Reddit's Brutal Truth About Crypto Profits: Why That Guy Who Sold Bitcoin at $100 Wasn't Actually Stupid
A Reddit post struck a nerve in the crypto community, sparking heated debate over one of investing's most painful questions: When do you take profits?
The post's central thesis is brutally simple: Despite what keyboard warriors claim today, virtually everyone who bought Bitcoin in its early days would have sold long before it reached current prices. And according to the poster—and basic investment principles—they would have been right to do so.
Don't Miss:
— no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies.
Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – .
The Reddit discussion reveals a fundamental tension between investment theory and human psychology. As one commenter noted, 'If you 500x an investment yeah you sold lol.'
The math is compelling: If you bought Bitcoin at $1 and watched it climb to $100, you'd have made a 10,000% return. Taking profits at that point wasn't paper hands—it was prudent risk management. The fact that Bitcoin later reached $60,000+ doesn't retroactively make selling at $100 a mistake.
'Nothing is guaranteed in investing,' the original poster emphasized. 'Anyone who saw their investment multiply by 1000x and didn't cash out was essentially gambling.'
One of the most insightful comments came from a user who highlighted how net worth influences selling decisions. A college student watching $500 turn into $10,000 faces a completely different calculus than a wealthy investor seeing the same percentage gain on a larger portfolio.
For the student, that $10,000 could mean a reliable car, reduced student debt, or a house down payment. For someone with substantial assets, letting it ride might make more sense as 'play money.'
This observation cuts to the heart of position sizing and risk management—concepts that crypto's 'diamond hands' culture often overlooks.
Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase.
Not everyone agreed with the 'everyone would have sold' narrative. Several commenters claimed to have held through massive gains, with one user reporting 300x returns while vowing to 'never sell Bitcoin even at x3000.'
These holders share a common belief: Bitcoin represents a fundamental shift away from traditional currency, making it a 'once in a lifetime' investment opportunity. As one put it, 'Bitcoin's price is only expected to rise and fiat is only expected to plummet.'
But even among the diamond hands crowd, practical challenges emerged. One commenter admitted, 'I've been holding BTC because I don't know where to sell it,' highlighting the gap between investment philosophy and execution.
The discussion wasn't without cautionary tales. One user shared how they lost 80% of their crypto holdings when the Voyager exchange collapsed, watching their '6 figure net worth reduced to 4 figure inside a week.'
This story underscores a critical point often lost in crypto success stories: unrealized gains aren't real until they're realized. The most perfect diamond hands strategy fails if you can't access your assets when you need them.
Some users proposed middle-ground strategies. One suggested time-locking Bitcoin to enforce long-term holding while still allowing eventual profit-taking—releasing a set amount each year over a decade, for instance.
This approach acknowledges both the potential for long-term growth and the human need to realize gains. It's a recognition that perfect market timing is impossible, but systematic profit-taking can work.The Reddit thread's most valuable insight isn't about crypto specifically—it's about the nature of investing decisions. As one commenter noted, 'Hindsight is a b*tch.'
Every investment decision must be made with incomplete information and uncertain outcomes. The person who sold Bitcoin at $100 made a rational decision based on the information available at the time. The fact that it continued rising doesn't invalidate that logic.
Start with position sizing: Never invest more than you can afford to lose completely. This makes holding through volatility psychologically easier.
Consider your circumstances: Your age, net worth, and financial obligations should influence your profit-taking strategy. What works for a 25-year-old may not work for a 45-year-old with a mortgage and kids.
Plan your exits: Before making any investment, decide at what point you'll take profits. Having a plan removes emotion from the decision.
Don't let perfect be the enemy of good: Taking some profits after significant gains isn't 'paper hands'—it's risk management.
Remember the risks: Unrealized gains can disappear quickly. Exchange failures, regulatory changes, and market crashes are all real possibilities.
The Reddit discussion reveals an uncomfortable truth: Most successful long-term crypto holders succeeded despite their strategy, not because of it. The difference between conviction and stubbornness is often just luck.
For retail investors, the lesson isn't to abandon long-term thinking—it's to balance conviction with prudence. Take some profits along the way. You might miss some upside, but you'll sleep better at night.
And if you're beating yourself up for selling an investment 'too early,' remember: You made a rational decision with the information you had. That's not failure—that's investing.
Read Next: Named a TIME Best Invention and Backed by 5,000+ Users, Kara's Air-to-Water Pod Cuts Plastic and Costs —
Image: Shutterstock
This article Reddit's Brutal Truth About Crypto Profits: Why That Guy Who Sold Bitcoin at $100 Wasn't Actually Stupid originally appeared on Benzinga.com
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Clarivate Collaborates with OverDrive and Innovative for Enhanced Digital Library Integration
Clarivate (NYSE:CLVT) is one of the cheap penny stocks to buy now. On June 24, OverDrive and Innovative announced a joint strategy for deep integration of their respective digital library solutions. The integration centers on OverDrive's Libby app, Kanopy, and Clarivate's Vega LX platform, which further includes Vega Discover and Vega Program. The goal is to use each company's technologies to improve how readers and library staff interact with both print and digital materials in a library's catalog. OverDrive and Innovative from Clarivate are actively seeking input and prioritization from library partners through a series of meetings with the OverDrive Advisory Group and at upcoming Digipalooza 2025 partner roundtable meetings. A state-of-the-art computer lab filled with engineers working on new analytics technologies. More updates on the collaboration will be shared later in 2025, with new tools and benefits expected to roll out in 2026. This is a non-exclusive initiative, so new tools will be available to all approved OverDrive partners. Clarivate (NYSE:CLVT) is an information services provider that operates through three segments: Academia & Government, Life Sciences & Healthcare, and Intellectual Property. OverDrive is a mission-based company that supports libraries and schools. While we acknowledge the potential of CLVT as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
CNN
30 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Democrats try to spoil Trump's victory party by slamming his greatest domestic win
Is it the start of something bigger? Or the beginning of the end of the GOP House majority? President Donald Trump's triumph in forcing his massive agenda bill into law before his July Fourth deadline was the most significant domestic triumph of his two terms in office. And his show of dominance in forcing Republican holdouts to back down has left GOP leaders wanting more at a time when his presidency is gathering momentum at home and abroad. It was a holiday weekend of celebration for the Republican Party, though shock over the unspeakable tragedy in Texas — where flash floods claimed many lives and swept away young girls at summer camp — kept some of the heat out of partisan clashes on Sunday talk shows. The GOP victory lap imposed huge pressure on Democrats to finally step up with an effective political strategy to take on an increasingly dominant president — and to turn his achievement into an anvil. Party leaders will now anchor their midterm election strategy for next year on their warning that Trump's law further enriched his billionaire friends and stuck working Americans with the bill. 'I cannot believe Congress was willing to pass this. I mean, it's awful,' Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear told CNN's Dana Bash on 'State of the Union' on Sunday. Beshear, who said he was considering a run for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028, warned the bill could end Medicaid for 200,000 people in his commonwealth alone and would buckle state budgets. Rep. Ro Khanna pressed home the new Democratic offensive against the new law. 'I just don't think that taking away the health care with the Medicaid cuts and food assistance to give the tax breaks for the very wealthy is going to be good for working- and middle-class Americans,' the California Democrat said on 'Fox News Sunday.' But House Speaker Mike Johnson doubled down Sunday on a plan to pass two more bills packed with Trump priorities using reconciliation — the budgetary trick the GOP used to ram through the president's tax cuts along with huge boosts in spending on border enforcement, carbon energy and defense. And he predicted Democrats would fail to make Trump's bill a political loser for the president. 'Everyone will have more take-home pay, they'll have more jobs and opportunity, the economy will be doing better and we'll be able to point to that as the obvious result of what we did,' Johnson said on Fox. Republicans deny the Democrats' claims about the effect of cuts to Medicaid, potentially the most emotive and politically sensitive aspect of the bill. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on 'State of the Union' that new work requirements for access to the program would preserve its viability and do nothing to hurt the most vulnerable Americans. And despite multiple independent assessments that the new law is a gift to the rich, Bessent highlighted its move to cut taxes on tips for some service workers for several years as proof that Trump had reoriented the economy toward workers. Bessent called his boss the 'most economically sophisticated president we have had in 100 years, maybe ever.' But legislation of this size and complexity, which has left many Americans unsure of what is actually included, always triggers a messaging war. Republicans, for instance, falsely presented the Affordable Care Act as a massive far-left takeover of government health care on the way to winning back the House in 2010. Democrats hope to inflict similar punishment on Trump. When Americans were suffering from rising grocery prices and inflation, Republicans were successful in blaming former President Joe Biden's billions of dollars in Covid-19 recovery legislation for making the situation worse. Multiple polls show Democrats may have an opening. Trump's new law is massively unpopular with Americans already — so a skillful public campaign by Democrats could play on voter discontent by blaming every future adverse economic event on the new law. But the administration carefully drew up the bill to ensure that tax cuts come into force quickly while some of the most controversial cuts in spending on programs such as Medicaid do not take effect until after the midterm elections, or even until 2028. The strategy seemed designed to spare GOP candidates political heat — but it also ensures the new law will be at the centerpiece of midterm elections next year and the 2028 presidential race, when Trump is term-limited. The swift passage of the bill — despite the GOP's tiny House majority and internal suspicion between Republicans in the House and Senate — was possible only because of Trump's crushing control over his party. It was not until nearly Christmas of his first term that his first tax-cutting legislation passed. This time, budget hawks in the House Freedom Caucus talked a good game, but ended up folding to the president's power when a vastly changed bill returned from the Senate. It was the latest occasion when the president's experience during his first White House spell helped make him more effective in his second. Johnson, meanwhile, led the fractious GOP House conference with skill that has not always been obvious since he rose from the back benches to succeed former Speaker Kevin McCarthy. But many of Trump's top priorities — on border funding, tax cuts and defense — were packed into one big bill for a good reason. Logic suggested that a majority in which the speaker can lose only a handful of votes could not bear multiple tests of fire. The upside of such an approach is that the bill was so vital to Trump's authority and prestige that it was harder for significant numbers of Republicans to oppose. Johnson is now testing the waters on pulling off the same trick again. 'We had always planned to do the first big reconciliation bill,' Johnson said on 'Fox News Sunday,' adding he was eyeing two more such efforts in the fall and next spring. 'Three more reconciliation bills before this Congress is over.' If the Louisiana Republican can deliver that, he'd repay the faith in millions of Republican base voters. But will divides in the GOP conference Trump papered over last week be as easily suppressed next time? Will budget hawks who swallowed their antipathy to widening the deficit fold for Trump again in the future? It's hard to believe that vulnerable swing-state Republicans will be more open to politically painful spending cuts even closer to the next election. Trump's wider economic political fortunes will therefore play a huge role in how the new law settles in the public's mind. If the economy proves resilient and his predictions of soaring growth materialize, it will be harder for Democrats to highlight the negative aspects of his leadership. But if inflation is rekindled and jobs and economic growth slow, they'll have an easier target. This is one reason why the coming days will be vital to the president. The deadline comes Wednesday for foreign nations to conclude trade deals with the US or face massive tariff hikes, which were pulled back amid global market panics in April. Across-the-board tariff increases could hammer the economy and raise prices for Americans who sent a message in the presidential election last year that they were angry about the cost of living. But Trump is betting that a three-legged strategy of huge cuts in government spending, increased revenue in tariffs and huge tax cuts will be an unorthodox growth plan. And Bessent appeared to indicate on 'State of the Union' that Trump's latest trade deadline this week is yet another bluff that might spare the economy the most adverse impacts. 'President Trump's going to be sending letters to some of our trading partners, saying that 'If you don't move things along, then, on August 1, you will boomerang back to your April 2 tariff level.' So I think we're going to see a lot of deals very quickly.' That sounds a lot like another extension to another deadline for trade deals that administration officials once predicted would arrive in huge numbers. Aside from a few framework agreements with nations including Britain and Vietnam, there have been no major breakthroughs. Unlike the mirages and contradictions of Trump's constantly shifting trade policy, however, the new agenda bill represents a big concrete bet. If rural hospitals are shuttered because of Medicaid cuts, if major immigration spending feeds a police state that alienates moderate Americans or if regular workers struggle in Trump's new age of oligarchy, the GOP risks paying the price in coming elections. But the president has a record of convincing millions of people of his own version of reality — and Democrats have rarely found a way to counter him. They have yet another chance with the 'One Big Beautiful Bill.'
Bloomberg
31 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Is the Dollar Resting, or Nailed to Its Perch?
To get John Authers' newsletter delivered directly to your inbox, sign up here. John Cleese's dead parrot famously wouldn't voom if you put 4,000 volts through it. Similarly, the dollar at present won't voom, even with a jolt of startlingly positive economic data. The question for the second half of this year is whether it's merely resting, or sticking to its perch only because it has been nailed there (by the exorbitant privilege which comes with being the world's reserve currency). The trend is startlingly negative, with the DXY dollar index now further below its own 200-day moving average than at any time in 20 years:
