There's one scenario in which tariffs won't be a disaster for Ireland
Uruguay round
of talks which concluded in 1994 and was – though we didn't know it at the time – the high point of a long postwar drive to free world trade and reduce tariffs. The media spent many hours outside meeting rooms as negotiators from more than 120 countries went through complex line-by-line negotiations to cut tariffs and trade barriers.
For Ireland, it was always a case of trading off the potential gains for industry with the threat to farmers. But over time, the State was a huge winner.
The world had already started to move away from the relentless globalisation drive which had lasted well into this century. And now we have
Trump's new world order
and trade 'deals' which are a mix of reality, spin and fudge.
We still do not know the full details of the deal between the
United States
and the
European Union
– before we even start to worry about how Trump might try to rewrite it.
Ibec
chief economist Gerard Brady calculates that exporters accounting for about 10 per cent of our export value to the US now know their
tariff
and another 10-15 per cent await news on exemptions from tariffs being negotiated between the US and the EU. The remaining 75 per cent or so of pharma and semiconductor exporters will have to wait for separate investigations now under way in the Trump administration.
READ MORE
There is a potential outcome from all this which, while damaging, would not be disastrous for Ireland in the short term. There will be problems, but the economy could adjust and adapt. While the
Department of Finance estimates
that the tariffs could lead to employment being 70,000 lower in five years' time and the economy 1.5 per cent smaller are, at best, a rough guesstimate, they do look to be in the right direction. On current trends, this would mean growth continuing, just not as quickly as it would have.
We can assess the potential damage for Ireland only when we know the full details. The
spirits and whiskey sectors
look exposed, for example, as the US says it is a target for the 15 per cent tariffs. As this is a big issue in France, there will be an EU push in the week ahead, before final details of the deal with the US are published, to try to lower the burden here.
As well as the impact on Ireland, this is one to watch at political level in the EU, as France puts pressure on
Ursula von der Leyen
's
European Commission
, which negotiates on behalf of the EU. As butter, another vital Irish export, was already subject to a tariff of about 16-17 per cent (which will remain), things will at least not get any worse here.
If we want to identify problem areas, smaller companies reliant on the US in a range of sectors is one. Small may no longer be beautiful in a complex and politically-driven world market. And it is also worth focusing on the risks to parts of rural Ireland – as highlighted by
Chambers Ireland
chief executive Ian Talbot – particularly those reliant on sectors such as food and also
pharma
and medical products. Towns such as Westport and Kinsale will anxiously await details on the pharma tariffs.
[
EU-US trade deal analysis: Tariffs have a price for both sides. Trump was willing to pay it
Opens in new window
]
And here things remain a bit woolly, largely because the US president is undertaking study of this sector under
a so-called section 232 process
– referring to a section of a 1960s US act. This is separate from the big so-called reciprocal tariffs announced on Friday.
The EU view is that its deal caps tariffs on pharma at 15 per cent – including any outcome from this separate process. If this holds, the sector at least knows its maximum charge. A big report – due shortly – has been drawn up for Trump under section 232, which looks at national security issues from trade and how more of the supply chain of key products can be brought back to the US from countries such as Ireland. Let's hope Trump does not revisit the 15 per cent maximum tariff figure as part of this.
Tariffs are only one of Trump's policies options. On Thursday,
he issued a letter to 17 of the big pharma companies
demanding they cut prices in the US to the lowest level applying elsewhere. As a big buyer of pharma, the US state machinery has a lot of power here. Imposing high tariffs appears to run counter to the drive for lower prices. So the interaction between Trump and big pharma is another key thing to watch in the weeks ahead.
What we do know is that the US president is determined to return pharma investment to the US and get better prices for American consumers. For Ireland, the initial impact may be slow enough to emerge. But this is likely to mean somewhat lower investment by pharma here in the years ahead and a sector which may be more focused on EU and other markets rather than exporting back to the US. Changes in the pricing and accounting practices of the multinationals – now designed to report massive profits in low-tax Ireland – are also likely to cut corporate tax revenue here.
Like the rest of the economy, the Irish pharma sector will adjust. But there will be a cost, the scale of which depends on the extent of US policy action.
The longer-term strategic questions will take time to clarify themselves. A major issue is whether Trump's policy direction will stick. If you are, say, a big pharma company, do you base your investments on an expectation that this is now the new world, or that Trump's policies will, in time, be rolled back either by him or by his successor?
US court challenges to his powers to impose wide-scale tariffs are only now playing out. US consumer prices are surely set to rise – the only question is how much and whether there will be a cost in jobs. And the financial market calm could be upset at any time, given the crazy and risky course on which Trump has embarked. On Friday, they were already looking jumpy.
So the uncertainty will roll on. Ireland should get through the first wave of this, albeit with some collateral damage. But the big question is our place in a world which seems to be breaking up into new trading blocs and alliances. And whether the valuable certainty which a final, agreed trade deal might bring can last - Ireland and Europe now needs Trump to direct his attention elsewhere.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Presidential election: How much does it cost to run for the Áras?
With the presidential election looming, just how much does it cost to run a successful campaign or otherwise? It is a question that parties and candidates are considering as they either enter the race or think about doing so. National poster campaigns, online advertising and campaign teams cost money and a lot of it. The six candidates in 2018 declared a total spend of €1.36 million in the race for the Áras. The 2011 election cost even more, with more than €2.3 million in spending across seven candidates. Fine Gael has decided to go for it and run a candidate – former European commissioner Mairead McGuinness – for an office the party has never held, and having been burned by presidential elections in the past. Independent left-wing Galway West TD Catherine Connolly is also in the race with the backing of smaller parties and Independents to get on the ballot paper. Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin have yet to decide if they will enter the fray. Labour backs Connolly, and Flatley jumps the shark Listen | 50:26 Presidential elections are fraught with risks for candidates and political parties. Professor of politics at University College Dublin David Farrell says these risks are 'not just financial', but 'reputational' also. 'There have been plenty of examples of campaigns that have completely come unstuck in all sorts of ways that couldn't have been anticipated,' he says. 'It's a courageous person who puts themselves forward and I think particularly if they're representing one of the larger parties, that in itself could come home to bite them if they don't do particularly well.' Farrell suggests that Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin may face embarrassment if they do not enter the race, but could also look bad, temporarily at least, if they do and their candidates do not perform well. Independent TD Catherine Connolly has held a press conference outside Leinster House where she spoke about her plans to run for president. Video: Bryan O'Brien It may be a case of 'they're damned if they do and they're damned if they don't', he says. There is some State support when it comes to the costs, but only if a candidate wins or reaches more than 25 per cent of the quota. Under those circumstances, they are entitled to a reimbursement of election expenses up to a maximum of €250,000. However, there is no guarantee of getting any money back, as recent elections have shown. Just two of the six candidates in the 2018 election got refunds – the winner, President Michael D Higgins and the Independent candidate who came second, Peter Casey. Mr Higgins's re-election campaign cost just over €367,000, the most spent that year, and it was reimbursed up to the then-maximum sum of €200,000. Mr Casey, meanwhile, was refunded the full amount of his expenses, which amounted to €119,911. Sinn Féin spent some €209,716 on its 2018 candidate Liadh Ní Riada's campaign, but lost out on any reimbursement as her vote share was too low. The most expensive campaign of recent times was Fine Gael's unsuccessful attempt to get former MEP Gay Mitchell elected in 2011. Mitchell's campaign – which cost €527,152 – did not qualify for any reimbursement after he secured only 6.4 per cent of the first preference votes. It was a disastrous result and one that Fine Gael – and the other two large parties deliberating on entering the upcoming election – will want to avoid. Two names in the race for the Áras: early-mover advantage or risky tactic? Listen | 28:04 Fine Gael, Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin all had considerable costs last year as they fought local, European and Limerick mayoral elections in June and the general election in November. All three parties recorded deficits for 2024, according to financial statements. Fine Gael and Sinn Féin reported more cash reserves than Fianna Fáil. But this comes with the proviso that any of this that comes from State funding cannot be used for election purposes. Fine Gael remortgaged its Dublin headquarters last September to raise money in advance of the general election. The party did not offer an estimate on how much it will spend on McGuinness's election campaign. A statement indicated it will run 'a vigorous' campaign, which will be 'funded from the party's fundraising activities, the vast majority of which comes from the Fine Gael Superdraw'. It said all campaign spending 'will be in line with electoral guidelines and published with Sipo [Standards in Public Office Commission] after the election'. Fianna Fáil's financial statements for last year indicated 'net expenditure on election activity of €1,600,112 in 2024, contributing to a debt position at the end of the year of €1,527,288 which was in line with our projections at this point of the Dáil cycle'. The party said it will clear this debt and 'build an election fund for the future election cycles in this Dáil period'. It is understood that Fianna Fáil held a fundraising draw earlier this year that raised about €600,000. There are mixed views within Fianna Fáil on whether the cost of the presidential election will influence the decision on whether or not to contest it. One source suggested the party's finances will be a 'huge factor' and it is a reason 'not to run someone for the sake of running someone'. A different Fianna Fáil source said the identity of the candidate and strategy, not costs, will be what is taken into account in the decision-making. Another source said there is a strong view within the parliamentary party that Fianna Fáil should field a candidate, but it has to be the right one. 'There's no point in having a candidate and spending half a million euro and getting no positive result,' said the source. A separate source said the cost of the election 'is a factor' in Fianna Fáil's decision, but added: 'Is it a dominating factor? I don't believe it is. The party will want to see a viable candidate, one that can compete, and that will be the dominating factor.' There has been speculation about potential Fianna Fáil candidates, including former taoiseach Bertie Ahern, to ex-ministers Mary Hanafin and Éamon Ó Cuív. None appear to have been met with much enthusiasm within the party. Taoiseach Micheál Martin has ruled himself out and is consulting with the party on its approach to the election. It could be September before he makes a final decision on running a candidate. Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald, meanwhile, surprised many recently by not ruling herself out as a candidate as her party continues its deliberations. The Irish Times previously reported there is little appetite within Sinn Féin for her to run, with sources saying they would prefer her to stay in the Dáil, leading efforts to get into government. Sinn Féin may yet join other left-wing parties in backing Connolly. On the extent to which the cost of a campaign is influencing its deliberations, a Sinn Féin source said: 'The internal party discussion on the approach to contesting the upcoming presidential elections are primarily political. Financing a campaign is not the determining factor.' At her campaign launch last month, Connolly said she self-funded her last two Dáil election campaigns, and it will be 'big shift for me to move up and look at a national campaign with a serious amount of money'. [ Fine Gael says Mairead McGuinness 'acted in full accordance' with medical advice after being injured in crash Opens in new window ] She said she would be asking for contributions and the parties backing her are also 'open to providing funds in whatever way they see fit'. The Social Democrats said they are 'proud' to be supporting Connolly, adding: 'While we envisage there will be a financial contribution from the party, the bulk of donations will come from individuals and fundraising efforts around the country.' The Labour Party – also supporting Connolly – said it is 'finalising our approach to the upcoming presidential campaign'. A statement noted: 'As is standard practice, a separate fundraising stream will be established specifically for the purposes of the presidential campaign.' [ Labour Party backs Catherine Connolly's bid for Áras Opens in new window ] The Connolly campaign has been fundraising through its website and a spokeswoman said: 'We're very encouraged by the support Catherine Connolly is getting from around the country. It's really going to be a grassroots campaign.' As of Monday afternoon, the campaign has raised almost €35,000 in less than three weeks. On the evidence of previous presidential elections, Connolly's campaign, and those of any rivals in the race, will need a lot more.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
William Fry hires partners from rival law firm
Leading Irish law firm William Fry has hired four senior partners from rival Eversheds Sutherland as the fallout from a failed merger of the two firms continues. Merger talks between the two firms collapsed in May, but it subsequently emerged that William Fry was bidding to recruit several senior partners from Eversheds. Sources confirmed over the bank holiday weekend that William Fry has succeeded in hiring Gerard Ryan (the head of corporate mergers and acquisitions in Eversheds Sutherland), together with Gavin O'Flaherty, Enda Newton, and Maria O'Brien. All four are senior partners in Eversheds' corporate unit and are likely to bring members of their departments with them. READ MORE In all, 10 to 15 lawyers could move to William Fry as a result, it is understood. Eversheds did not comment when contacted by The Irish Times. Sources say its corporate lawyers had strongly supported the proposed merger with William Fry. The weekend's move means that the firm has gained many of the likely benefits of the merger, but at a fraction of the cost and risk normally associated with such deals. It leaves William Fry with one of the country's biggest corporate and mergers and acquisitions practices. It also means that five of the firm's senior partners are ranked 'leading partners' by Legal 500 EMEA 2025, an international directory that grades lawyers according to jurisdiction and specialisation. So far this year, William Fry's corporate team has advised on two of the three biggest deals in the Republic in the six months to the end of June. The firm advised Irish-listed company DCC on the €1.22 billion sale of its healthcare division to HealthCo Investment Limited, a subsidiary of funds managed by Investindustrial Advisors Limited. It also worked for the Department of Finance on the completion of a €1.2 billion share buyback with AIB, which was bailed out by the State post the 2008 financial crash. Did the EU have its hands tied before striking a trade deal with the US? Listen | 23:32 William Fry is one of the State's biggest law firms and employs 500 people, including 350 legal and tax professionals. The firm was founded in 1847 and is led by managing partner Stephen Keogh. According to recent reports, nine Eversheds Sutherland partners are likely to join a new practice that Eversheds Sutherland will establish in the Republic, while about 150 of the firm's existing 290 staff were destined to do the same. London-based Eversheds Sutherland (International) put the existing Irish practice on notice that it was taking back the Eversheds name after news of the merger talks broke late last year.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Has Ireland become too pricey for tourists? An economist and a tourism industry representative debate
David W Higgins: Ireland's hotel and restaurants prices are almost 30% higher than EU average When tourists travel there are a mix of costs. This can include flights, car rental, souvenirs and guided tours. High on the list is the cost of restaurants and hotels . It's basic. Tourists need somewhere to stay at night and eat throughout the day. The prices set for these items can decide if their trip happens or not. It's therefore disappointing to continually find that Ireland compares poorly across Europe when measuring these costs. Eurostat recently compared countries for the mix of prices on hotels and restaurants in 2024. It found that Ireland was 29.3 per cent higher than the EU average. The only country higher than us was Denmark on 47.6 per cent. There's a silver lining in being second because it means the Danes can feel rich travelling here. I once met a Dane who said coffee in Dublin was really affordable. You can imagine the raised eyebrows and blank stares from anyone who heard this. With a population of just six million, Denmark won't be enough to keep Ireland a vibrant tourist destination going forward. The years emerging from the Covid pandemic saw countries around the world rattled by supply chain disruption and an emergence of meaningful price jumps for the first time in decades. Consumer prices in Ireland are up 25 per cent across the board since 2016. READ MORE As wages have also risen here and elsewhere, we can assume this first 25 per cent move isn't an issue. It's price growth above these levels that should worry us. That's where restaurants and hotels continue to sound alarm. Prices linked to restaurants and hotels are up 39 per cent on 2016, according to Eurostat. What's worse is that this masks the underlying mix of the two parts. Inflation data is compiled with the Irish consumer in mind. In a given year, many of us spend sizeable amounts with local cafes, pubs and restaurants. Our spend on hotels is a much smaller fraction. Inflation among accommodation providers is up a seismic 77 per cent. It's manageable for locals and sometimes unnoticed because domestic travel is less frequent than our visits to restaurants. Now put yourself into the shoes of international travellers. Their mix of spending is heaviest on accommodation. It's the main plank of their trip. [ Alarm bells are sounding over falling visitor numbers. But is tourism really in crisis? Opens in new window ] The hospitality sector has admittedly faced rising input costs. All sectors have. We can give further allowance to policy changes such as higher minimum wage levels. This has notched up wages across hospitality at a pace higher than in other sectors. You can understand how restaurants, cafes and pubs have had to pass on higher costs. It's just hard to feel sympathy for hotels. But how is this possible? Surely a competitive market will attract new hotels, B&Bs and other sources of supply? The opposite has taken place. The surge in migration sent the Government scrambling for beds. Hotels were offered safe contracts which guaranteed income, instead of the precarious fluctuations they normally face from tourism. Even with International Protection Accommodation Services numbers falling, the latest data shows 7 per cent of hotel rooms are still used for this purpose. Releasing these rooms would mean a welcome easing to price pressures. It's all the more essential given the clouds that now hang over the tourism sector. The latest CSO data on international arrivals showed a 10 per cent decline in May, compared with the same month last year. Travellers from continental Europe are down 21 per cent. You might have expected travellers from America to be down, given the moves in the dollar this year. Numbers are actually up 11 per cent. But this is only cause for more alarm. As the tariff story unfolds, we may also see a turn. Americans are on course for a big inflation development of their own. Something's gotta give somewhere, because international tourists will only keep giving so much. David W Higgins is an economist Eoghan O'Mara Walsh: Nearly two-thirds of all holidaymakers rate us as 'very good' or 'good' value Now that we are in the peak summer tourism season, a question often asked is if Ireland is still a value-for-money destination? In my opinion, the answer is yes – and crucially it is not my opinion that counts. Fáilte Ireland, the State agency for tourism, carries out annual surveys with tourists as they are holidaying here. One of the key responses that is closely monitored by industry leaders is the value-for-money question. The latest available research shows Irish tourism is doing pretty well: 63 per cent of all holidaymakers report Ireland as being 'very good' or 'good' value, with a further 32 per cent rating us as 'fair' value and only 5 per cent rating us as 'poor' value. US visitors, buoyed by a relatively strong dollar were most positive; cash-strapped British and price-conscious Europeans a little less enthusiastic. The truth is that Liveline anecdotes about how expensive Ireland is as a holiday destination are often more of a domestic concern, whereas the international visitor tends to be a little more insouciant. The three primary reasons visitors come to Ireland after all are low-cost to no-cost: the friendliness of the people, the stunning scenery, and our culture and heritage. That's not to say Ireland isn't a northern European destination in terms of costs and prices. Last month, as noted above, Eurostat ranked Ireland as the second most expensive country in the EU, with prices 38 per cent higher than the average. That is bound to find its way into the pub, restaurant and hotel bills that consumers pay. There is a huge onus on tourism and hospitality businesses to continue delivering a compelling experience for visitors. If the quality of the Irish tourism product drops then we certainly will have a problem. [ Is Ireland really suffering a tourism collapse? Opens in new window ] How Irish tourism is faring this summer depends on who you talk to. National Central Statistics Office numbers indicate a double-digit tourism decline for the first half of the year, whereas industry data is less alarmist, pointing to a flat year. Consistent feedback, though, from all quarters is that escalating costs of business continue to squeeze already tight profit margins. Many of these business costs are of course State-induced and tourism chiefs are rightly pressuring Government to row back on some of these impositions. That is why industry leaders are pushing for Government to deliver on its commitment to restore the 9 per cent VAT rate for hospitality on budget day. My economics lectures may have been some time ago but even I remember that adding supply to meet demand helps moderate prices. So as well as curbing costs of business, the Government should be working to attract additional capacity into the market. Instead it seems to be doing the opposite. Tourism chiefs are mystified with the proposed draconian clampdown on short-term rental tourism properties. There is widespread agreement urban centres need more long-term rentals but the blunt way the legislation is currently designed means there is a real risk that rural and coastal Ireland will be denuded of holiday homes and self-catering properties, a staple of Irish tourism for decades. Taking so much stock out of the market is going to do nothing to support our value proposition. And why hasn't the passenger cap at Dublin Airport been lifted by this stage? It has been debated ad nauseam. More air access into the island's main gateway would lead to greater competition and better value for visitors coming to our shores. [ The Irish Times view on the Dublin airport cap: will politicians or the courts finally decide? Opens in new window ] Tourism and hospitality is the country's largest indigenous industry and biggest regional employer. There are more than a quarter of a million people employed in the sector across 20,000 businesses. Put simply, tourism matters. Minister for Tourism Peter Burke is set to unveil a new national tourism policy this autumn. Hopefully it will match the ambitions of the industry. But sustainable growth can only be enabled by pro-tourism and pro-enterprise policies. Competitiveness is all-important. Let's curb additional business costs and facilitate extra supply into the market. That will be a win for the visitor, for industry, for the exchequer and for the communities across swathes of regional Ireland where tourism is the only show in town. Eoghan O'Mara Walsh is chief executive of the Irish Tourism Industry Confederation
