politics", but that the film is mainly about morality and kindness.
However, filming did begin on 29 February 2024, which was after the attacks on 7 October 2023.
Despite this uncertainty about the link between the film and what is happening in Gaza, viewers are sharing their thoughts on Reddit on the ways that the film has played a part in changing how they view what is taking place in Gaza.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion Network
3 days ago
- Fashion Network
Prada scandal proves the power of India's troll army
Retailing for as little as $10, India's beloved Kolhapuri sandals are a staple in wardrobes across the sub-continent. So when luxury brand Prada SpA debuted a new type of footwear at Milan Fashion Week that bore a stark resemblance to them, it didn't take long for the fury to build online. See catwalk The saga underscores how much power the South Asian giant's digital tribe holds, where online outrage regularly influences public debate — especially when citizens perceive their heritage is under attack. International firms eyeing one of the world's fastest-growing markets should weigh the risks of these cultural missteps. The Italian fashion house's troubles began when it introduced its menswear collection in June. The sandals, described as 'leather footwear,' displayed an open-toe braided pattern that was strikingly similar to Kolhapuri sandals made in the Indian states of Maharashtra and Karnataka. (Your columnist has several pairs of Kolhapuris in her wardrobe.) Historically, the sandals were produced for specific communities. For farmers who worked in the fields, they were robust and able to withstand wear-and-tear; for the courtier class and nobles they were more delicate and ostentatious. In 2019, the footwear was awarded the Geographical Indication status, viewed as a mark of authenticity. (Other Indian items to have received this tag include Darjeeling tea and Alphonso mangoes.) But Prada didn't credit India for the designs, prompting a brutal social media backlash. The nationalistic sentiment whipped up by this controversy boosted sales of the traditional sandals. The country's online community is renowned for its digital ferocity — it accused the brand of cultural appropriation, and the furor forced the fashion house into damage control mode. It issued a statement saying it recognized the sandals were inspired by traditional Indian footwear. The luxury brand's experience is a reminder that in India, foreign firms have to be aware of how reputational risk could affect future revenue. Internet penetration is rising, with 55% of the population connected. Social media is growing fast, too: It's estimated the world's most populous nation is home to 462 million social media users. India is a rising global power, one international brands are keen to break into. But local and foreign firms face various challenges: Bureaucracy, shoddy infrastructure and unique consumer behaviors that include a fierce defense of India's rich heritage. All of these factors require a tailored approach. Success in the market lies in the ability to balance local authenticity and global appeal — and the willingness to 'learn to love and speak to India,' as Francois Grouiller, chief executive officer of the luxury consultancy IndLux recently noted. Foreign brands can't afford to ignore India's luxury market, which reached $7.74 billion in 2023, and is projected to approach $12 billion by 2028, a recent Kearney report notes. Other estimates predict the sector could more than triple by 2030, growing to upward of $85 billion. The number of ultra-high-net-worth individuals — people with a net worth of at least $30 million — is expected to grow by 50% by 2028. These forecasts come with the obvious caveats — most notably, there is still a huge wealth gap in the country. While the 100 million wealthiest people are splurging, 400 million of their middle-class counterparts have cut back. Global economic conditions are becoming less supportive, as US President Donald Trump 's sweeping tariffs fuel trade tensions and put pressure on future growth. Still, viewing consumers as a long-term opportunity rather than just a short-term play would help these firms thrive. Even more important is understanding that India is home to a diverse market with distinct needs. Some brands have grasped this already — high-end jeweler Bulgari SpA offers a pricey Mangalsutra necklace inspired by a chain traditionally worn by married women — tapping into the desire for luxury with home-grown sensibilities. The Italian brand is not the first — and neither will it be the last — to fall foul of cultural norms. Earlier this year, Gucci made the mistake of calling Bollywood star Alia Bhatt's custom-made sari-lehenga (a fusion of the traditional sari with a long skirt) a gown. Another online frenzy was set off in May, when a viral social media trend was criticized for calling the dupatta — a traditional South Asian shawl — a Scandinavian scarf. Prada doesn't own any retail stores in India, depending instead on the super-rich diaspora and wealthy Indians who travel overseas. But the firm — which has seen its shares lose about 30% since February as investors took fright at its purchase of Versace — isn't taking any chances. In a conciliatory move, it's now working with traditional artisans to understand the history behind the famed Kolhapuris. The luxury fashion house has learned the hard way that cultural fluency is no longer a 'nice to have'— it's central to business survival.
Euronews
3 days ago
- Euronews
Is the new ‘Superman' film about Gaza?
The newest 'Superman' film has now grossed over $406.8 million (€345.65 million) worldwide and has been a runaway box office hit. The story follows the superhero to the fictional US-backed country of Boravia, which is attempting to occupy neighbouring impoverished Jarhanpur, which is also fictional. Some posts online claim that the imagery in the film is highly reminiscent of images from Gaza. People making these claims reference scenes such as one where a child holds a flag in the face of an invasion, and elements such as a border fence against a landscape that looks like the Palestinian territory. Boravia conducts a high-tech military operation against Jarhanpur, whose inhabitants are portrayed by Middle Eastern, South Asian, and Black actors. Meanwhile, the Boravians are played by white actors. The Consulate General of Israel in Los Angeles appeared to respond to the film with two Facebook posts reading 'Real Superheroes' alongside images that seem to be of the Israeli army. Production started before 7 October However, production, costume design, and casting for 'Superman' actually began in April 2023. Meanwhile, storyboarding took place in May, and screen tests took place in June; all before Hamas attacked Israel on 7 October 2023. James Gunn, the American director of 'Superman', has also said in interviews that the script was completed before 7 October. He has insisted that there are no direct references to Israel and Palestine. Gunn did concede that the movie is 'about politics", but that the film is mainly about morality and kindness. However, filming did begin on 29 February 2024, which was after the attacks on 7 October 2023. Despite this uncertainty about the link between the film and what is happening in Gaza, viewers are sharing their thoughts on Reddit on the ways that the film has played a part in changing how they view what is taking place in Gaza.
France 24
3 days ago
- France 24
Hungary bans Kneecap performance over 'antisemitic hate speech'
The Belfast group has made headlines in recent months after it sharply criticised Israel and its military campaign against the Palestinian militant group Hamas in Gaza. Known for their confrontational style and Irish nationalist messaging, the band has denied supporting violence or banned groups. But their anti-Israel comments on stage at the Glastonbury Festival in June drew global condemnation. While Kneecap has denied any terrorism connection, singer Liam O'Hanna, known by his stage name Mo Chara, has been charged in the UK with a "terror" offence over alleged support for Hamas and Hezbollah in connection with a performance last year. He is due to appear in a London court in August. The rappers have been taken off the bill for festivals in Scotland and Germany this year because of the controversy. However, they are scheduled to appear at France's Rock en Seine on August 24. "Hungary's government has moved to ban @KneecapCEOL from entering the country and performing at @szigetofficial -- citing antisemitic hate speech and open praise for Hamas and Hezbollah as justification," government spokesperson Zoltan Kovacs wrote on X. "Granting them a stage normalizes hate and terror, and puts democratic values on the line," Kovacs wrote, citing Hungary's "duty to protect" its Jewish community. The travel ban can be challenged within 30 days. Kneecap was scheduled to perform on August 11 at the Sziget festival in Budapest, which ranks among Europe's largest outdoor music bonanzas, drawing about 400,000 people each year. The trio denounced the decision by the "authoritarian government of Viktor Orban" on its social media channels as "outrageous", saying the move had "no legal basis". "It's clear this is a political distraction and a further attempt to silence those who call out genocide against the Palestinian people" Kneecap said on X. 'Unprecedented move' Israeli ambassador to Budapest Maya Kadosh praised the Hungarian government for "its clear stance". Festival organisers, however, expressed regret over the "unprecedented move", warning it could "negatively affect Hungary's international standing". "We believe that cancel culture and cultural boycotts are not the solution," they said. Almost 300 Hungarian artists, including Oscar-winning film director Laszlo Nemes, joined a petition earlier protesting the trio's planned Sziget performance. Facing growing pressure, festival organiser Tamas Kadar said there was no "good answer" to the issue. "We do not tolerate hate speech in any form -- and that includes antisemitism," but "we remain committed to the spirit of free expression" and "will not act as censors", Kadar wrote in an op-ed published last week by a Hungarian newspaper. Hungary is one of Israel's closest allies in the European Union, with Prime Minister Viktor Orban directing police to ban pro-Palestinian rallies following the Hamas attack against Israel on October 7, 2023.
