Israeli airstrikes rain down in Beirut after IDF urged civilians to evacuate as it targeted 'Hezbollah's underground drone factories hidden in the heart of neighbourhoods'
The IDF today claimed the proscribed terror group has established five sites in the Dahieh neighbourhood of Beirut that is producing 'thousands of UAVs, with the direction and funding of Iranian terrorists.'
The military claims the underground facilities belong to Hezbollah's Unit 127.
It said in a statement: 'Following Hezbollah's extensive use of UAV's as a central component of its terrorist attacks on the state of Israel, the terrorist organization is operating to increase production of UAV's for the next war.'
In November 2023, Hezbollah, which maintains control over much of Lebanon, signed a ceasefire agreement with Israel following 13 months of conflict that began after the paramilitary group attacked the nation on October 8, a day after Hamas ' deadly attack.
Israel claimed that the purported UAV factories on the Beirut sites 'constitute a violation of the understandings between Israel and Lebanon.'
It added: 'The IDF will operate against every threat posed to the state of Israel and its civilians, and will prevent all attempts of the Hezbollah terrorist organisation to reestablish itself.'
Smoke was tonight seen rising from the sites highlighted by the IDF, as civilians desperately tried to leave the area following a warning from the military.
The IDF has so far not provided proof of the existence of the factories, only sharing their locations and a computer-generated image of two men apparently making drones in a basement.
But the warning of an imminent attack was real, with IDF spokespeople warning civilians in the area to leave immediately.
Lt. Col. Avichay Adraee said: 'You are located near facilities belonging to the terrorist organisation Hezbollah. For your safety and the safety of your families, you must evacuate these buildings immediately and stay at least 300 meters away.'
Footage shared online from the Dahieh neighbourhood showed scores of people in cars desperately trying to leave the area, sounding their horns in panic.
According to Israeli media, Unit 127 works with Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) to produce and use drones for intelligence gathering and military attacks.
It was reportedly responsible for a drone strike on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's private residence in Caesarea last October.
Netanyahu and his family were not at the house at the time.
Unit 127 operates a range of drones produced by Iran, including the Ziad 107 'kamikaze' drone with GPS-guided capabilities. They also use Shadaa 101 and Mohajer drones.
Israel's strike on a dense civilian centre risks the killing of more innocent people, which it has already come under fire for in Gaza.
Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli attacks killed at least 37 people on Thursday alone.
The Israeli military has recently stepped up its campaign in Gaza in what it says is a renewed push to defeat Hamas, whose October 2023 attack sparked the war.
But Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva rejected the term 'war' to describe the conflict in the devastated Palestinian territory, accusing Israel instead of carrying out 'premeditated genocide'.
The IDF has so far not provided proof of the existence of the factories, only sharing their locations and a computer-generated image of two men apparently making drones in a basement
People fire live rounds into the air as a warning, following Israeli threats of an impending attack on Dahiyeh, a southern suburb of Beirut, Lebanon, Thursday, June 5, 2025
Gaza civil defence official Mohammed al-Mughayyir said that '37 people have been martyred in Israeli strikes on the Gaza Strip', reporting attacks up and down the length of the territory.
Calls have mounted for a negotiated ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, but indirect talks between the parties have failed to yield a breakthrough since the collapse of the last brief truce in March.
'What is happening in Gaza is not a war. It's a genocide being carried out by a highly prepared army against women and children,' said Brazil's Lula, who has previously used the legal term to describe the conflict.
'It's no longer possible to accept,' he added.
French President Emmanuel Macron, who has declined to use the term himself, vowed at a joint appearance with Lula to 'ramp up pressure in coordination with the Americans to obtain a ceasefire'.
France is due later this month to co-host with Saudi Arabia a United Nations conference in New York on a two-state solution to the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
33 minutes ago
- Reuters
Israel will strike Iran again if threatened, defence minister says
JERUSALEM, July 10 (Reuters) - Israel will strike Iran again if it is threatened by Tehran, Defence Minister Israel Katz said on Thursday. "Israel's long arm will reach you in Tehran, Tabriz, Isfahan, and anywhere you try to threaten or harm Israel. There is no place to hide", Katz said at an air force graduation ceremony, according to a statement from his office. "If we must return, we will do so with greater force." Israel launched a 12-day air war against Iran in June that raised fears of a broader regional conflict. The two sides agreed to a U.S.-brokered ceasefire, announced by President Donald Trump on June 23, to end hostilities. Israel struck Iranian nuclear sites during the campaign, citing concerns that Tehran was nearing the development of a nuclear weapon, which Iran denies. The United States joined the campaign with strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
This report confirms what we knew. The BBC has an Israel problem
The BBC has not had a 'good war' since 7 October. Whether it is the smug anti-Israel tone of its reporters, or its use of casualty numbers and narratives dished out by a terror group, it has been pretty shameful stuff. And I say that as someone who generally has a lot of time for the corporation. Today, things reached a new low. We finally got the full report into the documentary 'Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone'. The show was broadcast on BBC Two and iPlayer in February before being pulled. It emerged that the 13-year-old narrator just happened to be the son of the deputy minister of agriculture in the Hamas government, something the audience were never told. The investigation, carried out by Peter Johnston, Director of Editorial Complaints and Reviews, found that 'regardless of how the significance or otherwise of the narrator's father's position was judged, the audience should have been informed about this'. You reckon? The BBC insists that it was not told who the narrator's father was, although three people at HOYO Films, the independent production company who made the documentary, knew. Worse, it seems that nobody at the Beeb was that interested in finding out. As the report puts it, the BBC team was not 'sufficiently proactive'. That is pathetic, at best, and deliberately negligent at worse. Given we know that Hamas, a proscribed terror organisation, runs all aspects of the Gaza Strip, why did nobody think to check what connections this child had? The answer is obvious. Why question anything too much if it makes Israel look bad? While the BBC insists that nobody subject to financial sanctions received money as part of the production process, the narrator was paid £795 for his time. So, money did go to a Hamas minister's family and it's hard to believe it stayed in this child's piggy bank. I wonder how much concrete for a terror tunnel you can get for £795 these days. Maybe you can get it cheap via the UN. The report also found no evidence 'to support a suggestion that the narrator's father or family influenced the content of the programme in any way'. Terrorist organisations are, of course, well known for their lack of influence on family members and so even in something scripted, as this narrator's contribution was, this seems a nonsensical argument. It seems to me that terrorists don't need to be explicit to influence someone's behaviour, especially if it is a close family member. Commenting on the latest scandal engulfing his ex-employer, former director of BBC Television Danny Cohen said: The serious journalistic failings of this documentary have severely damaged public trust in the BBC. This is not an isolated incident but part of a pattern of systemic bias in the BBC's coverage of the war. Cohen is right. This is far from the only such incident during this terrible war. Remember when correspondent Jon Donnison announced live on air that it was 'hard to see' that anyone but the IDF could have bombed a hospital in Gaza? It subsequently emerged that that the missile had been fired from inside Gaza i.e. it had been fired by Hamas or another terror group in the territory. That was 10 days after Hamas conducted its massacre. We've also had Jeremy Bowen suggest that a hoard of weapons found by the IDF in a hospital might have simply been the armoury of the site's security team, not terrorists using civilian infrastructure to hide their arms. It's all so ridiculous that it would be laughable if it were not so dangerous. Cohen believes that 'the BBC's failure to recognise this [pattern] and take real action is a serious leadership failure,' adding that 'statements from the BBC that it takes antisemitism seriously have become utterly meaningless'. It is hard to disagree. The BBC leadership will no doubt continue to highlight that the only breach of its editorial guidelines found was not declaring who the narrator was, as if that is not serious enough. The fact that this report found no impartiality issues will be of no comfort to most of the UK's Jewish population, who have felt let down by the national broadcaster for almost two years – including during its nonsensical coverage of Glastonbury recently. In its response to today's report, the BBC also flags that it and other journalistic organisations are not allowed into Gaza. That's a serious issue, one worthy of separate discussion and that I have mixed feelings about. However, in this instance it is a deflection that has nothing to do with the sheer incompetence by the corporation in this and other instances. Just because you cannot go into a complex, dangerous warzone, it doesn't mean you need to regurgitate propaganda put out by terrorists or hide key facts from your viewers. After this latest fiasco, the BBC needs to take a good hard look at itself. But it probably won't.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Iran says its president was injured in Israeli airstrike last month
Iran has confirmed that President Masoud Pezeshkian was wounded during an Israeli airstrike that targeted a high-level government meeting in Tehran last month. Mr Pezeshkian, 70, is said to have sustained a leg injury and was forced to flee the building through a pre-planned emergency hatch. Fars news, which is affiliated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Cops, described the strike as bearing similarities to the Israeli operation that killed Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in Beirut . The report said: 'The attack occurred before noon on Monday, June 16, while a meeting of the Supreme National Security Council was being held with the heads of the three branches of government and other senior officials in the lower floors of a building in western Tehran.' 'The attackers targeted the building's entrances and exits by firing six bombs or missiles to block escape routes and cut off air flow.' Other senior officials present at the meeting reportedly included parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and judiciary chief Mohseni Ejei. Several people were injured, with Fars reporting that 'some officials, including the president, suffered minor injuries to their legs while leaving' and escaped using 'an emergency hatch that had been planned in advance'. It also noted that power was cut off on the affected floor after the explosions. The revelation is in line with claims made by Mr Pezeshkian in a recent interview, in which he accused Israel of trying to assassinate him. Speaking to political commentator Tucker Carlson, the president said: 'They did try, yes… They acted accordingly, but they failed.' However, he did not mention being injured during the interview. Despite the president's calm tone, his remarks triggered a backlash among Iranian lawmakers. Twenty-four MPs signed an open letter accusing him of undermining national security. The criticism was also aimed at his apparent willingness to re-engage with the United States, despite tensions over American airstrikes on nuclear sites and Iran's recent expulsion of the International Atomic Energy Agency. 'From a national security standpoint, such messaging risks inviting further aggression,' the MPs wrote. A new emergency espionage law is also being debated, which would introduce harsher punishments for spying, including capital punishment. Fars did not disclose the precise location of the strike, though opposition outlet Iran International reported that an Israeli airstrike targeted an area near Shahrak-e-Gharb in western Tehran on the same day.
