
Uttarakhand CM plants sapling on World Environment Day
This campaign is dedicated simultaneously to expression of respect towards mothers and environmental protection, he said on the occasion.
Dehradun, Jun 5 (PTI) Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami on Thursday planted a sapling at his official residence on the occasion of World Environment Day, according to a statement.
Municipal Corporation Rudrapur was honored with the Sunder Lal Bahuguna Nature and Environment Conservation Award-2025 (Government Category). Deputy Municipal Commissioner Shipra Joshi from Municipal Corporation Rudrapur received the award.
Vijay Jaddhari and Pratap Singh Pokhriyal were honored with the Sunder Lal Bahuguna Nature and Environment Conservation Award-2025 (Non-Government Category).
Dhami also administered the oath of plastic-free Uttarakhand and provided cloth bags to school children.
Dhami directed the Forest Department to plant at least one thousand fruit trees in every forest division of the state this year so that wild animals can get adequate food.
He urged the people of the state and pilgrims visiting the state not to feed animals things that are harmful to their health.
He called upon the residents to plant trees on birthdays, wedding anniversaries and other important occasions.
'Only with such efforts will we be able to promote environmental conservation,' he said. PTI ALM HIG
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
No backbenchers : This Kerala school has introduced new seating arrangements for classrooms
In a corner of South Kerala, a school is rewriting the rules of classroom dynamics — and it's catching the nation's eye. Ramavilasom Vocational Higher Secondary School (RVHSS) in Valakom, is experimenting to remove the idea of backbenchers but introducing a new seating arrangement for the classrooms. Influenced by a Malayalam movie, 'Sthanarthi Sreekuttan', the school has brought in an innovative seating arrangement. The school has done away with traditional rows of benches, replacing them with single rows aligned along the four walls of the classroom. In this set-up, every child becomes a frontbencher — and every voice counts. Eight schools in Kerala have already adopted this seating arrangement, and even a school in Punjab has adopted it, as mentioned news agency, PTI. 'I got a message that a school in Punjab has also adopted it after the principal saw the movie on the OTT platform. He also screened the movie for the students. I am happy that it got national attention,' Vinesh Viswanathan, director of the movie 'Sthanarthi Sreekuttan', told PTI. He said the movie had just one scene showing this arrangement, as an idea implemented by a 7th standard student in the film. 'It was his experience of being insulted sitting on the backbench that gave him such an idea. I never thought it would get such attention. It is not an idea created by us, but we did have such a seating arrangement earlier in classrooms, as part of the District Primary Education Programme (DPEP), and we had lost it somewhere in between,' Vinesh said. The headmaster of the school, Sunil P Sekhar, told the news agency that this system enabled teachers to give equal attention to all students in the classroom and helped them monitor the students better. Moreover, it eliminated the concept of backbenchers and put all students at the forefront. He said many more schools have now shown interest in adopting this model. 'Lower primary classes are where students learn a lot of new things, and they naturally get rid of the concept or taboo of sitting on the backbenches. It also helps students to have a more direct interaction with the teachers,' he added. He said even Anand Mahindra has tweeted, saying it is a welcome move, though he personally likes the concept of backbenchers. (with inputs from PTI)


India.com
5 hours ago
- India.com
Sole Air India Plane Crash survivor, Vishwas Kumar, battles trauma, seeks psychiatric help, cousin says, 'He doesn't talk, sleeps.....
Sole Air India Plane Crash survivor, Vishwas Kumar, battles trauma, seeks psychiatric help, cousin says, 'He doesn't talk, sleeps..... Many would think of him as one of the luckiest persons alive in the world. But for Vishwas Kumar Ramesh, the sole survivor of the June 12 Air India plane crash, it has been a struggle to get over the monumental tragedy. He is now taking a psychiatrist's help to find a way of coping with the traumatic experience, his cousin said, PTI reported. Ahmedabad plane crash: Meet the lone survivor of the Air India Boeing 787-8 crash The Air India Boeing 787-8 aircraft crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport on June 12, resulting in the deaths of 260 individuals, including 229 passengers, 12 crew members, and 19 people on the ground. Vishwas Kumar Ramesh is the sole survivor of the Air India Boeing 787-8 crash that occurred on June 12, 2025. The flight was headed from Ahmedabad to London when it crashed shortly after takeoff. Vishwas survived but is reportedly in trauma and receiving psychiatric treatment. Sole Air India Plane Crash survivor, Vishwas Kumar, is seeking psychiatric help, cousin says, 'He doesn't talk, sleeps….. Ramesh, a resident of Leicester, UK, was travelling with his brother Ajay on flight AI-171 to London when the incident happened. Vishwas is struggling to cope with the trauma of the plane crash, considered one of the most horrific in Indian aviation history. He was the sole survivor of the ill-fated London-Ahmedabad flight, walking out alive while all others perished. While speaking to a leading publication, his cousin stated that Vishwas is currently undergoing psychiatric treatment to deal with the emotional aftermath. His cousin stated, 'Many people, including our relatives living abroad, call us to inquire about Vishwas's well-being. But he does not talk to anyone. He is yet to overcome the mental trauma of the crash and the death of his brother.' 'He still wakes up in the middle of the night and finds it difficult to fall asleep again. We took him to a psychiatrist two days ago to find remedy. He has not made any plans yet to return to London because his treatment has just begun,' Sunny added, PTI reported. Vishwas is presently in a fragile emotional position, dealing with the trauma of the crash. His cousin Sunny stated that he frequently wakes up during the night, remembers the crash, and cannot go back to sleep. He was seated in seat 11A, close to the exit — this is probably why he survived the crash. Sunny also reported that Vishwas doesn't plan to travel to London anytime soon, as he had only just started psychiatric treatment. 'We took him to a psychiatrist two days ago to find remedy. He has not made any plans yet to return to London because his treatment has just begun,' he stated. Vishwas was discharged from the Ahmedabad Civil Hospital on June 17. On the same day, the mortal remains of his brother Ajay were handed over to the family after a DNA match. Vishwas and Ajay were returning to London by the Air India flight after visiting their family in Diu, a part of the Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu. What did the AAIB preliminary report reveal? India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on Friday released the preliminary report into the tragic crash of Air India flight AI171. The report outlines a harrowing sequence of events that unfolded within 90 seconds of takeoff, as both engines of the aircraft shut down unexpectedly during the initial climb, leading to a catastrophic loss of thrust and rapid descent. Flight data recovered from the aircraft's Enhanced Airborne Flight Recorder (EAFR) stated that the fuel cutoff switches for both engines were inadvertently moved from RUN to CUTOFF, one after the other within a 1-second interval, at an altitude just moments after liftoff. One pilot was heard asking the other, 'Why did you cut off?' to which the response was, 'I did not. 'This uncommanded shutdown triggered the deployment of the Ram Air Turbine (RAT), and the aircraft began losing altitude almost immediately, unable to sustain powered flight. According to the AAIB, the pilots re-engaged the fuel switches in an attempt to relight both engines. Engine 1 showed signs of recovering thrust, but Engine 2 failed to stabilise. Why did you cut off… the last words of pilot The aircraft, which had briefly reached a speed of 180 knots, was already descending and failed to regain altitude. The final distress call — a 'MAYDAY' — was transmitted at 08:09 UTC, just seconds before the aircraft crashed into residential buildings outside the airport perimeter. In an interview with Doordarshan, he narrated the incident and said that his seat, 11-A, was situated in a part of the plane that had landed on the ground floor of the building, which it had crashed into. Vishwash, who is a British Citizen of Indian origin, then removed his seat belt and came out of the aircraft, adding that his left hand was burned when fire erupted. Miracle survivor of AI-171 plane crash narrates horrific tale of escaping death Sharing the horrific experience, he said that all he saw were the bodies of passengers and crew membersVishwash said, 'The side where I was sitting wasn't on the hostel side, it was the ground floor of the hostel. I don't know about others, but the place I was sitting that portion landed on the ground floor, and there was some space. As soon as my door broke, I saw that there was some space, and then I tried to get out, and I got out. There was a building wall on the opposite side, and the plane had crashed completely on that side, so probably that is why nobody could get out from that side. There was space only where I was. I don't know how I survived. When the fire broke out, my left hand also got burned. Then I was admitted to the hospital. People here are treating me well. People are very nice here.' (With Agencies Inputs)


Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Key to fatal Air India crash mystery: 32 seconds in flight deck
In the final seconds of Air India Flight 171, as both engines lost power and the Boeing 787 began its fatal descent, a crucial exchange unfolded between two experienced pilots that investigators believe holds the key to understanding what went wrong. The crash site of Air India's Boeing 787-8 aircraft, which was operating flight AI 171 from Ahmedabad to London.(PTI) 'One of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cutoff. The other pilot responded that he did not do so,' according to the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau's preliminary report. Those paraphrased words are at the centre of a complex investigation into whether the accident was caused by human error, mechanical failure, or an emergency procedure gone catastrophically wrong. The cockpit was staffed according to standard procedures, with first officer Clive Kunder, 32, serving as the pilot flying while captain Sumeet Sabharwal, 56, monitored the flight. Both had passed pre-flight breath analyser tests and met all rest requirements, the report noted. Kunder, the junior pilot, had 1,128 hours on the Boeing 787 and was responsible for controlling the aircraft during the critical take-off phase. Sabharwal, with 8,596 hours on the same type of jet, was tasked with monitoring systems and providing oversight—a standard arrangement designed to combine experience with operational currency. JS Rawat, former joint director general of DGCA, cautioned against drawing conclusions from the limited cockpit voice recorder information. 'While nothing can be ascertained with a paraphrased sentence in the report that mentions one pilot asking the other if he switched off the fuel switches and the second pilot denying the same, nothing can be positively said at this stage,' he said. The preliminary report provides a precise timeline of the crew's actions. Citing flight data from the EAFR (the integrated blackboxes), it states the switches moved to cutoff state one second apart—engine 1 first, followed by engine 2, almost immediately after the plane lifted off from the ground. 'The aircraft achieved the maximum recorded airspeed of 180 Knots IAS at about 08:08:42 UTC and immediately thereafter, the engine 1 and engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another with a time gap of 01 sec,' it stated. An experienced airline commander, requesting anonymity, questioned the plausibility of pilot error during this critical phase. 'It is highly unlikely that any pilot, especially during take-off, would want to fiddle around with switches behind the thrust levels. At best, you'd focus on raising the landing gear which is located in the front panel of the cockpit, or raise the flaps,' he said. A second pilot framed the phase as a time when pilots are laser-focused on flight instruments in the front, and not the centre console, where the fuel switches are located. 'No pilot is inept to want to play around with switches in the middle section of the cockpit when all attention is focused on forward flight cockpit instruments located in front of the pilots, during take-off and landing,' this person said. At a subsequent moment after the cutoff – the report does not mention when or in what words exactly – came the exchange between the pilots about how the fuel flow stop was engaged. Roughly 10 seconds after the first engine cutoff was recorded by the flight data recorder, one of the pilots – it is unclear who -- returned the first engine's switch to 'RUN' position. Engine 2's switch followed another four seconds later. The four-second interval between restart attempts could indicate pilots following emergency protocols or the time needed to recognise the first engine's restart attempt before moving to the second. 'In my view the 4 second interval was part of emergency protocols and call-outs etc. That is why the entire CVR transcript was essential,' Aviation expert Sanjay Lazar said. Once they engaged the fuel switches in the run mode, the Boeing 787's Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) systems automatically began a sequence to restart the engine. The crew then issued a Mayday call at 08:09:05 UTC (Co-ordinated Universal Time; 5 hours and 30 minutes behind IST)—23 seconds after the initial fuel cut-off and just six seconds before the flight recorder stopped working. Both pilots brought significant experience to the cockpit. Sabharwal had accumulated 15,638 total flight hours across multiple aircraft types, while Kunder had logged 3,403 hours overall. Their flying experience was current, with both pilots having flown more than 230 hours in the previous 180 days. That the report does not identify which pilot made which statement in the crucial exchange reflects investigative protocol designed to avoid prejudging crew actions. Determining whether the pilot flying or pilot monitoring moved the switches—and why—will be crucial to the final investigation. 'What surprises is the intentional mystery with the crew communication transcript documented in the PIR. It's impossible that during an emergency the cockpit would be so quiet. For starters, take- off checklist and emergency call out phrases are left out in the report allowing the reader to be creative with making assumptions. Clearly critical aspects that are known to the investigators have been withheld,' said Mark Martin, CEO of Marin Consulting, an aviation consulting firm based in Asia. Peter Goelz, a former managing director of the US's NTSB, told the BBC: 'There's likely much more on the cockpit voice recorder than what's been shared. A lone remark like 'why did you cut off the switches' isn't enough,' he said.