
U.K.-U.S trade deal cutting tariffs on cars, beef, ethanol goes live
A British-American trade deal meaning the vast majority of British car exports to the United States will be subject to a preferential 10% tariff rate, compared with 27.5% for all other countries, came into effect Monday. File Photo by Phil McCarten/UPI | License Photo
June 30 (UPI) -- A tariff-busting trade deal between Britain and the United States came into force Monday, slashing U.S. tariffs on imports of British cars, including Jaguar, Range Rover, Aston Martin and Mini by 17.5% to 10% and eliminating a 10% tariff on aerospace sales such as jet engines and aircraft parts.
The Department of Business and Trade said in a news release that the "landmark" deal would protect significant numbers of British jobs and save two key industries hundreds of millions of dollars a year lost from higher prices to U.S. customers and stressed that Britain was the only country to have secured this deal with the United States.
It said the auto industry employed hundreds of thousands of people, while removing the 10% tariff on imports of aero engines and aircraft parts would make companies in the sector, including Rolls Royce, a major global manufacturer of jet engines, more competitive and enable them to keep driving technological advances.
The deal on cars is subject to a 100,000-unit annual quota, roughly equivalent to all vehicles sold to the United States in 2024, which were worth $12.4 billion with an average price of $121,000, according to Office for National Statistics figures.
In return, Britain will axe tariffs of 20% and 19% on imports of U.S. beef and ethanol and hike the tariff-free quota to 13,000 tons and 370 million gallons a year, respectively.
Hailing the so-called Economic Prosperity agreement, which was finalized with U.S. President Donald Trump two weeks ago on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the deal would benefit critical British industries.
"Our historic trade deal with the United States delivers for British businesses and protects U.K. jobs. From today, our world-class automotive and aerospace industries will see tariffs slashed, safeguarding key industries that are vital to our economy," he said.
"We will always act in the national interest -- backing British businesses and workers, delivering on our Plan for Change."
Britain was the first country to negotiate a deal after Trump announced what he said were reciprocal tariffs on the United States' trading partners on April 2, as high as 49%. Britain escaped with a baseline 10% goods tariff, the lowest of any major trade partner.
U.K. steel and aluminum exports to the United States were slapped with a 25% tariff, in line with all other countries, when Trump unveiled the new import duties in March -- which he said were aimed at reviving domestic production -- but received a interim exemption from a doubling to 50% imposed Trump on June 4.
The Business and Trade Department insisted negotiations to permanently remove the entire tariff were on track despite the waiver expiration date fast approaching in just over a week on July 9, saying Starmer and Trumo "again confirmed, we will continue go further and make progress towards 0% tariffs on core steel products as agreed."
Sheffield-based Marecgaglia told the BBC that even the initial 25% was making selling to the United States a "lot tougher," and that the potential hike to 50% would be a "massive headache."
The company's stainless steel products are made in the United States, but the materials such as rods and bars are shipped from the U.K.
"The lead times to get it to the plant are longer than the nine days left for the negotiations. That means I would be shipping something -- and a ship will probably have around $4.1 to $5.5 million of product on it -- and I don't know will I be paying $2.1 million duty on it or zero? said managing director Liam Bates.
"So it gives us an extremely hard decision to make as to how we can continue production in the US," he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
5 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Nations decry Iranian threat against IAEA general director
June 30 (UPI) -- Member nations of the International Atomic Energy Agency called out Iran Monday for threats made against Rafael Grossi, the organization's top official. "Any undermining, sanctioning or even threat against the director general personally or his staff are completely unacceptable," posted Austria's Chancellor Christian Stocker to X Monday. The French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs released a statement Monday that it "strongly condemns the threats against the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency." The French statement was further echoed by a joint press release from France, Germany and the United Kingdom that condemned "threats against the Director General of the IAEA Rafael Grossi." Iran's ambassador to the United Nations Amir Saeid Iravani spoke Sunday on the CBS News program "Face The Nation" and said that there was no threat made to Grossi, despite an article that ran last week in Iran's ultra-conservative Kayhan newspaper that alleged Grossi to be a spy for Israel, and that "as soon as he enters Iran, he will be tried and executed for spying for Mossad and participating in the murder of the oppressed people of our country." U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubiohad responded Saturday on X that "calls in Iran for the arrest and execution of IAEA Director General Grossi are unacceptable and should be condemned." Iravani however, when asked by CBS if he condemned calls for Grossi to be executed, replied "Yeah." He also explained that IAEA inspectors already in Iran are safe but are not being permitted to inspect nuclear sites there. "It is our assessment is that they have not done their jobs," Iravani said, and implied the IAEA "failed" in regard to the attacks made by Israel and United States on Iranian nuclear facilities. In the joint statement made by Britain, France and Germany, the countries called on "Iranian authorities to refrain from any steps to cease cooperation with the IAEA." "We urge Iran to immediately resume full cooperation in line with its legally binding obligations, and to take all necessary steps to ensure the safety and security of IAEA personnel," the statement continued. "The organization's work is now more important than ever and must urgently be continued," said Stocker in the same X post he made Monday. The IAEA had announced in a press release Friday that radiation levels in the Gulf region had remained normal following the attacks on Iran's Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant and the Tehran Research Reactor. Grossi explained in the release that the attacks "could have caused a radiological accident with potential consequences in Iran as well as beyond its borders." "It did not happen, and the worst nuclear safety scenario was thereby avoided," Grossi said., Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.


Miami Herald
5 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
US Military Issues Update on China's Rocket Force Threat
The Chinese Rocket Force's increasingly capable missile fleet is a growing threat to U.S. bases and security partners in the Asia-Pacific, top Pentagon officials told lawmakers. Newsweek reached out to the Chinese Foreign Ministry via email for comment outside of office hours. The People's Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF) is responsible for China's missile and nuclear arsenal and is a key component of Beijing's efforts to surpass Washington as the region's leading military power. In some areas, the Rocket Force's capabilities have already surpassed those of the United States, such as with its so-called "carrier killer" hypersonic missiles. While these weapons remain untested in combat, they could potentially keep American forces at bay in a wartime scenario. "The PLA's Rocket Force (PLARF) is advancing its long-term modernization plans to enhance its strategic deterrence capabilities," read a written testimony by U.S. Air Force and Space Force leadership prepared for a Senate Appropriations Committee budget hearing. China's missile arsenal is estimated to include 400 ground-launched cruise missiles capable of reaching anywhere within the so-called First Island Chain, a stretch of islands from Japan to Indonesia that Washington considers crucial for containing China's navy in the event of a conflict, such as one over Beijing-claimed Taiwan. China is also believed to field 1,300 intermediate-range ballistic missiles that can strike targets even further afield, threatening the Second Island Chain, which includes U.S. military bases in Guam. Another 500 medium-range missiles put parts of Alaska and U.S.-allied Australia within range, while 900 short-range ballistic missiles could easily cross the narrow Taiwan Strait to strike the self-ruled democracy. The Rocket Force's arsenal also includes 400 intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear warheads anywhere in the world. China's advances in hypersonic missile technology—difficult-to-intercept missiles that travel at over five times the speed of sound—remain a major concern for the Pentagon. In particular, the Dong Feng-17 hypersonic missile may increasingly replace older missile systems and could target foreign bases and naval assets in the Western Pacific, the officials said. Though China still lags far behind the U.S. and Russia in warhead count, the country has rapidly expanded its nuclear forces in recent years, a buildup analysts attribute to President Xi Jinping's emphasis on nuclear deterrence against the U.S. The Department of Defense estimates China surpassed the 600-warhead mark last year and is on track to field over 1,000 operational warheads in the coming years, according to the statement. Beyond missile systems, officials also discussed "kill webs," or networks of sensors, satellites, and weapons that detect threats, share data, and coordinate military responses across air, land, sea, and space. General Chance Saltzman, U.S. Space Force chief of space operations, during the hearing: "My biggest concern is that the kill web, as we call it, that the PRC [People's Republic of China] has put in place allows them to track and target at great range the rest of the joint force in all the other domains. "They've put a very capable ISR [intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance] web together on orbit, and if we're going to protect the joint force, we have to be able to mitigate the effects that they're generating by that constellation. General David Allvin, U.S. Air Force chief of staff: "The PRC is rapidly modernizing its military with the clear intent to reshape the international order—to include nuclear breakout that includes unmatched deterrence capabilities." Citing "unprecedented threats to our homeland," Allvin outlined three top priorities for the service: to defend the homeland by detecting, tracking, and defeating threats; to provide a reliable, safe, and effective nuclear deterrent; and to project power globally—either independently or as part of a joint force. The Pentagon has requested $961.6 billion for its 2026 defense budget—an amount that, supporters note, is roughly half the proportion of the U.S.'s GDP that defense spending consumed during the height of the Cold War. Related Articles China Reveals Fighter Jets Expelled Foreign Military AircraftWho Will Be Next Dalai Lama? Tibetan Leader Set To Detail SuccessionChina's Rival Receives Anti-Ship Boost From USChina Research Ship Spotted on NATO's Doorstep 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.


Forbes
8 minutes ago
- Forbes
NATO Launches Global Arms Race As Defense Spending Set To Explode
Unidentified NATO soldiers Readers of a certain age will recall President Ronald Reagan launching one of the most ambitious military buildups in American history. In a bid to overwhelm the Soviet Union, Reagan doubled the U.S. military's budget from under $150 billion in 1980 to over $300 billion by 1985. The government invested heavily in B-1 bombers, MX missiles and an expanded Navy fleet. The Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), dubbed 'Star Wars' by critics, aimed to create a space-based missile defense system. The 40th president believed that peace could only be achieved through strength, and history proved him right. The Americans outspent and out-innovated the Soviets… and ultimately outlasted them. NATO Agrees to Increase Defense Spending Today, we're seeing Regan's strategy play out on the international stage. At the NATO summit in The Hague last week, the 32-member alliance agreed to boost defense spending to 5% of GDP by 2035, with a floor of 3.5% earmarked for 'core military needs.' That's more than double the previous 2% target set back in 2014. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte credited President Donald Trump with pushing allies to commit to a higher spending level. 'This would not have happened' without Trump, Rutte said. Trump echoed Reagan's 'peace through strength' energy in his own remarks: 'It's vital that this additional money be spent on very serious military hardware... and hopefully that hardware is going to be made in America because we have the best hardware in the world.' Growing Number of Conflicts Across the Globe It's not difficult to see why this spending spree is happening now. The world is getting more dangerous. According to the 2025 Global Peace Index, there are 59 active state-based conflicts globally, the highest number since World War II. Number of state-based conflicts is now higher than at any point since WWII Ranked as this year's least peaceful country, Russia remains an active military threat, with its war in Ukraine extending into a third year and showing few signs of resolution. China is executing a 'massive' military expansion, according to NATO, including advanced missile systems and naval expansion in the South China Sea. And as you know, Iran recently retaliated against U.S. airstrikes with missile attacks on Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, raising tensions in the Middle East. NATO Allies Moving Fast Some NATO countries aren't waiting until 2035 to act. Poland is already spending over 4% of its GDP on defense, the highest rate among all other and bottom five military spenders in NATO Germany has pledged to reach 3.5% by 2029, even changing its constitutional debt rules to make it possible. The UK just ordered a dozen nuclear-capable F-35A fighter jets, marking its biggest nuclear deterrent upgrade since the Cold War. Here in the U.S., President Trump has proposed an $893 billion defense budget for 2026 that favors drones and smart missiles, while reducing some legacy investments such as warships and fighter jets. He appears to be focused on high-tech, cost-effective equipment, modeled in part after Ukraine's recent successes with drones on the battlefield. Defense a 'Dynamic Growth Industry'? Defense has long been considered a 'value sector'—slow and steady, backed by government contracts. That narrative could be changing. According to analysts at Stifel, we're entering a new cycle where defense is a 'dynamic growth industry.' We're now in an arms race driven not just by tanks and jets, but also AI, cyber, space and next-gen missiles. Consider that U.S. defense budgets remain near record highs. Defense spending in Europe rose 17% year-over-year to $693 billion in 2024, before the new 5% NATO target became a reality. Despite this, Europe is still overly reliant on American hardware and production capacity, according to findings by the Kiel Institute. That, too, could spell opportunity. American defense companies—especially those focused on drones, missile systems, cybersecurity and space-based tech—stand to benefit the most from this multi-decade rearmament cycle. For investors, I believe this marks the beginning of a long-term secular shift.