Trump's Mega-Bill: Key Claims Under Scrutiny as Critics Raise Economic Concerns
The bill is being positioned by the White House as a boost to economic growth and a safeguard against tax hikes, but independent experts warn it could significantly widen the national deficit, cut healthcare coverage, and shift tax benefits toward the wealthy.
📉 Will the Bill Cut or Expand the Deficit?
While the administration claims the legislation will reduce the national deficit by over $2 trillion, multiple independent analyses project the opposite. Estimates from official sources forecast the bill could add over $3.3 trillion to the deficit in the next decade.
The projected rise is primarily attributed to the bill's deep tax cuts, which are expected to outweigh proposed spending cuts. Analysts suggest that although there may be a short-term economic uplift, long-term effects could include higher national debt, rising interest rates, and reduced investment in critical sectors.
🏥 Impact on Medicaid: Deep Cuts Expected
Despite assurances from President Trump that Medicaid 'is left the same,' independent health policy groups estimate up to $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts over the next ten years.
These changes would likely affect millions of low-income Americans who depend on Medicaid for healthcare services. Official projections indicate nearly 12 million people could lose coverage by 2034, though the administration argues some of these would be individuals without legal status.
💰 Taxes: Who Gains and Who Pays More?
A major talking point for the administration has been the claim that the bill prevents a 68% tax hike. However, experts note that the actual average increase, if previous tax cuts expire without renewal, would be closer to 7.5%.
The legislation aims to extend and expand tax cuts first introduced in 2017. Yet, studies show the majority of benefits would go to higher-income earners, with over 60% of the tax relief going to individuals earning above $217,000 annually.
Critics argue the bill promotes an upward redistribution of wealth at the expense of lower-income Americans.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Tribune
6 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Trump's Mega-Bill: Key Claims Under Scrutiny as Critics Raise Economic Concerns
President Donald Trump's flagship legislative package—dubbed the 'big beautiful bill'—has ignited intense debate across party lines, with Democrats and even some Republicans raising concerns over its financial implications, tax impacts, and proposed welfare changes. The bill is being positioned by the White House as a boost to economic growth and a safeguard against tax hikes, but independent experts warn it could significantly widen the national deficit, cut healthcare coverage, and shift tax benefits toward the wealthy. 📉 Will the Bill Cut or Expand the Deficit? While the administration claims the legislation will reduce the national deficit by over $2 trillion, multiple independent analyses project the opposite. Estimates from official sources forecast the bill could add over $3.3 trillion to the deficit in the next decade. The projected rise is primarily attributed to the bill's deep tax cuts, which are expected to outweigh proposed spending cuts. Analysts suggest that although there may be a short-term economic uplift, long-term effects could include higher national debt, rising interest rates, and reduced investment in critical sectors. 🏥 Impact on Medicaid: Deep Cuts Expected Despite assurances from President Trump that Medicaid 'is left the same,' independent health policy groups estimate up to $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts over the next ten years. These changes would likely affect millions of low-income Americans who depend on Medicaid for healthcare services. Official projections indicate nearly 12 million people could lose coverage by 2034, though the administration argues some of these would be individuals without legal status. 💰 Taxes: Who Gains and Who Pays More? A major talking point for the administration has been the claim that the bill prevents a 68% tax hike. However, experts note that the actual average increase, if previous tax cuts expire without renewal, would be closer to 7.5%. The legislation aims to extend and expand tax cuts first introduced in 2017. Yet, studies show the majority of benefits would go to higher-income earners, with over 60% of the tax relief going to individuals earning above $217,000 annually. Critics argue the bill promotes an upward redistribution of wealth at the expense of lower-income Americans.
Daily Tribune
10 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Gaza civil defence says Israel strikes displacement shelter
Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli forces killed at least 25 people on Thursday, including 12 in a strike on a school sheltering Palestinians displaced by the war nearing its 22nd month. Israel has recently expanded its military operations in the Gaza Strip, where its war on Hamas militants has created dire humanitarian conditions and displaced nearly all of the territory's population of more than two million. Many have sought shelter in school buildings, but these have repeatedly come under Israeli attacks that the military often says target Hamas militants hiding among civilians. In Gaza City on Thursday, civil defence official Mohammad al-Mughayyir told AFP that 12 people, "the majority of them children and women", were killed and several others wounded in an Israeli air strike on a school-turned-shelter, which the Israeli military did not confirm. Pressure has risen for a ceasefire to allow sorely needed humanitarian aid into Gaza at scale and permit the release of hostages seized by Palestinian militants during Hamas's October 2023 attack that sparked the war. US President Donald Trump earlier this week declared a new ceasefire push, aiming for an initial 60-day truce, which he said had Israel's backing. But Israel's leaders held firm to their objective of crushing Hamas, even as the group said Tuesday it was discussing new proposals for a ceasefire from mediators.
Gulf Insider
19 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
Iran Reportedly Made Plans To Litter Strait Of Hormuz
The U.S. launched 'Operation Midnight Hammer' on June 22, deploying stealth bombers to strike Iran's nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan using Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs. President Trump declared the sites were 'totally obliterated.' In retaliation, Iran's parliament voted to authorize the closure of the Strait of Hormuz—a critical maritime chokepoint through which 20% of the world's oil flows—sparking renewed anxiety among global energy traders over the threat to vital tanker lanes. As readers understand, any move by Iran to close the critical waterway would instantly disrupt nearly one-fifth of the world's oil shipments and trigger substantial—and potentially cascading—economic harm (energy inflation) worldwide. However, those threats ultimately fell short in the days that followed, and Brent crude futures have since returned to the $67-a-barrel level, effectively roundtripping the entire move. Iran has several military and asymmetric tools at its disposal to disrupt or close the Strait of Hormuz, including: Naval Mines Fast Attack Boats & Swarm Tactics Anti-Ship Missiles Submarine Operations Seizing or Boarding Tankers Shore-Based Artillery or Rocket Attacks or Drone Strikes GPS Scrambling Cyberattacks on Port Infrastructure Coordinated Proxy Attacks In the lead-up to and during Operation Midnight Hammer, widespread GPS interference was reported across the Strait of Hormuz. Multiple sources we highlighted indicated a noticeable slowdown in tanker traffic, as navigation systems were degraded and insurance premiums for vessels surged. A new Reuters report, citing anonymous U.S. officials, reveals that intelligence indicated Tehran was preparing to blockade the Strait of Hormuz using one of its most effective and low-cost tactics: littering the narrow shipping corridor with naval mines. More color on the report: The previously unreported preparations, which were detected by U.S. intelligence, occurred some time after Israel launched its initial missile attack against Iran on June 13, said the officials, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence matters. The loading of the mines – which have not been deployed in the strait – suggests that Tehran may have been serious about closing one of the world's busiest shipping lanes, a move that would have escalated an already-spiraling conflict and severely hobbled global commerce. Reuters was not able to determine precisely when during the Israel-Iran air war Tehran loaded the mines, which – if deployed – would have effectively stopped ships from moving through the key thoroughfare. It is also unclear if the mines have since been unloaded. The sources did not disclose how the United States determined that the mines had been put on the Iranian vessels, but such intelligence is typically gathered through satellite imagery, clandestine human sources or a combination of both methods. . . . The two officials said the U.S. government has not ruled out the possibility that loading the mines was a ruse. The Iranians could have prepared the mines to convince Washington that Tehran was serious about closing the strait, but without intending to do so, the officials said. Israel's 12-day war with Iran and Tehran's ultimately hollow threat (so far) to close the Strait of Hormuz appear to have had limited lasting impact on global oil markets, reflected in Brent crude trading around $68 on Wednesday afternoon. Also read: 'Unacceptable' – US Officials Slam Iran's Suspending Cooperation With UN Nuclear Watchdog
