logo
Top tips for dealing with toxic in-laws, according to a psychotherapist

Top tips for dealing with toxic in-laws, according to a psychotherapist

Telegraph12 hours ago

Dr Sheri Jacobson has a PhD in counselling and psychotherapy, and a degree in cognitive behavioural therapy. She worked for many years as a senior therapist with the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy, as well as for MIND, MENCAP, a women's centre and the NHS. She is the founder of Harley Therapy.
It's rare to find a family without at least some conflict between first-degree relatives. Imagine, then, the whole extra layer that can come with in-laws. We haven't known these people since childhood, and aren't as acclimatised to their ways. Getting used to this can take time.
The gaining of an in-law represents a significant shift in the dynamics of your family. But while people often dwell on the difficulties that arrive with their in-laws, it's important first to note the positives in your by-marriage relationships.
Your in-laws can give you social, practical and financial support. They're often sounding boards, or can help you with the day-to-day challenges of getting older. In-laws often increase the diversity of the types of personalities in your circle. Plus, this wider family often shares important experiences: celebrating joyful occasions, such as weddings and graduations, and offering support in times of bereavement.
That said, there can often be tensions and difficulties involving hierarchy and power structures. People are often used to interacting in specific ways with certain dynamics at play, and it can take time to recalibrate to a new family set-up. Our loyalties and allegiances often realign – for example, if a close sibling gets married, that can lead to feelings of envy towards their new spouse if they aren't confiding in us as much.
Families have different styles. On top of this, every individual brings into the mix their own underlying patterns of behaviour shaped by their unique past experiences. These can sometimes manifest in less desirable behaviours, such attention-seeking, wilfulness, manipulation or sulking.
Whatever the reason for conflict, the same principles and values apply. Always try to start with compassion and empathy: aiming to understand, as opposed to being judgemental. This is the best way to de-escalate a situation, so it becomes less threatening to everyone.
Here are four common in-law scenarios, and how to defuse them.
The possessive mother-in-law
'I know him better than you'; 'he doesn't like it when you do things that way' – a mother-in-law's possessiveness is often driven by an underlying anxiety. Perhaps she senses her adult child is being 'taken away', and she still wants to be included.
A mother might behave in a controlling way or use 'guilt-tripping' in order to remain relevant and central to her child's life.
In all in-law relationships, there's the possibility of divided loyalties – that the wife is 'against' the mother, or vice versa. There's no right way to deal with this. Some people prefer to speak directly to their in-laws, and others prefer to enlist support from outside.
The most important thing is for the couple to safeguard their own relationship – to discuss and air their views about this problem in non-belligerent ways. An opening comment such as: 'When your mother criticises my cooking, I feel undermined' might be helpful, and then take it from there. The key here is to explain how you are feeling, and open a discussion.
If, as is often the case, your mother-in-law's behaviour is driven by anxiety, the best way to counter this is to make her feel included (while also making sure she doesn't take over). For example, if it's your anniversary dinner, and she tries to invite herself, say something like: 'We'd love you to be there, but tonight is just for the two of us. Let's do something separate next week.'
The self-indulgent daughter-in-law
Start by putting yourself in your daughter-in-law's place, to try and understand the root of why she's behaving like this. Perhaps she's trying to assert her independence, or establish a position within a new family hierarchy. Or maybe a memory of her earlier experiences is being played out: it could be that she was neglected when she was younger, or quite the opposite – she's used to being the centre of attention.
Either way, it's difficult to cope with a daughter-in-law when she's demanding, 'drive me here', or 'I need this, now', especially if this squeezes out the preferences of other people. Your son's self-involved wife might also disengage, appear aloof or prioritise her own family over yours, which can lead to a lot of upset and sullen family dinners.
This is a hard situation to manage and it's important to be sensitive. Family ruptures can happen easily. Though it has to be said that, in some contexts, the cycle of rupture and repair – heated arguments followed by making up – is not uncommon.
Communication is nearly always a good idea, but be careful not to accuse your daughter-in-law of anything directly. Instead of: 'You always cancel when I plan a dinner, but you never cancel on your own family – that's not fair,' consider saying: 'I feel sad when you don't come to our dinners, as family time is special to us. Is there something about our gatherings that makes you feel unwelcome?'
If you'd rather avoid such disclosures, or feel that this type of communication won't lead anywhere, my advice would be to work on acceptance of the situation. Realise that it might never really change.
Some people maintain some distance to protect themselves from emotional strain. The alternative is to lower your expectations – appreciating that your daughter-in-law's behaviour might be linked to her past experiences rather than being personal. Sometimes, it can help to vent to a third party, such as a close friend or a therapist, who can hear you out and support you to better manage the situation.
The controlling son-in-law
This can cover a wide spectrum from, 'let me drive' to a partner who takes total economic control, or restricts his wife from having a social life of her own.
In a milder scenario, this may manifest with your son-in-law by arguing with your child's opinions, or by being dismissive of them. Various things can drive this sort of behaviour, including a perceived threat to the man's authority, or uncertainty of his place in the family hierarchy.
In certain cultures, the 'husband in charge' scenario is more accepted, and this can be harder to question or challenge.
Whatever the cause, it can be important to keep an eye on a bossy son-in law, as in its most serious form, damaging control can escalate. 'Let's not see your family today' can swiftly become: 'I'm better with money than you are, let me look after the account.'
As a parent, it's important to look out for signs of overly domineering and manipulative behaviour. If you find that your daughter seems unrecognisable from her usual self, or she seems nervous, silent or on edge, you may want to intervene. This is a difficult situation, as you may see a problem and your child may not, and attempting to point it out could push her further away.
Bring up the problem gently: don't accuse or point fingers. Say something like: 'I know you are devoted to your husband, but I'm concerned in seeing some of the ways he is with you. I care about you greatly, and I'm here for you regardless. Whenever you are ready, I would like to help.'
If your son-in-law becomes menacing or abusive – whether violently or otherwise – seek support from the relevant professional services.
The inappropriate father-in-law
Whether the inappropriate behaviour is aimed at you personally – or in a more general sense – there are ways of dealing with it. It's not uncommon for older relatives to have 'blind spots', owing to the generation in which they grew up – they just don't see the world in the same way as you do. If your partner's father is being racist or lascivious to the people around you, a comment such as: 'Remember, we don't use those sorts of comments today' might help, delivered in an approachable tone.
If you are feeling personally targeted, then it's important to set boundaries. Say to your father-in-law: 'I know you mean well, but it's not OK to comment on my low-cut dress.' Or, 'I don't like it when you come up and hug me – I hope you understand.' It's also important to let your partner know you feel a bit nervous around his dad.
All of this can be hard to do. But you aren't only looking after yourself: you are also prioritising safety for younger family members, and guarding them from inappropriate sexual or pejorative comments. Reshaped families can add much to our lives, and all the more so when we consider the feelings of every single member.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I'm growing tired of three-year-affair with my lover… our sex is awesome but he's still with his wife
I'm growing tired of three-year-affair with my lover… our sex is awesome but he's still with his wife

The Sun

time25 minutes ago

  • The Sun

I'm growing tired of three-year-affair with my lover… our sex is awesome but he's still with his wife

DEAR DEIDRE: MY lover visits me every ­Thursday or Friday, late afternoon. We have sex and then he carries on his merry way back to his wife. He tells me he loves me and sounds genuine but after three years, I am starting to tire of this arrangement. I am 39 and he is 45. He has been married for 18 years but says that, despite the fact he and his wife are no more than friends, he would feel too guilty to leave her. He is an HGV driver and regularly stops in the lorry park where I have a mobile burger van. We used to swap banter while he stopped to eat and one time he suggested we go for a drink. There was a pub just up the road, so we went there. The next time we met up he came back to my flat. We discovered that we are compatible when it comes to sex and instantly gelled. No matter what his working week is like, he always makes sure he calls at my flat before he returns to his wife for the weekend. The sex is awesome; he is a thoughtful lover. I convince myself things will work out with him in the end. However, I have been waiting for him to sort his life out for almost three years now. He promises me we will be together soon and that we can have a fantastic life, but it is just words because nothing changes. He hates it when I tell him my plans for the weekend. He doesn't like me going out with my friends even though he admits that he has got no right to expect me to live like a hermit. Is it time to end things even though I know how much it will hurt me to do so? DEIDRE SAYS: Your lover's marriage might be one of friendship, but he shows no signs of leaving his wife for you, despite his promises. Tell him to focus on his marriage and work out what he wants. Perhaps give him a deadline and don't spend your entire life waiting around for him now. You can find someone to love you who is free to be with you – it's really what you deserve. But first you must end this affair. It will be tough, but you have no future together. Improve your social life, get out there and meet men who are free. My support pack Your Lover Not Free explains more. MY ROTTEN TEETH ARE A TURNOFF DEAR DEIDRE: MY horrible teet h are scaring women away. I rarely get a second date even though I have no trouble meeting women through dating apps. I am a 36-year-old man. I go to the gym to keep myself toned. I'm not that bad looking until I open my mouth. It is so awful. I have a couple of chipped and broken teeth and some of them are discoloured and misaligned too. I will chat to women and get on well with them while we message but when we meet up, I can tell immediately that the spark isn't there for them. I am terrified of the dentist but can't carry on like this because I am totally miserable. I am ashamed and embarrassed to let anyone look in my mouth. It has gone on so long and my teeth are getting worse. I'm so ashamed and embarrassed. It really is soul-destroying. There is no need for you to suffer a minute longer. Dentists are trained to be sympathetic, not to judge you. It is important you seek professional help because this issue will only get worse. Take a look at Dental Phobia ( who have a guide Overcoming Dental Fear you can download. Think ahead and imagine how relieved you will feel when you have got the treatment you desperately need and can start to date with confidence. DEAR DEIDRE: I AM desperate to have a baby after waiting years for my husband to say he is ready for us to start a family. I am 34 and my husband is 35. We've been married for five years. A year into our marriage he agreed to try, but then when I discussed coming off The Pill with him he said to leave it a month or two. He admitted he wasn't 'quite ready'. I agreed to not mention it again for a while, but I don't understand what he is waiting for. Now a couple of years have gone by, and I am still waiting. We own a house together, our jobs are secure, and our relationship is good. I thought it would be the perfect time. My husband loves children and is brilliant with his nieces and nephews. I don't want to have a baby unless my husband wants it, too. I am trying to be understanding but my resentment is starting to drive a wedge between us. Why doesn't he want to start a family with me? DEIDRE SAYS: You are going to have to bring it up again in a calm moment because your husband is unlikely to. His attitude towards starting a family could be tied up with difficult experiences. Perhaps he had problems with his own dad and is scared that history will repeat itself? If you both want a family, it is time to start talking honestly but if he is adamant about never having children then I'm afraid you may have a difficult decision to make. HIS MUM WON'T GIVE US SPACE DEAR DEIDRE: IT appears my boyfriend's mum will always be the main woman in his life. She is like the third wheel in my relationship. I am 27 and my boyfriend is 29. We have been together for almost two years. My boyfriend was brought up by his mum after his dad died when he was only ten. As a result, he and his mum are very close, which I completely understand. However, if we go out anywhere, to the cinema, bowling alley, dinner or just for a drink, my boyfriend always calls his mum to say where we are going. It is infuriating. It has got to the stage that if we go out for the day, a trip to the seaside or an adventure park, his mum comes along too. We have just bought our first flat, which needs a lot of work so there is plenty for us to do. His mum calls every weekend to say she has some DIY she needs help with, or something has gone wrong with her car, knowing that my boyfriend will drop everything to help her. Sometimes he can be gone for the rest of the day. Recently I picked her up late from the hairdressers. She told my boyfriend that I drove too fast and almost caused an accident, which was untrue. My boyfriend went ballistic saying I had stressed her out. I am starting to feel that we are at a breaking point in our relationship. He formed a deep emotional connection with his mum, which has resulted in his loyalty towards her. You really must talk to him. Tell him that he must start putting your relationship first and then, put some boundaries in place with his mum, so he can be his own man. I would also encourage him to talk to a Cruse bereavement counsellor, which will help him deal with his dad's death too ( 0808 808 1677).

Famous UK tourist attraction almost had its massive penis COVERED up after complaint that it ‘offended Christian values'
Famous UK tourist attraction almost had its massive penis COVERED up after complaint that it ‘offended Christian values'

The Sun

time25 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Famous UK tourist attraction almost had its massive penis COVERED up after complaint that it ‘offended Christian values'

THE Home Office once suggested covering up the Cerne Abbas Giant's manhood with shrubbery. It came after a prudish member of the public complained that the 35ft chalk penis was an 'obscenity that offended Christian values'. The whiner claimed that two bishops and other religious leaders supported his view — and it forced the Home Office to raise the 'serious charge of indecency against a prehistoric monument' with the National Trust. But Cecil Yates, an official at the Home Office, added in a letter in 1932: 'What does the complainant want us to do? 'Plant a small grove of fig trees in a strategic position?' And in an official response to the moaning prude — a man called Walter Long, he said: 'The Secretary of State regrets that he cannot see his way to take any action in the matter.' The 180ft Giant — a bald, naked man with an erection and carrying a club — is etched in chalk on a hillside in Cerne Abbas, Dorset. It was created by the Anglo-Saxons in the 8th century as a tribute to god of health Helith. Mr Long's pre-war complaint was uncovered by writer and local historian Karen Heaney as she carried out research for a new book on the landmark. Karen, 64, of Netherbury, said: 'It made me smile to think the Giant was controversial even back then. "The Home Office official wasn't sure what they were expected to do about it.' In 2023, The Oxford Cheese Company caused upset by branding a vintage cheddar range with the Giant — but ­covering his appendage.

Brian Bond obituary: pioneering academic at war studies school
Brian Bond obituary: pioneering academic at war studies school

Times

time2 hours ago

  • Times

Brian Bond obituary: pioneering academic at war studies school

English and geography once struggled to gain acceptance as degree subjects but war studies struggled longer. In 1966 Brian Bond joined the newly formed department at King's College London (KCL) as a lecturer, giving up his more 'respectable' post in the history department at Liverpool. A department of military science had existed at KCL since the college's early years in the 19th century but it was not until 1962 that a separate, permanent department was established for the study of war and its impact on the world. Sir Michael Howard (obituary, December 2, 2019) was its founder and, thanks in the main to his support, Bond would go on to become reader and then professor of military history, writing numerous books and papers specialising in the late 19th century and the two world wars. He was first encouraged in the subject by no less a figure than Sir Basil Liddell Hart, the former Great War soldier, interwar strategist and apostle of 'the indirect approach', although perhaps studied more in Nazi Germany than in Britain. While reading history at Worcester College, Oxford, in the late 1950s, Bond met Liddell Hart at home in Buckinghamshire, where the latter had recently settled and Bond's father had become his gardener. At Oxford, Bond had elected to take the special subject paper on Napoleonic military history taught by Norman Gibbs, Chichele professor of the history of war. Liddell Hart, impressed by his gardener's son's scholarship, gave him access to his library and private papers and introduced him to visiting prominenti including Howard, who encouraged him to take an MA in war studies. This he completed in 1962 while lecturing at Exeter and then Liverpool. Brian James Bond was born in Marlow, Buckinghamshire, in 1936 to Edward Bond and Olive (née Sartin). He was an early beneficiary of the 1944 (Butler) Education Act, gaining a free place at Sir William Borlase's Grammar School in 1947. Leaving school in 1954 he elected to do his two years' National Service first, rather than deferring it to take up his place at Oxford, and was commissioned into the Royal Artillery. Although hardly the same as Howard's decorated active service in Italy with the Coldstream Guards, it did at least give him an insider's understanding of military culture and some credibility with serving officers looking to KCL for professional development. In 1962 he married Madeleine Joyce Carr. She died in 2023. They had no children. Bond's first book, as the editor of Victorian Military Campaigns, with each campaign written by a different historian, including Sir John Keegan, was published in 1967. Next came a serious study of the Victorian army and the staff college before two books on the Second World War and a highly regarded study of British military policy between the wars. He was disappointed not to be Liddell Hart's official biographer, the job going instead to one of his former doctoral students. Evidently Liddell Hart's widow, Kathleen, had wrongly believed that Bond had said that her husband had been a fascist. To an extent, honour was satisfied when, with the diplomatic intervention of Howard, he was allowed to write an interim study of Liddell Hart's ideas, but not touching on his life as a whole: Liddell Hart: a Study of His Military Thought (1977). Unfortunately, two reviews focused not on the book but on Liddell Hart himself — and disobligingly — which further upset his widow. Bond then turned, as eventually all British military historians must, to the First World War and in particular to the Western Front, which meant Field Marshal Haig. Undoubtedly the pendulum had swung beyond all balance with the publication in 1961 of Alan Clark's The Donkeys, a book that Howard dismissed as being almost entirely worthless. Some rebalancing was needed but Bond's revisionism was considered by many to be almost as unbalanced as Clark's diatribe. It was ironic, too, that Bond's revisionism disputed Liddell Hart's own assessment of the British high command in the First World War. One review of Haig: A Reappraisal said that Bond wrote with blinkers on: '[His] Haigiography testifies to the power of British patriotism and loyalty into which, as a British general, Haig tapped. Bond's defence of Haig's asininity horsed cavalry convictions is only exceeded by defence of Haig when he was faced by the evidence that his major push into the Somme had failed.' A later book, The Unquiet Western Front: Britain's Role in Literature and History (2002), which tried to unpick the myth, as he saw it, from the 'reality', brought a sharp retort from the other side of the Atlantic that Bond was trying to 'set up traditional military history in the mansion while relegating art to the little shed out back'. Disappointed not to have become head of the war studies department, Bond knew that his strength lay principally in teaching, which he did at KCL for 35 years. He was also a visiting professor at the University of Western Ontario, visiting lecturer at the US Naval War College, visiting fellow at Brasenose and briefly at All Souls colleges, Oxford, and for 20 years was president of the British Commission for Military History. In 2001 he retired to Buckinghamshire to watch cricket, a lifelong passion, to tend his garden and to visit country houses. He was, too, a strong supporter of wildlife conservation, especially of foxes, not a species usually thought to require protection, unlike Field Marshal Haig. Brian Bond, pioneering war studies academic, was born on April 17, 1936. He died on June 2, 2025, aged 89

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store