GDP in Therapy
US GDP walks into a therapist's office, sobbing.'Everyone watches me like I'm a measure of their worth. But sometimes I just want to grow because I feel good, not because people buy more hot tubs during recessions!'Therapist: Have you tried embracing emotional value instead of monetary?GDP: I tried that. Then the Fed raised interest rates and my happiness contracted 2.4%.Angst ReturnsA man in Trumpland receives a letter from IRS asking him to clarify a deduction for 'existential dread'.He replies: It's the direct result of paying taxes that fund a military-industrial complex, failing infrastructure, and debates on whether healthcare should be a luxury. I believe this dread is both medically significant and patriotic.IRS responds: We appreciate your honesty. However, dread must be itemised. You may only deduct 'existential angst' if accompanied by receipts.He sends back:A prescription for Xanax.An Economist subscription he can't cancel.The IRS audits him anyway, concluding he owes $742, and must attend a seminar on 'Optimism in Capitalism'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump approval ratings collapse across America as July Fourth protests erupt in fury over economy, immigration, and sweeping social cuts
New polling data revealed a starkly divided political landscape under President Donald Trump 's administration. A national survey conducted by Civiqs, based on 35,929 respondents, showed that Trump's approval rating is net positive in just 21 states, while 29 states report a net negative perception of the president. Wyoming showed the highest support with a net approval of +44 percent, followed by West Virginia at +36 percent. On the other end of the spectrum, Hawaii reported a staggering –47 percent net approval and Maryland followed with –41 percent. Broader national trend These state-level numbers reflect a broader national trend. A YouGov/Economist poll conducted between June 20 and 23 found that 40 percent of Americans approved of Trump's performance, while 54 percent disapproved, resulting in a net rating of –14. A separate poll by the Tyson Group, conducted June 25 to 26, found a slightly narrower gap, with 45 percent approving and 51 percent disapproving, for a net of –6. While the president still maintains a strong base in many Republican-leaning states, his overall national approval has struggled to break into positive territory. Live Events The timing of the data is particularly significant on July 4 . Traditionally, a unifying celebration of American independence was marked this year by political tension and widespread protest. Demonstrations took place across the country as part of the 'Free America Weekend,' with large gatherings in cities such as Los Angeles, Houston, Tampa Bay, and New York City. The protests were driven by opposition to recent White House decisions, including deep cuts to public programs under the administration's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' and new restrictions on immigration and reproductive health access. Economy - A key issue Experts believe the economy remains the key issue shaping Trump's approval. Scott Lucas, a professor of international politics at University College Dublin, noted that economic uncertainty and tariffs have played a central role in pushing approval ratings down in many states. Richard Johnson, a senior lecturer in US politics at Queen Mary University of London, offered a broader view, saying that while Trump's numbers remain net negative, they reflect a relatively high 'floor' of support in an era of intense political polarization, higher, he noted, than the ceiling of his predecessor, Joe Biden, after 2021. As protests continue and more are planned, such as the 'Good Trouble Lives On' events on July 17 in honor of civil rights icon John Lewis, Trump's approval ratings will remain sensitive to economic trends, foreign policy decisions, and civil unrest.
Hindustan Times
19 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Mortgage rates see slight rise in US: 30-year fixed now at 6.59%
Mortgage rates hiked a little on July 5, but weren't too high. Today, the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate increased by one basis point to 6.59%, as per Yahoo Finance. Mortgage rates saw a slight increase today, with the 30-year fixed rate at 6.59% and the 15-year fixed at 5.81%.(Representative Image: Pexels) Steady rates were a good sign for people wanting to lock in a mortgage. Sure, borrowers preferred lower rates, but having stable ones was better than dealing with big changes. The housing market already saw a lot of ups and downs in 2025. Today's average mortgage rates The following were the average mortgage rates recorded today, according to Zillow. • 30-year fixed: 6.59% • 20-year fixed: 6.24% • 15-year fixed: 5.81% • 5/1 ARM: 7.36% • 7/1 ARM: 7.38% • 30-year VA: 6.14% • 15-year VA: 5.60% • 5/1 VA: 6.29% Also Read: Mortgage rates: Slight dip as 30-year hits 6.68%, jumbo at 6.80% Relation between mortgage rates and US Treasury bonds Most of the time, mortgage rates function closely with the yields on US Treasury bonds. When bond yields fall, mortgage rates tend to fall as well. There can also be instances where the Fed plays a role in this. If inflation picks up or the economy shows signs of slowing down, the Fed often lowers rates, too. For example, we saw this during the COVID-19 pandemic when rates hit historic lows. Now, experts are not anticipating this to happen again anytime soon, but we could see some drops in mortgage rates if inflation slows further or the economy slows substantially more. Even if mortgage rates drop again this summer, many home buyers are not going to experience much relief right away. Is there a correlation between mortgage rates and Fed rates? Mortgage rates almost always lag significantly and have no direct correlation to the Fed rate. Also, home values/prices are still fairly elevated, meaning the overall cost to buy remains high, although new listings are increasing on average each day. Some people want to wait to buy real estate due to uncertainty in their job situations or concerns about the economy. Others are trying to alleviate their borrowing costs by improving their credit ratings, saving for a larger down payment, or buying "mortgage points." Some people are holding off on buying because they are unsure about their jobs or worried about the economy. Others are looking to cut borrowing costs by boosting their credit, saving up for a bigger down payment, or buying mortgage points.
Mint
a day ago
- Mint
Trump's ‘fiscal dominance' play
There is a potential spoiler to the growth dividend President Trump is counting on from the tax cuts that Congress just passed. Those tax cuts will be financed by unprecedented borrowing. Textbook economics predicts that borrowing will push interest rates higher, neutralizing the benefits of lower tax rates. Trump has an answer for that: break the link between budget deficits and rates. In recent weeks, he has intensified his demands that Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell cut rates, or step aside for someone who will. Trump has always been, as he puts it, a 'low interest rate person." But his latest demands add a critical new dimension—he wants lower rates to meet his fiscal priorities. A flood of new bonds to finance deficits would normally put upward pressure on long-term interest rates. Trump's Treasury is trying to short-circuit that mechanism, signaling that debt issuance will tilt toward shorter-term securities and Treasury bills. This is a gamble. If short-term rates jump, the cost quickly hits the budget. Trump, though, doesn't intend to let that happen. 'We're going to get somebody into the Fed who's going to be able to lower the rates," he said on Fox News. A central bank that shifts its priorities from employment and inflation to financing the government has succumbed to 'fiscal dominance." It is usually associated with emerging markets that have weak central banks, such as Argentina. The result is typically some combination of inflation, crisis and stagnation. Getting to that point, though, can take years. Meanwhile, fiscal dominance can be a powerful stimulant. While fiscal dominance isn't yet the status quo in the U.S., the mere possibility might be influencing markets. Lower interest rates, aided in part by the prospect of a change in Fed leadership, coupled with deficit-financed tax cuts, have helped the stock market romp to new records. Central banks have long been intertwined with government finance. The Bank of England was founded in 1694 to help the monarchy raise money. The Federal Reserve helped finance the U.S. government in World War I. At Treasury's request, it capped interest rates during and after World War II. In the 1960s, it avoided tightening monetary policy while Treasury was trying to sell bonds, a practice that helped fuel inflation. Since then, the Fed has avoided explicit coordination with fiscal policy. From 2008 to 2014, it did hold interest rates near zero and buy government bonds. This wasn't fiscal dominance, because the Fed was acting on its own assessment of inflation, then below its 2% target, not on the instructions of the president. Trump, unlike other presidents, expects the Fed chair to follow his priorities. Earlier this year, he flirted with firing Powell. He backed off after bond yields shot up and stocks sank. A few weeks later, the Supreme Court effectively said the president can't fire a Fed governor (including the chair) without cause. Trump then explored a different way to pressure the Fed: naming the next Fed chair, even though Powell's term runs through next May. The idea is that markets, being forward-looking, would pay more attention to this 'shadow chair"than Powell. And indeed potential successors are now openly making the case for lower rates. It isn't a given, of course, that Powell's successor will do Trump's bidding. Still, Trump is creative at finding ways to force institutions he doesn't directly control to do as he says. Just look at universities and law firms. Back in May, House Republicans unveiled their version of Trump's 'one big, beautiful bill." It would have pushed the deficit from $1.8 trillion last year, or 6.4% of gross domestic product, to $2.9 trillion in 2034, or 6.8% of GDP, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. The U.S. has never before run such large deficits for so long. As bidding at Treasury bond auctions turned sloppy and Moody's stripped the U.S. of its triple-A credit rating, 10-year Treasury note yields climbed to 4.55%. The bill that passed Thursday is even more profligate: Deficits rise to $3 trillion, or 7.1% of GDP, in a decade. And if temporary tax cuts in the bill are extended, as the 2017 tax cuts have been, the deficit climbs to $3.3 trillion, or 7.9%, CRFB projects. And yet yields closed Thursday at 4.35%. Yields have fallen for several reasons, including mild inflation and softer labor market data. But the prospect of a Trump-friendly successor to Powell seems to have played a part. Goldman Sachs economists recently concluded that the next Fed chair will be less worried about deficits than Powell and will thus lower rates further in the next few years. If governments could borrow as much as they wished and set interest rates by fiat, why don't more do it? Because there is no free lunch. If interest rates are persistently too low, something bad will happen, usually inflation. Trump's threats against the Fed have yet to shift investors' expectations of future inflation. Perhaps they believe that no matter what Trump wants, the Fed will remain true to its mission. Even if they don't believe that, it is expensive to fight the Fed. For all the mystique around 'bond market vigilantes," markets won't price in higher rates if the Fed is determined to keep them down. More important, inflation has many drivers besides fiscal and monetary policy. As I wrote three weeks ago, mild inflation and cracks in the labor market (assuaged somewhat by the June jobs report) have boosted the case for a rate cut. Just because Trump's call for lower rates is self-serving doesn't mean it is wrong. Still, history suggests that when a central bank over time follows a president's dictates rather than its own judgment, the economy pays a price. Though maybe not soon enough to matter to the president. Write to Greg Ip at
