Ethel Cain responds to backlash for past racist statements and allegations in full statement
The posts, mostly dating from 2017 to 2018, were circulated on Reddit and X (formerly Twitter), and appear to show the artist using racist language, promoting offensive humour, and referencing taboo topics.
Among the most serious claims are allegations that Cain, then 19, used the N-word and posted anti-Latino remarks like 'build that wall!' She was also seen in a photo wearing a shirt reading 'LEGALIZE INCEST' and has been accused of creating art interpreted by some as referencing child sexual abuse.
Other content included rape jokes, fat-shaming, and a post allegedly making light of sexual abuse involving animals.
Critics further allege that Cain knowingly signed to Dr. Luke's publishing company, Prescription Songs, despite public knowledge of his legal battle with Kesha.
A promotional poster for her 2022 album Preacher's Daughter also drew criticism for resembling a real missing child notice, with many calling it careless and offensive. Additionally, Cain has been accused of fetishising trauma and the female experience in her work—claims she strongly denies.
In a statement shared on July 9, Cain confirmed the posts were hers, saying, 'That was my account and they were my words.' She added, 'I am truly sorry from the bottom of my heart,' but insisted many of the more extreme allegations are the result of a 'targeted smear campaign.'
She said her actions as a teen were driven by a desire for attention and rebellion against her upbringing.
Cain also revealed that she had been raped at the time some of the content was created, and that some work was an attempt to process trauma.
Her new album Willoughby Tucker, I'll Always Love You is set to release August 8.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
FIA officers caught taking bribes
A major twist emerged in the Federal Investigation Agency's (FIA) probe into the illegal issuance of e-visas to Afghan nationals on Friday as two officials from the agency's Anti-Human Smuggling Cell - including a sub-inspector - have been caught allegedly soliciting bribes from suspects in custody. Taking serious notice of the matter, FIA Director General Raja Riffat Mukhtar ordered the arrest of both officials and constituted a four-member Joint Investigation Team (JIT) to conduct a thorough inquiry. The FIA's Anti-Human Smuggling Cell had earlier uncovered a large-scale scandal involving the illegal issuance of Pakistani e-visas to Afghan nationals. The racket was allegedly operating through fake sponsorships and with the connivance of officials from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Press Information Department (PID). Following the registration of a formal case, FIA arrested six individuals, including PID Information Assistant Nader Rahim and several Afghan nationals. However, during the investigation, DG FIA Raja Riffat Mukhtar received credible information that some FIA personnel involved in the investigation were allegedly colluding with the suspects and facilitating them in exchange for bribes. The DG immediately directed Director FIA Islamabad Zone, Shehzad Nadeem Bukhari, to initiate a discreet internal inquiry. According to the FIA spokesperson, the agency's Anti-Corruption Circle in Islamabad arrested Sub-Inspector Waseem Ahmed and Constable Aqib Mahmood from the Anti-Human Smuggling Cell on charges of corruption and bribery. The two officers were allegedly caught demanding a bribe of Rs2 million from Zubair Ahmed, one of the accused in custody in the e-visa case. The demand was made during his physical remand, in return for providing special treatment and ensuring he would be shifted to judicial custody instead of remaining under physical remand. A four-member JIT has now been constituted under the supervision of FIA Assistant Director Anti-Corruption, Nauman Khalil, to investigate the matter transparently and impartially. Other members of the team include Sub-Inspector Shams Khan, Sub-Inspector Shehryar, and Constable Mehdi. The JIT has commenced its inquiry by interrogating the two arrested FIA personnel. Authorities revealed that six individuals have so far been arrested in connection with the illegal Afghan e-visa case. The suspects include Abdul Aziz, Ahmad Sakhi, Atif Ahmed, Nader Rahim Abbasi (a PID official), Abrar Ahmed and Zubair Ahmed. Investigations suggest the gang operated by manipulating sponsorship documentation with support from insiders within government departments.
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Notices in military courts convictions issued
Fateh Khan, Fazal Ghaffar and Tajir Gul had been convicted of carrying our terror attacks in the country by military courts. CREATIVE: AAMIR KHAN A two-member bench of the Peshawar High Court (PHC), comprising Justice Sahibzada Asadullah and Justice Khurshid Iqbal, has issued notices to the relevant authorities in response to appeals filed by individuals convicted by military courts in connection with the May 9 riots. The appellants hail from Bannu, Chakdara, and Balambat in Lower Dir, and their legal counsel has challenged the legality and transparency of their convictions. The appeals, filed against the sentences handed down by military courts under the Field General Court Martial (FGCM), argue that the convicts were denied a fair trial and not provided with verdict copies or related legal documents. During the hearing, the appellants were represented by Barrister Amirullah Chamkani, who told the court that the convictions and subsequent prison terms – ranging from two to 10 years – were based on allegedly unlawful trials. According to Chamkani, his clients include Rahimullah, Izzat Gul, Naik Muhammad, Khalid Nawaz, Ikramullah, Ameenullah, Saqlain Haider, Khizar Hayat, and Afaq from Bannu, who were sentenced to 10 years each. Sohrab Khan and Asadullah Durrani from Balambat received two-year terms, while Rais Ahmad and another individual named Ikramullah from Chakdara were sentenced to four years. All were charged under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) for allegedly protesting against the arrest of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan and damaging state properties, including security installations and police stations. The lawyer noted that although similar charges were faced by other protestors, many of them were tried in anti-terrorism courts and were acquitted due to lack of evidence. In contrast, the current appellants were handed over to military courts without any explanation, raising serious concerns about selective prosecution and lack of due process. He emphasized that under Pakistan's Constitution, specifically Article 10-A, every citizen is entitled to a fair trial and access to necessary legal documentation, including a written copy of the verdict. However, the appellants were neither given formal charges nor informed of the exact nature of their alleged offenses. Chamkani argued that the appellants only became aware of their sentences after the statutory period for appeal had lapsed, effectively denying them their legal right to challenge the convictions in a timely manner. Moreover, he pointed out that none of the appellants were directly named in the original FIRs; their names were added at a later stage without any disclosed basis. Despite several efforts to obtain clarity from authorities and request documentation, their concerns have been met with silence, further undermining the legitimacy of the process. Citing a recent Supreme Court observation, the counsel stressed that while military trials of civilians were upheld, the apex court maintained that such convicts must have the right to appeal. Since no appeal forum currently exists for military court convictions, he asserted that the high court has jurisdiction to hear the matter. Concluding his argument, Chamkani requested the court to declare the military court convictions null and void and to direct that the cases be tried afresh in accordance with civil laws and constitutional guarantees. After hearing the preliminary arguments, the PHC issued notices to the Secretary of Defence, the Field General Court Martial, the federal government.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Hailey Welch reportedly sells X account after viral fame as Hawk Tuah Girl
Hailey Welch, widely known as the "Hawk Tuah Girl" after her viral rise to internet fame in 2024, is back in the spotlight—this time for reportedly selling her X (formerly Twitter) account. The page, once personal and linked to Welch, has now been rebranded as "Up Only Memes," with a new profile image and direction, catching the attention of her nearly 400,000 followers. Hawk Tuah aka Hailey Welch sold her X account allegedly. — DramaAlert (@DramaAlert) July 10, 2025 The sudden transformation raised questions, especially after two new tweets appeared on July 9. One was a playful reference to memes, while the other cryptically stated, 'What the helly,' alongside a screenshot of someone offering $325,000 to purchase an X account. It remains unclear whether these posts came from Welch as parting shots or from a new owner signaling a shift in content. Meanwhile, the account—which now boasts nearly 400,000 followers—shows only four tweets. Of those, two date back to Welch's time managing the page (July 27, 2024, and March 28, 2025), while the other two—posted on July 9—suggest a new and possibly chaotic direction. The disappearance of previous tweets has fueled theories and confusion among longtime fans. Gotta pay those legal bills somehow — The Brown Slimer (@Brownslimer) July 10, 2025 Social media users wasted no time reacting. Some joked that Welch might be 'paying legal bills,' while others saw it as either a smart business move or a digital stunt. 'She might be the best one-hit wonder of all time,' one user commented. Another called it, 'the greatest scam.' Whether this is a strategic exit, a brand pivot, or something else entirely, Welch's digital footprint continues to spark viral interest and online debate—proving once again that internet fame rarely fades quietly.
