RTC staff threaten stir over privatisation of Vijayawada depot lands
In a press release issued here, the EU announced that the state government, on Sunday, approved the handover of approximately 4.15 acres of prime land to the Lulu Group for the construction of a shopping mall. This allocated land reportedly includes not only the Governorpet 1 & 2 depots but also the Old Bus Stand and even a municipal park developed during the previous TDP regime.
The union alleges that this valuable public land, estimated to be worth hundreds of crores of rupees, has been earmarked for the Lulu Mall, a move they argue will displace essential public transport infrastructure and adversely affect thousands of daily commuters.
'This decision is not in the public interest. It moves RTC depots away from the city's center and hands over valuable public land to private entities,' stated Palisetti Damodara Rao, State president of the APPTD Employees Union.
In response to the government's decision, the union has announced a teleconference with its state-level leadership for July 29.
Following this, a detailed agitation plan will be declared on July 30, according to Damodara Rao. The union has demanded the immediate withdrawal of G.O. Ms. No. 137 and has vowed to escalate protests if the government proceeds with the proposed land transfer.
'We are not against development, but not at the cost of public transport and public assets,' added GV Narasaiah, State General Secretary of the Employees Union. 'We urge the government to reconsider its decision and protect the RTC properties that serve lakhs of RTC passengers.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Consider complaints filed for removal of unauthorised constructions and dispose of them within a time frame, Madras High Court tells committee
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has directed Madurai Collector, the chairperson of the Madurai District High Level Monitoring Committee to consider the applications/complaints filed for removal of encroachments/unauthorised constructions and dispose of the complaints within a time frame. The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by R. Mayilsamy of Madurai who sought a direction to Madurai Collector to constitute a District High Level Committee for monitoring and preventing unauthorised constructions as per a G.O. issued in 2024 by the Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department. The State submitted that pursuant to the G.O., the Madurai Collector issued proceedings dated October 24, 2024, constituting the Madurai District High Level Monitoring Committee. The members of the Monitoring Committee comprise officers of various levels. The petitioner submitted that though the committee was constituted no action has been taken for removal of encroachment. The complaints filed by the aggrieved persons were not dealt with and kept pending for a long time. A Division Bench of Justices S.M. Subramaniam and A.D. Maria Clete observed that keeping the petitions pending for a long time would cause prejudice to the interest of the complainants who were suffering on account of unauthorised constructions. Urgent action should be initiated to deal with the complaints and initiate enforcement actions by following procedures as per the G.O.. The G.O. states that meetings should be conducted periodically. A report should be submitted to the State High Level Committee. However, the petitioner submitted that no such report had been submitted to the State High Level Committee so far. The G.O. should be followed scrupulously by the District High Level Monitoring Committee, failing which, the government has to initiate all appropriate action to ensure that the G.O.s are implemented in its letter and spirit, the court directed.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg dropped out of Harvard: Here's how this decision shaped two of the world's biggest tech empires
Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates dropped out of Harvard. In the hallowed halls of Harvard, ambition is a given. But few stories rival the paths of Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg , two students who walked away from the Ivy League. Not out of failure or rebellion, but to chase visions that would eventually define the digital age. Their decision to drop out of one of the most prestigious universities in the world is now etched into tech folklore. But what really made this bold move possible? And how did it lead to the creation of Microsoft and Facebook, two of the largest tech empires the world has ever known? The Harvard beginning Bill Gates enrolled at Harvard in 1973. Already a programming prodigy, he initially leaned toward mathematics and even flirted with pre-law before settling into computer science. Known for his laser-sharp focus and obsession with computing, Gates spent much of his time programming on Harvard's mainframes and exploring the emerging world of microprocessors. Mark Zuckerberg, on the other hand, arrived in 2002 with a reputation as a whiz kid from Phillips Exeter Academy. At Harvard, he pursued psychology and computer science while experimenting with social networks and data-sharing tools. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Learn More - How Donating Sperm May Boost Your Income SpellRock Undo In 2004, he launched 'TheFacebook' from his dorm room, first for Harvard students, then quickly spreading to other campuses. In both cases, Harvard provided the intellectual environment, technical infrastructure, and peer networks that served as springboards for their ideas. The decision to drop out: Not rebellion, but acceleration Neither Gates nor Zuckerberg dropped out because they lacked academic ability. Gates left in 1975, during his sophomore year, after reading an article in Popular Electronics about the Altair 8800. Sensing a golden opportunity in the dawn of personal computing, he teamed up with childhood friend Paul Allen to write software for it. Thus, Microsoft was born. Zuckerberg left in 2005, a year after launching Facebook. What began as a niche platform had exploded into a social phenomenon, with rapid user adoption across major universities. With venture capital knocking and momentum surging, he chose to focus entirely on scaling the platform. In both cases, dropping out was less about leaving Harvard and more about racing toward a larger vision. The classroom simply couldn't keep up with the market reality unfolding outside. From dorm room projects to global powerhouses Microsoft: Building the Operating System of the World Founded in 1975, Microsoft revolutionised the software industry by developing an operating system (MS-DOS) for IBM PCs, followed by the launch of Windows. Gates's strategy of licensing software, rather than selling hardware, flipped the computing model and made software the most valuable component of tech infrastructure. Under his leadership, Microsoft became a household name and one of the most valuable companies in history. Facebook: Redefining Social Connection By the late 2000s, Facebook had evolved from a college project into the dominant global social network. Zuckerberg's vision of a connected world materialised through a series of expansions, acquisitions (like Instagram and WhatsApp), and innovations. Facebook (now Meta) didn't just reshape communication, it rewired the internet around social behavior. Together, Gates and Zuckerberg helped create and define the modern digital ecosystem, shaping industries from enterprise software to advertising, communication, education, and entertainment. Still a Harvard story Ironically, even as dropouts, Gates and Zuckerberg are products of Harvard's unique environment: Talent Density: Both met key collaborators (Paul Allen, Eduardo Saverin, Dustin Moskovitz) at or through Harvard networks. Freedom to Experiment: Harvard offered computing access and a culture where unorthodox projects were encouraged. Brand Power: Being from Harvard opened doors in the venture capital world and gave their early ideas instant credibility. They left without degrees, but not without Harvard's influence. Return to campus: Full circle with honour Both tech moguls eventually returned to Harvard, not as students, but as commencement speakers. In 2007, Gates received an honorary Doctor of Laws and delivered a speech on global inequality and philanthropy. In 2017, Zuckerberg returned to accept an honorary degree and shared reflections on purpose, risk-taking, and building meaningful communities. Their stories became case studies in alternative pathways to success, inspiring generations of entrepreneurs and sparking debates on the value, and limitations, of formal education in fast-moving industries. Lessons beyond the legend While it's tempting to romanticise the 'Harvard dropout' narrative, it's worth noting: Both Gates and Zuckerberg were outliers, armed with once-in-a-generation ideas, early access to tech, and support networks. Their departures weren't acts of defiance, but of strategic vision. Their success underscores that education is more than a degree, it's a launchpad for those who know how to use it. For students, educators, and entrepreneurs alike, their journeys serve as a reminder: sometimes the biggest decisions aren't about what you walk away from, but what you're walking toward. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Associations collectively voice opposition against proposed mall construction in APSRTC land
Representatives of various people's organisations, political parties and voluntary bodies came together to collectively oppose the government's decision to hand over 4.5 acres of land belonging to the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC) in the heart of Vijayawada city to UAE-based Lulu Group International for construction of a shopping mall. At a roundtable organised by Vijayawada Poura Vedika (Vijayawada Citizens Forum) on Thursday, a resolution was passed to stage a massive dharna at the Old Bus Stand, the proposed site for construction of the mall, on August 6. The members also constituted an RTC Asset Protection Committee with the national working president of All-India Lawyers' Union (AILU) S. Rajendra Prasad as its convenor and called for a broad, apolitical unity to protect RTC lands and ensure the survival of small and middle class traders in the surrounding areas. Former Minister Vadde Shobhanadreeswara Rao took strong exception to the government selling public assets and said it was against the law. Calling for a united fight, he said that people cannot remain silent spectators when valuable RTC lands worth crores of rupees were being handed over, in Vijayawada and in Visakhapatnam, to the MNC at throwaway prices. He said that it was against the 2012 Land Allotment Act of united Andhra Pradesh, which mandates market value and transparency in land allocation. Former Mayor Jandhyala Shankar said it was unfortunate that in its eagerness to usher in development, the TDP-led coalition government was losing sight of critical factors like environmental protection and public welfare. He said it would severely harm the interests of the urban residents. Mr. Rajendra Prasad highlighted the need for a sustained legal, as well as people's struggle, to protect the RTC lands, while the forum's State convener Ch. Baburao called for a united agitation to scuttle the government plans in this regard. He urged all sections — intellectuals, civic leaders, RTC unions, civil society bodies and others to unite for the cause. He said while the market rate of the land was ₹200 per sq. ft on Bandar Road, the valuable RTC land was being given for an alarmingly low rate of ₹1.50 per sq. ft. Andhra Pradesh Public Transport Department (APPTD) Employees Union State president P. Damodar the RTC unions were ready to make any sacrifice to protect the assets belonging to the Public Transport Department. Representatives of various organisations like Jana Chaitanya Vedika, A.P. Chamber of Commerce, farmers' associations, hotel owners' association, pensioners' association, tax-payers association and others attended the meeting and expressed solidarity for the cause of protecting APSRTC land.
