PCB Issues Blanket Ban On Future Participation In WCL After 2025 Edition Embarrassment
'The contents of the said press releases highlight a duality where the narrative of 'peace through sport' is selectively applied and sporting events are held hostage to political expediency and narrow commercial interests.
'In light of this unfortunate development, which underscores a clear and intolerable pattern of external influence and a disregard for the principles of sporting neutrality, the Pakistan Cricket Board is compelled to take a firm stance. The PCB can no longer condone participation in an event where the fundamental principles of fair play and unbiased administration are compromised by external pressures,' read the statement by PCB.
Several Indian players, including Shikhar Dhawan, had voiced their refusal to face Pakistan in Birmingham in the league stage of the tournament. The two sides were slated to meet again in the semi-finals before team India opted to pull out of the game instead.
PCB's virtual BoG meeting was attended by Sumair Ahmed Syed, Salman Naseer, Zaheer Abbas, Zahid Akhtar Zaman, Sajjad Ali Khokhar, Zafarullah Jadgal, Tanveer Ahmed, Tariq Sarwar, Muhammad Ismail Qureshi, Anwaar Ahmad Khan, Adnan Malik, Usman Wahla (special invitee) and Mir Hassan Naqvi (Additional Secretary).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
9 minutes ago
- First Post
Harbhajan takes a dig at Vaughan and other English experts over Test series prediction: 'I would tell them to look...'
Michael Vaughan was among a host of English experts who had predicted a series victory for the Ben Stokes-led hosts over a new-look Indian team led by Shubman Gill, captaining in the Test format for the first time. India, however, proved Vaughan and others wrong with a victory at The Oval that ended the series in a 2-2 draw. read more Harbhajan Singh took a dig at Michael Vaughan and other English experts following India's series-leveling victory at The Oval on Monday. PTI/Reuters Indian spin legend Harbhajan Singh took aim at former England captain Michael Vaughan over the latter's prediction ahead of the 2025 Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy. Vaughan, who had led England to a famous victory in the 2005 Ashes, had predicted a 3-1 victory for the Ben Stokes-led hosts in the five-match series. The prediction, however, was proven wrong on Day 5 of the series finale at The Oval in London as an inspired spell from Mohammed Siraj helped India bowl England out for 367 and collect a six-run victory – their narrowest in Test cricket – leveling the series 2-2 in the process. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I feel there is a big win hidden for India here. Yes, the scoreline shows 2-2. Michael Vaughan and many others predicted that it would be 3-1 or 3-0. I would tell them to look towards their side a bit and where England cricket stands. Our warriors have shown the level of Indian cricket,' Harbhajan said on his YouTube channel. 'Bhajji' further heaped praise on the Gill-led squad for 'creating history' in the absence of stalwarts such as Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma and Ravichandran Ashwin. While Ashwin had retired from international cricket midway during the tour of Australia, Kohli and Rohit had quit the Test format in May. 'Unbelievable Test match and the way India have played the series, they deserve praise. When the team went to England, many people said it was young and there were no seniors. But see how the young team created history,' he added. How Team India proved Vaughan's prediction wrong at The Oval India were facing the prospect of a 3-1 series loss on the penultimate day of the fifth Test at The Oval after Harry Brook and Joe Root struck centuries and forged a 195-run stand for the fourth wicket taking England to 301/3 in their chase of a challenging 374-run target. The Indian pace trio of Akash Deep, Mohammed Siraj and Prasidh Krishna celebrate India's series-leveling victory at The Oval. Image: AP Akash Deep's dismissal of Brook, who had been handed a lifeline by Siraj on 19 earlier in the chase, as well as Prasidh Krishna's twin-strike shortly before stumps, rekindled India's hopes in the closing stages of the penultimate day. . Siraj put the visitors in pole position by dismissing overnight batters Jamie Smith and Jamie Overton in successive overs. Prasidh then castled Josh Tongue before Siraj sealed one of the greatest triumphs in Indian cricket history by castling Gus Atkinson, who nearly took England home in the company of an injured Chris Woakes. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Why India's English summer of 2025 was more heroic than 2021-22
Mumbai: It will be near impossible for any Indian Test win to touch the heights of Gabba 2021 because of the acute scarcity of resources with which it was achieved. But the Oval Test win on Monday that levelled the series presented serious challenges to the bowlers, and the manner in which India's pacers passed the endurance test has earned them a rightful place in the echelons of the country's best Test performances. FILE PHOTO: Cricket - International Test Match Series - Fifth Test - England v India - Kia Oval, London, Britain - August 2, 2025 India's Mohammed Siraj celebrates after taking the wicket of England's Zak Crawley Action Images via Reuters/Paul Childs/File Photo (Action Images via Reuters) Mohammed Siraj, Prasidh Krishna and Akash Deep bowled 126 of India's 136 overs at The Oval. In the England second innings, the trio was forced to go to 'dark places' as Ben Stokes had described his travails taking on a heavy bowling workload after breaking down before the final Test. Deep, who suffered a groin strain at Lord's, needed injections to play in the final Test. Siraj, in his fifth successive match, refused to give up belief. Prasidh, battling issues with accuracy, persevered and ultimately found his sweet spot on the pitch. The strain of chasing 20 wickets with fewer frontline bowlers was accentuated in the series finale, but it was felt all the way through with India seeing greater merit in adding batting depth. That India could still win two Tests – the other came in the 2nd Test at Birmingham – in the series was down to one or the other fast bowler rising to the occasion at different times. Siraj was a key contributor in both the wins, picking up seven and nine wickets respectively. Besides, Deep emerged as wrecker-in-chief at Edgbaston, taking a 10-fer. He did most of the damage with the new ball. At The Oval, Prasidh, despite being expensive, found ways to exploit the carry on the pitch, and later, uneven bounce for his eight wickets. Deep with the new ball and Prasidh with the old became India's mantra to make things happen in the two Tests spearhead Jasprit Bumrah missed. So much so that in the final analysis – not just in those Tests India won – Deep held the best new ball numbers (avg 28.4) and Prasidh caused problems with the older ball, averaging 28.54, next only to Bumrah (22.12), but inducing more false shots (28.2 to 23.4%). To manage his workload, Bumrah had to be restricted to three Tests. The lead pacer was still very good, averaging the best of the lot, but his limited role forced the others to push their limits. This is where workhorse Siraj rose to the occasion, not only bowling 14 spells of more than 5 overs, but also finishing as the highest wicket-taker. How far India's tactics stretched their bowlers can be understood by a comparative look at the last tour of England (2021-22). It was also a five-Test series, the result (2-2) was identical, and the frontline bowlers took the same number of wickets (65). The key difference was the workload of the main bowlers, which was well spread among the experienced lot. Bumrah and Siraj played all the Tests, Mohammed Shami was there in four, Ishant Sharma played two and Umesh Yadav in one in which he made his presence felt. In three matches in this series, India played three all-rounders (including spinners), and two in the other games. Spinners made a limited impact in both series. The all-rounders bowled 7% more overs than three years ago but returned a poorer bowling average (54.3 to 43.14). While output comparison in absolute terms would not be accurate as the pitches this time were mostly batting friendly, it's worth noting that Shardul Thakur was a more effective bowler earlier. With England laying out flat decks barring The Oval, India's strategy to shore up batting had some merit. Their batting depth bailed them out on a few occasions. Washington Sundar produced important cameos besides the unbeaten century at Old Trafford. But data suggests India could have shown more faith in their batters though they lacked the experience of 2021— the top five scored more heavily (2,643 runs) than England's (2,076). Contributions of No.6-8 of both teams (India – 823, England – 844) were nearly the same. This margin might have swelled if India had picked an extra frontline bowler – a fourth pacer at The Oval and wrist spinner Kuldeep Yadav in some of the other Tests. But the bowling averages could have improved and the lead pacers could have been sharper. 'That's something we will reflect on when the tour is over, on things we could have done better,' Morne Morkel, India's bowling coach, had said after Day 4 of the final Test. It didn't matter to Siraj, who took it upon himself to win the final morning of the pulsating series. It is because of lion-hearted performances like his that India competed in every Test.
Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Gambhir, Agarkar to hand ultimatums after Gavaskar's fury; BCCI miffed over Bumrah situation: This culture must stop
If Mohammed Siraj's Herculean effort throughout the England tour achieved one thing, it was reportedly this — it empowered India head coach Gautam Gambhir and chief selector Ajit Agarkar to push for uniformity across formats and bring an end to the long-running narrative around workload management. Jasprit Bumrah, left, with head coach Gautam Gambhir at the Lord's Cricket Ground(PTI) According to a PTI report, Gambhir, Agarkar, and other top decision-makers within the BCCI want to clamp down on players picking and choosing matches or series under the pretext of managing workload. The report added that discussions have already taken place following the conclusion of the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy on Monday, and centrally-contracted players will soon be formally informed of the new directive. "There have been discussions and the message will be sent across to the centrally contracted players, especially those who are all format regulars that this culture of picking and choosing games won't be entertained in near future," a senior BCCI official privy to current happenings told PTI on conditions of anonymity. "It doesn't mean that workload management will be thrown out of the window but a more objective approach is expected in near future. Obviously, fast bowlers' workload needs to be managed but it can't be accepted that in the name of workload management, people will miss crucial matches." The report came after former India captain Sunil Gavaskar lashed out at the continued chatter around workload management as he highlighted Siraj's lion-hearted effort through the series against England. He was, in fact, among the only two fast bowlers to play in all the five matches, and only one from India, as he delivered 185.3 overs, picking 23 wickets - the most by any bowler on either side. "When you are playing for your country, forget the aches and the pains. On the border, do you think that the jawans are complaining about cold? What did Rishabh Pant show you? He came out to bat with a fracture. That is what you expect from the players. Playing cricket for India is an honour," Gavaskar told 'India Today'. "You are representing 140 crore people and that is what we saw in Mohammed Siraj. I think Siraj bowled his heart out, and he debunked forever this business of workload. For five Test matches, non-stop he has bowled 7-8 over spells, because the captain wanted him and the country expected of him," added the former skipper. "I hope that the word 'workload' goes out of the Indian cricket dictionary. I've been saying that for a long time... And I think that is the one thing that we all should keep in mind that this workload is only a mental thing, not so much a physical thing," he added. BCCI not happy with Bumrah situation Although Gavaskar clarified that he did not aim his comment at Jasprit Bumrah, who was benched for two of the matches, citing workload management, the PTI report added that Bumrah's not featuring in all the games against England "hasn't gone down too well with the powers that be in the BCCI." In fact, it further raised questions about the competence of the Sports science team working at the Centre of Excellence in Bengaluru. Bumrah suffered back spasms earlier this year during the Sydney Test against Australia and was hence out of action until mid-April. He did prove his fitness by playing in the IPL, after which he was picked for the Test series against England, but the selectors, after consulting the BCCI medical team, clarified that the 31-year-old would play just three games against England to manage his injury issue.
