Volkswagen recalls 32,000 VW, Audi vehicles for rear-view camera or battery issues
The automaker is recalling 29,569 of its 2022-2024 Volkswagen Tiguan SUVs, 2023 Volkswagen Arteon sedans and 2024-2025 Audi Q3 SUVs because the rearview camera image may not display as intended, Volkswagen says in a report filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. An error may occur in the camera control unit at vehicle startup and may not show a rearview camera image. This can increase the risk of a crash, the company said in the report.
Volkswagen is also recalling 2,616 of its 2023 Audi Q5 PHEV hybrid SUVs because defective high-voltage battery cell modules may overheat, increasing the risk of a fire, according to a NHTSA report.
Looking for a recall?Check out USA TODAY's recall database
What Volkswagen, Audi vehicles are affected in the rearview camera recall?
The rearview camera recall covers the following Audi and Volkswagen vehicles:
Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
2024-2025 Audi Q3 (14,028)
2023 Volkswagen Arteon (1,660)
2022-2024 Volkswagen Tiguan (13,881)
What Audi vehicles are covered in the battery recall?
The high-voltage battery recall covers certain 2023 Audi Q5 plug-in hybrid vehicles.
How to get recalled vehicles fixed
Automaker remedies for the recalls:
Volkswagen and Audi rearview camera recall: Owners of the vehicles with the rearview camera issues are expected to get notification letters mailed to them April 11, 2025. Dealers will update the camera control unit software, free of charge. Owners may contact Volkswagen customer service at 1-800-893-5298 or Audi customer service at 1-800-253-2834. Volkswagen's numbers for this recall are (Volkswagen) 91NY and (Audi) 90AV.
Audi high-voltage battery recall: Owners of 2023 Audi Q5 vehicles with the safety risk are expected to have interim notification letters mailed April 11, 2025. A second notice will be sent once the final remedy – installation of advanced onboard diagnostic software – is available, which is anticipated to be available in the second quarter of 2025.
Volkswagen will monitor available online vehicle data and contact owners as necessary, to advise them not to charge the vehicle from an external source until the battery can be replaced. For vehicles in which online data is unavailable, owners are advised not to charge their batteries from external sources until the final remedy becomes available. Repairs will be performed free of charge. Owners may contact Audi customer service at 1-800-253-2834. Volkswagen's number for this recall is 93AA. This recall expands previous NHTSA recall number 24V-898.
Follow Mike Snider on Threads, Bluesky and X: mikegsnider &@mikegsnider.bsky.social &@mikesnider.
What's everyone talking about? Sign up for our trending newsletter to get the latest news of the day
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Car and Driver
7 hours ago
- Car and Driver
Ford Recalling 312,000 Trucks, SUVs with Brake Booster Issue
Ford is recalling another 312,120 vehicles, this time over an issue with the electronic brake booster. The recall population is split among 2025 Ford F-150, Expedition, Bronco, Ranger, and 2025 Lincoln Navigator models, with the majority—217,969—being F-150 pickups. In affected models, the electronic brake booster model can enter a faulted state while driving, creating a total loss of brake boost. Ford's year of recalls continues, with the company issuing yet another, this time for 312,120 vehicles over an issue with the electronic brake booster. The recall population is limited to 2025 models and extends to certain Ford F-150, Expedition, Bronco, and Ranger models, along with the Lincoln Navigator. Ford According to documents associated with the recall, the issue stems from the electronic brake booster (EBB) module, which can shut off either during normal driving or while a driver-assist system (ADAS) is in use. Once in this faulted state, the car won't have any brake boost until the EBB module is reset along with the car's ignition cycle. The documents confirm that as of mid-July, Ford was aware of 37 warranty claims associated with the brake boost issue. Ford is also aware of one alleged low-speed crash related to the issue. No injuries or fires have been connected to the fault, according to NHTSA documents. Lincoln The documents show that the issue arises because the EBB module is susceptible to "normal but infrequent voltage disturbances." A momentary drop in voltage and a subsequent surge can result in a spike that causes the EBB motor to power off. If the brake boost is lost, the ABS, electronic stability control, and brake cluster warning lights will illuminate on the dash alongside warning messages. The loss in boost will also likely cause a change in brake pedal feel and increased pedal travel. The remedy for the issue is a simple software update for the EBB module. Ford expects to begin rolling out over-the-air updates sometime in August, though owners will also have the choice to bring their car to a local dealership for the install. Ford will begin notifying dealers of the crash on August 11, with owner notification letters scheduled to be sent on August 25. Owners concerned that their vehicle may be involved can check on the NHTSA recalls website now. Jack Fitzgerald Associate News Editor Jack Fitzgerald's love for cars stems from his as yet unshakable addiction to Formula 1. After a brief stint as a detailer for a local dealership group in college, he knew he needed a more permanent way to drive all the new cars he couldn't afford and decided to pursue a career in auto writing. By hounding his college professors at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, he was able to travel Wisconsin seeking out stories in the auto world before landing his dream job at Car and Driver. His new goal is to delay the inevitable demise of his 2010 Volkswagen Golf. Read full bio
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
F1 Engines Don't Last Long, And Replacing One Isn't Cheap
You're here because you find automotive technical minutiae fascinating. While there's plenty of cool engines in passenger cars -- oddities like the Honda S800's roller bearing crank that needs no oil pressure or the Volkswagen Beetle's magnesium engine block and transmission come to mind -- Formula 1 is where engine tech nerds drool themselves to dehydration. Despite the incredible engineering that goes into F1 engines, they are short-lived. After all, these F1 powertrains generate thrust like you wouldn't believe. 1,000-hp 1.6-liter turbocharged hybrids push these cars to stupendous speeds. Sparks glitter in the dark from the titanium skid blocks that prevent the cars from bottoming out. All this power means these engines will only last for around seven or eight races before they need to be replaced, which means the engine will last about 1,500 miles. This takes into account eight 190-mile races, but not any qualifying or practice. So, the real distance is certainly a bit more. The engines aren't cheap, either, with estimates ranging from $11 million to just over $16 million per engine. That's more than most of us even dream of spending on cars in our lifetimes, much less an individual engine. Those millions could easily fill a garage with Ferraris, Bentleys, some rare muscle cars, and maybe a six-pack of tricked-out Honda Accords to boot. Extrapolate that across the four engine allocation each team gets for the 2024 and 2025 seasons -- Formula 1 used to restrict teams to three engines -- and you're looking at $44 million to $64 million. The teams are probably happy that the current $135 million-per-year spending cap doesn't apply to engines. Read more: Everrati's Electric Porsche 911 RSR Has Me Driving Into The Future With Open Arms The Money F1 Teams Actually Spend On Engines That may not be the whole story, however. According to former racer Scott Mansell, who discussed the subject on his Driver61 YouTube channel, F1 teams spent about $16 million in 2023 purchasing engines, but that's when teams still operated under the three-engine-per-season cap. Beyond that, the numbers we hear about how much an F1 engine costs have more to do with development than purchasing. Look at Forbes' 2019 write-up on F1 engine development costs. The article claimed that developing an F1 engine cost around $1.4 billion, using the Mercedes V6 as an example. Forbes went on to report that Williams and Racing Point spent an estimated $37 million each per year purchasing engines from Mercedes, meaning that if each team had the same budget, they were both forking over $18.5 million. Where F1 engine costs skyrocket is in the design and manufacturing. Engineers work tirelessly to extract every last horsepower from the allowed parameters, and the machining of each part must be unfathomably precise with tolerances usually measured in double-digit microns. Manufacturing processes must be strictly controlled to prevent inconsistent results. For instance, maintaining a stable temperature keeps thermal expansion at bay. Scott Mansell's video How Formula 1 Pistons Are Made shows a clip of Dave Herbert, a production engineer for legendary engine builder Cosworth, saying, "If you just held the piston for about ten seconds, it'll go out of tolerance." To ensure parts can be reused after a race, teams will tear the engine down and X-ray parts to ensure there aren't any defects, among many other tests. Shocking Durability And Relatively Plain Materials Until 2004, F1 teams could use as many engines as they wanted. Today, the 2025 Power Unit Component Allocation limitations for a 24-race season include eight exhaust systems, four internal combustion engines, four turbochargers, two energy stores, and two sets of control electronics. Exceed these numbers, and expect grid penalties. Being able to replace an engine every race meant that those screaming V10s back in 2003 weren't the most durable. Don't hold your breath on V10s coming back, either, as hybrids are here to stay in F1 -- for now, at least. Teams would only get an average of 250 miles out of an engine, and considering that's only 60 miles more than the race itself, that meant the engine was essentially designed to last one race. What's surprising is how conventional the materials are in F1 engines. There's no Vibranium or Adamantium -- McLaren tried using beryllium in its pistons until the FIA banned it in 2001. F1 engines can use aluminum alloys for the block, crankcase, and pistons. Iron-based alloys -- basically steel -- are used for the crankshaft, connecting rods, and cams. Finally, nickel, cobalt, iron, or titanium alloys compose the valves. This is ostensibly to keep manufacturing costs non-exorbitant and avoid safety concerns with exotic materials, as was the case with the FIA's banning of beryllium. So, with reasonably conventional aluminum and iron alloys and no meteorite metals, F1 engines handle internal temperatures that can far exceed 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit, not to mention incredible pressure. Those pistons have to change direction constantly, as well, at up to 15,000 times per minute. Honestly, it's impressive that F1 engines don't tear themselves apart faster than they do. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
European automakers face profitability squeeze in 2025: Fitch
European carmakers are expected to face a decline in profitability in 2025 due to the combined impact of global trade tensions, weakening demand in China, and the accelerating transition to electric vehicles (EVs), according to Fitch Ratings. Fitch said recently announced U.S. tariffs will have negative consequences for automotive production and sales, prompting manufacturers to reassess their global manufacturing strategies and cut fixed costs. Rising raw material prices and ongoing cost pressures from suppliers are expected to further strain margins. These developments add to Fitch's prior expectation of a low-single-digit decline in European vehicle sales. The credit rating agency warned that tariff risks are especially significant for companies exporting vehicles from Japan, Korea, and Germany to the U.S. Volkswagen is expected to be particularly affected, with its high-margin luxury brands — Audi and Porsche — likely to face pressure on free cash flow and rating headroom. Mercedes-Benz also faces downside risk, as its U.S. production hub for sport utility vehicles could be exposed to retaliatory Chinese tariffs. Fitch noted that while the burden of higher tariffs is likely to be shared between suppliers and automakers, the latter are expected to shoulder the larger share. Disruptions in production may also hit suppliers' cash flows, particularly those highly dependent on automaker volumes. Although a recently announced EU-U.S. trade agreement appears consistent with Fitch's expectations, details remain unclear and require approval from EU member states. Structural challenges also persist. European auto production remains 15%–20% below pre-pandemic levels and is unlikely to recover soon. Fitch attributes this to a slower-than-expected EV transition, growing foreign competition, and shifting consumer preferences. Carmakers like Volkswagen and Stellantis have begun rationalising operations through plant closures and layoffs, which will weigh on short-term cash generation. One-off restructuring costs are expected to amount to roughly 1% of median free cash flow. In China, German premium brands continue to lose market share to domestic players and are experiencing intensifying price competition — even in the typically more resilient premium segment. While some European automakers are partnering with Chinese firms in areas like autonomous driving and software to stem further losses, Fitch does not expect significant improvement in competitive positioning in the near term. On the EV front, Fitch expects European automakers to rebound from a sluggish 2024 with increased battery EV sales in 2025, driven by new model launches and competitive gains against non-EU rivals. However, this growth will come with tighter margins as Chinese brands expand their market presence and infrastructure in Europe. As a result of these pressures, Fitch said profitability and free cash flow generation declined in 2024 and will likely deteriorate further in 2025. The agency has issued Negative Outlooks and taken negative rating actions across the sector. Nevertheless, most investment-grade manufacturers retain solid balance sheets, supported by strong capital structures and net cash positions, which provide some buffer against ongoing challenges. "European automakers face profitability squeeze in 2025: Fitch" was originally created and published by Motor Finance Online, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
